Bitcoin Forum
October 22, 2017, 02:06:51 PM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.15.0.1  [Torrent]. (New!)
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 [16] 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 »
  Print  
Author Topic: NiceHash EQM Zcash NVIDIA optimized miner [Maxwell/Pascal] + CPU mining v1.0.4c  (Read 218245 times)
scryptr
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 1134



View Profile WWW
November 28, 2016, 08:56:42 PM
 #301

Oh yes Smiley its -w for worker

Have 218 sol with 1 gtx 1070 .


 
I think gtx 1070 work fine a 300 sol soon .



YOU HAVE OVER 400Sols/s--

Read the labels... I/s is "Iterations per second".  The second term is Sols/s, or "Solutions per second".         --scryptr

wtf ?? 400Sols/s ? You use Windows 10?

I Have 240 Sols/s with 1 GtX 1070 use Windows 10

HE HAS TWO GPUS--

Nvidia Inspector indicates that he has two GPUs.  But the "218" still refers to Iterations per second (I/s).  His GPUs average 200 Sols/s each.       --scryptr

TIPS:  BTC - 1Fs4uZ6a9ABYBTaHGUfqcwCQmeBRxkKRQT
          DASH - XrK81tW31SLsVvZ2WX9VhTjpT6GXJPLdbQ
1508681211
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1508681211

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1508681211
Reply with quote  #2

1508681211
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
Amph
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1666



View Profile
November 28, 2016, 09:02:43 PM
 #302

Oh yes Smiley its -w for worker

Have 218 sol with 1 gtx 1070 .



I think gtx 1070 work fine a 300 sol soon .



YOU HAVE OVER 400Sols/s--

Read the labels... I/s is "Iterations per second".  The second term is Sols/s, or "Solutions per second".         --scryptr

wtf ?? 400Sols/s ? You use Windows 10?

I Have 240 Sols/s with 1 GtX 1070 use Windows 10

your score is more impressive with one gpu, what are your setting and model?
Velgelm
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 296



View Profile
November 29, 2016, 05:23:23 AM
 #303

He has TWO GPU Look at NV inspector screenshot GPU1/2
GTX 1070(0) first GPU


giagge
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 728



View Profile
November 29, 2016, 08:20:51 AM
 #304

Yes guys its 2 gpu 2 x gtx 1070 .


                ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
             ▄███████████▄
           ▄███████████████▄
         ▄███████████████████▄
       ▄███████████████████████▄          ▄▄            ▄▄      ▄▄                                           ▄▄
     ▄███████████████████████████▄        ██          █ ██      ██                                           ██
   ▄█████████▀███████████▀█████████▄      ██            ██      ██                                           ██
 ▄█████████▀  ▐█████████▌  ▀█████████▄    ██ ▐██████▄ █████████ ██  ███████ ▄██████████████████▄  ████████████████▌
█████████▀     █████████     ▀█████████   ██    ▄████ █▌██      ██    ▄████▌██       ▐█        █▌▐█▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██
 ▀█████▀       ▐███████▌       ▀█████▀    ██  ▄█▀  ██ █▌██      ██  ▄█▀  ▐█▌██       ▐█        █▌ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▐█▌██
   ▀█▀          ███████          ▀█▀      ██       ██ █▌██      ██       ▐█▌██       ▐█▌      ▐█▌         ▐█▌██
                ▐█████▌                   █████████▀▀ █▌██      ██████████▀  ▀█████████████████▀ ▀█████████▀ ██
                 █████
                 ▐███▌
                  ███
                   ▀
║█
║█
║█
█║
█║
█║

 
 
       ▄▄▄▄▄▄
    ▄████████
    █████▀▀▀▀
   ▐████
   ▐████
████████████
████████████
   ▐████
   ▐████
   ▐████
   ▐████

 
 
                 ▄████▄▄    ▄
██             ████████████▀
████▄         █████████████▀
▀████████▄▄   █████████████
▄▄█████████████████████████
██████████████████████████
  ▀██████████████████████
   █████████████████████
    ▀█████████████████▀
      ▄█████████████▀
▄▄███████████████▀
   ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀

 
 
 
 
 ▄████████████████████▄
████████████████████████
██████████ ▀████████████
██████████    ▀█████████
██████████    ▄█████████
██████████ ▄████████████
████████████████████████
 ▀████████████████████▀

 
 
             ▄██▄
     ▄      ▐████   ▄▄
   █████     ██████████
    █████████████████▀
 ▄████████████▀████▌
██████████     ▀████   
 ▀▀   █████     ██████████
      ▀████▌▄████████████▀
    ▄▄▄███████████████▌
   ██████████▀    ▐████
    ▀▀▀  ████▌     ▀▀▀
         ▀███▀
ioglnx
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 378

Fighting mob law and inquisition in this forum


View Profile
November 29, 2016, 08:31:59 AM
 #305

But interesting here is the 200sol/s per card did you overclock or something?

GTX 1080Ti rocks da house... seriously... this card is a beast³
Owning by now 18x GTX1080Ti :-D @serious love of efficiency
ZenFr
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 910


Bitcoin address 1Pjs4aP2LpwcP1nBDUq9ivyFRABQtwZ8z7


View Profile
November 29, 2016, 10:19:21 AM
 #306

Ok, guys, 2 x 1070 :-).

@loginx :
Hashrate for GTX 1070 is ~ 200/220 sol/s @ base frequencies @~125 W  and ~170/175 sol/s @boost frequencies @ <100 W.

       ▄▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄▄
    ▄█▀ ▄▄███████▄▄ ▀█▄
  ▄█▀ ▄█████████████▄ ▀▄▄
 ▄▀ ▄█████    ████████▄ ▀▄
▄█ ███████    ██████████ █▄
█ ▄█████▀▀   █▀    ▄████▄ █
█ ██████▄    ▀   ▄███████ █
█ ▀████         ▄███████▀ █
▀█ █████    █    ▀██████ █▀
 ▀▄ ▀██    ███    ▀███▀ ▄▀
  ▀█▄ ▀█████████████▀ ▄█▀
    ▀█▄ ▀▀███████▀▀ ▄█▀
       ▀▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀▀
kickcity     ▄█▄           ▄█▄
▄███ ███ █████████ ███ ███▄
████▄ ▄█████████▄ ▄████
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀

███████████████████████████
██                       ██
██      ███ ███ ███ ███  ██
██                       ██
██  ███ ███ ███ ███ ███  ██
██                       ██
██  ███ ███ ███ ███      ██
██                       ██
▀█████████████████████████▀
         ▀   ▀▄  ▄  ▄▀
   ▀    ▄   ▀  ▀▄ ▄▀  ▀
     ▀
█  ▀  ▀▀▄ ▄▀▀▀▀▀▀
  ▀▄  ▀    ▄▀▀▀   ▄   ▀
   ▀ ▀▀  ▀  ▀  ▄
▀▀▀▀  ▀▄  ▀   ▄▀  █ ▀  ▀
   █   ▀▄  ▀ █      ▀
 ▀   █ ▀  █  █  ▀
   ▀
        █
        ▀ 
           
           
           
............WHITEPAPER............
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
facebook   slack   VK   twitter   telegram
.
|
.
|
Amph
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1666



View Profile
November 29, 2016, 11:37:07 AM
 #307

Ok, guys, 2 x 1070 :-).

@loginx :
Hashrate for GTX 1070 is ~ 200/220 sol/s @ base frequencies @~125 W  and ~170/175 sol/s @boost frequencies @ <100 W.

i'm at 202 sol with 95 watt per card, but 240 is unreachable for me dunno how that guy did it, unless he rised the tdp too high but it's not worth it, too much consumption for little gain
ZenFr
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 910


Bitcoin address 1Pjs4aP2LpwcP1nBDUq9ivyFRABQtwZ8z7


View Profile
November 29, 2016, 05:00:34 PM
 #308

Ok, guys, 2 x 1070 :-).

@loginx :
Hashrate for GTX 1070 is ~ 200/220 sol/s @ base frequencies @~125 W  and ~170/175 sol/s @boost frequencies @ <100 W.

i'm at 202 sol with 95 watt per card
Wich cards is it and how do you setup them ?

Personnaly :
1 x KFA2 EX + 1 x KFA2 EXOC
GTX 1070 EX : Frequencies = 4004 and 1923 MHz & TdP = 100 W
GTX 1070 EXOC : Frequencies = 4004 and 2012 MHz & TdP = 100 W
Setup made in the driver (Ubuntu 16.04/Cuda Cool with the "nidia-smi" command.
My hashrate is a little less than 200 sol/s, for both cards (not realy differences between them).

       ▄▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄▄
    ▄█▀ ▄▄███████▄▄ ▀█▄
  ▄█▀ ▄█████████████▄ ▀▄▄
 ▄▀ ▄█████    ████████▄ ▀▄
▄█ ███████    ██████████ █▄
█ ▄█████▀▀   █▀    ▄████▄ █
█ ██████▄    ▀   ▄███████ █
█ ▀████         ▄███████▀ █
▀█ █████    █    ▀██████ █▀
 ▀▄ ▀██    ███    ▀███▀ ▄▀
  ▀█▄ ▀█████████████▀ ▄█▀
    ▀█▄ ▀▀███████▀▀ ▄█▀
       ▀▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀▀
kickcity     ▄█▄           ▄█▄
▄███ ███ █████████ ███ ███▄
████▄ ▄█████████▄ ▄████
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀

███████████████████████████
██                       ██
██      ███ ███ ███ ███  ██
██                       ██
██  ███ ███ ███ ███ ███  ██
██                       ██
██  ███ ███ ███ ███      ██
██                       ██
▀█████████████████████████▀
         ▀   ▀▄  ▄  ▄▀
   ▀    ▄   ▀  ▀▄ ▄▀  ▀
     ▀
█  ▀  ▀▀▄ ▄▀▀▀▀▀▀
  ▀▄  ▀    ▄▀▀▀   ▄   ▀
   ▀ ▀▀  ▀  ▀  ▄
▀▀▀▀  ▀▄  ▀   ▄▀  █ ▀  ▀
   █   ▀▄  ▀ █      ▀
 ▀   █ ▀  █  █  ▀
   ▀
        █
        ▀ 
           
           
           
............WHITEPAPER............
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
facebook   slack   VK   twitter   telegram
.
|
.
|
martanFTM
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 16


View Profile
November 29, 2016, 11:59:53 PM
 #309

Hey, lets brag a bit Smiley Just for fun - maybe setting new benchmark?

heavy overclocked GTX 1070 MSI Gaming X - 2202 / 4800 Mhz = 255 sol/s max
Powerlimit @72
This one is really nice piece of silicon - 24/7 stable, other 4x 1070 are capped around 235/sol/s

windows 10 (1607) + latest 375.95 driver + MSI Afterburner


and even more fun 10/20cores i7-6950X @ 4200Mhz + quad channel 3200Mhz RAM
= 70sol/s or 520.000H/s cryptonight
Amph
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1666



View Profile
November 30, 2016, 06:57:30 AM
 #310

Ok, guys, 2 x 1070 :-).

@loginx :
Hashrate for GTX 1070 is ~ 200/220 sol/s @ base frequencies @~125 W  and ~170/175 sol/s @boost frequencies @ <100 W.

i'm at 202 sol with 95 watt per card
Wich cards is it and how do you setup them ?

Personnaly :
1 x KFA2 EX + 1 x KFA2 EXOC
GTX 1070 EX : Frequencies = 4004 and 1923 MHz & TdP = 100 W
GTX 1070 EXOC : Frequencies = 4004 and 2012 MHz & TdP = 100 W
Setup made in the driver (Ubuntu 16.04/Cuda Cool with the "nidia-smi" command.
My hashrate is a little less than 200 sol/s, for both cards (not realy differences between them).

g1 gaming, i suspect palit is better, i just tested now 100 core and 400 mem doing 206 and always 95w per card

1809/3999 core and mem, using win 10, 375.95 drivers

someone has the speed of a 1060 3gb? i'm interested in the hash/watt ratio
Kompik
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 322


View Profile
November 30, 2016, 09:00:43 AM
 #311

Hey, lets brag a bit Smiley Just for fun - maybe setting new benchmark?

heavy overclocked GTX 1070 MSI Gaming X - 2202 / 4800 Mhz = 255 sol/s max
Powerlimit @72
This one is really nice piece of silicon - 24/7 stable, other 4x 1070 are capped around 235/sol/s

windows 10 (1607) + latest 375.95 driver + MSI Afterburner


and even more fun 10/20cores i7-6950X @ 4200Mhz + quad channel 3200Mhz RAM
= 70sol/s or 520.000H/s cryptonight


How dangerous is it to overclock the memory so high? Smiley
ZenFr
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 910


Bitcoin address 1Pjs4aP2LpwcP1nBDUq9ivyFRABQtwZ8z7


View Profile
November 30, 2016, 09:18:41 AM
 #312

Ok, guys, 2 x 1070 :-).

@loginx :
Hashrate for GTX 1070 is ~ 200/220 sol/s @ base frequencies @~125 W  and ~170/175 sol/s @boost frequencies @ <100 W.

i'm at 202 sol with 95 watt per card
Wich cards is it and how do you setup them ?

Personnaly :
1 x KFA2 EX + 1 x KFA2 EXOC
GTX 1070 EX : Frequencies = 4004 and 1923 MHz & TdP = 100 W
GTX 1070 EXOC : Frequencies = 4004 and 2012 MHz & TdP = 100 W
Setup made in the driver (Ubuntu 16.04/Cuda Cool with the "nidia-smi" command.
My hashrate is a little less than 200 sol/s, for both cards (not realy differences between them).

g1 gaming, i suspect palit is better, i just tested now 100 core and 400 mem doing 206 and always 95w per card

1809/3999 core and mem, using win 10, 375.95 drivers

someone has the speed of a 1060 3gb? i'm interested in the hash/watt ratio
Thank you :-).

       ▄▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄▄
    ▄█▀ ▄▄███████▄▄ ▀█▄
  ▄█▀ ▄█████████████▄ ▀▄▄
 ▄▀ ▄█████    ████████▄ ▀▄
▄█ ███████    ██████████ █▄
█ ▄█████▀▀   █▀    ▄████▄ █
█ ██████▄    ▀   ▄███████ █
█ ▀████         ▄███████▀ █
▀█ █████    █    ▀██████ █▀
 ▀▄ ▀██    ███    ▀███▀ ▄▀
  ▀█▄ ▀█████████████▀ ▄█▀
    ▀█▄ ▀▀███████▀▀ ▄█▀
       ▀▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀▀
kickcity     ▄█▄           ▄█▄
▄███ ███ █████████ ███ ███▄
████▄ ▄█████████▄ ▄████
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀

███████████████████████████
██                       ██
██      ███ ███ ███ ███  ██
██                       ██
██  ███ ███ ███ ███ ███  ██
██                       ██
██  ███ ███ ███ ███      ██
██                       ██
▀█████████████████████████▀
         ▀   ▀▄  ▄  ▄▀
   ▀    ▄   ▀  ▀▄ ▄▀  ▀
     ▀
█  ▀  ▀▀▄ ▄▀▀▀▀▀▀
  ▀▄  ▀    ▄▀▀▀   ▄   ▀
   ▀ ▀▀  ▀  ▀  ▄
▀▀▀▀  ▀▄  ▀   ▄▀  █ ▀  ▀
   █   ▀▄  ▀ █      ▀
 ▀   █ ▀  █  █  ▀
   ▀
        █
        ▀ 
           
           
           
............WHITEPAPER............
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
facebook   slack   VK   twitter   telegram
.
|
.
|
ZenFr
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 910


Bitcoin address 1Pjs4aP2LpwcP1nBDUq9ivyFRABQtwZ8z7


View Profile
November 30, 2016, 09:20:35 AM
 #313

Hey, lets brag a bit Smiley Just for fun - maybe setting new benchmark?

heavy overclocked GTX 1070 MSI Gaming X - 2202 / 4800 Mhz = 255 sol/s max
Powerlimit @72
This one is really nice piece of silicon - 24/7 stable, other 4x 1070 are capped around 235/sol/s

windows 10 (1607) + latest 375.95 driver + MSI Afterburner


and even more fun 10/20cores i7-6950X @ 4200Mhz + quad channel 3200Mhz RAM
= 70sol/s or 520.000H/s cryptonight


How dangerous is it to overclock the memory so high? Smiley
Not really dangerous and not at all if TdP is downclocking.
That is dangerous, is to increase the TdP/power usage/consumption.

       ▄▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄▄
    ▄█▀ ▄▄███████▄▄ ▀█▄
  ▄█▀ ▄█████████████▄ ▀▄▄
 ▄▀ ▄█████    ████████▄ ▀▄
▄█ ███████    ██████████ █▄
█ ▄█████▀▀   █▀    ▄████▄ █
█ ██████▄    ▀   ▄███████ █
█ ▀████         ▄███████▀ █
▀█ █████    █    ▀██████ █▀
 ▀▄ ▀██    ███    ▀███▀ ▄▀
  ▀█▄ ▀█████████████▀ ▄█▀
    ▀█▄ ▀▀███████▀▀ ▄█▀
       ▀▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀▀
kickcity     ▄█▄           ▄█▄
▄███ ███ █████████ ███ ███▄
████▄ ▄█████████▄ ▄████
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀

███████████████████████████
██                       ██
██      ███ ███ ███ ███  ██
██                       ██
██  ███ ███ ███ ███ ███  ██
██                       ██
██  ███ ███ ███ ███      ██
██                       ██
▀█████████████████████████▀
         ▀   ▀▄  ▄  ▄▀
   ▀    ▄   ▀  ▀▄ ▄▀  ▀
     ▀
█  ▀  ▀▀▄ ▄▀▀▀▀▀▀
  ▀▄  ▀    ▄▀▀▀   ▄   ▀
   ▀ ▀▀  ▀  ▀  ▄
▀▀▀▀  ▀▄  ▀   ▄▀  █ ▀  ▀
   █   ▀▄  ▀ █      ▀
 ▀   █ ▀  █  █  ▀
   ▀
        █
        ▀ 
           
           
           
............WHITEPAPER............
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
facebook   slack   VK   twitter   telegram
.
|
.
|
martanFTM
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 16


View Profile
November 30, 2016, 10:05:56 AM
 #314

Hey, lets brag a bit Smiley Just for fun - maybe setting new benchmark?

heavy overclocked GTX 1070 MSI Gaming X - 2202 / 4800 Mhz = 255 sol/s max
Powerlimit @72
This one is really nice piece of silicon - 24/7 stable, other 4x 1070 are capped around 235/sol/s

windows 10 (1607) + latest 375.95 driver + MSI Afterburner


and even more fun 10/20cores i7-6950X @ 4200Mhz + quad channel 3200Mhz RAM
= 70sol/s or 520.000H/s cryptonight


How dangerous is it to overclock the memory so high? Smiley
Not really dangerous and not at all if TdP is downclocking.
That is dangerous, is to increase the TdP/power usage/consumption.

This remain to be seen in longer term. But still, card is running in P2 mode (second fastest), if it switches to P0, which is driver prohibited for mining(cuda compute), it goes beyond 5000Mhz with no visible artifacts. Guessing from that, it still should have some room.
ol92
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 372


View Profile
November 30, 2016, 12:59:14 PM
 #315

Hey, lets brag a bit Smiley Just for fun - maybe setting new benchmark?

heavy overclocked GTX 1070 MSI Gaming X - 2202 / 4800 Mhz = 255 sol/s max
Powerlimit @72
This one is really nice piece of silicon - 24/7 stable, other 4x 1070 are capped around 235/sol/s

windows 10 (1607) + latest 375.95 driver + MSI Afterburner


and even more fun 10/20cores i7-6950X @ 4200Mhz + quad channel 3200Mhz RAM
= 70sol/s or 520.000H/s cryptonight

i7 6900K@4,2, ddr@2800, win 10 : around 50h/s (a little bit more if no other programs running), 600h-630/s @cryptonight  if no others programs running, else 580 with gpu mining.

return to nvidia zcah : GTX1080 : around 185-190 @100W with mem +1000, tdp @50% (msi gaming x)
kopija
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 257


View Profile
December 01, 2016, 07:00:42 AM
 #316


1 x KFA2 EX + 1 x KFA2 EXOC
GTX 1070 EX : Frequencies = 4004 and 1923 MHz & TdP = 100 W
GTX 1070 EXOC : Frequencies = 4004 and 2012 MHz & TdP = 100 W
Setup made in the driver (Ubuntu 16.04/Cuda Cool with the "nidia-smi" command.
My hashrate is a little less than 200 sol/s, for both cards (not realy differences between them).

Greetings ZenFr,
I am seeing only 20 sol/s on 1060 on Linux, while my 970 is pulling 130 sol/s on Windows machine.
Running Ubuntu 16.04/Cuda 8, driver 370.28, nvidia-smi confirms 100% GPU usage
./nheqminer_cuda_tromp -l equihash.eu.nicehash.com:3357 -u deleted.worker1  -cd 0 -t 0
Why is my Linux hashrate so low?
Is it due to limitations of Linux version of EQM?

we are nothing but a smart contracts on a cosmic blockchain
Amph
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1666



View Profile
December 01, 2016, 07:36:35 AM
 #317


1 x KFA2 EX + 1 x KFA2 EXOC
GTX 1070 EX : Frequencies = 4004 and 1923 MHz & TdP = 100 W
GTX 1070 EXOC : Frequencies = 4004 and 2012 MHz & TdP = 100 W
Setup made in the driver (Ubuntu 16.04/Cuda Cool with the "nidia-smi" command.
My hashrate is a little less than 200 sol/s, for both cards (not realy differences between them).

Greetings ZenFr,
I am seeing only 20 sol/s on 1060 on Linux, while my 970 is pulling 130 sol/s on Windows machine.
Running Ubuntu 16.04/Cuda 8, driver 370.28, nvidia-smi confirms 100% GPU usage
./nheqminer_cuda_tromp -l equihash.eu.nicehash.com:3357 -u deleted.worker1  -cd 0 -t 0
Why is my Linux hashrate so low?
Is it due to limitations of Linux version of EQM?

so for the 1060 the hash is incorrect? it should be 150 sol, if we account 33% less speed in comparison with the 1070
kopija
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 257


View Profile
December 01, 2016, 08:00:41 AM
 #318


1 x KFA2 EX + 1 x KFA2 EXOC
GTX 1070 EX : Frequencies = 4004 and 1923 MHz & TdP = 100 W
GTX 1070 EXOC : Frequencies = 4004 and 2012 MHz & TdP = 100 W
Setup made in the driver (Ubuntu 16.04/Cuda Cool with the "nidia-smi" command.
My hashrate is a little less than 200 sol/s, for both cards (not realy differences between them).

Greetings ZenFr,
I am seeing only 20 sol/s on 1060 on Linux, while my 970 is pulling 130 sol/s on Windows machine.
Running Ubuntu 16.04/Cuda 8, driver 370.28, nvidia-smi confirms 100% GPU usage
./nheqminer_cuda_tromp -l equihash.eu.nicehash.com:3357 -u deleted.worker1  -cd 0 -t 0
Why is my Linux hashrate so low?
Is it due to limitations of Linux version of EQM?

so for the 1060 the hash is incorrect? it should be 150 sol, if we account 33% less speed in comparison with the 1070

The hash for 1060 in my case is low in Linux.
Maybe I am doing something wrong?

we are nothing but a smart contracts on a cosmic blockchain
ZenFr
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 910


Bitcoin address 1Pjs4aP2LpwcP1nBDUq9ivyFRABQtwZ8z7


View Profile
December 01, 2016, 09:38:22 AM
 #319

Yes, there is no doubt, something is wrong.

Try my coomand :
Quote
./eqm_ubuntu_16 -l eu -t 0 -u 16HGUJUGh7TF9QiGm759h4phwAJXMjaDZT -w 1070b -cd 0
Does it works ? And how many Sol/s ?

You probably should have arround 125 sol/s...

       ▄▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄▄
    ▄█▀ ▄▄███████▄▄ ▀█▄
  ▄█▀ ▄█████████████▄ ▀▄▄
 ▄▀ ▄█████    ████████▄ ▀▄
▄█ ███████    ██████████ █▄
█ ▄█████▀▀   █▀    ▄████▄ █
█ ██████▄    ▀   ▄███████ █
█ ▀████         ▄███████▀ █
▀█ █████    █    ▀██████ █▀
 ▀▄ ▀██    ███    ▀███▀ ▄▀
  ▀█▄ ▀█████████████▀ ▄█▀
    ▀█▄ ▀▀███████▀▀ ▄█▀
       ▀▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀▀
kickcity     ▄█▄           ▄█▄
▄███ ███ █████████ ███ ███▄
████▄ ▄█████████▄ ▄████
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀

███████████████████████████
██                       ██
██      ███ ███ ███ ███  ██
██                       ██
██  ███ ███ ███ ███ ███  ██
██                       ██
██  ███ ███ ███ ███      ██
██                       ██
▀█████████████████████████▀
         ▀   ▀▄  ▄  ▄▀
   ▀    ▄   ▀  ▀▄ ▄▀  ▀
     ▀
█  ▀  ▀▀▄ ▄▀▀▀▀▀▀
  ▀▄  ▀    ▄▀▀▀   ▄   ▀
   ▀ ▀▀  ▀  ▀  ▄
▀▀▀▀  ▀▄  ▀   ▄▀  █ ▀  ▀
   █   ▀▄  ▀ █      ▀
 ▀   █ ▀  █  █  ▀
   ▀
        █
        ▀ 
           
           
           
............WHITEPAPER............
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
facebook   slack   VK   twitter   telegram
.
|
.
|
_javi_
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 546



View Profile
December 01, 2016, 10:47:31 AM
 #320

i see speeds above 200sols for a single 1070 rig. Even 2x card rigs have such speeds..

I´m only getting 680 at most with a 4x rig. (Gigab G1)

Win7, 372.54 driver. (-502, +0 , 80% seem to get the better results)

I´m upgrading driver to latest to test. Currently using 1.0.2b miner, what am i missing???

██
█║█
║║║
║║║
█║█
██
'BTC MULTI-WALLET SOON'
▬▬▬▬ Download WHITEPAPER ▬▬▬▬

                    ▄██▄
                  ▄██████▄
                ▄██████████
              ▄██████████▀   ▄▄
            ▄██████████▀   ▄████▄
          ▄██████████▀    ████████▄
         ██████████▀      ▀████████
         ▀███████▀   ▄███▄  ▀████▀   ▄█▄
    ▄███▄  ▀███▀   ▄███████▄  ▀▀   ▄█████▄
  ▄███████▄      ▄██████████     ▄█████████
  █████████    ▄██████████▀    ▄██████████▀
   ▀█████▀   ▄██████████▀    ▄██████████▀
     ▀▀▀   ▄██████████▀    ▄██████████▀
          ██████████▀    ▄██████████▀
          ▀███████▀      █████████▀
            ▀███▀   ▄██▄  ▀█████▀
                  ▄██████▄  ▀▀▀
                  █████████
                   ▀█████▀
                     ▀▀▀
e i d o o
██

███▀▀
▐▐▌
▐▌
▐▌
▐▐▌
███▄▄
▀▀███
▐▌▌
▐▌
▐▌
▐▌▌
▄▄███
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 [16] 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!