TR8888
|
|
December 13, 2016, 08:48:14 AM |
|
Nice dont pay at 0.01 btc ? today at 00:00 i have 0.012 and no pay .
2016-12-09
Change in payment (payouts) schedule for hashing power sellers/providers Dear hashing power sellers/providers,
Due to extremely increased Bitcoin Transaction fees we're once again forced to adjusting payments (payouts) schedule. We are striving to process payments to miners fast, multiple times per day and making sure that payments are confirmed as soon as possible - by including adequate amount of Bitcoin Transaction fee from our pockets to each payment (payouts).
Unfortunately Bitcoin Blockchain network is completely saturated lately and thus the Bitcoin Transaction fees became enormous. We are supporting and encouraging SegWit adoption and really we hope that it will soon be implemented and thus enable normal Bitcoin Transaction fees and higher transaction processing throughput. But until this is realized, we will change our payout schedule as follows:
Payments (payouts) will be issued four times a day if your unpaid balance is greater than 0.1 BTC. We will be processing payments for balances greater than 0.01 BTC once every week, usually each Saturday at 16:00 UTC. Payments for balances greater than 0.001 BTC will be processed once every four weeks.
The switch to the new payment (payouts) schedule for hashing power sellers/providers will take place on December 10th 2016 at 09:00 UTC.
We are also making a commitment that as soon as Bitcoin Blockchain transaction processing network will be extended by either implementing SegWit or a hard fork to a larger block size, we will switch back to previous payouts schedule, allowing more frequent payouts with lower payout thresholds.
Thank you for your using our service and keep on hashing!
Best regards, NiceHash team
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"With e-currency based on cryptographic proof, without the need to
trust a third party middleman, money can be secure and transactions
effortless." -- Satoshi
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
riser
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 59
Merit: 10
|
|
December 13, 2016, 09:28:39 AM |
|
Thanks! miner good!
|
|
|
|
coinut
|
|
December 13, 2016, 10:07:03 AM |
|
thanks for the update nicehash
|
|
|
|
m1n1ngP4d4w4n
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
CryptoLearner
|
|
December 13, 2016, 10:15:54 AM Last edit: December 13, 2016, 10:37:27 AM by m1n1ngP4d4w4n |
|
6x GTX 1070 EVGA FTW Moderate OC +140/+660 (1860mhz/4460mhz) - 50% TDP (~95w per card) Launched with 2x process, 3x cards each about 965 sols/s (~320sol/s per card) per process for a total of 1930 Sol/s (2 process help stability & maximization grinded about 40 more sol/s, accepted nicehash speed after 2 hours : Equihash 2397.62 Sol/s and 0% reject) so far very stable I must say, im impressed, very nice work
|
|
|
|
NiceHashSupport
|
|
December 13, 2016, 10:54:53 AM |
|
6x GTX 1070 EVGA FTW Moderate OC +140/+660 (1860mhz/4460mhz) - 50% TDP (~95w per card) Launched with 2x process, 3x cards each about 965 sols/s (~320sol/s per card) per process for a total of 1930 Sol/s (2 process help stability & maximization grinded about 40 more sol/s, accepted nicehash speed after 2 hours : Equihash 2397.62 Sol/s and 0% reject) so far very stable I must say, im impressed, very nice work No need to run multiple .exe anymore, just set multiple threads/instances per device. Same speed is achieved.
|
|
|
|
tbearhere
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3122
Merit: 1003
|
|
December 13, 2016, 11:02:43 AM Last edit: December 13, 2016, 11:19:04 AM by tbearhere |
|
Nicehash If I run eqm.exe -l usa -u wallet -t 6 -cd 0 1 2 -w HC = 225 s/s without read each card.
If I run eqm.exe -l usa -u wallet -t 0 -cd 0 1 2 -d 1 -w HC = 213 s/s with read each card.
If I run eqm.exe -l usa -u wallet -t 6 -cd 0 1 2 -d 1 -w HC = scrolling no hash.
Edit: With ver03a.
|
|
|
|
m1n1ngP4d4w4n
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
CryptoLearner
|
|
December 13, 2016, 11:05:19 AM |
|
6x GTX 1070 EVGA FTW Moderate OC +140/+660 (1860mhz/4460mhz) - 50% TDP (~95w per card) Launched with 2x process, 3x cards each about 965 sols/s (~320sol/s per card) per process for a total of 1930 Sol/s (2 process help stability & maximization grinded about 40 more sol/s, accepted nicehash speed after 2 hours : Equihash 2397.62 Sol/s and 0% reject) so far very stable I must say, im impressed, very nice work No need to run multiple .exe anymore, just set multiple threads/instances per device. Same speed is achieved. How do you do that, can you do it with the -ca switch ? or need to do -cd 0 0 1 1 2 2 and so on ?
|
|
|
|
tbearhere
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3122
Merit: 1003
|
|
December 13, 2016, 11:12:52 AM |
|
getting this all the time, Plus 25% rejects
[08:19:30][0x000009cc][warning] Assigning used nonce; duplicates will happen
Where do I reduce it to 256?
How do you launch it? I found the problem, When I set CPU threads to 0 it works fine and I get no rejects or assigning used nonce warning. I have a 5820k with 12 threads I'm trying to use, I've tried using 6,8,10 & all 12 threads but it still creates the same rejects.. I open it by double clicking start.bat.. :: your Bitcoin address and worker name SET BTCADDR=1HaLHSjTdCr3buSQWrGnYK7QSzPwaoyKYi SET WORKER=PC
:: number of CPU threads, 0 disables CPU mining SET CPU_THREADS=0
:: eu usa hk jp SET LOCATION=eu
eqm -t %CPU_THREADS% -l %LOCATION% -u %BTCADDR% -w %WORKER% -cd 0 0 If you use the -d 1 option try taking it out and then use the -t 6 for your cpu and your hashrate should increase. ver3a.
|
|
|
|
tbearhere
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3122
Merit: 1003
|
|
December 13, 2016, 11:42:25 AM |
|
ver3a. Nicehash If I run eqm.exe -l usa -u wallet -t 6 -cd 0 1 2 -w HC = 225 s/s without read each card. If I run eqm.exe -l usa -u wallet -t 0 -cd 0 1 2 -d 1 -w HC = 213 s/s with read each card. If I run eqm.exe -l usa -u wallet -t 6 -cd 0 1 2 -d 1 -w HC = scrolling no hash. Nicehash nice....... fix ver03b. eqm.exe -l usa -u wallet -t 6 -cd 0 1 2 -d 1 -w HC = 228 s/s total.... it displays each cards hashrate and each cores hashrate. Well done.
|
|
|
|
tbearhere
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3122
Merit: 1003
|
|
December 13, 2016, 12:19:22 PM |
|
340 s/s on 1070.
|
|
|
|
m1n1ngP4d4w4n
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
CryptoLearner
|
|
December 13, 2016, 12:20:19 PM |
|
I often see those messages device#2 | Solver interrupted what does they mean exactly ? is that a problem ? 340 s/s on 1070.
What brand,model, OC, real freq, tdp, how many cards in rig ? I'm interested
|
|
|
|
nicehash (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 885
Merit: 1006
NiceHash.com
|
|
December 13, 2016, 12:46:52 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
tbearhere
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3122
Merit: 1003
|
|
December 13, 2016, 01:18:04 PM |
|
I often see those messages device#2 | Solver interrupted what does they mean exactly ? is that a problem ? 340 s/s on 1070.
What brand,model, OC, real freq, tdp, how many cards in rig ? I'm interested EVGA GeForce GTX 1070 FTW GAMING ACX 3.0, 08G-P4-6276-KR, 8GB GDDR5, RGB LED, 10CM FAN, 10 Power Phases, Double BIOS, DX12 OSD Support (PXOC) 77% tdp core 2000 mhz mem +500 one.... but rig is 1x 750ti 2x 970gtx 1x 980ti 1x 1070 evga. I should try 55% tdp to see if price per hash per cost of electricity... it should be better at 55%.
|
|
|
|
marvykkio
|
|
December 13, 2016, 01:27:04 PM |
|
why not make free the miner to use it on other pools, the Chinese always want the whole real control?
|
|
|
|
Newton90
|
|
December 13, 2016, 01:42:28 PM |
|
what hashrate has 1060 with latest version?
|
|
|
|
m1n1ngP4d4w4n
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
CryptoLearner
|
|
December 13, 2016, 01:58:05 PM |
|
I often see those messages device#2 | Solver interrupted what does they mean exactly ? is that a problem ? 340 s/s on 1070.
What brand,model, OC, real freq, tdp, how many cards in rig ? I'm interested EVGA GeForce GTX 1070 FTW GAMING ACX 3.0, 08G-P4-6276-KR, 8GB GDDR5, RGB LED, 10CM FAN, 10 Power Phases, Double BIOS, DX12 OSD Support (PXOC) 77% tdp core 2000 mhz mem +500 one.... but rig is 1x 750ti 2x 970gtx 1x 980ti 1x 1070 evga. I should try 55% tdp to see if price per hash per cost of electricity... it should be better at 55%. Thanks for reply, nice amount of sol/s i should also try with a bit higher tdp to find the sweet spot between electricity cost and sol/s
|
|
|
|
tbearhere
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3122
Merit: 1003
|
|
December 13, 2016, 02:14:57 PM |
|
I often see those messages device#2 | Solver interrupted what does they mean exactly ? is that a problem ? 340 s/s on 1070.
What brand,model, OC, real freq, tdp, how many cards in rig ? I'm interested EVGA GeForce GTX 1070 FTW GAMING ACX 3.0, 08G-P4-6276-KR, 8GB GDDR5, RGB LED, 10CM FAN, 10 Power Phases, Double BIOS, DX12 OSD Support (PXOC) 77% tdp core 2000 mhz mem +500 one.... but rig is 1x 750ti 2x 970gtx 1x 980ti 1x 1070 evga. I should try 55% tdp to see if price per hash per cost of electricity... it should be better at 55%. Thanks for reply, nice amount of sol/s i should also try with a bit higher tdp to find the sweet spot between electricity cost and sol/s Yes I dropped my tdp to 55% because the going price at nicehash. If I up it to 75% the extra amount of sols = the cost of electricity so why wear the card out. If the price goes up to .0160 then I'll up the tdp to 75% to 100%.
|
|
|
|
m1n1ngP4d4w4n
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
CryptoLearner
|
|
December 13, 2016, 02:52:53 PM |
|
yup totally agree, more electricity, more wearing, more heat and so on, will try @ 55 like you to see how it goes, pretty happy @ 50 for the moment, it's possible also that 55 leave a bit more OC so it could balance out even better, will do some testing cheers
|
|
|
|
xxcsu
|
|
December 13, 2016, 03:46:15 PM |
|
gtx980 / 376.19 driver / win 10-64bit i got between 235-240 sol/s
how can i get rid of this error : "assigning used nonce duplicates will happen "
How many threads are you using? You used max of 256. Reduce number of them. There is no system around that would need more (even if you have dual 64 thread CPU and 6 gpus on it, 256 will be enough). Used 11 threads on intel i7-5960X , updated miner to version eqm_v1.0.3b_Win64 , problem resolved , no more " assigning used nonce duplicates will happen " error or reejected shares . Thank You for the quick fix
|
|
|
|
Squall10
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 47
Merit: 0
|
|
December 13, 2016, 04:31:11 PM |
|
It will be nice if we had a table with the diffrents cards, their hashrates, settings, drivers...
Here some data :
MSI GTX 1080 Armor OC Edition : TDP 56%, Core + 187, Memory + 550, Drivers 376.19 = 333 Sols/s Asus GTX 1070 Founder's Edition : TDP 65%, Core + 200, Memory + 650, Drivers 376.19 = 333 Sol/s
|
|
|
|
|