iMish
Newbie
 Offline
Activity: 91
Merit: 0
|
 |
December 10, 2016, 11:05:08 AM |
|
I've tested the v9.1 but I prefer the v9.0 version. With v9.1 I lose around 12 15 sol per card.
For me v8 worked fine on 6 RX 470 8gb . On 9 I could not make it work. It crashed after a few minutes or max an hour. (tried what was suggested around here and it crashed ) (have a 1200w PSU) After a few tests on v 9 and then Claymore for ETH I found that a GPU just made the system crash each time .... even tho everything worked fine on v 8. After removing all cards except the one that made the system crash..I then changed the cables...riser and mined only with it on v8 v9 and ETH - on ETH and v9 it crashed each time so now I'm 100% sure that GPU was at fault . No idea why..but I'll prob return that GPU. All cards were stock (new) and no changes in Trixx. Anybody had something like this happen ? On 5 cards and v9 the system looks stable and I'm getting same performance like with 6 on v8 Also...I see drivers 15.12 suggested . Can't find a valid download link for Win 10 x64. A valid link to download ? one of my RX 480s does not support v9 either i'm using -di to disable it and using it for dual mining ETH + SIA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are several different types of Bitcoin clients. The most secure are full nodes like Bitcoin Core, which will follow the rules of the network no matter what miners do. Even if every miner decided to create 1000 bitcoins per block, full nodes would stick to the rules and reject those blocks.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
oslak
|
|
December 10, 2016, 11:06:50 AM |
|
Dual-X R9 280X 3G D5
win7 4 Gb RAM, 16 Gb virtual RAM
radeon software ver 16.9.2
zecminerx64.exe -zpool ssl suprnova -i 8
hashrate avg 200 h/s
hashrate do not match between pools and my rig
and always : share rejected 5
is this normal ?
yes http://imgur.com/a/OOubg |
|
|
|
|
ioglnx
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 574
Merit: 250
Fighting mob law and inquisition in this forum
|
|
December 10, 2016, 11:33:17 AM |
|
v9.1 is much more stable and works reliable!
Thanks Claymore.
|
GTX 1080Ti rocks da house... seriously... this card is a beast³
Owning by now 18x GTX1080Ti :-D @serious love of efficiency
|
|
|
beIbox
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 21
Merit: 0
|
|
December 10, 2016, 11:42:21 AM |
|
9.1 is working like a charm, even on shitty VTX3D  thank you, Claymore! |
|
|
|
|
|
gennadiv
|
|
December 10, 2016, 12:01:56 PM |
|
working with all versions on r9 380 graphics cards behave well and work steadily and on version version v9.1: the difference in the hashes's almost never seen ZEC: 12/10/16-18:57:05 - New job from equihash.eu.nicehash.com:3357
ZEC - Total Speed: 496.454 H/s, Total Shares: 175, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:14
ZEC: GPU0 166.981 H/s, GPU1 164.576 H/s, GPU2 164.897 H/s
GPU0 t=69C fan=67%, t GPU1=64C fan=47%, GPU2 t=66C fan=57%
ZEC: 12/10/16-18:57:22 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 2)
ZEC: Share accepted (172 ms)!
ZEC: 12/10/16-18:57:23 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 2)
ZEC: Share accepted (187 ms)!
|
|
|
|
|
vapourminer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4312
Merit: 3517
what is this "brake pedal" you speak of?
|
|
December 10, 2016, 12:15:35 PM |
|
Is it me the only one who is getting a lot of connection failed retry to connect in 20 sec?
All my miners started doing this, and my pool stats show 30% less hashrate like this.
Version 9/9.1 isn't worth the hassle if your rigs were working fine and are now playing up, even if you get a lesser fee then Version 8 stick to being stable and hashing stable. The newer versions seem nuked to me... You just need to reduce the voltage or the clock frequency so that it will stress the PSU less. That should solve the problem. actually, i increased the voltage to my 390s. apparently the prior undervolt that v8 was ok with was too much for v9. bumped it from -75 to -50. been rock solid since. |
|
|
|
|
|
yudhistira
|
|
December 10, 2016, 12:17:46 PM |
|
Dual-X R9 280X 3G D5
win7 4 Gb RAM, 16 Gb virtual RAM
radeon software ver 16.9.2
zecminerx64.exe -zpool ssl suprnova -i 8
hashrate avg 200 h/s
hashrate do not match between pools and my rig
and always : share rejected 5
is this normal ?
yes http://imgur.com/a/OOubgshare rejected is always same value what that means |
|
|
|
|
oslak
|
|
December 10, 2016, 12:26:33 PM |
|
Dual-X R9 280X 3G D5
win7 4 Gb RAM, 16 Gb virtual RAM
radeon software ver 16.9.2
zecminerx64.exe -zpool ssl suprnova -i 8
hashrate avg 200 h/s
hashrate do not match between pools and my rig
and always : share rejected 5
is this normal ?
yes http://imgur.com/a/OOubgshare rejected is always same value what that means 16 rejects for 2 hours. mostly when submitWork is late, auto reject from pool. |
|
|
|
|
Svedge
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
|
|
December 10, 2016, 01:05:07 PM |
|
Don't download the 16.12.1 drivers, horrible hashrate on my 290 cards and not compatible with the current MSI Afterburner. I reverted back 16.11.2 instantly.
|
|
|
|
|
Murval
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 9
Merit: 0
|
|
December 10, 2016, 01:19:54 PM |
|
Hi All!
Is it strongly recommended to use only 15.12 crimson drivers version?
Higher version not better?
|
|
|
|
|
|
bisba
|
|
December 10, 2016, 01:40:34 PM |
|
Hmm I have run the new Claymores v9.1 GPU miner for zcash and I am getting about a 10sol/s increase on each of my 280x GPU's (Same settings as previously used)
I haven't tested the power draw yet and compared it to V8 but if it uses more power for an extra 10sol/s than V8 then it might be better to just stick to that one and pay the additional 0.5% fee.
hello friend i mining with 280x too... what settings you use??oc etc? |
|
|
|
|
beIbox
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 21
Merit: 0
|
|
December 10, 2016, 02:08:25 PM |
|
Hi All!
Is it strongly recommended to use only 15.12 crimson drivers version?
Higher version not better?
+10-12 H/s with 15.12 in my case. Windows 10, r9 390/390x |
|
|
|
|
|
Nagadota
|
|
December 10, 2016, 02:26:22 PM |
|
Juz use the latest ddu to uninstall 16.12.1, u will be fine DDU is best. It is much better than the AMD clean utility. But make sure you reboot into safe mode to do the clearn up. |
|
|
|
|
rpg
|
|
December 10, 2016, 02:31:01 PM |
|
Dual-X R9 280X 3G D5
win7 4 Gb RAM, 16 Gb virtual RAM
radeon software ver 16.9.2
zecminerx64.exe -zpool ssl suprnova -i 8
hashrate avg 200 h/s
hashrate do not match between pools and my rig
and always : share rejected 5
is this normal ?
Yes. Pools steal shares from you. The only zcash pool that reports and pays correctly what is expected is dwarfpool. |
|
|
|
|
LandOwner
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 60
Merit: 0
|
|
December 10, 2016, 02:34:18 PM |
|
Hi All!
Is it strongly recommended to use only 15.12 crimson drivers version?
Higher version not better?
I see no difference between the 16.9.2 and 15.12. |
|
|
|
|
BeneQ
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 67
Merit: 0
|
|
December 10, 2016, 02:45:00 PM |
|
WTF ?
Ii is obvious that 15.12 crimson drivers are not compatible with Radeon 470/480 family
|
|
|
|
|
|
manotroll
|
|
December 10, 2016, 02:49:45 PM |
|
WTF ?
Ii is obvious that 15.12 crimson drivers are not compatible with Radeon 470/480 family
use 16.11.4 |
|
|
|
|
ober
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 29
Merit: 0
|
|
December 10, 2016, 03:01:38 PM |
|
Juz use the latest ddu to uninstall 16.12.1, u will be fine DDU is best. It is much better than the AMD clean utility. But make sure you reboot into safe mode to do the clearn up. Yes, there is new DDU version for all of you who want to get rid of 16.12 driver  http://www.wagnardsoft.com/?q=node/132Display Driver Uninstaller (DDU) V17.0.4.0 Released.
ChangeLog:
-Added support to AMD Crimson ReLive Edition 16.12.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
dragonchopper9
|
|
December 10, 2016, 03:02:40 PM |
|
WTF ?
Ii is obvious that 15.12 crimson drivers are not compatible with Radeon 470/480 family
15.12 crimson drivers - they work for about two years. Rx 470/480 family - only about half year. |
|
|
|
beIbox
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 21
Merit: 0
|
|
December 10, 2016, 03:29:38 PM |
|
that ssl thing is only good for mining software makers, plain old users don't benefit anything from it.
i would say it only slows down things a little bit because of the encryption-decryption process.
I don't see it being necessary at all, considering how it doesn't affect any good hackers. This is protection from government spying. |
|
|
|
|
|
