poor uliepooie it is you who is stuck in 2009 with the idea of Bljatcoin dream. To enlighten ur old arse i learned way more about this than you
taps on your forehead : Wake up . It is 2023
I did not start in bitcoin until late 2013, and I did not even really have much of any clue about what it was prior to late 2013 (except that I had heard the name).
So I started learning about bitcoin in late 2013 (in November) at about the same time that I started to buy it.
Even if you suggest that I am still caught in 2013 or some other timeline around then, you are the one who seems to be out of touch, especially since bitcoin has come a long way since late 2013. Haven't you even noticed that? Those are the basics, no?
Bitcoin is out of the bag, and it has transformed (transitioned?) into something close to an unstoppable force..
Bitcoin is a paradigm-shifting invention (discovery) that cannot be uninvented (undiscovered), and so if you realize the significance and impact of such a thing that might fit in the category of paradigm-shifting, then you may well realize that bitcoin is such a protocol level kind of thing in which other things are built on top of it, and at the same time, bitcoin is the ONLY real native token that would be quite difficult to replace, since it is the leader in its space and any kind of replacement would likely need to be in the neighborhood of 10x greater (or perhaps more than that?) in order to replace/unseat it from its place.
There seems to be no asset class that is even close to as good as bitcoin, and if you know about one, then please point it out. Go ahead. I am waiting.
Maybe even if I tried to help you out, you could say something like gold or property.. or maybe you could name some specific equities (ownership in companies).. .. Of course, bitcoin has some gold-like properties (related to money and store of value), but bitcoin is likely at least 1,000x better than gold in a variety of ways that have to do with transportability but really where bitcoin outperforms gold is bitcoin's verifiability (every 10-minutes), and property has limitations in terms of physicality, fungibility, liquidity and transportability problems.. Equities are surely connected to the performance of various centralized entities (and people), so there is going to be a lot of variance with equities as an asset class.. or in terms of a kind of universal and generic kind of a class of an asset that bitcoin seems to be.
So go ahead..
Anything?
Anything?
.................................
Anyone?
Anyone?
Do you know what I'm talking 'bout Willis?
Apparently not.
Many of us likely realize that you are a bit of a dumb fuck (or at least you play one on TV), and seem to want to argue about something in order to describe bitcoin in some kind of a non-sensical and ill-informed kind of a way, that shows you to likely be disingenuine at best, since no one could be that dumb, right?