bitcoin is on top as the most sound of the monies/assets
I hope you do not actually believe this.
Of course, I believe it in the context in which I wrote it and as a contemporary statement. If things change, then I will reconsider my thoughts about the topic.
The "bitcoin as an infectious disease model" is correct.
I don't know what that is supposed to mean. Bitcoin only has less than 1% of world adoption, so it could hardly be very "infectious", yet. In the future, perhaps?
Marcus saw it and immediately got upset because he knew it was legit.
Marcus seems to be a pretty smart member. i am sure that he continues to study and assess bitcoin rather than just coming to an early conclusion (without thought - as you seem to suggest) and sticking with it based on a wish, as you seem to suggest.
There's a certain percentage of the population who is susceptible to the scam, then others who are completely immune.
Fair enough.. So far, it seems that a lot of them have been getting sucked into alt coins.. but we are a long way from any significant portion of the world's population getting involved in any of this crypto stuff, whether we are referring to bitcoin or alt coins.
There will be no neverending 45 degree angle of adoption/growth because that's not how diseases work. Disease outbreaks come in and hit whoever they're going to hit fast and that's it.
Even if you characterize this matter as a negative, it seems that your recognition of a growth curve, here, seems to show that you should be prudent with your own investment(s) and take some kind of stake in some of this hype (whether it is well founded or not from your perspective).
Look at the comment section of many of these Youtube videos. The amount of people who don't like bitcoin and refuse to touch it because they know it's a trojan horse to a cashless society slave system is enormous.
Who gives a ratt's ass about the multitude of misinformation and stupid ass comments from paid shills and probably others who don't have a clue about what they are talking about?
They have no intention of giving up the human right of physical money, nor do they want all their transactions tracked and monitored like an Orwellian system on steroids, then have their account balance turned off by the state because transaction validators are designed to centralize and can easily blacklist you (just as Aaron Russo predicted).
Sounds like you are engaged in a lot of fantastical thinking, here.
'Acceptability' is one of the main components of money, and an enormous percentage of the population boycotts this garbage because they know the endgame of shitcoins is a huge negative to human freedom.
What the fuck you talking about? Of course, people invest into ideas or assets based on the present and future utility of them, yet so far, like I already mentioned (and you likely understand this too) there are NOT that many people involved in crypto or bitcoin, so these systems take a long time to develop. You are being stupid-ass myopic if you are attempting to capture some kind of current sentiment from some select misinformed group and then locking them into such stupid perspective for your own wishful propaganda purposes. You really seem to be mischaracterizing what motivates people on a more fundamental level and that may have to do with their information about some asset, such as bitcoin, and then figuring out the extent to which it might currently fit in their lives.. and if they currently conclude that bitcoin does not fit our work for them, they can still reconsider the matter 1yr, 3yrs, 5yrs, 10yrs or some other time frame down the road when there are more systems and more development and likely when bitcoin is a much higher price per unit, whether we are talking about bitcoins, satoshis, some other unit in between or perhaps at some point we may be going into sub-satoshis, even though that might be much more than 10 years from now... even though there is already some subsatoshi transactions occurring on the lightning network, from my understanding...
It's 100% guaranteed to be completely centralized and controlled by the state in the end
Nothing is 100% guaranteed, you numb nut, except perhaps death and taxes? hahahahahaha
- an exact replica of the Chinese social credit score system, ushering in a new age of unfathomable horror.
Make retarded and exaggerated comments, and who the fuck is going to pay attention to you?
You need to be just stark raving retarded to support craptocurrency over physical metals once you realize the inevitable endgame.
Don't be so stupid, and we have already gone over some of the possible unlikely Armageddon scenarios in which physical metals might possibly be practical for usage or even for storage of value. Get into the modern world, because it remains quite impractical also for storage costs and portability and divisibility and even the quick clarifications that can be made about authenticity or supply manipulation when it comes to PMs as compared with bitcoin. Get a grip with your dumbass nonsensical repetitions.
Poll
