|
flekkelek
|
 |
December 07, 2016, 03:35:36 PM |
|
173H/s from 140 on 380x
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Whoever mines the block which ends up containing your transaction will get its fee.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
offon
Newbie
 Offline
Activity: 15
Merit: 0
|
|
December 07, 2016, 03:37:12 PM |
|
same speed on 7950 and 7970  |
|
|
|
|
|
IOTUSA
|
|
December 07, 2016, 03:37:29 PM |
|
Any numbers on 390x/290/290x from real life testing?
|
|
|
|
Taxidermista
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1147
Merit: 1001
|
|
December 07, 2016, 03:38:22 PM |
|
Zec needs to go high now or the next few days or else it will be hammered down by these new faster miner from nvidia and claymore. You don't have a f**ing clue about math&mining stuff, do you? |
|
|
|
|
batko
|
|
December 07, 2016, 03:41:03 PM |
|
R9 280x -220sol 1100/1500 Rx 480 -225sol 1300/1950 R9 380 160sol 1010/1550 Thanks clay  |
Donation: ETH: 0x0c8ce94dd3d1bfd09c0f887559c61d1b551e4b4d
|
|
|
|
shadabahmed
|
|
December 07, 2016, 03:44:37 PM |
|
R9 280x -220sol 1100/1500 Rx 480 -225sol 1300/1950 R9 380 160sol 1010/1550 Thanks clay any idea about rx 470 setting? |
Am I spamming? Report me!
|
|
|
|
IOTUSA
|
|
December 07, 2016, 03:45:35 PM |
|
R9 280x -220sol 1100/1500 Rx 480 -225sol 1300/1950 R9 380 160sol 1010/1550 Thanks clay I'm still confused as to why 380's seem to run so slow. Well actually not really, memory bandwidth I guess. |
|
|
|
amfofo
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 46
Merit: 0
|
|
December 07, 2016, 03:46:50 PM |
|
280x toxic stock 1 card @244 others are at 216 -i 7
480 ref 8gb @209-220 -i 8
|
|
|
|
|
spycheast
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 15
Merit: 0
|
|
December 07, 2016, 03:47:06 PM |
|
HD7970 GHz edition (1150/1525) ~234sol/s (-i 8 )
~5-8sol/s increse compared to v8.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
Qazo
|
|
December 07, 2016, 03:47:35 PM |
|
v9.0 -i 8
2x480 8 gb
Gpu clock: 1400, voltage: 1100
Memory clock: 2030, voltage: 1000
Gpu1: 240 h/s, gpu2: 220h/s
390w from wall
|
|
|
|
|
|
flekkelek
|
|
December 07, 2016, 03:49:29 PM |
|
R9 280x -220sol 1100/1500 Rx 480 -225sol 1300/1950 R9 380 160sol 1010/1550 Thanks clay I'm still confused as to why 380's seem to run so slow. Well actually not really, memory bandwidth I guess. TBH it's not a good card, if I couldn't buy on half price my cards, I'd never buy 380s. |
|
|
|
|
Etolay
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 21
Merit: 0
|
|
December 07, 2016, 03:50:28 PM |
|
MSI Rx 470 8gb - 212 h/s - 1242/2000
Sapphire R9 290 tri x - 270 h/s - 1100/1250
Sapphire R9 290 dual x - 265 h/s - 1100/1250
Approx 747-750 h/s
60h/s faster than v8 for me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
vleroybrown
|
|
December 07, 2016, 03:50:36 PM |
|
Any numbers on 390x/290/290x from real life testing?
Same speed on 290 |
|
|
|
|
toptek
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1274
Merit: 1000
|
|
December 07, 2016, 03:51:37 PM |
|
v9.0 -i 8
2x480 8 gb
Gpu clock: 1400, voltage: 1100
Memory clock: 2030, voltage: 1000
Gpu1: 240 h/s, gpu2: 220h/s
390w from wall
390w from wall for both ? wait for the new AMD drives that release tomorrow you may see a drop in Power usages and heat , probable no speeds increase. just because the leaked info says in games doesn't mean in games . remember it's leaked info and the tester are still under NDA . |
|
|
|
|
ghostfaceuk
|
|
December 07, 2016, 03:52:24 PM |
|
I'm guessing the R9280 not the X version are maxed out, CM 9 didn't do any thing for it speed wise, time to edit the bios, i guess to see if that does any thing.
it DID improve my R7370 by 10 or so Sol . they were doing 131 to 134 sol tops now they do 143 sol or more with CM 9 haven't tried my RX 400 series cards, yet .
Nm didn't wait long enough for the R9280 not x version it does 215 Sols up from 209. not much more but it's still more, it looks like it may be reaching it's max limits at stock setting .
What settings are you using for your 280, I'm on full stock bios and clocks and getting 188h/s? |
|
|
|
|
mfsmarques
Member
Offline
Activity: 65
Merit: 10
|
|
December 07, 2016, 03:53:48 PM |
|
RX 470 - 202 H/s - 1250/1750
RX 480 - 242 H/s - 1350/2200
R9 390x - 309 H/s - 1100/1500
|
|
|
|
|
|
shadabahmed
|
|
December 07, 2016, 03:54:38 PM |
|
v8 was working fine for me in v9 system hangs. i have to reboot system manully
|
Am I spamming? Report me!
|
|
|
|
Qazo
|
|
December 07, 2016, 03:59:59 PM |
|
v9.0 -i 8
2x480 8 gb
Gpu clock: 1400, voltage: 1100
Memory clock: 2030, voltage: 1000
Gpu1: 240 h/s, gpu2: 220h/s
390w from wall
390w from wall for both ? wait for the new AMD drives that release tomorrow you may see a drop in Power usages and heat , probable no speeds increase. just because the leaked info says in games doesn't mean in games . remember it's leaked info and the tester are still under NDA . yes from both |
|
|
|
|
|
IOTUSA
|
|
December 07, 2016, 04:00:16 PM |
|
ZEC: Stratum - connecting to 'equihash.usa.nicehash.com' <198.11.195.136> port 3357 (unsecure) ZEC: Stratum - Connected (equihash.usa.nicehash.com:3357) (unsecure) This (unsecure) message is new with V9 anyone else seeing this? Claymore, THANKS for the new Miner  This is because Claymore added TLS/SSL support. Nothing has changed form the old one, the new version just lets you know that the connection isn't 'secure' (the older wasn't either) but gives you secure connection option when available from pool. |
|
|
|
juhasz1109
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 47
Merit: 0
|
|
December 07, 2016, 04:01:06 PM |
|
claymore v9
R7 370 4GB GPU:1175 MEM:1475
147 H/s
|
|
|
|
|
|
