Bitcoin Forum
October 20, 2017, 10:55:28 AM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.15.0.1  [Torrent]. (New!)
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [29] 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 »
  Print  
Author Topic: NiceHash EQM Zcash NVIDIA optimized miner [Maxwell/Pascal] + CPU mining v1.0.4c  (Read 217863 times)
chronek
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 262


View Profile
December 12, 2016, 07:32:05 PM
 #561

Interesting card: GTX 1050 Ti with samsung memory. Overclocked, it gets 150 Sol/s (not that bad), and only 60 W consumption (wall). It also costs way less than many other cards. Why were people buying RX470/480 for mining ZEC? ^^

in my country rx480 cost the same as 1050 ti, but with overclocked rx480 i can get 260 sol/s, yes it is 160W (wall) but still better ROI
1508496928
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1508496928

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1508496928
Reply with quote  #2

1508496928
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
giagge
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 728



View Profile
December 12, 2016, 07:44:31 PM
 #562

Why diff 512 ? .


                ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
             ▄███████████▄
           ▄███████████████▄
         ▄███████████████████▄
       ▄███████████████████████▄          ▄▄            ▄▄      ▄▄                                           ▄▄
     ▄███████████████████████████▄        ██          █ ██      ██                                           ██
   ▄█████████▀███████████▀█████████▄      ██            ██      ██                                           ██
 ▄█████████▀  ▐█████████▌  ▀█████████▄    ██ ▐██████▄ █████████ ██  ███████ ▄██████████████████▄  ████████████████▌
█████████▀     █████████     ▀█████████   ██    ▄████ █▌██      ██    ▄████▌██       ▐█        █▌▐█▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██
 ▀█████▀       ▐███████▌       ▀█████▀    ██  ▄█▀  ██ █▌██      ██  ▄█▀  ▐█▌██       ▐█        █▌ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▐█▌██
   ▀█▀          ███████          ▀█▀      ██       ██ █▌██      ██       ▐█▌██       ▐█▌      ▐█▌         ▐█▌██
                ▐█████▌                   █████████▀▀ █▌██      ██████████▀  ▀█████████████████▀ ▀█████████▀ ██
                 █████
                 ▐███▌
                  ███
                   ▀
║█
║█
║█
█║
█║
█║

 
 
       ▄▄▄▄▄▄
    ▄████████
    █████▀▀▀▀
   ▐████
   ▐████
████████████
████████████
   ▐████
   ▐████
   ▐████
   ▐████

 
 
                 ▄████▄▄    ▄
██             ████████████▀
████▄         █████████████▀
▀████████▄▄   █████████████
▄▄█████████████████████████
██████████████████████████
  ▀██████████████████████
   █████████████████████
    ▀█████████████████▀
      ▄█████████████▀
▄▄███████████████▀
   ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀

 
 
 
 
 ▄████████████████████▄
████████████████████████
██████████ ▀████████████
██████████    ▀█████████
██████████    ▄█████████
██████████ ▄████████████
████████████████████████
 ▀████████████████████▀

 
 
             ▄██▄
     ▄      ▐████   ▄▄
   █████     ██████████
    █████████████████▀
 ▄████████████▀████▌
██████████     ▀████   
 ▀▀   █████     ██████████
      ▀████▌▄████████████▀
    ▄▄▄███████████████▌
   ██████████▀    ▐████
    ▀▀▀  ████▌     ▀▀▀
         ▀███▀
Amph
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1666



View Profile
December 12, 2016, 07:46:53 PM
 #563

Interesting card: GTX 1050 Ti with samsung memory. Overclocked, it gets 150 Sol/s (not that bad), and only 60 W consumption (wall). It also costs way less than many other cards. Why were people buying RX470/480 for mining ZEC? ^^

in my country rx480 cost the same as 1050 ti, but with overclocked rx480 i can get 260 sol/s, yes it is 160W (wall) but still better ROI

it depend on electricity price, at 0.2 cent you are not doing better with your 480, but at 0.1 cent yes
Velgelm
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 296



View Profile
December 12, 2016, 07:55:29 PM
 #564

GTX 1070 +120 ore +400(4202) mem get 347 ss
GTX 960 mod bios 1428 core 3505 mem get 137 ss

scryptr
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1134



View Profile WWW
December 12, 2016, 08:09:04 PM
 #565

GTX 960 GETS 120Sols/s --

At stock clocks my GTX 960 cards are mining Equihash at 120Sols/s with EQM v1.0.3a.  This is not so impressive, just look at the above post, but it is far better than the 30-40Sols/s they were earning a week or so ago.  For some reason, NiceHash miner auto-tunes EQM better than I was able to with a simple batch file.       --scryptr

TIPS:  BTC - 1Fs4uZ6a9ABYBTaHGUfqcwCQmeBRxkKRQT
          DASH - XrK81tW31SLsVvZ2WX9VhTjpT6GXJPLdbQ
NiceHashSupport
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 588



View Profile WWW
December 12, 2016, 09:09:06 PM
 #566

GTX 960 GETS 120Sols/s --

At stock clocks my GTX 960 cards are mining Equihash at 120Sols/s with EQM v1.0.3a.  This is not so impressive, just look at the above post, but it is far better than the 30-40Sols/s they were earning a week or so ago.  For some reason, NiceHash miner auto-tunes EQM better than I was able to with a simple batch file.       --scryptr

NHM runs 2 threads/instances by default. If you do the same, you will get the same speed as NHM.

i have 6xgtx 1070
my bat file -
eqm -u btcadress -w worker -t 0 -ca -ca -ca -ca -ca -ca
or right
eqm -u btcadress -w worker -t 0 -cd 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 5

log:
[22:21:05][0x00000d68][info] device#0 | Initializing thread #35 (CUDA-DJEZO) GeForce GTX 1070 (#5) M=1
[22:21:29][0x00000d68][info] device#35 | Initializing thread #35 (CUDA-DJEZO) GeForce GTX 1070 (#5) M=1

the speed drops in 5 min
2665 ....2150

TPD in AfterBurner 80-85%

As said before, there is no sense to run so many instances... that may rather slow you down over a time due to massive context switching needed. Just do -ca -ca and nothing more (no -cd) and you will be fine.

NiceHash.com - Largest Crypto-Mining Marketplace
krnlx
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 226


View Profile
December 12, 2016, 09:13:23 PM
 #567

@NiceHashSupport

Can you check an issue on linux version, that I reported?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1677369.msg17163199#msg17163199

BTC 1DGhgVtTzJqxFvM9yrL8kFBGZdf8Zq6bEr
NiceHashSupport
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 588



View Profile WWW
December 12, 2016, 09:16:52 PM
 #568

We did not have an issue. You have overclocked cards? Try different driver? What happens if using multiple eqm instances?

NiceHash.com - Largest Crypto-Mining Marketplace
krnlx
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 226


View Profile
December 12, 2016, 09:21:27 PM
 #569

We did not have an issue. You have overclocked cards? Try different driver? What happens if using multiple eqm instances?

with multiple eqm instances(or wit 2 threads) speed is slower. With overclock, or without.

1 thread :
Code:
$ ./eqm -cd 0 -b

==================== www.nicehash.com ====================
     EQM v1.0.3a equihash CPU&GPU Miner for NiceHash.
  This miner is using proprietary base code by NiceHash.
    CPU solver: by xenoncat
    CUDA solver: by djeZo; heavily modified Tromp solver
==================== www.nicehash.com ====================

[00:19:57][0x00007ffb2c022740][info] Log started
[00:19:58][0x00007ffb2c022740][info] Starting up miner instances...
[00:19:58][0x00007ffb222b4700][info] device#0 | Initializing thread #0 (CUDA-DJEZO) GeForce GTX 1070 (#0) M=1
[00:20:00][0x00007ffb2c022740][info] Benchmarking, please wait about 20 seconds...
[00:20:20][0x00007ffb222b4700][info] device#0 | Thread #0 ended (CUDA-DJEZO)
[00:20:20][0x00007ffb2c022740][info] Benchmarking finished
[00:20:20][0x00007ffb2c022740][info] Total time : 20 s
[00:20:20][0x00007ffb2c022740][info] device#0: 178 I/s, 326.016 Sols/s
[00:20:20][0x00007ffb2c022740][info] Total measured: 178 I/s
[00:20:20][0x00007ffb2c022740][info] Total measured: 326.016 Sols/s
[00:20:20][0x00007ffb2c022740][info] Theoretical: 334.471 Sols/s

2 threads:
Code:
$ ./eqm -cd 0 0 -b

==================== www.nicehash.com ====================
     EQM v1.0.3a equihash CPU&GPU Miner for NiceHash.
  This miner is using proprietary base code by NiceHash.
    CPU solver: by xenoncat
    CUDA solver: by djeZo; heavily modified Tromp solver
==================== www.nicehash.com ====================

[00:20:28][0x00007f958269d740][info] Log started
[00:20:28][0x00007f958269d740][info] Starting up miner instances...
[00:20:28][0x00007f9577c9a700][info] device#1 | Initializing thread #1 (CUDA-DJEZO) GeForce GTX 1070 (#0) M=1
[00:20:28][0x00007f957849b700][info] device#0 | Initializing thread #0 (CUDA-DJEZO) GeForce GTX 1070 (#0) M=1
[00:20:30][0x00007f958269d740][info] Benchmarking, please wait about 20 seconds...
[00:20:50][0x00007f9577c9a700][info] device#1 | Thread #1 ended (CUDA-DJEZO)
[00:20:50][0x00007f957849b700][info] device#0 | Thread #0 ended (CUDA-DJEZO)
[00:20:50][0x00007f958269d740][info] Benchmarking finished
[00:20:50][0x00007f958269d740][info] Total time : 20 s
[00:20:50][0x00007f958269d740][info] device#0: 76.8692 I/s, 146.437 Sols/s
[00:20:50][0x00007f958269d740][info] device#1: 76.8615 I/s, 144.629 Sols/s
[00:20:50][0x00007f958269d740][info] Total measured: 153.731 I/s
[00:20:50][0x00007f958269d740][info] Total measured: 291.066 Sols/s
[00:20:50][0x00007f958269d740][info] Theoretical: 288.868 Sols/s

BTC 1DGhgVtTzJqxFvM9yrL8kFBGZdf8Zq6bEr
NiceHashSupport
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 588



View Profile WWW
December 12, 2016, 09:34:02 PM
 #570

Do you get ~330 on overclocked or stock 1070 ?

NiceHash.com - Largest Crypto-Mining Marketplace
krnlx
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 226


View Profile
December 12, 2016, 09:42:43 PM
 #571

Do you get ~330 on overclocked or stock 1070 ?

a bit overclocked.

Anyway, I ran the windows version under wine on same hardware

Code:
$ /opt/wine-staging/bin/wine eqm.exe -cd 0 -b
fixme:winediag:start_process Wine Staging 1.9.23 is a testing version containing experimental patches.
fixme:winediag:start_process Please mention your exact version when filing bug reports on winehq.org.
fixme:heap:RtlSetHeapInformation 0x3f0000 0 0x23fd20 4 stub

==================== www.nicehash.com ====================
     EQM v1.0.3a equihash CPU&GPU Miner for NiceHash.
  This miner is using proprietary base code by NiceHash.
    CPU solver: by xenoncat
    CUDA solver: by djeZo; heavily modified Tromp solver
==================== www.nicehash.com ====================

[00:39:49][0x00000026][info] Log started
[00:39:49][0x00000026][info] Starting up miner instances...
fixme:module:load_library unsupported flag(s) used (flags: 0x00000800)
fixme:ntdll:EtwRegisterTraceGuidsW (0x31ec34, (nil), {f7b697a3-4db5-4d3b-be71-c4d284e6592f}, 7, 0x3debb0, (null), (null), 0x3e2280): stub
fixme:ntdll:EtwRegisterTraceGuidsW   register trace class {72b14a7d-704c-423e-92f8-7e6d64bcb92a}
fixme:ntdll:EtwRegisterTraceGuidsW   register trace class {e2091f8a-1e0a-4731-84a2-0dd57c8a5261}
fixme:ntdll:EtwRegisterTraceGuidsW   register trace class {e8a3bf1f-a86b-4390-9c60-5390b969d22c}
fixme:ntdll:EtwRegisterTraceGuidsW   register trace class {5727a00f-50be-4519-8256-f7699871fecb}
fixme:ntdll:EtwRegisterTraceGuidsW   register trace class {7e854ec7-cdc4-405a-b5b2-aaf7c9e7d40c}
fixme:ntdll:EtwRegisterTraceGuidsW   register trace class {79a60dc6-5fc8-4952-a41c-1163aeec5eb8}
fixme:ntdll:EtwRegisterTraceGuidsW   register trace class {2718d25b-5bf5-4479-8e88-babc64bdbfca}
fixme:process:GetNumaHighestNodeNumber (0x23e7a0): semi-stub
fixme:ver:GetCurrentPackageId (0xfbe550 (nil)): stub
[00:39:49][0x00000033][info] device#0 | Initializing thread #0 (CUDA-DJEZO) GeForce GTX 1070 (#0) M=1
[00:39:51][0x00000026][info] Benchmarking, please wait about 20 seconds...
[00:40:11][0x00000033][info] device#0 | Thread #0 ended (CUDA-DJEZO)
[00:40:11][0x00000026][info] Benchmarking finished
[00:40:11][0x00000026][info] Total time : 20 s
[00:40:11][0x00000026][info] device#0: 186.828 I/s, 342.001 Sols/s
[00:40:11][0x00000026][info] Total measured: 186.828 I/s
[00:40:11][0x00000026][info] Total measured: 342.001 Sols/s
[00:40:11][0x00000026][info] Theoretical: 351.059 Sols/s

350 vs 330 , I reported same issue on 1.0.2 version, and you fixed it (1.0.2d, 1.0.2e, 1.0.2f) in last release

and memory controller usage 76% vs 73%

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1677369.msg17068170#msg17068170

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1677369.msg17064206#msg17064206

BTC 1DGhgVtTzJqxFvM9yrL8kFBGZdf8Zq6bEr
wacko
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 251


View Profile
December 12, 2016, 09:48:04 PM
 #572

Do you get ~330 on overclocked or stock 1070 ?
Since most miners use non-reference 1070s (Founder's edition is noisy), there's really no such thing as "stock 1070". Smiley Cards from different brands all come with quite different "stock" clocks; what's considered "stock" by someone will be a noticeable overclock to someone else.
NiceHashSupport
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 588



View Profile WWW
December 12, 2016, 10:08:23 PM
 #573

Do you get ~330 on overclocked or stock 1070 ?

a bit overclocked.

Anyway, I ran the windows version under wine on same hardware

Code:
$ /opt/wine-staging/bin/wine eqm.exe -cd 0 -b
fixme:winediag:start_process Wine Staging 1.9.23 is a testing version containing experimental patches.
fixme:winediag:start_process Please mention your exact version when filing bug reports on winehq.org.
fixme:heap:RtlSetHeapInformation 0x3f0000 0 0x23fd20 4 stub

==================== www.nicehash.com ====================
     EQM v1.0.3a equihash CPU&GPU Miner for NiceHash.
  This miner is using proprietary base code by NiceHash.
    CPU solver: by xenoncat
    CUDA solver: by djeZo; heavily modified Tromp solver
==================== www.nicehash.com ====================

[00:39:49][0x00000026][info] Log started
[00:39:49][0x00000026][info] Starting up miner instances...
fixme:module:load_library unsupported flag(s) used (flags: 0x00000800)
fixme:ntdll:EtwRegisterTraceGuidsW (0x31ec34, (nil), {f7b697a3-4db5-4d3b-be71-c4d284e6592f}, 7, 0x3debb0, (null), (null), 0x3e2280): stub
fixme:ntdll:EtwRegisterTraceGuidsW   register trace class {72b14a7d-704c-423e-92f8-7e6d64bcb92a}
fixme:ntdll:EtwRegisterTraceGuidsW   register trace class {e2091f8a-1e0a-4731-84a2-0dd57c8a5261}
fixme:ntdll:EtwRegisterTraceGuidsW   register trace class {e8a3bf1f-a86b-4390-9c60-5390b969d22c}
fixme:ntdll:EtwRegisterTraceGuidsW   register trace class {5727a00f-50be-4519-8256-f7699871fecb}
fixme:ntdll:EtwRegisterTraceGuidsW   register trace class {7e854ec7-cdc4-405a-b5b2-aaf7c9e7d40c}
fixme:ntdll:EtwRegisterTraceGuidsW   register trace class {79a60dc6-5fc8-4952-a41c-1163aeec5eb8}
fixme:ntdll:EtwRegisterTraceGuidsW   register trace class {2718d25b-5bf5-4479-8e88-babc64bdbfca}
fixme:process:GetNumaHighestNodeNumber (0x23e7a0): semi-stub
fixme:ver:GetCurrentPackageId (0xfbe550 (nil)): stub
[00:39:49][0x00000033][info] device#0 | Initializing thread #0 (CUDA-DJEZO) GeForce GTX 1070 (#0) M=1
[00:39:51][0x00000026][info] Benchmarking, please wait about 20 seconds...
[00:40:11][0x00000033][info] device#0 | Thread #0 ended (CUDA-DJEZO)
[00:40:11][0x00000026][info] Benchmarking finished
[00:40:11][0x00000026][info] Total time : 20 s
[00:40:11][0x00000026][info] device#0: 186.828 I/s, 342.001 Sols/s
[00:40:11][0x00000026][info] Total measured: 186.828 I/s
[00:40:11][0x00000026][info] Total measured: 342.001 Sols/s
[00:40:11][0x00000026][info] Theoretical: 351.059 Sols/s

350 vs 330 , I reported same issue on 1.0.2 version, and you fixed it (1.0.2d, 1.0.2e, 1.0.2f) in last release

and memory controller usage 76% vs 73%

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1677369.msg17068170#msg17068170

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1677369.msg17064206#msg17064206

We will take a look into this...

NiceHash.com - Largest Crypto-Mining Marketplace
Kompik
Sr. Member
****
Online Online

Activity: 318


View Profile
December 12, 2016, 10:21:22 PM
 #574

Did you change the payment threshold from 0.01 to 0.1 BTC? I really dont to wait a week for a payout.
TR8888
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 528


View Profile
December 12, 2016, 10:24:01 PM
 #575

Which drivers should I use for this miner for a 1070? I'm currently using 372.54 and it seems a little slow with 290 sols on stock 1070, W10
peonv
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 15


View Profile
December 12, 2016, 10:30:35 PM
 #576

346 per 1070 with overclocked memory.
NiceHashSupport
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 588



View Profile WWW
December 12, 2016, 10:33:22 PM
 #577

Which drivers should I use for this miner for a 1070? I'm currently using 372.54 and it seems a little slow with 290 sols on stock 1070, W10

Use -cd 0 0 or -ca -ca to get better speed.

NiceHash.com - Largest Crypto-Mining Marketplace
TR8888
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 528


View Profile
December 12, 2016, 10:51:29 PM
 #578

Which drivers should I use for this miner for a 1070? I'm currently using 372.54 and it seems a little slow with 290 sols on stock 1070, W10

Use -cd 0 0 or -ca -ca to get better speed.

I tried both, -cd 0 0 is the best achieving 299 sols.

Which drivers are recommended? The most recent from nVidia website?
_javi_
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 541



View Profile
December 12, 2016, 11:06:10 PM
 #579

i cant pass 300 sols either..

Gigabyte g1 1070 (6 pin, does it matter??), win 7 64, 4 gb... latest drivers.

██
█║█
║║║
║║║
█║█
██
'BTC MULTI-WALLET SOON'
▬▬▬▬ Download WHITEPAPER ▬▬▬▬

                    ▄██▄
                  ▄██████▄
                ▄██████████
              ▄██████████▀   ▄▄
            ▄██████████▀   ▄████▄
          ▄██████████▀    ████████▄
         ██████████▀      ▀████████
         ▀███████▀   ▄███▄  ▀████▀   ▄█▄
    ▄███▄  ▀███▀   ▄███████▄  ▀▀   ▄█████▄
  ▄███████▄      ▄██████████     ▄█████████
  █████████    ▄██████████▀    ▄██████████▀
   ▀█████▀   ▄██████████▀    ▄██████████▀
     ▀▀▀   ▄██████████▀    ▄██████████▀
          ██████████▀    ▄██████████▀
          ▀███████▀      █████████▀
            ▀███▀   ▄██▄  ▀█████▀
                  ▄██████▄  ▀▀▀
                  █████████
                   ▀█████▀
                     ▀▀▀
e i d o o
██

███▀▀
▐▐▌
▐▌
▐▌
▐▐▌
███▄▄
▀▀███
▐▌▌
▐▌
▐▌
▐▌▌
▄▄███
dakky
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 41


View Profile
December 12, 2016, 11:06:28 PM
 #580

with single 980Ti and (single) -ca  @ 340 sols/s

but Off Topic... why next payout time at @ 0.03 ?? something changed, not anymore at 0.01?
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [29] 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!