Bitcoin Forum
April 28, 2024, 07:51:14 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 [374] 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 ... 760 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Claymore's ZCash/BTG AMD GPU Miner v12.6 (Windows/Linux)  (Read 3839038 times)
ofpcarnage
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 76
Merit: 10


View Profile
December 07, 2016, 08:24:28 PM
 #7461

Well I'm stumped all 5 cards work fine except 1 ...all the same cards and bios.
The problem card is over hashing as I mentioned earlier all other cards are hashing at over 200+
The problem card is hashing at over 400+ with lots of rejected shares.
I've tried swapping the order it sits on the motherboard .
I've swapped it to another rig.
I've reflashed the bios. Nothing works. The card was fine in V8 and it works fine in ETH so its not the card.

I'm not complaining but I think something is off with the miner for RX480 cards

Yeah, something is wrong, most probably with your overclocked memory. Reset the card to stock clocks and see how it goes Smiley


Thankyou I value your reply. And I'm not saying you are wrong but it is puzzling me why the other cards are ok with the same bios.

If I was to reset my cards to stock any idea what the best values would be to use in afterburner for the rx480 8gb cards?
I am a little reluctant to change the bios to be honest as its set up to mine nicely for eth with a low power drain.
I'm sure we can all agree its all about balancing hashing power with what it will cost you .

You don't have to change bios to original, just set memory clock of that 480 to default 2000MHz with your favorite tool - AB, Trixx, Wattmann, Watttool, whatever Smiley And I hope you didn't put too strict mem timings in 2000 strap.
Even Claymore's miners have the option for "-mclock", RTFM and don't forget to restart miner after change Smiley



I tried to set my clock to default but it didn't do anything I guess the timing in the 2000 strap are to strict.
I'm using jukebox's bios for eth on my cards. Still strange how none of the other cards are affected.
1714290674
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714290674

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714290674
Reply with quote  #2

1714290674
Report to moderator
1714290674
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714290674

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714290674
Reply with quote  #2

1714290674
Report to moderator
1714290674
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714290674

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714290674
Reply with quote  #2

1714290674
Report to moderator
Bitcoin addresses contain a checksum, so it is very unlikely that mistyping an address will cause you to lose money.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714290674
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714290674

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714290674
Reply with quote  #2

1714290674
Report to moderator
1714290674
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714290674

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714290674
Reply with quote  #2

1714290674
Report to moderator
1714290674
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714290674

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714290674
Reply with quote  #2

1714290674
Report to moderator
Arek
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 44
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 07, 2016, 08:24:42 PM
 #7462

I'm getting 205h/s on xfx rx470 1200/1750 with 1500straps bios with -i 4. Power consumption is the same as with v8 at 127W per card at the wall. I was getting lot of rejects on one rig but it had 16.9.2 drivers, after updated to latest driver no more rejects.
crazyearner
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1820
Merit: 1001



View Profile
December 07, 2016, 08:28:36 PM
 #7463

Nice to see more improvements with this miner sure are rocking the miners for this algo keep up the good work. How much more can this be improved. Shocking to see what results you have provided so far kick ass miner looking forward to future updates and changes Smiley

=
  R E B E L L I O U S 
  ▄▀▀▀▀▀▄▄                           ▄▄▀▀▀▀▀▄
▄▀        █▄▄                     ▄▄█        ▀▄
█            █████████████████████            █
█▄          ██       ██ ██       ██          ▄█
█        █            █            █        █
  █    █               █               █    █
   █ ██               █ █               ██ █
    █ █               █ █               █ █
    █ ███▄  █████▄   ██ ██   ▄█████  ▄███ █
    █     ███     █         █     ███     █
     █   █   ▀███ █  █   █  █ ███▀   █   █
     █   █      █ █  █   █  █ █      █   █
     █   █      ██  █     █  ██      █   █
      █  █     ██  █       █  ██     █  █
      █  █    ██  █ ███████ █  ██    █  █
      █ ███   ██  █         █  ██   ███ █
       █   ▀███      █   █      ███▀   █
        █     ██       █       ██     █
         █      █   ▄▄███▄▄   █      █
          ███   ███▀       ▀███   ███
             █████           █████
                  ███████████
  ▄▀▀▀▀▀▄▄                           ▄▄▀▀▀▀▀▄
▄▀        █▄▄                     ▄▄█        ▀▄
█            █████████████████████            █
█▄          ██       ██ ██       ██          ▄█
█        █            █            █        █
  █    █               █               █    █
   █ ██               █ █               ██ █
    █ █               █ █               █ █
    █ ███▄  █████▄   ██ ██   ▄█████  ▄███ █
    █     ███     █         █     ███     █
     █   █   ▀███ █  █   █  █ ███▀   █   █
     █   █      █ █  █   █  █ █      █   █
     █   █      ██  █     █  ██      █   █
      █  █     ██  █       █  ██     █  █
      █  █    ██  █ ███████ █  ██    █  █
      █ ███   ██  █         █  ██   ███ █
       █   ▀███      █   █      ███▀   █
        █     ██       █       ██     █
         █      █   ▄▄███▄▄   █      █
          ███   ███▀       ▀███   ███
             █████           █████
                  ███████████
  R E B E L L I O U S
ofpcarnage
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 76
Merit: 10


View Profile
December 07, 2016, 08:30:07 PM
 #7464

Think I'll also try to update my drivers it may fix the issue...it may also break it lol
VxTuga
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 07, 2016, 08:31:50 PM
 #7465

Loving this V9.0 !
So far, MSI RX480 8GB 1200/2110 @ 0.875v 70W = 220h/s vs 185 = 19% increase!
          HIS HD7770 1GB 1020/1625 @ 1v = 77h/s vs 63 = 22% increase!
BeneQ
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 67
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 07, 2016, 08:32:59 PM
 #7466

4x Sapphire 480 Nitro OC 4GB  memory tweaked  1315MHz/1750MHz     905 H/s
680 Watt from power socket

Thank You  Claymore
ofpcarnage
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 76
Merit: 10


View Profile
December 07, 2016, 08:37:03 PM
 #7467

Loving this V9.0 !
So far, MSI RX480 8GB 1200/2110 @ 0.875v 70W = 220h/s vs 185 = 19% increase!
          HIS HD7770 1GB 1020/1625 @ 1v = 77h/s vs 63 = 22% increase!

I dont understand this 1200/2110 @ 0.875v

Is 1200 coreclock
2110 memory clock
and how much did you under volt to get to 0.875v
I use after burner to my reading are 937mv
verjic
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 19
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 07, 2016, 08:38:07 PM
 #7468

What I said is happening, more electricity consumption, bigger hashrate, bigger difficulty and the same income, or maybe less, due to electricity Sad
VxTuga
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 07, 2016, 08:41:50 PM
 #7469

Loving this V9.0 !
So far, MSI RX480 8GB 1200/2110 @ 0.875v 70W = 220h/s vs 185 = 19% increase!
          HIS HD7770 1GB 1020/1625 @ 1v = 77h/s vs 63 = 22% increase!

I dont understand this 1200/2110 @ 0.875v

Is 1200 coreclock
2110 memory clock
and how much did you under volt to get to 0.875v
I use after burner to my reading are 937mv


Yes 1200 is core clock, 2110 is memory clock and 0.875v is 875mv, i don't use msi afterburner so i dont know how much you can undervolt, i'm using the WattTool from here: http://www.overclock.net/t/1609782/watttool-a-simple-tool-that-combines-overclocking-with-vrm-monitoring-tweaking-for-rx-400-series, but be carefull, dont mess with what you don't know, you can damage your card.
amirheavy666
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 228
Merit: 101


NEM (XEM) Top Coin


View Profile
December 07, 2016, 08:42:35 PM
 #7470

You are best claymore

with R9 390x = 300 H/s

with R9 380 = 160 H/S

Nem.io
ofpcarnage
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 76
Merit: 10


View Profile
December 07, 2016, 08:44:46 PM
 #7471

Loving this V9.0 !
So far, MSI RX480 8GB 1200/2110 @ 0.875v 70W = 220h/s vs 185 = 19% increase!
          HIS HD7770 1GB 1020/1625 @ 1v = 77h/s vs 63 = 22% increase!

I dont understand this 1200/2110 @ 0.875v

Is 1200 coreclock
2110 memory clock
and how much did you under volt to get to 0.875v
I use after burner to my reading are 937mv


Yes 1200 is core clock, 2110 is memory clock and 0.875v is 875mv, i don't use msi afterburner so i dont know how much you can undervolt, i'm using the WattTool from here: http://www.overclock.net/t/1609782/watttool-a-simple-tool-that-combines-overclocking-with-vrm-monitoring-tweaking-for-rx-400-series, but be carefull, dont mess with what you don't know, you can damage your card.

Thankyou I may have to reset my cards back to standard bios and try to alter the timings in afterburner.

Does anyone have any effective timings for the Sapphire RX480 8gb ? Pretty please.
manotroll
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 305
Merit: 250


View Profile
December 07, 2016, 08:52:47 PM
 #7472

 Grin Grin Grin Cheesy

added "-v" option ?
Jjohnwick
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 39
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 07, 2016, 09:00:01 PM
 #7473

Sapphire Nitro Rx480 8gb 255h/s .  You are the best Claymore.
riser
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 59
Merit: 10


View Profile
December 07, 2016, 09:00:51 PM
 #7474

Thanks!!
rpg
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 728
Merit: 500



View Profile
December 07, 2016, 09:05:55 PM
 #7475

After some tunning now doing 247-253 on rx480.
1420/2195 +20% power

7950 tuning - 205 sols @ 1050/1375
ocminer
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2660
Merit: 1240



View Profile WWW
December 07, 2016, 09:07:23 PM
 #7476

Sapphire Nitro Rx480 8gb 255h/s .  You are the best Claymore.

how do you get 255 ? I get 222 on sapphire nitro 480.. Do you have bios mod ?

suprnova pools - reliable mining pools - #suprnova on freenet
https://www.suprnova.cc - FOLLOW us @ Twitter ! twitter.com/SuprnovaPools
ofpcarnage
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 76
Merit: 10


View Profile
December 07, 2016, 09:08:24 PM
 #7477

I wish someone would share a decent mod for the sapphire rx480
a7med918
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 33
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 07, 2016, 09:12:05 PM
 #7478

Well I'm stumped all 5 cards work fine except 1 ...all the same cards and bios.
The problem card is over hashing as I mentioned earlier all other cards are hashing at over 200+
The problem card is hashing at over 400+ with lots of rejected shares.
I've tried swapping the order it sits on the motherboard .
I've swapped it to another rig.
I've reflashed the bios. Nothing works. The card was fine in V8 and it works fine in ETH so its not the card.

I'm not complaining but I think something is off with the miner for RX480 cards

Yeah, something is wrong, most probably with your overclocked memory. Reset the card to stock clocks and see how it goes Smiley


Thankyou I value your reply. And I'm not saying you are wrong but it is puzzling me why the other cards are ok with the same bios.

If I was to reset my cards to stock any idea what the best values would be to use in afterburner for the rx480 8gb cards?
I am a little reluctant to change the bios to be honest as its set up to mine nicely for eth with a low power drain.
I'm sure we can all agree its all about balancing hashing power with what it will cost you .

You don't have to change bios to original, just set memory clock of that 480 to default 2000MHz with your favorite tool - AB, Trixx, Wattmann, Watttool, whatever Smiley And I hope you didn't put too strict mem timings in 2000 strap.
Even Claymore's miners have the option for "-mclock", RTFM and don't forget to restart miner after change Smiley



I tried to set my clock to default but it didn't do anything I guess the timing in the 2000 strap are to strict.
I'm using jukebox's bios for eth on my cards. Still strange how none of the other cards are affected.

Same Issue in R9 285x + R9 280x
gaah
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 07, 2016, 09:12:51 PM
 #7479

Was 9.0 the last one or will you make another one!  Roll Eyes <3 Claymore!
doyler29
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 311
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 07, 2016, 09:16:01 PM
 #7480

What pool is best for zcash???

Was using Nanopool but seemed to be losing alot of H/s on average compared to what my miner was doing even after the fee. Switched to Flypool H/s moved alot closer on average but still less than average with fee & bad share's which is never much, Also the the hashrate on there graph is wildly unstable, anythg from 700-1050 h/s, averaging about 900 from 960 on my miner....

Also cheers 2 Claymore, another increase on my cards.....
Pages: « 1 ... 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 [374] 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 ... 760 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!