NiceHash EQM Zcash NVIDIA optimized miner [Maxwell/Pascal] + CPU mining v1.0.4c

[giagge]

Yes guys its 2 gpu 2 x gtx 1070 .

[1714200508]

1714200508

[1714200508]

1714200508

[1714200508]

1714200508

[1714200508]

1714200508

[ioglnx]

But interesting here is the 200sol/s per card did you overclock or something?

[ZenFr]

Ok, guys, 2 x 1070 :-).

@loginx :
Hashrate for GTX 1070 is ~ 200/220 sol/s @ base frequencies @~125 W  and ~170/175 sol/s @boost frequencies @ <100 W.

[Amph]

Ok, guys, 2 x 1070 :-).

@loginx :
Hashrate for GTX 1070 is ~ 200/220 sol/s @ base frequencies @~125 W  and ~170/175 sol/s @boost frequencies @ <100 W.

i'm at 202 sol with 95 watt per card, but 240 is unreachable for me dunno how that guy did it, unless he rised the tdp too high but it's not worth it, too much consumption for little gain

[ZenFr]

Ok, guys, 2 x 1070 :-).

@loginx :
Hashrate for GTX 1070 is ~ 200/220 sol/s @ base frequencies @~125 W  and ~170/175 sol/s @boost frequencies @ <100 W.

i'm at 202 sol with 95 watt per card

Wich cards is it and how do you setup them ?

Personnaly :
1 x KFA2 EX + 1 x KFA2 EXOC
GTX 1070 EX : Frequencies = 4004 and 1923 MHz & TdP = 100 W
GTX 1070 EXOC : Frequencies = 4004 and 2012 MHz & TdP = 100 W
Setup made in the driver (Ubuntu 16.04/Cuda with the "nidia-smi" command.
My hashrate is a little less than 200 sol/s, for both cards (not realy differences between them).

[martanFTM]

Hey, lets brag a bit Just for fun - maybe setting new benchmark?

heavy overclocked GTX 1070 MSI Gaming X - 2202 / 4800 Mhz = 255 sol/s max
Powerlimit @72
This one is really nice piece of silicon - 24/7 stable, other 4x 1070 are capped around 235/sol/s

windows 10 (1607) + latest 375.95 driver + MSI Afterburner


and even more fun 10/20cores i7-6950X @ 4200Mhz + quad channel 3200Mhz RAM
= 70sol/s or 520.000H/s cryptonight

[Amph]

Ok, guys, 2 x 1070 :-).

@loginx :
Hashrate for GTX 1070 is ~ 200/220 sol/s @ base frequencies @~125 W  and ~170/175 sol/s @boost frequencies @ <100 W.

i'm at 202 sol with 95 watt per card

Wich cards is it and how do you setup them ?

Personnaly :
1 x KFA2 EX + 1 x KFA2 EXOC
GTX 1070 EX : Frequencies = 4004 and 1923 MHz & TdP = 100 W
GTX 1070 EXOC : Frequencies = 4004 and 2012 MHz & TdP = 100 W
Setup made in the driver (Ubuntu 16.04/Cuda with the "nidia-smi" command.
My hashrate is a little less than 200 sol/s, for both cards (not realy differences between them).

g1 gaming, i suspect palit is better, i just tested now 100 core and 400 mem doing 206 and always 95w per card

1809/3999 core and mem, using win 10, 375.95 drivers

someone has the speed of a 1060 3gb? i'm interested in the hash/watt ratio

[Kompik]

Hey, lets brag a bit Just for fun - maybe setting new benchmark?

heavy overclocked GTX 1070 MSI Gaming X - 2202 / 4800 Mhz = 255 sol/s max
Powerlimit @72
This one is really nice piece of silicon - 24/7 stable, other 4x 1070 are capped around 235/sol/s

windows 10 (1607) + latest 375.95 driver + MSI Afterburner


and even more fun 10/20cores i7-6950X @ 4200Mhz + quad channel 3200Mhz RAM
= 70sol/s or 520.000H/s cryptonight

How dangerous is it to overclock the memory so high?

[ZenFr]

Ok, guys, 2 x 1070 :-).

@loginx :
Hashrate for GTX 1070 is ~ 200/220 sol/s @ base frequencies @~125 W  and ~170/175 sol/s @boost frequencies @ <100 W.

i'm at 202 sol with 95 watt per card

Wich cards is it and how do you setup them ?

Personnaly :
1 x KFA2 EX + 1 x KFA2 EXOC
GTX 1070 EX : Frequencies = 4004 and 1923 MHz & TdP = 100 W
GTX 1070 EXOC : Frequencies = 4004 and 2012 MHz & TdP = 100 W
Setup made in the driver (Ubuntu 16.04/Cuda with the "nidia-smi" command.
My hashrate is a little less than 200 sol/s, for both cards (not realy differences between them).

g1 gaming, i suspect palit is better, i just tested now 100 core and 400 mem doing 206 and always 95w per card

1809/3999 core and mem, using win 10, 375.95 drivers

someone has the speed of a 1060 3gb? i'm interested in the hash/watt ratio

Thank you :-).

[ZenFr]

Hey, lets brag a bit Just for fun - maybe setting new benchmark?

heavy overclocked GTX 1070 MSI Gaming X - 2202 / 4800 Mhz = 255 sol/s max
Powerlimit @72
This one is really nice piece of silicon - 24/7 stable, other 4x 1070 are capped around 235/sol/s

windows 10 (1607) + latest 375.95 driver + MSI Afterburner


and even more fun 10/20cores i7-6950X @ 4200Mhz + quad channel 3200Mhz RAM
= 70sol/s or 520.000H/s cryptonight

How dangerous is it to overclock the memory so high?

Not really dangerous and not at all if TdP is downclocking.
That is dangerous, is to increase the TdP/power usage/consumption.

[martanFTM]

Hey, lets brag a bit Just for fun - maybe setting new benchmark?

heavy overclocked GTX 1070 MSI Gaming X - 2202 / 4800 Mhz = 255 sol/s max
Powerlimit @72
This one is really nice piece of silicon - 24/7 stable, other 4x 1070 are capped around 235/sol/s

windows 10 (1607) + latest 375.95 driver + MSI Afterburner


and even more fun 10/20cores i7-6950X @ 4200Mhz + quad channel 3200Mhz RAM
= 70sol/s or 520.000H/s cryptonight

How dangerous is it to overclock the memory so high?

Not really dangerous and not at all if TdP is downclocking.
That is dangerous, is to increase the TdP/power usage/consumption.

This remain to be seen in longer term. But still, card is running in P2 mode (second fastest), if it switches to P0, which is driver prohibited for mining(cuda compute), it goes beyond 5000Mhz with no visible artifacts. Guessing from that, it still should have some room.

[ol92]

Hey, lets brag a bit Just for fun - maybe setting new benchmark?

heavy overclocked GTX 1070 MSI Gaming X - 2202 / 4800 Mhz = 255 sol/s max
Powerlimit @72
This one is really nice piece of silicon - 24/7 stable, other 4x 1070 are capped around 235/sol/s

windows 10 (1607) + latest 375.95 driver + MSI Afterburner


and even more fun 10/20cores i7-6950X @ 4200Mhz + quad channel 3200Mhz RAM
= 70sol/s or 520.000H/s cryptonight

i7 6900K@4,2, ddr@2800, win 10 : around 50h/s (a little bit more if no other programs running), 600h-630/s @cryptonight  if no others programs running, else 580 with gpu mining.

return to nvidia zcah : GTX1080 : around 185-190 @100W with mem +1000, tdp @50% (msi gaming x)

[kopija]

1 x KFA2 EX + 1 x KFA2 EXOC
GTX 1070 EX : Frequencies = 4004 and 1923 MHz & TdP = 100 W
GTX 1070 EXOC : Frequencies = 4004 and 2012 MHz & TdP = 100 W
Setup made in the driver (Ubuntu 16.04/Cuda with the "nidia-smi" command.
My hashrate is a little less than 200 sol/s, for both cards (not realy differences between them).

Greetings ZenFr,
I am seeing only 20 sol/s on 1060 on Linux, while my 970 is pulling 130 sol/s on Windows machine.
Running Ubuntu 16.04/Cuda 8, driver 370.28, nvidia-smi confirms 100% GPU usage
./nheqminer_cuda_tromp -l equihash.eu.nicehash.com:3357 -u deleted.worker1  -cd 0 -t 0
Why is my Linux hashrate so low?
Is it due to limitations of Linux version of EQM?

[Amph]

1 x KFA2 EX + 1 x KFA2 EXOC
GTX 1070 EX : Frequencies = 4004 and 1923 MHz & TdP = 100 W
GTX 1070 EXOC : Frequencies = 4004 and 2012 MHz & TdP = 100 W
Setup made in the driver (Ubuntu 16.04/Cuda with the "nidia-smi" command.
My hashrate is a little less than 200 sol/s, for both cards (not realy differences between them).

Greetings ZenFr,
I am seeing only 20 sol/s on 1060 on Linux, while my 970 is pulling 130 sol/s on Windows machine.
Running Ubuntu 16.04/Cuda 8, driver 370.28, nvidia-smi confirms 100% GPU usage
./nheqminer_cuda_tromp -l equihash.eu.nicehash.com:3357 -u deleted.worker1  -cd 0 -t 0
Why is my Linux hashrate so low?
Is it due to limitations of Linux version of EQM?

so for the 1060 the hash is incorrect? it should be 150 sol, if we account 33% less speed in comparison with the 1070

[kopija]

1 x KFA2 EX + 1 x KFA2 EXOC
GTX 1070 EX : Frequencies = 4004 and 1923 MHz & TdP = 100 W
GTX 1070 EXOC : Frequencies = 4004 and 2012 MHz & TdP = 100 W
Setup made in the driver (Ubuntu 16.04/Cuda with the "nidia-smi" command.
My hashrate is a little less than 200 sol/s, for both cards (not realy differences between them).

Greetings ZenFr,
I am seeing only 20 sol/s on 1060 on Linux, while my 970 is pulling 130 sol/s on Windows machine.
Running Ubuntu 16.04/Cuda 8, driver 370.28, nvidia-smi confirms 100% GPU usage
./nheqminer_cuda_tromp -l equihash.eu.nicehash.com:3357 -u deleted.worker1  -cd 0 -t 0
Why is my Linux hashrate so low?
Is it due to limitations of Linux version of EQM?

so for the 1060 the hash is incorrect? it should be 150 sol, if we account 33% less speed in comparison with the 1070

The hash for 1060 in my case is low in Linux.
Maybe I am doing something wrong?

[ZenFr]

Yes, there is no doubt, something is wrong.

Try my coomand :

./eqm_ubuntu_16 -l eu -t 0 -u 16HGUJUGh7TF9QiGm759h4phwAJXMjaDZT -w 1070b -cd 0

Does it works ? And how many Sol/s ?

You probably should have arround 125 sol/s...

[_javi_]

i see speeds above 200sols for a single 1070 rig. Even 2x card rigs have such speeds..

I´m only getting 680 at most with a 4x rig. (Gigab G1)

Win7, 372.54 driver. (-502, +0 , 80% seem to get the better results)

I´m upgrading driver to latest to test. Currently using 1.0.2b miner, what am i missing???

[Styx36]

1 x KFA2 EX + 1 x KFA2 EXOC
GTX 1070 EX : Frequencies = 4004 and 1923 MHz & TdP = 100 W
GTX 1070 EXOC : Frequencies = 4004 and 2012 MHz & TdP = 100 W
Setup made in the driver (Ubuntu 16.04/Cuda with the "nidia-smi" command.
My hashrate is a little less than 200 sol/s, for both cards (not realy differences between them).

Greetings ZenFr,
I am seeing only 20 sol/s on 1060 on Linux, while my 970 is pulling 130 sol/s on Windows machine.
Running Ubuntu 16.04/Cuda 8, driver 370.28, nvidia-smi confirms 100% GPU usage
./nheqminer_cuda_tromp -l equihash.eu.nicehash.com:3357 -u deleted.worker1  -cd 0 -t 0
Why is my Linux hashrate so low?
Is it due to limitations of Linux version of EQM?

so for the 1060 the hash is incorrect? it should be 150 sol, if we account 33% less speed in comparison with the 1070

Hi Guys !
I have maybe 165-170 sol/s with my gtx 1060 6gb strix.

[Amph]

i see speeds above 200sols for a single 1070 rig. Even 2x card rigs have such speeds..

I´m only getting 680 at most with a 4x rig. (Gigab G1)

Win7, 372.54 driver. (-502, +0 , 80% seem to get the better results)

I´m upgrading driver to latest to test. Currently using 1.0.2b miner, what am i missing???

win 7? with your same setting under msi i have 180 sol per card, with 100 core 400 mem 206 sol per card

driver are the one before the new one tht were released recently

[kopija]

Yes, there is no doubt, something is wrong.

Try my coomand :

./eqm_ubuntu_16 -l eu -t 0 -u 16HGUJUGh7TF9QiGm759h4phwAJXMjaDZT -w 1070b -cd 0

Does it works ? And how many Sol/s ?

You probably should have arround 125 sol/s...

Solved. Thanks.
I installed eqm from github, that was the problem.
Downloaded zip from the first page, no need to compile.
140 sols/s on 1060 3G.
Nice work by djeZo, shows that CUDA still has potential.