Bitcoin Forum
May 22, 2018, 06:28:44 PM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.16.0  [Torrent]. (New!)
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [29] 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 »
  Print  
Author Topic: NiceHash EQM Zcash NVIDIA optimized miner [Maxwell/Pascal] + CPU mining v1.0.4c  (Read 230888 times)
chronek
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 275
Merit: 250


BD People Are Legend


View Profile
December 12, 2016, 07:32:05 PM
 #561

Interesting card: GTX 1050 Ti with samsung memory. Overclocked, it gets 150 Sol/s (not that bad), and only 60 W consumption (wall). It also costs way less than many other cards. Why were people buying RX470/480 for mining ZEC? ^^

in my country rx480 cost the same as 1050 ti, but with overclocked rx480 i can get 260 sol/s, yes it is 160W (wall) but still better ROI


                 ▄▄▄██████████████████▄▄▄
            ▄▄██▀▀▀▀▀███████████████████████▄▄
        ▄▄███▀   ▄▄▄   ▀████████████████████████▄▄
     ▄██████  ▄███████▄  ▀██████████████████▀▀▀█████▄
   ▄███████    ███▀▀ ██    ███████████  ███▀  ▄███████▄
  █████████▄  ▄█▀  ▄███    ██████████  ▄██  ▄███████████
 ██████████████▀  ████▀   ▄██▀▀▀████  ▄████▀  ███████████
██████████████▀  ▄███▀   ▄█▀  ▄▄ ██▀ ▄█  ██  █████████████
██████████████   ▀     ▄██▀  ▄█  █▀  █   █▀▄  ▀███████████
█████████████▀  ▄███▄  ▀██   ██ ▄▄▄  █▀ ▄▄▀█▄  ▀▄█████████
█████████████   █████   ▀██▄ ▀▄████▄  ▄███▄▀  ▄███████████
 █████   ▀██▀  ▄█████    █▀▀█████████████████▀███████████
  ████   ▄█▀   █████    ██ ▀▄█▀▄▄▀█ ▀▄▀█▀▄▀ █▀█ ▀▄██████
   ▀███▄▄   ▄█▄ ▀▀     ███ █ █ ▄▄▄█  █ █ █  █ █ ██████▀
     ▀██████████▄▄▄▄▄█████▄█▄██▄▄██ █▄███▄█▄█▄█▄████▀
        ▀▀██████████████████████████████████████▀▀
            ▀▀██████████████████████████████▀▀
                 ▀▀▀██████████████████▀▀▀
      Supported by
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
John McAfee     
|
|
|
|

   ▀██▄       ▀████▄
▄    ▀██          ▀██▄
██▄ ▄███         ▄█████▄▄
 ▀███████▄     ▄██▀ ▀▀████
      ▀████▄ ▄██▀     ▀█▀
        ▀████▄
        ▄█▀████▄
      ▄███▄▀▀████▄
    ▄████▀    ▀████▄
  ▄████▀        ▀██▀█▄
  ▀██▀            ▀██▀
1527013724
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1527013724

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1527013724
Reply with quote  #2

1527013724
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1527013724
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1527013724

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1527013724
Reply with quote  #2

1527013724
Report to moderator
1527013724
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1527013724

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1527013724
Reply with quote  #2

1527013724
Report to moderator
giagge
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 924
Merit: 1001



View Profile
December 12, 2016, 07:44:31 PM
 #562

Why diff 512 ? .

Amph
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1876
Merit: 1001



View Profile
December 12, 2016, 07:46:53 PM
 #563

Interesting card: GTX 1050 Ti with samsung memory. Overclocked, it gets 150 Sol/s (not that bad), and only 60 W consumption (wall). It also costs way less than many other cards. Why were people buying RX470/480 for mining ZEC? ^^

in my country rx480 cost the same as 1050 ti, but with overclocked rx480 i can get 260 sol/s, yes it is 160W (wall) but still better ROI

it depend on electricity price, at 0.2 cent you are not doing better with your 480, but at 0.1 cent yes

        ██████████
     ████████████████
   ████████████████████
  ██████▀▀     ▀▀███████
 ██████           ███████
▐█████             ██████▌
▐█████             ██████▌
▐██████           ███████▌
 ████████        ████████
  █████████   ▐█████████
    ███████    ███████
    ▐████▌     ▐████▌
    █████       █████
   ▐████▄▄▄     ▐████▌   
   ███████████   █████▄▄██▌
  ▐██████████▌   ▐█████████
  █████   ▀▀▀     ████████▀▀
 ▐████▌           ▐████▌
 █████             █████
      ██████       ▐████▌
     ▐█████▌        █████
     ██████
███
███
 ██
 ██
 ██
 ██
 ██
 ██
 ██
 ██
 ██
 ██
███
███
███
███
 ██
 ██
 ██
 ██
 ██
 ██
 ██
 ██
 ██
 ██
███
███
■  Telegram
■  Twitter
■  Reddit
■  ANN
■  Ambassador
■  GitHub
Velgelm
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 299
Merit: 250



View Profile
December 12, 2016, 07:55:29 PM
 #564

GTX 1070 +120 ore +400(4202) mem get 347 ss
GTX 960 mod bios 1428 core 3505 mem get 137 ss

scryptr
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1344
Merit: 1000



View Profile WWW
December 12, 2016, 08:09:04 PM
 #565

GTX 960 GETS 120Sols/s --

At stock clocks my GTX 960 cards are mining Equihash at 120Sols/s with EQM v1.0.3a.  This is not so impressive, just look at the above post, but it is far better than the 30-40Sols/s they were earning a week or so ago.  For some reason, NiceHash miner auto-tunes EQM better than I was able to with a simple batch file.       --scryptr

TIPS:  BTC - 1Fs4uZ6a9ABYBTaHGUfqcwCQmeBRxkKRQT
          DASH - XrK81tW31SLsVvZ2WX9VhTjpT6GXJPLdbQ
NiceHashSupport
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 588
Merit: 500



View Profile WWW
December 12, 2016, 09:09:06 PM
 #566

GTX 960 GETS 120Sols/s --

At stock clocks my GTX 960 cards are mining Equihash at 120Sols/s with EQM v1.0.3a.  This is not so impressive, just look at the above post, but it is far better than the 30-40Sols/s they were earning a week or so ago.  For some reason, NiceHash miner auto-tunes EQM better than I was able to with a simple batch file.       --scryptr

NHM runs 2 threads/instances by default. If you do the same, you will get the same speed as NHM.

i have 6xgtx 1070
my bat file -
eqm -u btcadress -w worker -t 0 -ca -ca -ca -ca -ca -ca
or right
eqm -u btcadress -w worker -t 0 -cd 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 5

log:
[22:21:05][0x00000d68][info] device#0 | Initializing thread #35 (CUDA-DJEZO) GeForce GTX 1070 (#5) M=1
[22:21:29][0x00000d68][info] device#35 | Initializing thread #35 (CUDA-DJEZO) GeForce GTX 1070 (#5) M=1

the speed drops in 5 min
2665 ....2150

TPD in AfterBurner 80-85%

As said before, there is no sense to run so many instances... that may rather slow you down over a time due to massive context switching needed. Just do -ca -ca and nothing more (no -cd) and you will be fine.

NiceHash.com - Largest Crypto-Mining Marketplace
krnlx
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 232
Merit: 100


View Profile
December 12, 2016, 09:13:23 PM
 #567

@NiceHashSupport

Can you check an issue on linux version, that I reported?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1677369.msg17163199#msg17163199

BTC 1DGhgVtTzJqxFvM9yrL8kFBGZdf8Zq6bEr
NiceHashSupport
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 588
Merit: 500



View Profile WWW
December 12, 2016, 09:16:52 PM
 #568

We did not have an issue. You have overclocked cards? Try different driver? What happens if using multiple eqm instances?

NiceHash.com - Largest Crypto-Mining Marketplace
krnlx
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 232
Merit: 100


View Profile
December 12, 2016, 09:21:27 PM
 #569

We did not have an issue. You have overclocked cards? Try different driver? What happens if using multiple eqm instances?

with multiple eqm instances(or wit 2 threads) speed is slower. With overclock, or without.

1 thread :
Code:
$ ./eqm -cd 0 -b

==================== www.nicehash.com ====================
     EQM v1.0.3a equihash CPU&GPU Miner for NiceHash.
  This miner is using proprietary base code by NiceHash.
    CPU solver: by xenoncat
    CUDA solver: by djeZo; heavily modified Tromp solver
==================== www.nicehash.com ====================

[00:19:57][0x00007ffb2c022740][info] Log started
[00:19:58][0x00007ffb2c022740][info] Starting up miner instances...
[00:19:58][0x00007ffb222b4700][info] device#0 | Initializing thread #0 (CUDA-DJEZO) GeForce GTX 1070 (#0) M=1
[00:20:00][0x00007ffb2c022740][info] Benchmarking, please wait about 20 seconds...
[00:20:20][0x00007ffb222b4700][info] device#0 | Thread #0 ended (CUDA-DJEZO)
[00:20:20][0x00007ffb2c022740][info] Benchmarking finished
[00:20:20][0x00007ffb2c022740][info] Total time : 20 s
[00:20:20][0x00007ffb2c022740][info] device#0: 178 I/s, 326.016 Sols/s
[00:20:20][0x00007ffb2c022740][info] Total measured: 178 I/s
[00:20:20][0x00007ffb2c022740][info] Total measured: 326.016 Sols/s
[00:20:20][0x00007ffb2c022740][info] Theoretical: 334.471 Sols/s

2 threads:
Code:
$ ./eqm -cd 0 0 -b

==================== www.nicehash.com ====================
     EQM v1.0.3a equihash CPU&GPU Miner for NiceHash.
  This miner is using proprietary base code by NiceHash.
    CPU solver: by xenoncat
    CUDA solver: by djeZo; heavily modified Tromp solver
==================== www.nicehash.com ====================

[00:20:28][0x00007f958269d740][info] Log started
[00:20:28][0x00007f958269d740][info] Starting up miner instances...
[00:20:28][0x00007f9577c9a700][info] device#1 | Initializing thread #1 (CUDA-DJEZO) GeForce GTX 1070 (#0) M=1
[00:20:28][0x00007f957849b700][info] device#0 | Initializing thread #0 (CUDA-DJEZO) GeForce GTX 1070 (#0) M=1
[00:20:30][0x00007f958269d740][info] Benchmarking, please wait about 20 seconds...
[00:20:50][0x00007f9577c9a700][info] device#1 | Thread #1 ended (CUDA-DJEZO)
[00:20:50][0x00007f957849b700][info] device#0 | Thread #0 ended (CUDA-DJEZO)
[00:20:50][0x00007f958269d740][info] Benchmarking finished
[00:20:50][0x00007f958269d740][info] Total time : 20 s
[00:20:50][0x00007f958269d740][info] device#0: 76.8692 I/s, 146.437 Sols/s
[00:20:50][0x00007f958269d740][info] device#1: 76.8615 I/s, 144.629 Sols/s
[00:20:50][0x00007f958269d740][info] Total measured: 153.731 I/s
[00:20:50][0x00007f958269d740][info] Total measured: 291.066 Sols/s
[00:20:50][0x00007f958269d740][info] Theoretical: 288.868 Sols/s

BTC 1DGhgVtTzJqxFvM9yrL8kFBGZdf8Zq6bEr
NiceHashSupport
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 588
Merit: 500



View Profile WWW
December 12, 2016, 09:34:02 PM
 #570

Do you get ~330 on overclocked or stock 1070 ?

NiceHash.com - Largest Crypto-Mining Marketplace
krnlx
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 232
Merit: 100


View Profile
December 12, 2016, 09:42:43 PM
 #571

Do you get ~330 on overclocked or stock 1070 ?

a bit overclocked.

Anyway, I ran the windows version under wine on same hardware

Code:
$ /opt/wine-staging/bin/wine eqm.exe -cd 0 -b
fixme:winediag:start_process Wine Staging 1.9.23 is a testing version containing experimental patches.
fixme:winediag:start_process Please mention your exact version when filing bug reports on winehq.org.
fixme:heap:RtlSetHeapInformation 0x3f0000 0 0x23fd20 4 stub

==================== www.nicehash.com ====================
     EQM v1.0.3a equihash CPU&GPU Miner for NiceHash.
  This miner is using proprietary base code by NiceHash.
    CPU solver: by xenoncat
    CUDA solver: by djeZo; heavily modified Tromp solver
==================== www.nicehash.com ====================

[00:39:49][0x00000026][info] Log started
[00:39:49][0x00000026][info] Starting up miner instances...
fixme:module:load_library unsupported flag(s) used (flags: 0x00000800)
fixme:ntdll:EtwRegisterTraceGuidsW (0x31ec34, (nil), {f7b697a3-4db5-4d3b-be71-c4d284e6592f}, 7, 0x3debb0, (null), (null), 0x3e2280): stub
fixme:ntdll:EtwRegisterTraceGuidsW   register trace class {72b14a7d-704c-423e-92f8-7e6d64bcb92a}
fixme:ntdll:EtwRegisterTraceGuidsW   register trace class {e2091f8a-1e0a-4731-84a2-0dd57c8a5261}
fixme:ntdll:EtwRegisterTraceGuidsW   register trace class {e8a3bf1f-a86b-4390-9c60-5390b969d22c}
fixme:ntdll:EtwRegisterTraceGuidsW   register trace class {5727a00f-50be-4519-8256-f7699871fecb}
fixme:ntdll:EtwRegisterTraceGuidsW   register trace class {7e854ec7-cdc4-405a-b5b2-aaf7c9e7d40c}
fixme:ntdll:EtwRegisterTraceGuidsW   register trace class {79a60dc6-5fc8-4952-a41c-1163aeec5eb8}
fixme:ntdll:EtwRegisterTraceGuidsW   register trace class {2718d25b-5bf5-4479-8e88-babc64bdbfca}
fixme:process:GetNumaHighestNodeNumber (0x23e7a0): semi-stub
fixme:ver:GetCurrentPackageId (0xfbe550 (nil)): stub
[00:39:49][0x00000033][info] device#0 | Initializing thread #0 (CUDA-DJEZO) GeForce GTX 1070 (#0) M=1
[00:39:51][0x00000026][info] Benchmarking, please wait about 20 seconds...
[00:40:11][0x00000033][info] device#0 | Thread #0 ended (CUDA-DJEZO)
[00:40:11][0x00000026][info] Benchmarking finished
[00:40:11][0x00000026][info] Total time : 20 s
[00:40:11][0x00000026][info] device#0: 186.828 I/s, 342.001 Sols/s
[00:40:11][0x00000026][info] Total measured: 186.828 I/s
[00:40:11][0x00000026][info] Total measured: 342.001 Sols/s
[00:40:11][0x00000026][info] Theoretical: 351.059 Sols/s

350 vs 330 , I reported same issue on 1.0.2 version, and you fixed it (1.0.2d, 1.0.2e, 1.0.2f) in last release

and memory controller usage 76% vs 73%

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1677369.msg17068170#msg17068170

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1677369.msg17064206#msg17064206

BTC 1DGhgVtTzJqxFvM9yrL8kFBGZdf8Zq6bEr
wacko
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 896
Merit: 1014


View Profile
December 12, 2016, 09:48:04 PM
 #572

Do you get ~330 on overclocked or stock 1070 ?
Since most miners use non-reference 1070s (Founder's edition is noisy), there's really no such thing as "stock 1070". Smiley Cards from different brands all come with quite different "stock" clocks; what's considered "stock" by someone will be a noticeable overclock to someone else.
NiceHashSupport
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 588
Merit: 500



View Profile WWW
December 12, 2016, 10:08:23 PM
 #573

Do you get ~330 on overclocked or stock 1070 ?

a bit overclocked.

Anyway, I ran the windows version under wine on same hardware

Code:
$ /opt/wine-staging/bin/wine eqm.exe -cd 0 -b
fixme:winediag:start_process Wine Staging 1.9.23 is a testing version containing experimental patches.
fixme:winediag:start_process Please mention your exact version when filing bug reports on winehq.org.
fixme:heap:RtlSetHeapInformation 0x3f0000 0 0x23fd20 4 stub

==================== www.nicehash.com ====================
     EQM v1.0.3a equihash CPU&GPU Miner for NiceHash.
  This miner is using proprietary base code by NiceHash.
    CPU solver: by xenoncat
    CUDA solver: by djeZo; heavily modified Tromp solver
==================== www.nicehash.com ====================

[00:39:49][0x00000026][info] Log started
[00:39:49][0x00000026][info] Starting up miner instances...
fixme:module:load_library unsupported flag(s) used (flags: 0x00000800)
fixme:ntdll:EtwRegisterTraceGuidsW (0x31ec34, (nil), {f7b697a3-4db5-4d3b-be71-c4d284e6592f}, 7, 0x3debb0, (null), (null), 0x3e2280): stub
fixme:ntdll:EtwRegisterTraceGuidsW   register trace class {72b14a7d-704c-423e-92f8-7e6d64bcb92a}
fixme:ntdll:EtwRegisterTraceGuidsW   register trace class {e2091f8a-1e0a-4731-84a2-0dd57c8a5261}
fixme:ntdll:EtwRegisterTraceGuidsW   register trace class {e8a3bf1f-a86b-4390-9c60-5390b969d22c}
fixme:ntdll:EtwRegisterTraceGuidsW   register trace class {5727a00f-50be-4519-8256-f7699871fecb}
fixme:ntdll:EtwRegisterTraceGuidsW   register trace class {7e854ec7-cdc4-405a-b5b2-aaf7c9e7d40c}
fixme:ntdll:EtwRegisterTraceGuidsW   register trace class {79a60dc6-5fc8-4952-a41c-1163aeec5eb8}
fixme:ntdll:EtwRegisterTraceGuidsW   register trace class {2718d25b-5bf5-4479-8e88-babc64bdbfca}
fixme:process:GetNumaHighestNodeNumber (0x23e7a0): semi-stub
fixme:ver:GetCurrentPackageId (0xfbe550 (nil)): stub
[00:39:49][0x00000033][info] device#0 | Initializing thread #0 (CUDA-DJEZO) GeForce GTX 1070 (#0) M=1
[00:39:51][0x00000026][info] Benchmarking, please wait about 20 seconds...
[00:40:11][0x00000033][info] device#0 | Thread #0 ended (CUDA-DJEZO)
[00:40:11][0x00000026][info] Benchmarking finished
[00:40:11][0x00000026][info] Total time : 20 s
[00:40:11][0x00000026][info] device#0: 186.828 I/s, 342.001 Sols/s
[00:40:11][0x00000026][info] Total measured: 186.828 I/s
[00:40:11][0x00000026][info] Total measured: 342.001 Sols/s
[00:40:11][0x00000026][info] Theoretical: 351.059 Sols/s

350 vs 330 , I reported same issue on 1.0.2 version, and you fixed it (1.0.2d, 1.0.2e, 1.0.2f) in last release

and memory controller usage 76% vs 73%

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1677369.msg17068170#msg17068170

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1677369.msg17064206#msg17064206

We will take a look into this...

NiceHash.com - Largest Crypto-Mining Marketplace
Kompik
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 430
Merit: 250


View Profile
December 12, 2016, 10:21:22 PM
 #574

Did you change the payment threshold from 0.01 to 0.1 BTC? I really dont to wait a week for a payout.
TR8888
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 528
Merit: 500


View Profile
December 12, 2016, 10:24:01 PM
 #575

Which drivers should I use for this miner for a 1070? I'm currently using 372.54 and it seems a little slow with 290 sols on stock 1070, W10
peonv
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 18
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 12, 2016, 10:30:35 PM
 #576

346 per 1070 with overclocked memory.
NiceHashSupport
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 588
Merit: 500



View Profile WWW
December 12, 2016, 10:33:22 PM
 #577

Which drivers should I use for this miner for a 1070? I'm currently using 372.54 and it seems a little slow with 290 sols on stock 1070, W10

Use -cd 0 0 or -ca -ca to get better speed.

NiceHash.com - Largest Crypto-Mining Marketplace
TR8888
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 528
Merit: 500


View Profile
December 12, 2016, 10:51:29 PM
 #578

Which drivers should I use for this miner for a 1070? I'm currently using 372.54 and it seems a little slow with 290 sols on stock 1070, W10

Use -cd 0 0 or -ca -ca to get better speed.

I tried both, -cd 0 0 is the best achieving 299 sols.

Which drivers are recommended? The most recent from nVidia website?
_javi_
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 965
Merit: 502



View Profile
December 12, 2016, 11:06:10 PM
 #579

i cant pass 300 sols either..

Gigabyte g1 1070 (6 pin, does it matter??), win 7 64, 4 gb... latest drivers.

dakky
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 43
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 12, 2016, 11:06:28 PM
 #580

with single 980Ti and (single) -ca  @ 340 sols/s

but Off Topic... why next payout time at @ 0.03 ?? something changed, not anymore at 0.01?
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [29] 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!