wtfonly16
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 05, 2016, 03:12:31 PM |
|
been mining since claymore released miner and average hashrate is reported correctly. so any devfee mining its doing is proper, i dont get any rejected shares. maybe check your pool guys? ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FH9byOw8.png&t=665&c=8ZHf8ppodnUwXg)
|
ye i aint bares
|
|
|
IOTUSA
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 05, 2016, 03:26:30 PM |
|
Win 10, 16.11.1 hotfix, 4x XFX 480 8GB = 155-160sols/s not overclocked or modified Win 7, 16.9.2, 1x 280X + 1x 290 = 89sols/s Win 10, 15.7.1, 3x 280X + 1x 270X = 164 sols/s
Really nice!
Any custom parameters for the 290 rig? I seem to only be getting between 36-33 a card. I am getting 45 sol/s on 2 x 290 for a total of 90 sol/s completely stock. With default mem/core, no mods, no bios, and just latest calalyst.
|
|
|
|
vapourminer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4424
Merit: 3853
what is this "brake pedal" you speak of?
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 05, 2016, 03:29:32 PM |
|
been mining since claymore released miner and average hashrate is reported correctly. so any devfee mining its doing is proper, i dont get any rejected shares. maybe check your pool guys?
same here, no rejects after devfee mining on 1.0. using -allpools at supernova. onespec your time between shares is in the mainly in the 40s to 60s, mine is the 300s. maybe that has something to do with it? long shot but hey.. im at supernova btw.
|
|
|
|
Toninho
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 05, 2016, 03:48:42 PM |
|
Hey , for Nvidia GPU 1070 GTX ![Huh](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/huh.gif)
|
|
|
|
gloupsy
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 05, 2016, 03:50:07 PM Last edit: November 05, 2016, 04:02:27 PM by gloupsy |
|
I got this error when launching claymore's miner on 3 of my rigs ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fgcluber.free.fr%2Fclaymore1.jpg&t=665&c=evXJqpVHUgp9BA) "error at hooking API NtProtectVirtualMemory" can you help me to understand why please ? I'm running it with 1x7970+2x7950 on 2 rigs,and another 1x r9 290, win7 64bit.
|
|
|
|
Onespec
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 29
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 05, 2016, 03:54:37 PM |
|
been mining since claymore released miner and average hashrate is reported correctly. so any devfee mining its doing is proper, i dont get any rejected shares. maybe check your pool guys?
same here, no rejects after devfee mining on 1.0. using -allpools at supernova. onespec your time between shares is in the mainly in the 40s to 60s, mine is the 300s. maybe that has something to do with it? long shot but hey.. im at supernova btw. I'm mine on Coinmine.pl. and this "40s to 60 MILIseconds" usual ping from me to pool. And this good for me. Yours 300 Ms too many for minig, change server maybe. I think Claymore need something to do with his DEVfee account. Maybe add additional Devfee account to Coinmine.pl?
|
|
|
|
molitar
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 05, 2016, 03:58:21 PM |
|
Miner will not work for me at all! Help! GPU0: R9 280x GPU1: RX 480 GPU2: R9 380x ZecMiner64.exe -zpool zec.suprnova.cc:2142 -zwal molitar.miner1 -zpsw pass1 -allpools 1 -di 1 AMD Cards available: 3 GPU #0: Ellesmere, 8192 MB available, 36 compute units GPU #0 recognized as Radeon RX 480 POOL/SOLO version Total cards: 1 ZEC: Stratum - connecting to 'zec.suprnova.cc' <46.105.114.185> port 2142 "-allpools" option is set, default pools can be used for devfee, check "Readme" file for details Watchdog enabled Remote management is enabled on port 3333
ZEC: Stratum - Connected (zec.suprnova.cc:2142) Pool sets new share target: 0x00f0f0f0 (diff: 272H) ZEC: Authorized ZEC: 11/05/16-11:52:04 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0) ZEC: Share accepted (140 ms)! ZEC: 11/05/16-11:52:07 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0) ZEC: Share accepted (140 ms)! ZEC: 11/05/16-11:52:09 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0) ZEC: Share accepted (140 ms)! ZEC: 11/05/16-11:52:10 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0) ZEC: Share accepted (140 ms)! GPU0 t=39C fan=23%, GPU1 t=54C fan=68%, GPU2 t=37C fan=30% ZEC: 11/05/16-11:52:14 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0) ZEC: Share accepted (141 ms)! ZEC: 11/05/16-11:52:18 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0) ZEC: Share accepted (141 ms)! ZEC: 11/05/16-11:52:23 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0) ZEC: Share accepted (141 ms)! ZEC: 11/05/16-11:52:28 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0) ZEC: Share accepted (140 ms)! ZEC: 11/05/16-11:52:34 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0) ZEC: Share accepted (140 ms)! Pool sets new share target: 0x00505050 (diff: 816H) ZEC: 11/05/16-11:52:36 - New job from zec.suprnova.cc:2142 ZEC - Total Speed: 43.430 H/s, Total Shares: 9, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:00 ZEC: GPU0 43.430 H/s (hung at this point no more hashing!) It hangs no matter how many cards I choose..
|
|
|
|
wpalczynski
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 05, 2016, 04:01:30 PM |
|
Win 10, 16.11.1 hotfix, 4x XFX 480 8GB = 155-160sols/s not overclocked or modified Win 7, 16.9.2, 1x 280X + 1x 290 = 89sols/s Win 10, 15.7.1, 3x 280X + 1x 270X = 164 sols/s
Really nice!
Any custom parameters for the 290 rig? I seem to only be getting between 36-33 a card. I am getting 45 sol/s on 2 x 290 for a total of 90 sol/s completely stock. With default mem/core, no mods, no bios, and just latest calalyst. Could you post you start bat file so I can see what environment parameters you are setting if any pls? I cannot get over 70 off two cards.
|
|
|
|
DeCrypterManiac
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 05, 2016, 04:06:29 PM |
|
Anyone got this working stable with suprnova ? There's 0% fee ...
|
|
|
|
ocminer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2674
Merit: 1240
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 05, 2016, 04:09:14 PM |
|
Miner will not work for me at all! Help! GPU0: R9 280x GPU1: RX 480 GPU2: R9 380x ZecMiner64.exe -zpool zec.suprnova.cc:2142 -zwal molitar.miner1 -zpsw pass1 -allpools 1 -di 1 AMD Cards available: 3 GPU #0: Ellesmere, 8192 MB available, 36 compute units GPU #0 recognized as Radeon RX 480 POOL/SOLO version Total cards: 1 ZEC: Stratum - connecting to 'zec.suprnova.cc' <46.105.114.185> port 2142 "-allpools" option is set, default pools can be used for devfee, check "Readme" file for details Watchdog enabled Remote management is enabled on port 3333
ZEC: Stratum - Connected (zec.suprnova.cc:2142) Pool sets new share target: 0x00f0f0f0 (diff: 272H) ZEC: Authorized ZEC: 11/05/16-11:52:04 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0) ZEC: Share accepted (140 ms)! ZEC: 11/05/16-11:52:07 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0) ZEC: Share accepted (140 ms)! ZEC: 11/05/16-11:52:09 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0) ZEC: Share accepted (140 ms)! ZEC: 11/05/16-11:52:10 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0) ZEC: Share accepted (140 ms)! GPU0 t=39C fan=23%, GPU1 t=54C fan=68%, GPU2 t=37C fan=30% ZEC: 11/05/16-11:52:14 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0) ZEC: Share accepted (141 ms)! ZEC: 11/05/16-11:52:18 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0) ZEC: Share accepted (141 ms)! ZEC: 11/05/16-11:52:23 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0) ZEC: Share accepted (141 ms)! ZEC: 11/05/16-11:52:28 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0) ZEC: Share accepted (140 ms)! ZEC: 11/05/16-11:52:34 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0) ZEC: Share accepted (140 ms)! Pool sets new share target: 0x00505050 (diff: 816H) ZEC: 11/05/16-11:52:36 - New job from zec.suprnova.cc:2142 ZEC - Total Speed: 43.430 H/s, Total Shares: 9, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:00 ZEC: GPU0 43.430 H/s (hung at this point no more hashing!) It hangs no matter how many cards I choose.. Looks like you're being retarget slightly too high from the pool, just wait about 1 minute and you should automatically be targeted down again. Alternatively you can always set your own diff through the password field like so: ZecMiner64.exe -zpool zec.suprnova.cc:2142 -zwal molitar.miner1 -zpsw d=128 -allpools 1 -di 1 Which would give you a diff of 128 or ZecMiner64.exe -zpool zec.suprnova.cc:2142 -zwal molitar.miner1 -zpsw d=256 -allpools 1 -di 1 A diff of 256 Anyone got this working stable with suprnova ? There's 0% fee ...
What problem have you got ? Should work fine
|
suprnova pools - reliable mining pools - #suprnova on freenet https://www.suprnova.cc - FOLLOW us @ Twitter ! twitter.com/SuprnovaPools
|
|
|
molitar
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 05, 2016, 04:17:28 PM |
|
Miner will not work for me at all! Help! GPU0: R9 280x GPU1: RX 480 GPU2: R9 380x ZecMiner64.exe -zpool zec.suprnova.cc:2142 -zwal molitar.miner1 -zpsw pass1 -allpools 1 -di 1 Looks like you're being retarget slightly too high from the pool, just wait about 1 minute and you should automatically be targeted down again.
Alternatively you can always set your own diff through the password field like so:
ZecMiner64.exe -zpool zec.suprnova.cc:2142 -zwal molitar.miner1 -zpsw d=128 -allpools 1 -di 1
Which would give you a diff of 128
or
ZecMiner64.exe -zpool zec.suprnova.cc:2142 -zwal molitar.miner1 -zpsw d=256 -allpools 1 -di 1
A diff of 256
Ok here is a screenshot after running about 3 minutes after starting no change. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FZKF9pBi.png&t=665&c=bxxZJXBbn124bA) It is not moving. Than I decided to press <Enter> and it says this. It basically said but would not copy and paste that miner thread hung and restarting. What should I set target difficulty for these 3 cards realistically? Currently it's nuts.. I definitely need to lock it at a rate.. Pool sets new share target: 0x0067b1a6 (diff: 632H) ZEC: 11/05/16-12:20:18 - New job from zec.suprnova.cc:2142 ZEC - Total Speed: 114.582 H/s, Total Shares: 22, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:02 ZEC: GPU0 40.628 H/s, GPU1 42.777 H/s, GPU2 31.177 H/s ZEC: 11/05/16-12:20:23 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1) ZEC: Share accepted (141 ms)! ZEC: 11/05/16-12:20:25 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0) ZEC: Share accepted (140 ms)! ZEC: 11/05/16-12:20:27 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1) ZEC: Share accepted (140 ms)! GPU0 t=59C fan=34%, GPU1 t=55C fan=68%, GPU2 t=61C fan=52% Pool sets new share target: 0x00212e9b (diff: 1975H) ZEC: 11/05/16-12:20:39 - New job from zec.suprnova.cc:2142 ZEC - Total Speed: 110.445 H/s, Total Shares: 25, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:02 ZEC: GPU0 39.496 H/s, GPU1 41.310 H/s, GPU2 29.640 H/s ZEC: 11/05/16-12:20:44 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0) ZEC: Share accepted (141 ms)! Pool sets new share target: 0x000f7c26 (diff: 4232H) ZEC: 11/05/16-12:20:46 - New job from zec.suprnova.cc:2142 ZEC - Total Speed: 113.816 H/s, Total Shares: 26, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:02 ZEC: GPU0 41.130 H/s, GPU1 42.008 H/s, GPU2 30.677 H/s GPU0 t=60C fan=35%, GPU1 t=56C fan=68%, GPU2 t=61C fan=52% ZEC: 11/05/16-12:21:06 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1) ZEC: Share accepted (140 ms)! Pool sets new share target: 0x0016b616 (diff: 2885H) ZEC: 11/05/16-12:21:10 - New job from zec.suprnova.cc:2142 ZEC - Total Speed: 115.899 H/s, Total Shares: 27, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:03 ZEC: GPU0 41.688 H/s, GPU1 42.961 H/s, GPU2 31.249 H/s
|
|
|
|
vapourminer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4424
Merit: 3853
what is this "brake pedal" you speak of?
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 05, 2016, 04:18:00 PM Last edit: November 05, 2016, 04:28:07 PM by vapourminer |
|
I'm mine on Coinmine.pl. and this "40s to 60 MILIseconds" usual ping from me to pool. And this good for me. Yours 300 Ms too many for minig, change server maybe.
yup i know what ms is. im on evdo wireless. its 3g. and 300s is about as good as i gets for me ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) 200s in speedtest. two rigs at the moment. got about the same at nicehash. should try some more pools though, but doesnt seem to effect my hash rate. my 390s and 380 get about the same as others. some a bit higher, some lower.
|
|
|
|
mmitech
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1001
things you own end up owning you
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 05, 2016, 04:18:37 PM |
|
@Claymore, can you please consider raising the window before disconnecting your miner after not receiving a new job from the pool? Zcash blocks can sometimes take a bit longer, for instance the last 6 blocks took more than 36 minutes when they were supposed to be 15 min in average.
|
|
|
|
mewhoyou
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 05, 2016, 04:19:32 PM |
|
Can anyone else share similar details please and what works best for you?
Anything to add or edit? (using rx 470 and 480 8gb cards)
-ftime 15 -dbg -1 -tt 75 -ttli 85 -tstop 90 -cclock 900 -cvddc 800 -mclock 1750 -mvddc 800 -powlim -10
Any help would be much appreciated.
How does it compare with and without?
|
Ethereum the Next Big Thing?
|
|
|
rawbert
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 05, 2016, 04:24:36 PM |
|
gpu-z only shows draw from pcie, which I think for newer cards is mostly memory related
Even so, If I'm getting 35 sols drawing 40w and someone else is getting 50 sols drawing 100w how can that be irrelevant? You do the math ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) PS: I pay for my electric bill! It's not completely irrelevant. But you absolutely CANNOT accurately use GPUz power draw to compare different cards because they all have different power characteristics. It's only good for doing apples to apples comparisons. For example, mining Ethereum, I have RX480s that say 70~75w in GPUz but this relates to more like 120w from the wall. So a 50w difference. But my 290x, say around 130w in GPUz, but 200w from the wall, that's a 70w difference. Basically, you have almost no way of telling actual power draw from the wall with GPUz, it's just a guessing game. And power draw from the wall is what actually counts. And why do you need 2 x 850w PSU to power 6 x RX480? Even mining Ethereum at 180mh/s my 6 x RX480 only pull 810w, from the wall. You certainly don't need it for ZCash, I'm not even pulling 600w from the wall. Really 600w for 6 480s, thats crazy.....Would 470s be slightly lower? Oh yeah.. I got 3 470 rigs (all MSI RX470 4GB) doing 530-550W at the wall and I think I can go even lower ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
|
OverP
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 30
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 05, 2016, 04:27:08 PM |
|
will you ever do a cpu miner like xmr cpu miner or a M7M gpu miner?
|
|
|
|
henz46
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 24
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 05, 2016, 04:28:52 PM |
|
@ Claymore Waiting linux version
|
|
|
|
bmtrader
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 31
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 05, 2016, 04:32:20 PM |
|
LINUXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX? ![Huh](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/huh.gif)
|
|
|
|
el_rlee
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1600
Merit: 1014
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 05, 2016, 04:37:45 PM |
|
Yeah, Linux version would be great. It's just the obvious choice for big headless farms.
|
|
|
|
IOTUSA
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 05, 2016, 04:39:11 PM |
|
Looks like right now if you have any RX 470/480
ETC PROFITABILITY = ZEC PROFITABILITY
Still more profitable to mine ZEC on 280x however.
Going by Nicehash and Whattomine data
How do you figure? What ETC hash rate do you squeeze out of a 470? Or 390 for that matter?
|
|
|
|
|