Bitcoin Forum
February 19, 2017, 11:42:54 AM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.13.2  [Torrent]. (New!)
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 [33] 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 »
  Print  
Author Topic: NiceHash EQM Zcash NVIDIA optimized miner [Maxwell/Pascal] + CPU mining v1.0.4c  (Read 126811 times)
tbearhere
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1078



View Profile
December 13, 2016, 02:14:57 PM
 #641

I often see those messages

device#2 | Solver interrupted

what does they mean exactly ? is that a problem ?

340 s/s on 1070.

What brand,model, OC, real freq, tdp, how many cards in rig ? I'm interested Wink
EVGA GeForce GTX 1070 FTW GAMING ACX 3.0, 08G-P4-6276-KR, 8GB GDDR5, RGB LED, 10CM FAN, 10 Power Phases, Double BIOS, DX12 OSD Support (PXOC)
77% tdp core 2000 mhz mem +500 one.... but rig is  1x 750ti  2x 970gtx 1x 980ti  1x 1070 evga.
I should try 55% tdp to see if price per hash per cost of electricity... it should be better at 55%.

Thanks for reply, nice amount of sol/s Smiley i should also try with a bit higher tdp to find the sweet spot between electricity cost and sol/s Smiley
Yes I dropped my tdp to 55% because the going price at nicehash. If I up it to 75% the extra amount of sols = the cost of electricity so why wear the card out.
If the price goes up to .0160 then I'll up the tdp to 75% to 100%.

It's all a question of balance.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
m1n1ngP4d4w4n
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 84

CryptoLearner


View Profile
December 13, 2016, 02:52:53 PM
 #642

yup totally agree, more electricity, more wearing, more heat and so on, will try @ 55 like you to see how it goes, pretty happy @ 50 for the moment, it's possible also  that 55 leave a bit more OC so it could balance out even better, will do some testing Smiley

cheers  Cheesy

BTC - 1B1RBYkzxiTmrbnFe2vj8EaNPSYftW8186 Smiley
xxcsu
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 292


View Profile WWW
December 13, 2016, 03:46:15 PM
 #643

gtx980 / 376.19 driver / win 10-64bit i got between 235-240 sol/s

how can i get rid of this error : "assigning used nonce duplicates will happen "

How many threads are you using? You used max of 256. Reduce number of them. There is no system around that would need more (even if you have dual 64 thread CPU and 6 gpus on it, 256 will be enough).


Used 11 threads on intel i7-5960X , updated miner to version eqm_v1.0.3b_Win64 , problem resolved , no more " assigning used nonce duplicates will happen " error or reejected shares .

Thank You for the quick fix

Squall10
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 30


View Profile
December 13, 2016, 04:31:11 PM
 #644

It will be nice if we had a table with the diffrents cards, their hashrates, settings, drivers...

 Here some data :

 MSI GTX 1080 Armor OC Edition : TDP 56%, Core + 187, Memory + 550, Drivers 376.19 = 333 Sols/s
 Asus GTX 1070 Founder's Edition : TDP 65%, Core + 200, Memory + 650, Drivers 376.19 = 333 Sol/s
_javi_
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 361



View Profile
December 13, 2016, 05:39:05 PM
 #645

Gigabyte GTX 1070 Gaming G1: TDP 55%, no OC, Drivers 376.19, = 300 sol/s
nikkiman87
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 7


View Profile
December 13, 2016, 06:27:02 PM
 #646

Gigabyte GTX 950 WindForce 2X: TDP 73%, Core + 50, Memory (Samsung) + 100, Drivers 369.30 = 111 Sols/s (two threads per GPU)
Gigabyte GTX 950 XTREME: TDP 69%, no OC, Drivers 369.30 = 118 Sols/s (two threads per GPU)
Subw
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 578


View Profile
December 13, 2016, 08:26:18 PM
 #647

miner need fixes for reconnects:

Code:
[23:18:25][0x00007f4faf3e1740][info] Accepted: 10.6 /m  Rejected: 0 /m
[23:18:26][0x00007f5d2d52a700][info] net | Share with id 151 accepted
[23:18:31][0x00007f4fa6b2e700][info] net | Share with id 135 accepted
[23:18:36][0x00007f5d35ddd740][info] =====> 387.92 I/s, 718.403 Sols/s
[23:18:36][0x00007f5d35ddd740][info] Accepted: 5.4 /m  Rejected: 0 /m
[23:18:39][0x00007f4fa6b2e700][info] net | Share with id 136 accepted
[23:18:40][0x00007f4faf3e1740][info] =====> 388.103 I/s, 722.917 Sols/s
[23:18:40][0x00007f4faf3e1740][info] Accepted: 10.6 /m  Rejected: 0 /m
[23:18:51][0x00007f5d35ddd740][info] =====> 387.94 I/s, 718.52 Sols/s
[23:18:51][0x00007f5d35ddd740][info] Accepted: 5.4 /m  Rejected: 0 /m
[23:18:55][0x00007f4faf3e1740][info] =====> 388.097 I/s, 722.37 Sols/s
[23:18:55][0x00007f4faf3e1740][info] Accepted: 10 /m  Rejected: 0 /m
[23:19:06][0x00007f5d35ddd740][info] =====> 387.95 I/s, 719.493 Sols/s
[23:19:06][0x00007f5d35ddd740][info] Accepted: 5 /m  Rejected: 0 /m
[23:19:10][0x00007f4faf3e1740][info] =====> 388.083 I/s, 722.41 Sols/s
[23:19:10][0x00007f4faf3e1740][info] Accepted: 9.2 /m  Rejected: 0 /m
[23:19:21][0x00007f5d35ddd740][info] =====> 387.947 I/s, 721.04 Sols/s
[23:19:21][0x00007f5d35ddd740][info] Accepted: 4.2 /m  Rejected: 0 /m
[23:19:25][0x00007f4faf3e1740][info] =====> 388.093 I/s, 721.897 Sols/s
[23:19:25][0x00007f4faf3e1740][info] Accepted: 8.4 /m  Rejected: 0 /m
[23:19:36][0x00007f5d35ddd740][info] =====> 387.937 I/s, 721.487 Sols/s
[23:19:36][0x00007f5d35ddd740][info] Accepted: 3.6 /m  Rejected: 0 /m
[23:19:41][0x00007f4faf3e1740][info] =====> 388.113 I/s, 722.02 Sols/s
[23:19:41][0x00007f4faf3e1740][info] Accepted: 7.6 /m  Rejected: 0 /m
[23:19:51][0x00007f5d35ddd740][info] =====> 387.95 I/s, 721.433 Sols/s
[23:19:51][0x00007f5d35ddd740][info] Accepted: 3.6 /m  Rejected: 0 /m
[23:19:56][0x00007f4faf3e1740][info] =====> 388.097 I/s, 721.807 Sols/s
[23:19:56][0x00007f4faf3e1740][info] Accepted: 7 /m  Rejected: 0 /m
[23:20:06][0x00007f5d35ddd740][info] =====> 387.963 I/s, 722.123 Sols/s
[23:20:06][0x00007f5d35ddd740][info] Accepted: 3 /m  Rejected: 0 /m
[23:20:11][0x00007f4faf3e1740][info] =====> 388.11 I/s, 721.523 Sols/s
[23:20:11][0x00007f4faf3e1740][info] Accepted: 6.8 /m  Rejected: 0 /m
[23:20:21][0x00007f5d35ddd740][info] =====> 387.95 I/s, 721.91 Sols/s
[23:20:21][0x00007f5d35ddd740][info] Accepted: 3 /m  Rejected: 0 /m
[23:20:26][0x00007f4faf3e1740][info] =====> 388.103 I/s, 720.64 Sols/s
[23:20:26][0x00007f4faf3e1740][info] Accepted: 5.8 /m  Rejected: 0 /m
[23:20:37][0x00007f5d35ddd740][info] =====> 387.983 I/s, 722.89 Sols/s
[23:20:37][0x00007f5d35ddd740][info] Accepted: 3 /m  Rejected: 0 /m
[23:20:41][0x00007f4faf3e1740][info] =====> 388.127 I/s, 720.013 Sols/s
[23:20:41][0x00007f4faf3e1740][info] Accepted: 5.6 /m  Rejected: 0 /m
[23:20:52][0x00007f5d35ddd740][info] =====> 387.99 I/s, 723.12 Sols/s
[23:20:52][0x00007f5d35ddd740][info] Accepted: 2.8 /m  Rejected: 0 /m
[23:20:56][0x00007f4faf3e1740][info] =====> 388.117 I/s, 719.307 Sols/s
[23:20:56][0x00007f4faf3e1740][info] Accepted: 5.4 /m  Rejected: 0 /m
[23:21:07][0x00007f5d35ddd740][info] =====> 388.02 I/s, 723.287 Sols/s
[23:21:07][0x00007f5d35ddd740][info] Accepted: 2.8 /m  Rejected: 0 /m
[23:21:11][0x00007f4faf3e1740][info] =====> 388.097 I/s, 719.72 Sols/s
[23:21:11][0x00007f4faf3e1740][info] Accepted: 5.2 /m  Rejected: 0 /m
[23:21:22][0x00007f5d35ddd740][info] =====> 388.027 I/s, 723.427 Sols/s
[23:21:22][0x00007f5d35ddd740][info] Accepted: 2.6 /m  Rejected: 0 /m
[23:21:26][0x00007f4faf3e1740][info] =====> 388.12 I/s, 719.83 Sols/s
[23:21:26][0x00007f4faf3e1740][info] Accepted: 4.2 /m  Rejected: 0 /m
[23:21:37][0x00007f5d35ddd740][info] =====> 388.057 I/s, 723.317 Sols/s

lucasan123
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 218



View Profile
December 13, 2016, 08:35:37 PM
 #648

355 sol on gtx 980 ti and processor i7 6700k with allocated pages unblocked. but with the error of the allocated pages was making more sols!!!  Shocked

_ZET_
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 73

Mining rigs manufacturer


View Profile
December 13, 2016, 09:05:23 PM
 #649

Great results.

What would say AMD Radeon?

Can't even imagine what will happen. Let's the fight begin!

Amph
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1428



View Profile
December 13, 2016, 09:47:04 PM
 #650

the autopayout time is increased? it was paying daily before, but now i need to wait one whole week for it? why?

Psynthax
Sr. Member
****
Online Online

Activity: 286



View Profile
December 13, 2016, 10:09:25 PM
 #651

They have changed it due to high fees in bitcoin..
EmBoLa
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4


View Profile
December 13, 2016, 10:45:46 PM
 #652

nm, delete this comment
mirny
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 665


Buying Pascalcoin Accounts, PM for offers.


View Profile WWW
December 14, 2016, 12:56:51 AM
 #653

@nicehash

0,1BTC payout is really too much, reduce it at least for 0,05BTC.

       ▄▄█▀▀▀█▄▄
    ▄█▀▀▄▄███▄▄▀▀█▄
  ▄█▀▄███████████▄▀█▄
 ▄█ ██████▀▀▄▄▄▄▀██ █▄
 █ █████▀▄███████ ██ █
█▀▄████████ ████▀▄██▄▀█
█▄▀███▄▀▀██ █▀▀▄████▀▄█
 █ ██████▄▄ ▄███████ █
 ▀█ ███████ ███████ █▀
  ▀█▄▀███████████▀▄█▀
    ▀█▄▄▀▀███▀▀▄▄█▀
       ▀▀█▄▄▄█▀▀






FERMAT



                        ▄▄▄
    ▄▀▄              ▄▀▀   ▀▀▄
    ▀▄ ▀▀▄▄         █     ▄   ▀▀█▀
      ▀▄▄  ▀▀▄▄     █         █▀
      ▀▄ ▀     ▀▀▄▄▀         █
       ▄▀▀▄                  █
        ▀▄▄                 █
  ▀█▄▄     ▀▄              █
    ▀▄▀▀▀▀▀▀         ▄    █
      ▀▄▄          ▄▀▀ ▄▄▀
         ▀▀▄▄     ▄▄▄▀▀
             ▀▀▀▀▀

      
   ▄▄ ▄▄▄▄    ▄▄▄
  █  █    ▀▀▀▀   █
   █▀           █
    █   ▀▀▀▀▀▀   █
     █            █
      █   ▀▀▀▀▀▀   █
       █            █
      █▄   ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀   █
     █  █           █
      ▀▀ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
    ▄▀▄            ▄▀▄
   █   █          █   █
  █     █ ▄▄▄▄▄▄ █     █
 ▄▀      ▀      ▀      ▀▄
 █                      █
█       ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄       █
█    ▄▀▀          ▀▀▄    █
█   ▄▀   ▄      ▄   ▀▄   █
 █  █   ███    ███   █  █
  █  █   ▀      ▀   █  █
   ▀▄ ▀▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀▀ ▄▀
     ▀▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀▀



       ▄▄█▀▀▀█▄▄
    ▄█▀▀▄▄███▄▄▀▀█▄
  ▄█▀▄███████████▄▀█▄
 ▄█ ██████▀▀▄▄▄▄▀██ █▄
 █ █████▀▄███████ ██ █
█▀▄████████ ████▀▄██▄▀█
█▄▀███▄▀▀██ █▀▀▄████▀▄█
 █ ██████▄▄ ▄███████ █
 ▀█ ███████ ███████ █▀
  ▀█▄▀███████████▀▄█▀
    ▀█▄▄▀▀███▀▀▄▄█▀
       ▀▀█▄▄▄█▀▀
Barlog
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 64


View Profile
December 14, 2016, 01:04:16 AM
 #654

@nicehash
0,1BTC payout is really too much, reduce it at least for 0,05BTC.
Are u blind?
We will be processing payments for balances greater than 0.01 BTC once every week, usually each Saturday at 16:00 UTC

NiceHashSupport
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504


View Profile
December 14, 2016, 11:34:26 AM
 #655

With some proper GTX 1070 adjustments (TDP limit, mem overclock), you can get 310 Sol/s @ 90 W (wall).

That makes this card very efficient for mining ZEC @ astonish 3.44 Sols / W.

EDIT: Reducing TDP on GTX 1050 Ti can make it use only 35 W (wall) and still doing 120 Sol/s. That makes it's efficiency about the same @ 3.4 Sols / W.
sp_
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 952

Ccminer developer


View Profile
December 14, 2016, 11:50:06 AM
 #656

Would you like to share your tdp and clock settings? and card model?

BTC: 1CTiNJyoUmbdMRACtteRWXhGqtSETYd6Vd
NiceHashSupport
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504


View Profile
December 14, 2016, 11:57:20 AM
 #657

Sure np, it is Inno3D GTX 1070 iChill X4, TDP at 50%, mem clock +600 (total of 4500).
tbearhere
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1078



View Profile
December 14, 2016, 12:14:05 PM
 #658

I get 320 s/s at about the same settings  1070 evga ftw.

It's all a question of balance.
Amph
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1428



View Profile
December 14, 2016, 12:31:30 PM
 #659

same setting, but i can't get that hash with that wattage, the maximum is 310 sol 100w, what is your core clock?

m1n1ngP4d4w4n
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 84

CryptoLearner


View Profile
December 14, 2016, 05:11:23 PM
 #660

same setting, but i can't get that hash with that wattage, the maximum is 310 sol 100w, what is your core clock?

6x GTX 1070 EVGA FTW - Drivers 376.19

Core +140 (real core ~1860Mhz)
vCore +20%
Mem +685 (real core ~4482Mhz)
TDP 50% (~91w per card)




~320 Sols/card - Total 1927 sols/s with 2 process of EQM (3 cards each) i know you can do 2 threads per cards now, but i found it to be less stable in my experiments (had some crashes, and get 3% less sols/s overall)

~695W @ wall - 1 sol/s per 0.36066W

Very efficient for now ;-), will play a bit more with OC/vCore over the week-end, this configuration being rock stable for 2 days, 0 rejected shares. Would like to see if some settings or code optimizations could max out the GPU's they're not fully maxed (about 96% load in nvidia-smi), i used the usual variables to max out cards, but it's not 100%.

Cheers.

BTC - 1B1RBYkzxiTmrbnFe2vj8EaNPSYftW8186 Smiley
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 [33] 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!