NiceHash EQM Zcash NVIDIA optimized miner [Maxwell/Pascal] + CPU mining v1.0.4c

[QuintLeo]

For me ZEC profitability (and ETH and the rest of the backet) has dropped enough on my 1070s that I'm starting to shift them back over to their INTENDED work.

 Not exactly unanticipated - I'm more supprised that ZEC has stayed as HIGH as it has as long as it has.


 [edit] and of course a couple days later ZEC pumps back up again (for a short while most likely) [/edit]

[1714221369]

1714221369

[1714221369]

1714221369

[Amph]

For me ZEC profitability (and ETH and the rest of the backet) has dropped enough on my 1070s that I'm starting to shift them back over to their INTENDED work.

 Not exactly unanticipated - I'm more supprised that ZEC has stayed as HIGH as it has as long as it has.

it was expected, anyone believing in a pump is folling himself, just look at the supply delivered each day, 10 coin per day at 2:30 block time is 5760 x 0.042 = 241 btc per day produced, and when the price was double of this it was almost 500 btc a day

this is too much supply that will be dumped, sellers pressure as a result will be too high for buyers

[t2yax]

people,may you give your tdp values of cards,i do know zcash algorithm is energy efficient,but this one is bit faster so i want to know.

[QuintLeo]

My various 1070s running +500 or +550 memory overclock and stock core clock are generally drawing about 140 watts each (per NVidia-SMI) on average.
Most of them pull around 330 sol/s but there are a couple as high as 345 and a couple down around 310 - seems to be system dependent, the slower cards are on low-end motherboards with ancient CPUs and low system RAM.

[reb0rn21]

EWBF Version 0.0.6b is out, its time for nicehash to step up  a bit

[Amph]

My various 1070s running +500 or +550 memory overclock and stock core clock are generally drawing about 140 watts each (per NVidia-SMI) on average.
Most of them pull around 330 sol/s but there are a couple as high as 345 and a couple down around 310 - seems to be system dependent, the slower cards are on low-end motherboards with ancient CPUs and low system RAM.

you can easily set 323 sol at 100watt, by just decrease the power limit at the minimum, which is far better than 350 at 140watt

[sp_]

I get this sometimes on my rigs

Restarting the miner helps

[xPwnK]

I get this sometimes on my rigs

Restarting the miner helps

http://i64.tinypic.com/5cf79v.jpg

I got that too but that was just because too high oc

[NiceHashSupport]

Do you believe you can push it even more? Maybe over 400 sols for the 1070?

Yep, latest version in development does more than 400 on overclocked 1070 with almost same power usage. But still trying some tricks before we do any release.

[reb0rn21]

Do you believe you can push it even more? Maybe over 400 sols for the 1070?

Yep, latest version in development does more than 400 on overclocked 1070 with almost same power usage. But still trying some tricks before we do any release.

GO GO GO !!!!!! 
kill the ATI abomination!

[NiceHashSupport]

Do you believe you can push it even more? Maybe over 400 sols for the 1070?

Yep, latest version in development does more than 400 on overclocked 1070 with almost same power usage. But still trying some tricks before we do any release.

GO GO GO !!!!!! 
kill the ATI abomination!

I think we did that with previous version already. 

[Amph]

Do you believe you can push it even more? Maybe over 400 sols for the 1070?

Yep, latest version in development does more than 400 on overclocked 1070 with almost same power usage. But still trying some tricks before we do any release.

GO GO GO !!!!!! 
kill the ATI abomination!

still waiting for other troll in the clymore thread that will claim amd is faster, at 400+ sol, even a 470 with its cheap price is pointless against a 1070 with double the speed and same wattage

[NiceHashSupport]

Here is what you will get soon (tomorrow?):

Stock GTX 1070 = 360 Sol/s @ 150 W
OC GTX 1070 (clock @ 2050, mem @ 4500) = 410 Sol/s @ 170 W
Efficient GTX 1070 (TDP 50%, mem @ 4500) = 330 Sol/s @ 95 W

[m1n1ngP4d4w4n]

Here is what you will get soon (tomorrow?):

Stock GTX 1070 = 360 Sol/s @ 150 W
OC GTX 1070 (clock @ 2050, mem @ 4500) = 410 Sol/s @ 170 W
Efficient GTX 1070 (TDP 50%, mem @ 4500) = 330 Sol/s @ 95 W

Nice

[Vcxz]

Here is what you will get soon (tomorrow?):

Stock GTX 1070 = 360 Sol/s @ 150 W
OC GTX 1070 (clock @ 2050, mem @ 4500) = 410 Sol/s @ 170 W
Efficient GTX 1070 (TDP 50%, mem @ 4500) = 330 Sol/s @ 95 W

Can you give some beta release before the price go down again ?

[Dr_Victor]

Here is what you will get soon (tomorrow?):

Stock GTX 1070 = 360 Sol/s @ 150 W
OC GTX 1070 (clock @ 2050, mem @ 4500) = 410 Sol/s @ 170 W
Efficient GTX 1070 (TDP 50%, mem @ 4500) = 330 Sol/s @ 95 W

Nice

Nice Hash

[bensam1231]

Do you believe you can push it even more? Maybe over 400 sols for the 1070?

Yep, latest version in development does more than 400 on overclocked 1070 with almost same power usage. But still trying some tricks before we do any release.

So like +15%? Slow and steady winning the race...

Would it be possible to increase hashrate if power usage wasn't a factor or is low power usage compared to other algos just part of equihash? Efficiency is always a thing, but some of us have lower power costs then others and I'd rather have a 1070 running at full TDP then be more efficient and produce less hash.

Perhaps a low power and high power mode for the miner?

[PovertyByte]

My 1070 won't exceed 73% power so I get 333 sols/s

[Amph]

Here is what you will get soon (tomorrow?):

Stock GTX 1070 = 360 Sol/s @ 150 W
OC GTX 1070 (clock @ 2050, mem @ 4500) = 410 Sol/s @ 170 W
Efficient GTX 1070 (TDP 50%, mem @ 4500) = 330 Sol/s @ 95 W

i think you can tweak it with the PL to have better consumptionm because 360 150watt is far worse than the currently 320 sol 100 watt

can you try reducing the power limit?

[Naxthor]

I cant wait!!!
is it done yet? is it there yet? 

when??