|
ol92
|
 |
November 25, 2016, 08:48:00 AM |
|
So far the best miner available. I am getting about 220 mh/s per each GTX 1070 (mining with 7GPU) + the processor. Unfortunately the profits calculated by the nicehash are about 15-25% lower than those on whatto mine. Maybe it has something to do with the conversion of Zcash to BTC automatically - i couldn't find the conversion rate anywhere, but I am not sure ATM.
Profit on calculators are frequently a little bit overestimated... Nicehash profits are linked to the demand/offer on their hashrate market I believe: which doesn't react as quick as the zcash rate on poloniex and is a little bit below (who will buy hashrate with higher price for estimated mining coins lower than direct buy in markets ?): with the recent increase in price, mining in zcash pool is more profitable for the moment, supposing there is no dump before you moved the coins to poloniex and sell your coins. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are several different types of Bitcoin clients. The most secure are full nodes like Bitcoin Core, but full nodes are more resource-heavy, and they must do a lengthy initial syncing process. As a result, lightweight clients with somewhat less security are commonly used.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
xPwnK
Newbie
 Offline
Activity: 41
Merit: 0
|
|
November 25, 2016, 09:56:20 AM |
|
So far the best miner available. I am getting about 220 mh/s per each GTX 1070 (mining with 7GPU) + the processor. Unfortunately the profits calculated by the nicehash are about 15-25% lower than those on whatto mine. Maybe it has something to do with the conversion of Zcash to BTC automatically - i couldn't find the conversion rate anywhere, but I am not sure ATM.
If you mine any coin at nicehash you get 20-30% less profit. |
|
|
|
|
ioglnx
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 574
Merit: 250
Fighting mob law and inquisition in this forum
|
|
November 25, 2016, 10:19:28 AM |
|
Something don't fit.
The miner says 1024sol/s the web interface says 624sol/s with your miner.
Also would it be possible to set the diff?
|
GTX 1080Ti rocks da house... seriously... this card is a beast³
Owning by now 18x GTX1080Ti :-D @serious love of efficiency
|
|
|
ioglnx
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 574
Merit: 250
Fighting mob law and inquisition in this forum
|
|
November 25, 2016, 10:30:26 AM |
|
Your miner I said..so EQM 1.0.2b :-D
It reported constanly above 1000sol/s while the site shows just 500-600sol/s..
|
GTX 1080Ti rocks da house... seriously... this card is a beast³
Owning by now 18x GTX1080Ti :-D @serious love of efficiency
|
|
|
alrami
Member
Offline
Activity: 92
Merit: 10
|
|
November 25, 2016, 11:11:39 AM |
|
Anyone mixing 970 + 1070's in 1 rig?
I'm mixing: rig 2x970 + 2x1070 = 660-670 Sol rig 4x970 = 635-661 Sol rig 1x960 + 1x980 = 213-234 Sol solo 960 = 59-61 Sol solo 970 = 143-144 Sol solo 980 = 159-166 Sol solo 1070 = 188-189 Sol all running under eqm_v1.0.2b_Win64 P.S. i'm not 100% sure, but looks eqm_v1.0.2a SolRate was better, even eqm_v1.0.2a falls at a poor connections |
|
|
|
|
clipto
Member
Offline
Activity: 311
Merit: 10
|
|
November 25, 2016, 11:25:56 AM |
|
Anyone mixing 970 + 1070's in 1 rig?
I'm mixing: ... thnx! |
|
|
|
|
|
NiceHashSupport
|
|
November 25, 2016, 11:36:51 AM |
|
Anyone mixing 970 + 1070's in 1 rig?
I'm mixing: rig 2x970 + 2x1070 = 660-670 Sol rig 4x970 = 635-661 Sol rig 1x960 + 1x980 = 213-234 Sol solo 960 = 59-61 Sol solo 970 = 143-144 Sol solo 980 = 159-166 Sol solo 1070 = 188-189 Sol all running under eqm_v1.0.2b_Win64 P.S. i'm not 100% sure, but looks eqm_v1.0.2a SolRate was better, even eqm_v1.0.2a falls at a poor connections You should be getting higher speed for 960 (probably around 90). That is way too low. eqm 1.0.2a used mode 2 for all cards. You can experiment with modes and see if that brings you higher speed. |
|
|
|
alrami
Member
Offline
Activity: 92
Merit: 10
|
|
November 25, 2016, 12:09:36 PM |
|
Anyone mixing 970 + 1070's in 1 rig?
I'm mixing: rig 2x970 + 2x1070 = 660-670 Sol rig 4x970 = 635-661 Sol rig 1x960 + 1x980 = 213-234 Sol solo 960 = 59-61 Sol solo 970 = 143-144 Sol solo 980 = 159-166 Sol solo 1070 = 188-189 Sol all running under eqm_v1.0.2b_Win64 P.S. i'm not 100% sure, but looks eqm_v1.0.2a SolRate was better, even eqm_v1.0.2a falls at a poor connections You should be getting higher speed for 960 (probably around 90). That is way too low. eqm 1.0.2a used mode 2 for all cards. You can experiment with modes and see if that brings you higher speed. thanks! eqm_v1.0.2b_Win64 sets M=2 eqm_v1.0.2a was M=1 so it can be a reason |
|
|
|
|
alrami
Member
Offline
Activity: 92
Merit: 10
|
|
November 25, 2016, 12:33:52 PM |
|
You should be getting higher speed for 960 (probably around 90). That is way too low. eqm 1.0.2a used mode 2 for all cards. You can experiment with modes and see if that brings you higher speed.
mode 1 and 2 gives almost same mode 3 decrease hash what drivers you advise to use? |
|
|
|
|
scryptr
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1793
Merit: 1028
|
|
November 25, 2016, 12:38:46 PM |
|
Anyone mixing 970 + 1070's in 1 rig?
I'm mixing: rig 2x970 + 2x1070 = 660-670 Sol rig 4x970 = 635-661 Sol rig 1x960 + 1x980 = 213-234 Sol solo 960 = 59-61 Sol solo 970 = 143-144 Sol solo 980 = 159-166 Sol solo 1070 = 188-189 Sol all running under eqm_v1.0.2b_Win64 P.S. i'm not 100% sure, but looks eqm_v1.0.2a SolRate was better, even eqm_v1.0.2a falls at a poor connections You should be getting higher speed for 960 (probably around 90). That is way too low. eqm 1.0.2a used mode 2 for all cards. You can experiment with modes and see if that brings you higher speed. GTX 750ti AND GTX 960 PERFORM AT ABOUT THE SAME HASH RATE-- The GTX 750ti cards have 5 CUDA cores, the GTX 960 cards have 8 CUDA cores. I have noticed that the GTX 960 does not perform much faster than the GTX 750ti on EquiHash. Certainly not at a ratio of 8 to 5 (8/5x faster). I am mining with EQM v1.0.2b. --scryptr |
|
|
|
tbearhere
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3122
Merit: 1003
|
|
November 25, 2016, 02:50:36 PM |
|
My 750ti 6 card rig hangs too.
Due to sudden high inflow of new miners, we had some issues. But should be resolved now and working fine. Ok Thank you. Is there anyway of putting in an intensity setting so I can use the card my monitor is hooked up to and mine with it? Thx |
|
|
|
|
|
NiceHashSupport
|
|
November 25, 2016, 02:57:35 PM |
|
Anyone mixing 970 + 1070's in 1 rig?
I'm mixing: rig 2x970 + 2x1070 = 660-670 Sol rig 4x970 = 635-661 Sol rig 1x960 + 1x980 = 213-234 Sol solo 960 = 59-61 Sol solo 970 = 143-144 Sol solo 980 = 159-166 Sol solo 1070 = 188-189 Sol all running under eqm_v1.0.2b_Win64 P.S. i'm not 100% sure, but looks eqm_v1.0.2a SolRate was better, even eqm_v1.0.2a falls at a poor connections You should be getting higher speed for 960 (probably around 90). That is way too low. eqm 1.0.2a used mode 2 for all cards. You can experiment with modes and see if that brings you higher speed. GTX 750ti AND GTX 960 PERFORM AT ABOUT THE SAME HASH RATE-- The GTX 750ti cards have 5 CUDA cores, the GTX 960 cards have 8 CUDA cores. I have noticed that the GTX 960 does not perform much faster than the GTX 750ti on EquiHash. Certainly not at a ratio of 8 to 5 (8/5x faster). I am mining with EQM v1.0.2b. --scryptr Yes, but GTX 960 also has 96KB of shared memory per SM (instead of 64KB). They do both have only 128 bit bus, which is a limiting factor. We will review settings when we get a hold of a GTX 960 and see what can be done regarding parameters. Does anyone have a GTX 950? How does that one perform? |
|
|
|
tbearhere
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3122
Merit: 1003
|
|
November 25, 2016, 03:03:26 PM |
|
Anyone mixing 970 + 1070's in 1 rig?
I'm mixing: ... thnx! I'm mixing a 750ti a 970 gtx and a 980ti.  |
|
|
|
|
tbearhere
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3122
Merit: 1003
|
|
November 25, 2016, 03:09:03 PM |
|
Anyone mixing 970 + 1070's in 1 rig?
I'm mixing: rig 2x970 + 2x1070 = 660-670 Sol rig 4x970 = 635-661 Sol rig 1x960 + 1x980 = 213-234 Sol solo 960 = 59-61 Sol solo 970 = 143-144 Sol solo 980 = 159-166 Sol solo 1070 = 188-189 Sol all running under eqm_v1.0.2b_Win64 P.S. i'm not 100% sure, but looks eqm_v1.0.2a SolRate was better, even eqm_v1.0.2a falls at a poor connections Mine doesn't display what cards are doing what hashrate. Only the total hashrate. But I'm still using v1.0.2a. |
|
|
|
|
tbearhere
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3122
Merit: 1003
|
|
November 25, 2016, 03:19:49 PM |
|
Anyone mixing 970 + 1070's in 1 rig?
I'm mixing: rig 2x970 + 2x1070 = 660-670 Sol rig 4x970 = 635-661 Sol rig 1x960 + 1x980 = 213-234 Sol solo 960 = 59-61 Sol solo 970 = 143-144 Sol solo 980 = 159-166 Sol solo 1070 = 188-189 Sol all running under eqm_v1.0.2b_Win64 P.S. i'm not 100% sure, but looks eqm_v1.0.2a SolRate was better, even eqm_v1.0.2a falls at a poor connections You should be getting higher speed for 960 (probably around 90). That is way too low. eqm 1.0.2a used mode 2 for all cards. You can experiment with modes and see if that brings you higher speed. GTX 750ti AND GTX 960 PERFORM AT ABOUT THE SAME HASH RATE-- The GTX 750ti cards have 5 CUDA cores, the GTX 960 cards have 8 CUDA cores. I have noticed that the GTX 960 does not perform much faster than the GTX 750ti on EquiHash. Certainly not at a ratio of 8 to 5 (8/5x faster). I am mining with EQM v1.0.2b. --scryptr Hi scryptr The 750ti has 640 CUDA cores. |
|
|
|
|
Amph
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3206
Merit: 1069
|
|
November 25, 2016, 03:49:58 PM |
|
Anyone mixing 970 + 1070's in 1 rig?
I'm mixing: rig 2x970 + 2x1070 = 660-670 Sol rig 4x970 = 635-661 Sol rig 1x960 + 1x980 = 213-234 Sol solo 960 = 59-61 Sol solo 970 = 143-144 Sol solo 980 = 159-166 Sol solo 1070 = 188-189 Sol all running under eqm_v1.0.2b_Win64 P.S. i'm not 100% sure, but looks eqm_v1.0.2a SolRate was better, even eqm_v1.0.2a falls at a poor connections Mine doesn't display what cards are doing what hashrate. Only the total hashrate. But I'm still using v1.0.2a. b version is the same it does not display single card just the total hash, i dunno if they fixed the crash and the other bug with it, but i see something strange when mining with this miner my gpu fan spin faster for a short time than return to normal, really annoying... |
|
|
|
|
|
NiceHashSupport
|
|
November 25, 2016, 04:03:30 PM |
|
You should not use ver a, it was only private alpha, never announced by us and is unstable, has memory leak and eventually crashes.
ver b has no issues, not a single crash report so far, it works superbly stable for everyone. There is no reason to use ver a.
|
|
|
|
reb0rn21
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1896
Merit: 1024
|
|
November 25, 2016, 04:43:17 PM |
|
Agree ver A had few issues as crash after disconnect and also random crashes, B no issue so for
I hope there is more room for optimization, AMD miners is quite competitive on Equihash, 280x 200sol/s and 390x 300sol/s, would be nice if 1070 can at least match 390x with heavy memory OC
|
|
|
|
|
NiceHashSupport
|
|
November 25, 2016, 05:00:00 PM |
|
Pascal cards I think still have better ratio performance/watt. GTX 1070 gives 200 Sol @ 130 W.
|
|
|
|
reb0rn21
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1896
Merit: 1024
|
|
November 25, 2016, 05:07:00 PM |
|
they sure do, if you undervolt(with OC and heavy TDP limit voltage drop per clock on same cards as gainward, gigabyte etc..) and run 2x exe file you can get 220sol with 115-120w per card
|
|
|
|
|
