Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion

[Ibian]

Keep in mind the kids come first.  Everyone else comes second.

That means that making the kids suffer because the mother slept around is the wrong answer.

No. I come first. Then my kids - (...)

I seriously doubt you have kids. and if so, I feel really sorry for them.

I don't see how somebody who didn't put themselves and their own development (economical, emotional, intellectual, spiritual) first would raise children. Such a person would have nothing to offer to their offspring and just propagate problems through generations instead of making improvements.

And that's what most commonly happens.

Stefan Molyneux deals with shit like that. Not subbed to him, but he does have a good deal of insight into family issues.

Well holy fuck. That's sobering: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tjp55-0W2QE

Yeah, we are sliding steadily towards soviet conditions. The Great Leader (or in our case, leftist ideology) is all that matters, and anyone who says otherwise is an enemy of the state.

[1714063983]

1714063983

[600watt]

Keep in mind the kids come first.  Everyone else comes second.

That means that making the kids suffer because the mother slept around is the wrong answer.

No. I come first. Then my kids - (...)

I seriously doubt you have kids. and if so, I feel really sorry for them.

I have said many times that I do not have any yet. There is nothing to doubt. Try to pay attention. Twat.

i have said many times that you are a fascist/racist/social darwinist. there is nothing to doubt. try to become a human being.
kids? you? yeah, good luck with finding a woman that is attracted to your intellectual beauty.

[Elwar]

Keep in mind the kids come first.  Everyone else comes second.

That means that making the kids suffer because the mother slept around is the wrong answer.

No. I come first. Then my kids - (...)

I seriously doubt you have kids. and if so, I feel really sorry for them.

I don't see how somebody who didn't put themselves and their own development (economical, emotional, intellectual, spiritual) first would raise children. Such a person would have nothing to offer to their offspring and just propagate problems through generations instead of making improvements.

Nietsche touches on this in explaining people's drive for power. Firstly they seek to stay alive, that is their initial instinct that is the highest priority up until they are able to have kids. Then having kids becomes a very high priority. This along with the drive for your children to live on in successful lives (touching on the initial drive to stay alive after understanding that you will eventually die, you live on through your children). It does not mean one has to dominate the other, just that every species has these drives. Otherwise after one generation that species would no longer exist.

[Last of the V8s]

Oh of course. Shoes on the 'blockchain'. This might just save ETH.

@La__Cuen 1h1 hour ago https://twitter.com/La__Cuen/status/965328842813448192
These @DenverKidsInc hackers came up with a wicked cool #fashiontech idea for custom shoes with a blockchain record for authentic designs & ownership (think rent-the-runway). #ETHDenver

[Spaceman_Spiff_Original]

Keep in mind the kids come first.  Everyone else comes second.

That means that making the kids suffer because the mother slept around is the wrong answer.

No. I come first. Then my kids - (...)

I seriously doubt you have kids. and if so, I feel really sorry for them.

I don't see how somebody who didn't put themselves and their own development (economical, emotional, intellectual, spiritual) first would raise children. Such a person would have nothing to offer to their offspring and just propagate problems through generations instead of making improvements.

You appear to like thinking in absolutes.  Life doesn't work that way.  If your small kid is sick and crying in the night, will you offer up your hours of sleep for him/her? There are moments when there is a tradeoff between what is best for you personally, and what is best for them.

[Ibian]

Keep in mind the kids come first.  Everyone else comes second.

That means that making the kids suffer because the mother slept around is the wrong answer.

No. I come first. Then my kids - (...)

I seriously doubt you have kids. and if so, I feel really sorry for them.

I don't see how somebody who didn't put themselves and their own development (economical, emotional, intellectual, spiritual) first would raise children. Such a person would have nothing to offer to their offspring and just propagate problems through generations instead of making improvements.

You appear to like thinking in absolutes.  Life doesn't work that way.  If your small kid is sick and crying in the night, will you offer up your hours of sleep for him/her? There are moments when there is a tradeoff between what is best for you personally, and what is best for them.

You don't get it. What is best for me, what I mean by putting myself first, is that my kids have the best possible life I can give them. What you call sacrificing for others is my selfishness. And the stronger and smarter and richer I am, the more I can do for them.

[suchmoon]

The average alt-right is an angry, unemployed, single white male.  So a bit hard for them to have polyamorous relationships when they are incapable of having any relationship.

"More than one-quarter of the total homeless population nationwide lives in California, roughly 114,000. "

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/21/us/california-today-states-homeless-population-drives-national-increase.html

State with roughly 50% more Democrats than Republicans. So your comment doesn't seem to hold under scrutiny.

You planning on being homeless in Fargo or San Diego?  Choose one.  

I don't know what either of those places look like. And it has no bearing on the argument. You've made a remark, and I've demonstrated it to be false.

You haven't. How does California's homeless population "demonstrate" anything about alt-right or their relationships?

It's like saying that racist bile in this thread is making Bitcoin go up. It might be the case for all I know but I'd like to see the evidence.

[HairyMaclairy]

Keep in mind the kids come first.  Everyone else comes second.

That means that making the kids suffer because the mother slept around is the wrong answer.

No. I come first. Then my kids - (...)

I seriously doubt you have kids. and if so, I feel really sorry for them.

I don't see how somebody who didn't put themselves and their own development (economical, emotional, intellectual, spiritual) first would raise children. Such a person would have nothing to offer to their offspring and just propagate problems through generations instead of making improvements.

You appear to like thinking in absolutes.  Life doesn't work that way.  If your small kid is sick and crying in the night, will you offer up your hours of sleep for him/her? There are moments when there is a tradeoff between what is best for you personally, and what is best for them.

You don't get it. What is best for me, what I mean by putting myself first, is that my kids have the best possible life I can give them. What you call sacrificing for others is my selfishness. And the stronger and smarter and richer I am, the more I can do for them.

Like making your children homeless or putting them into state custody per the example of the court case earlier in the thread.  

[Ibian]

Keep in mind the kids come first.  Everyone else comes second.

That means that making the kids suffer because the mother slept around is the wrong answer.

No. I come first. Then my kids - (...)

I seriously doubt you have kids. and if so, I feel really sorry for them.

I don't see how somebody who didn't put themselves and their own development (economical, emotional, intellectual, spiritual) first would raise children. Such a person would have nothing to offer to their offspring and just propagate problems through generations instead of making improvements.

You appear to like thinking in absolutes.  Life doesn't work that way.  If your small kid is sick and crying in the night, will you offer up your hours of sleep for him/her? There are moments when there is a tradeoff between what is best for you personally, and what is best for them.

You don't get it. What is best for me, what I mean by putting myself first, is that my kids have the best possible life I can give them. What you call sacrificing for others is my selfishness. And the stronger and smarter and richer I am, the more I can do for them.

Like making them homeless or putting them into state custody per the example of the court case earlier in the thread.  

3 out of 4 of those kids were not his, and his wife is a lying whore. What are you trying to get at?

In fact, you can start by denying what I just said. After that we can proceed. (there won't be an after. this is the end of this exchange.)

[Elwar]

Oh of course. Shoes on the 'blockchain'. This might just save ETH.

@La__Cuen 1h1 hour ago https://twitter.com/La__Cuen/status/965328842813448192
These @DenverKidsInc hackers came up with a wicked cool #fashiontech idea for custom shoes with a blockchain record for authentic designs & ownership (think rent-the-runway). #ETHDenver

Strangely enough this is a 'thing' in the shoe market.

https://www.ted.com/talks/josh_luber_why_sneakers_are_a_great_investment

[BTCMILLIONAIRE]

The average alt-right is an angry, unemployed, single white male.  So a bit hard for them to have polyamorous relationships when they are incapable of having any relationship.

"More than one-quarter of the total homeless population nationwide lives in California, roughly 114,000. "

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/21/us/california-today-states-homeless-population-drives-national-increase.html

State with roughly 50% more Democrats than Republicans. So your comment doesn't seem to hold under scrutiny.

You planning on being homeless in Fargo or San Diego?  Choose one.  

I don't know what either of those places look like. And it has no bearing on the argument. You've made a remark, and I've demonstrated it to be false.

You haven't. How does California's homeless population "demonstrate" anything about alt-right or their relationships?

It's like saying that racist bile in this thread is making Bitcoin go up. It might be the case for all I know but I'd like to see the evidence.

He insisted that the average alt-right is "unemployed". Given that a quarter of all homeless people in the US are found in California, the most left state in the US, it's clear that I have.

Keep in mind the kids come first.  Everyone else comes second.

That means that making the kids suffer because the mother slept around is the wrong answer.

No. I come first. Then my kids - (...)

I seriously doubt you have kids. and if so, I feel really sorry for them.

I don't see how somebody who didn't put themselves and their own development (economical, emotional, intellectual, spiritual) first would raise children. Such a person would have nothing to offer to their offspring and just propagate problems through generations instead of making improvements.

You appear to like thinking in absolutes.  Life doesn't work that way.  If your small kid is sick and crying in the night, will you offer up your hours of sleep for him/her? There are moments when there is a tradeoff between what is best for you personally, and what is best for them.

You don't get it. What is best for me, what I mean by putting myself first, is that my kids have the best possible life I can give them. What you call sacrificing for others is my selfishness. And the stronger and smarter and richer I am, the more I can do for them.

Like making your children homeless or putting them into state custody per the example of the court case earlier in the thread.  

They were not his children. How many times are you going to attempt to make this false argument?

[BTCMILLIONAIRE]

Keep in mind the kids come first.  Everyone else comes second.

That means that making the kids suffer because the mother slept around is the wrong answer.

No. I come first. Then my kids - (...)

I seriously doubt you have kids. and if so, I feel really sorry for them.

I don't see how somebody who didn't put themselves and their own development (economical, emotional, intellectual, spiritual) first would raise children. Such a person would have nothing to offer to their offspring and just propagate problems through generations instead of making improvements.

You appear to like thinking in absolutes.  Life doesn't work that way.  If your small kid is sick and crying in the night, will you offer up your hours of sleep for him/her? There are moments when there is a tradeoff between what is best for you personally, and what is best for them.

I understand very well how life works. And making sure that I put myself in the best position that I possibly could from the above mentioned perspectives ensures that my children will be significantly better off than the children of somebody who chose to play along with their peers instead.

Do I have to argue out how being emotionally stable, intellectually honest, and financially independent are traits that would be beneficial for any child's parents to have?

[HairyMaclairy]

One of the four was his biological child.  The other three children he had raised as his own from birth.

To turn his back on those children for something that was not the fault of those children, means he is a piece of shit.  

[jojo69]

To turn his back on those children for something that was not the fault of those children, means he is a piece of shit.

one among many

[Ibian]

One of the four was his biological child.  The other three children he had raised as his own from birth.

To turn his back on those children for something that was not the fault of those children, means he is a piece of shit.  

Why do you not care about the men? Please, won't somebody think of the men!

[BTCMILLIONAIRE]

One of the four was his biological child.  The other three children he had raised as his own from birth.

To turn his back on those children for something that was not the fault of those children, means he is a piece of shit.

Yes. One out of four. That doesn't mean that he should be paying child support for four out of four but one out of four kids. And not wanting to pay child support for kids that aren't yours isn't the same as not being there for them if they want to visit either, especially when it's to be assumed that most of the child support goes to the filthy cheating whore and not to the children.

[HairyMaclairy]

One of the four was his biological child.  The other three children he had raised as his own from birth.

To turn his back on those children for something that was not the fault of those children, means he is a piece of shit.

Yes. One out of four. That doesn't mean that he should be paying child support for four out of four but one out of four kids. And not wanting to pay child support for kids that aren't yours isn't the same as not being there for them if they want to visit either, especially when it's to be assumed that most of the child support goes to the filthy cheating whore and not to the children.

Tough shit. Man up.  Pay the fucking support.

[Ibian]

One of the four was his biological child.  The other three children he had raised as his own from birth.

To turn his back on those children for something that was not the fault of those children, means he is a piece of shit.

Yes. One out of four. That doesn't mean that he should be paying child support for four out of four but one out of four kids. And not wanting to pay child support for kids that aren't yours isn't the same as not being there for them if they want to visit either, especially when it's to be assumed that most of the child support goes to the filthy cheating whore and not to the children.

Tough shit. Man up.  Pay the fucking support.

no u

Seriously, you pay for the fucking three kids that aren't yours. Be the change you want to see in the world.

[BTCMILLIONAIRE]

One of the four was his biological child.  The other three children he had raised as his own from birth.

To turn his back on those children for something that was not the fault of those children, means he is a piece of shit.

Yes. One out of four. That doesn't mean that he should be paying child support for four out of four but one out of four kids. And not wanting to pay child support for kids that aren't yours isn't the same as not being there for them if they want to visit either, especially when it's to be assumed that most of the child support goes to the filthy cheating whore and not to the children.

Tough shit. Man up.  Pay the fucking support.

I don't wish it upon you, but you would certainly deserve getting cheated by the person you love and being forced to pay for 3 kids that aren't yours while knowing that the cunt that cheated on you will be spending the majority of that money.

[jojo69]

I think some of these folks were kicked too much when they were puppies.

Now all they've got is snarl.