Bitcoin Forum
February 19, 2017, 11:46:40 AM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.13.2  [Torrent]. (New!)
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 [30] 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 »
  Print  
Author Topic: NiceHash EQM Zcash NVIDIA optimized miner [Maxwell/Pascal] + CPU mining v1.0.4c  (Read 126850 times)
scryptr
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 882



View Profile WWW
December 12, 2016, 08:09:04 PM
 #581

GTX 960 GETS 120Sols/s --

At stock clocks my GTX 960 cards are mining Equihash at 120Sols/s with EQM v1.0.3a.  This is not so impressive, just look at the above post, but it is far better than the 30-40Sols/s they were earning a week or so ago.  For some reason, NiceHash miner auto-tunes EQM better than I was able to with a simple batch file.       --scryptr

TIPS:  BTC - 1Fs4uZ6a9ABYBTaHGUfqcwCQmeBRxkKRQT
          DASH - XrK81tW31SLsVvZ2WX9VhTjpT6GXJPLdbQ
          VTC - VuCSFDKuP9hhFvNsnKKypVMgRs52EVSG6R
1487504800
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1487504800

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1487504800
Reply with quote  #2

1487504800
Report to moderator
1487504800
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1487504800

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1487504800
Reply with quote  #2

1487504800
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1487504800
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1487504800

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1487504800
Reply with quote  #2

1487504800
Report to moderator
1487504800
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1487504800

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1487504800
Reply with quote  #2

1487504800
Report to moderator
1487504800
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1487504800

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1487504800
Reply with quote  #2

1487504800
Report to moderator
NiceHashSupport
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504


View Profile
December 12, 2016, 09:09:06 PM
 #582

GTX 960 GETS 120Sols/s --

At stock clocks my GTX 960 cards are mining Equihash at 120Sols/s with EQM v1.0.3a.  This is not so impressive, just look at the above post, but it is far better than the 30-40Sols/s they were earning a week or so ago.  For some reason, NiceHash miner auto-tunes EQM better than I was able to with a simple batch file.       --scryptr

NHM runs 2 threads/instances by default. If you do the same, you will get the same speed as NHM.

i have 6xgtx 1070
my bat file -
eqm -u btcadress -w worker -t 0 -ca -ca -ca -ca -ca -ca
or right
eqm -u btcadress -w worker -t 0 -cd 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 5

log:
[22:21:05][0x00000d68][info] device#0 | Initializing thread #35 (CUDA-DJEZO) GeForce GTX 1070 (#5) M=1
[22:21:29][0x00000d68][info] device#35 | Initializing thread #35 (CUDA-DJEZO) GeForce GTX 1070 (#5) M=1

the speed drops in 5 min
2665 ....2150

TPD in AfterBurner 80-85%

As said before, there is no sense to run so many instances... that may rather slow you down over a time due to massive context switching needed. Just do -ca -ca and nothing more (no -cd) and you will be fine.
krnlx
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 140


View Profile
December 12, 2016, 09:13:23 PM
 #583

@NiceHashSupport

Can you check an issue on linux version, that I reported?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1677369.msg17163199#msg17163199
NiceHashSupport
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504


View Profile
December 12, 2016, 09:16:52 PM
 #584

We did not have an issue. You have overclocked cards? Try different driver? What happens if using multiple eqm instances?
krnlx
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 140


View Profile
December 12, 2016, 09:21:27 PM
 #585

We did not have an issue. You have overclocked cards? Try different driver? What happens if using multiple eqm instances?

with multiple eqm instances(or wit 2 threads) speed is slower. With overclock, or without.

1 thread :
Code:
$ ./eqm -cd 0 -b

==================== www.nicehash.com ====================
     EQM v1.0.3a equihash CPU&GPU Miner for NiceHash.
  This miner is using proprietary base code by NiceHash.
    CPU solver: by xenoncat
    CUDA solver: by djeZo; heavily modified Tromp solver
==================== www.nicehash.com ====================

[00:19:57][0x00007ffb2c022740][info] Log started
[00:19:58][0x00007ffb2c022740][info] Starting up miner instances...
[00:19:58][0x00007ffb222b4700][info] device#0 | Initializing thread #0 (CUDA-DJEZO) GeForce GTX 1070 (#0) M=1
[00:20:00][0x00007ffb2c022740][info] Benchmarking, please wait about 20 seconds...
[00:20:20][0x00007ffb222b4700][info] device#0 | Thread #0 ended (CUDA-DJEZO)
[00:20:20][0x00007ffb2c022740][info] Benchmarking finished
[00:20:20][0x00007ffb2c022740][info] Total time : 20 s
[00:20:20][0x00007ffb2c022740][info] device#0: 178 I/s, 326.016 Sols/s
[00:20:20][0x00007ffb2c022740][info] Total measured: 178 I/s
[00:20:20][0x00007ffb2c022740][info] Total measured: 326.016 Sols/s
[00:20:20][0x00007ffb2c022740][info] Theoretical: 334.471 Sols/s

2 threads:
Code:
$ ./eqm -cd 0 0 -b

==================== www.nicehash.com ====================
     EQM v1.0.3a equihash CPU&GPU Miner for NiceHash.
  This miner is using proprietary base code by NiceHash.
    CPU solver: by xenoncat
    CUDA solver: by djeZo; heavily modified Tromp solver
==================== www.nicehash.com ====================

[00:20:28][0x00007f958269d740][info] Log started
[00:20:28][0x00007f958269d740][info] Starting up miner instances...
[00:20:28][0x00007f9577c9a700][info] device#1 | Initializing thread #1 (CUDA-DJEZO) GeForce GTX 1070 (#0) M=1
[00:20:28][0x00007f957849b700][info] device#0 | Initializing thread #0 (CUDA-DJEZO) GeForce GTX 1070 (#0) M=1
[00:20:30][0x00007f958269d740][info] Benchmarking, please wait about 20 seconds...
[00:20:50][0x00007f9577c9a700][info] device#1 | Thread #1 ended (CUDA-DJEZO)
[00:20:50][0x00007f957849b700][info] device#0 | Thread #0 ended (CUDA-DJEZO)
[00:20:50][0x00007f958269d740][info] Benchmarking finished
[00:20:50][0x00007f958269d740][info] Total time : 20 s
[00:20:50][0x00007f958269d740][info] device#0: 76.8692 I/s, 146.437 Sols/s
[00:20:50][0x00007f958269d740][info] device#1: 76.8615 I/s, 144.629 Sols/s
[00:20:50][0x00007f958269d740][info] Total measured: 153.731 I/s
[00:20:50][0x00007f958269d740][info] Total measured: 291.066 Sols/s
[00:20:50][0x00007f958269d740][info] Theoretical: 288.868 Sols/s
NiceHashSupport
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504


View Profile
December 12, 2016, 09:34:02 PM
 #586

Do you get ~330 on overclocked or stock 1070 ?
krnlx
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 140


View Profile
December 12, 2016, 09:42:43 PM
 #587

Do you get ~330 on overclocked or stock 1070 ?

a bit overclocked.

Anyway, I ran the windows version under wine on same hardware

Code:
$ /opt/wine-staging/bin/wine eqm.exe -cd 0 -b
fixme:winediag:start_process Wine Staging 1.9.23 is a testing version containing experimental patches.
fixme:winediag:start_process Please mention your exact version when filing bug reports on winehq.org.
fixme:heap:RtlSetHeapInformation 0x3f0000 0 0x23fd20 4 stub

==================== www.nicehash.com ====================
     EQM v1.0.3a equihash CPU&GPU Miner for NiceHash.
  This miner is using proprietary base code by NiceHash.
    CPU solver: by xenoncat
    CUDA solver: by djeZo; heavily modified Tromp solver
==================== www.nicehash.com ====================

[00:39:49][0x00000026][info] Log started
[00:39:49][0x00000026][info] Starting up miner instances...
fixme:module:load_library unsupported flag(s) used (flags: 0x00000800)
fixme:ntdll:EtwRegisterTraceGuidsW (0x31ec34, (nil), {f7b697a3-4db5-4d3b-be71-c4d284e6592f}, 7, 0x3debb0, (null), (null), 0x3e2280): stub
fixme:ntdll:EtwRegisterTraceGuidsW   register trace class {72b14a7d-704c-423e-92f8-7e6d64bcb92a}
fixme:ntdll:EtwRegisterTraceGuidsW   register trace class {e2091f8a-1e0a-4731-84a2-0dd57c8a5261}
fixme:ntdll:EtwRegisterTraceGuidsW   register trace class {e8a3bf1f-a86b-4390-9c60-5390b969d22c}
fixme:ntdll:EtwRegisterTraceGuidsW   register trace class {5727a00f-50be-4519-8256-f7699871fecb}
fixme:ntdll:EtwRegisterTraceGuidsW   register trace class {7e854ec7-cdc4-405a-b5b2-aaf7c9e7d40c}
fixme:ntdll:EtwRegisterTraceGuidsW   register trace class {79a60dc6-5fc8-4952-a41c-1163aeec5eb8}
fixme:ntdll:EtwRegisterTraceGuidsW   register trace class {2718d25b-5bf5-4479-8e88-babc64bdbfca}
fixme:process:GetNumaHighestNodeNumber (0x23e7a0): semi-stub
fixme:ver:GetCurrentPackageId (0xfbe550 (nil)): stub
[00:39:49][0x00000033][info] device#0 | Initializing thread #0 (CUDA-DJEZO) GeForce GTX 1070 (#0) M=1
[00:39:51][0x00000026][info] Benchmarking, please wait about 20 seconds...
[00:40:11][0x00000033][info] device#0 | Thread #0 ended (CUDA-DJEZO)
[00:40:11][0x00000026][info] Benchmarking finished
[00:40:11][0x00000026][info] Total time : 20 s
[00:40:11][0x00000026][info] device#0: 186.828 I/s, 342.001 Sols/s
[00:40:11][0x00000026][info] Total measured: 186.828 I/s
[00:40:11][0x00000026][info] Total measured: 342.001 Sols/s
[00:40:11][0x00000026][info] Theoretical: 351.059 Sols/s

350 vs 330 , I reported same issue on 1.0.2 version, and you fixed it (1.0.2d, 1.0.2e, 1.0.2f) in last release

and memory controller usage 76% vs 73%

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1677369.msg17068170#msg17068170

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1677369.msg17064206#msg17064206
wacko
Full Member
***
Online Online

Activity: 197


View Profile
December 12, 2016, 09:48:04 PM
 #588

Do you get ~330 on overclocked or stock 1070 ?
Since most miners use non-reference 1070s (Founder's edition is noisy), there's really no such thing as "stock 1070". Smiley Cards from different brands all come with quite different "stock" clocks; what's considered "stock" by someone will be a noticeable overclock to someone else.
NiceHashSupport
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504


View Profile
December 12, 2016, 10:08:23 PM
 #589

Do you get ~330 on overclocked or stock 1070 ?

a bit overclocked.

Anyway, I ran the windows version under wine on same hardware

Code:
$ /opt/wine-staging/bin/wine eqm.exe -cd 0 -b
fixme:winediag:start_process Wine Staging 1.9.23 is a testing version containing experimental patches.
fixme:winediag:start_process Please mention your exact version when filing bug reports on winehq.org.
fixme:heap:RtlSetHeapInformation 0x3f0000 0 0x23fd20 4 stub

==================== www.nicehash.com ====================
     EQM v1.0.3a equihash CPU&GPU Miner for NiceHash.
  This miner is using proprietary base code by NiceHash.
    CPU solver: by xenoncat
    CUDA solver: by djeZo; heavily modified Tromp solver
==================== www.nicehash.com ====================

[00:39:49][0x00000026][info] Log started
[00:39:49][0x00000026][info] Starting up miner instances...
fixme:module:load_library unsupported flag(s) used (flags: 0x00000800)
fixme:ntdll:EtwRegisterTraceGuidsW (0x31ec34, (nil), {f7b697a3-4db5-4d3b-be71-c4d284e6592f}, 7, 0x3debb0, (null), (null), 0x3e2280): stub
fixme:ntdll:EtwRegisterTraceGuidsW   register trace class {72b14a7d-704c-423e-92f8-7e6d64bcb92a}
fixme:ntdll:EtwRegisterTraceGuidsW   register trace class {e2091f8a-1e0a-4731-84a2-0dd57c8a5261}
fixme:ntdll:EtwRegisterTraceGuidsW   register trace class {e8a3bf1f-a86b-4390-9c60-5390b969d22c}
fixme:ntdll:EtwRegisterTraceGuidsW   register trace class {5727a00f-50be-4519-8256-f7699871fecb}
fixme:ntdll:EtwRegisterTraceGuidsW   register trace class {7e854ec7-cdc4-405a-b5b2-aaf7c9e7d40c}
fixme:ntdll:EtwRegisterTraceGuidsW   register trace class {79a60dc6-5fc8-4952-a41c-1163aeec5eb8}
fixme:ntdll:EtwRegisterTraceGuidsW   register trace class {2718d25b-5bf5-4479-8e88-babc64bdbfca}
fixme:process:GetNumaHighestNodeNumber (0x23e7a0): semi-stub
fixme:ver:GetCurrentPackageId (0xfbe550 (nil)): stub
[00:39:49][0x00000033][info] device#0 | Initializing thread #0 (CUDA-DJEZO) GeForce GTX 1070 (#0) M=1
[00:39:51][0x00000026][info] Benchmarking, please wait about 20 seconds...
[00:40:11][0x00000033][info] device#0 | Thread #0 ended (CUDA-DJEZO)
[00:40:11][0x00000026][info] Benchmarking finished
[00:40:11][0x00000026][info] Total time : 20 s
[00:40:11][0x00000026][info] device#0: 186.828 I/s, 342.001 Sols/s
[00:40:11][0x00000026][info] Total measured: 186.828 I/s
[00:40:11][0x00000026][info] Total measured: 342.001 Sols/s
[00:40:11][0x00000026][info] Theoretical: 351.059 Sols/s

350 vs 330 , I reported same issue on 1.0.2 version, and you fixed it (1.0.2d, 1.0.2e, 1.0.2f) in last release

and memory controller usage 76% vs 73%

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1677369.msg17068170#msg17068170

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1677369.msg17064206#msg17064206

We will take a look into this...
Kompik
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 101


View Profile
December 12, 2016, 10:21:22 PM
 #590

Did you change the payment threshold from 0.01 to 0.1 BTC? I really dont to wait a week for a payout.
TR8888
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504


View Profile
December 12, 2016, 10:24:01 PM
 #591

Which drivers should I use for this miner for a 1070? I'm currently using 372.54 and it seems a little slow with 290 sols on stock 1070, W10
peonv
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3


View Profile
December 12, 2016, 10:30:35 PM
 #592

346 per 1070 with overclocked memory.
NiceHashSupport
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504


View Profile
December 12, 2016, 10:33:22 PM
 #593

Which drivers should I use for this miner for a 1070? I'm currently using 372.54 and it seems a little slow with 290 sols on stock 1070, W10

Use -cd 0 0 or -ca -ca to get better speed.
TR8888
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504


View Profile
December 12, 2016, 10:51:29 PM
 #594

Which drivers should I use for this miner for a 1070? I'm currently using 372.54 and it seems a little slow with 290 sols on stock 1070, W10

Use -cd 0 0 or -ca -ca to get better speed.

I tried both, -cd 0 0 is the best achieving 299 sols.

Which drivers are recommended? The most recent from nVidia website?
_javi_
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 361



View Profile
December 12, 2016, 11:06:10 PM
 #595

i cant pass 300 sols either..

Gigabyte g1 1070 (6 pin, does it matter??), win 7 64, 4 gb... latest drivers.
dakky
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 25


View Profile
December 12, 2016, 11:06:28 PM
 #596

with single 980Ti and (single) -ca  @ 340 sols/s

but Off Topic... why next payout time at @ 0.03 ?? something changed, not anymore at 0.01?
ioglnx
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196

Fighting mob law and inquisition in this forum


View Profile
December 12, 2016, 11:06:35 PM
 #597

Yeah good question was the payout frame changed again?
It was usually always each night when reaching 0.01

This forum is filled with morons able to ignore every netiquette and basic respectful behaviour.
Yes I mean you bensam and you fellow fake accounts.
reb0rn21
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 966


View Profile
December 12, 2016, 11:10:31 PM
 #598

I just got paid for two days, just a bit over 0.1, might be new limit,.. BTC blockchain is so overloaded I see sometimes even with fee BTC do not pass for hours

... PLAY SHARE EARN...
.LBRY...
                            __¦¦¦__
                        __¦¦¦¦¦¯¦¦¦¦¦__
                    __¦¦¦¦¦¯¯     ¯¯¦¦¦¦¦__
                __¦¦¦¦¦¯¯             ¯¯¦¦¦¦¦__
            __¦¦¦¦¦¯¯                     ¯¯¦¦¦¦¦__
        __¦¦¦¦¦¯¯                             ¯¯¦¦¦¦¦__
    __¦¦¦¦¦¯¯                                     ¯¯¦¦¦
__¦¦¦¦¦¯¯                                         __¦¦¦
¦¦¦¯¯                                         __¦¦¦¦¦¯¯
¦¦¦     ¦__                               __¦¦¦¦¦¯¯
¦¦¦     ¦¦¦¦¦__                       __¦¦¦¦¦¯¯  ________
¦¦¦       ¯¯¦¦¦¦¦__               __¦¦¦¦¦¯¯       ¦¦¦¦¦¦
¦¦¦¦¦__       ¯¯¦¦¦¦¦__       __¦¦¦¦¦¯¯       __¦¦¦¦¦¦¦
  ¯¯¦¦¦¦¦__       ¯¯¦¦¦¦¦___¦¦¦¦¦¯¯       __¦¦¦¦¦¯¯ ¦¦
      ¯¯¦¦¦¦¦__       ¯¯¦¦¦¦¦¯¯       __¦¦¦¦¦¯¯
          ¯¯¦¦¦¦¦__       ¯       __¦¦¦¦¦¯¯
              ¯¯¦¦¦¦¦__       __¦¦¦¦¦¯¯
                  ¯¯¦¦¦¦¦___¦¦¦¦¦¯¯
                      ¯¯¦¦¦¦¦¯¯
                          ¯
ioglnx
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196

Fighting mob law and inquisition in this forum


View Profile
December 12, 2016, 11:16:37 PM
 #599

China wake up

This forum is filled with morons able to ignore every netiquette and basic respectful behaviour.
Yes I mean you bensam and you fellow fake accounts.
TR8888
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504


View Profile
December 12, 2016, 11:53:41 PM
 #600

When wantring to CPU mine only, It asks for cuda.dll , even the newes ver of nh miner cpu mining only for equi asks for cuda dll's..
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 [30] 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!