Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion

[pfrtlpfmpf]

My real name is Rosenberg Waterstein. Do your worst.

My birth name is Halal Al-Jihad and I'm still very surprised at the easy ride I get here.

If you say that on an airport, you´ll get arrested immediately  

Btw, i always read "Halal-Food" everywhere. That is food, without food, right ?

[Arriemoller]

Sweden doesn't care about your citizenship, anyone can own property, even people without citizenship. You would have to pay real estate tax, but that tax had a cap of 914 USD last year. And in many cases you pay less, it's adjusted for inflation yearly. And everybody speaks english.

It's also Sweden.

Also being overrun by muslim immigrants that are increasingly incompatible with civilized societies, but the Swedes are so cucked, they're bending over and taking it, while saying "Thank you. Can I have another ?"

I can't believe what's happening over there in Europe.

It's terrifying to me.

How's tax day coming along fellow Americans?

Much poorer Filed and paid online. Already had both the FY17 and Q1FY18 payments sucked out of my accounts by the IRS this morning.

Sadface.

One more year of "painful" tax returns with all the BTC selling I've done for retirement purposes this year, but have no concerns with meeting those obligations - especially with making a small estimated payment for Q1FY18.

Pay your estimated quarterly tax, folks. It saves you a lot of butthurt when you file at the end of the year.

You shouldn't believe everything you read Bob.

[marcus_of_augustus]

 My real name is Rosenberg Waterstein. Do your worst.

My birth name is Halal Al-Jihad and I'm still very surprised at the easy ride I get here.

My real name is satoshi nakamoto and I can't even get a free lunch. I'm not saying it's racism but it's racism.

[gentlemand]

My real name is satoshi nakamoto and I can't even get a free lunch. I'm not saying it's racism but it's racism.

Your work is done, grandad. Now push off and leave it to the cool kids.

[HairyMaclairy]

My real name is Rosenberg Waterstein. Do your worst.

My birth name is Halal Al-Jihad and I'm still very surprised at the easy ride I get here.

My real name is satoshi nakamoto and I can't even get a free lunch. I'm not saying it's racism but it's racism.

Craig.  You have had quite enough free lunches.

[slowlyslowly]

Racism is illegal? Despite our problems, I'm often glad I live in America, where at least we have truly free speech.

Whoa there, little buddy - I think you've overshot the mark.

agree with jbreher that you are way out of line.
 there is a very interesting "debate" going on in Australia at the moment where a famous sports player has said because of his religious beliefs he must speak out about homosexuals and how bad they are. Those with much saner minds have pushed back at what he has said including the top referee who is openly gay.  You cannot be racist or anything else just on the grounds that you can say things because you have the right to free speech. What you say should have consequences. There is a famous saying that Kennedy used and I am sure he was a very patriotic President and a supporter of free speech in America. " The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing."

[pfrtlpfmpf]

My real name is Rosenberg Waterstein. Do your worst.

My birth name is Halal Al-Jihad and I'm still very surprised at the easy ride I get here.

My real name is satoshi nakamoto and I can't even get a free lunch. I'm not saying it's racism but it's racism.

You sir, deserve a Merit.

[HairyMaclairy]

There a couple of possibilities here.  

We either have a minimum standard of behaviour (no genocide allowed) or we can fork the thread.  I don’t doubt our good moderator has the best of intentions but it is embarrassing to be associated with some of this stuff, even if only anonymously.  Ain’t nobody got time for Stormfront Word Salad. 

[B1tUnl0ck3r]

He just doesn't like free speech. Should stay on reddit.

[ ] Free Speech
[ ] Reddit

Pick one.

Clearly Voat is the solution.  

yeah, but what I find fun with markets is that it can stay irrational more than you solvable meaning that it's not because reddit is a hive of censorship that there can't be jems there .


this topic illustrate it : Reddit’s science forum banned climate deniers.

[...]
As a scientist myself, it became clear to me that the contrarians were not capable of providing the science to support their “skepticism” on climate change. The evidence simply does not exist to justify continued denial that climate change is caused by humans and will be bad. There is always legitimate debate around the cutting edge of research, something we see regularly. But with climate change, science that has been established, constantly tested, and reaffirmed for decades was routinely called into question.

Over and over, solid peer-reviewed science was insulted as corrupt, while blog posts from fossil-fuel-funded groups were cited as objective fact. Worst of all, they didn’t even get the irony of quoting oil-funded blogs that called university scientists biased.

The end result was a disservice to science and to rational exploration, not to mention the scholarly audience we are proud to have cultivated. When 97 percent of climate scientists agree that man is changing the climate, we would hope the comments would at least acknowledge if not reflect such widespread consensus. Since that was not the case, we needed more than just an ad hoc approach to correct the situation.

The answer was found in the form of proactive moderation. About a year ago, we moderators became increasingly stringent with deniers. When a potentially controversial submission was posted, a warning would be issued stating the rules for comments (most importantly that your comment isn’t a conspiracy theory) and advising that further violations of the rules could result in the commenter being banned from the forum.

http://grist.org/climate-energy/reddits-science-forum-banned-climate-deniers-why-dont-all-newspapers-do-the-same/



---------------------------------------------------------------------
In other scientific news CRYOSAT SATELLITE FINDS ARCTIC ICE INCREASED 50% IN VOLUME


Around 90 per cent of the increase is due to retention of older ice
This year’s multi-year ice is now around 30 cm thicker than last year
Experts claim increase does not indicate a reversal in long-term trends

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2524770/ESA-satellite-reveals-polar-ice-INCREASED-50-year.html

it wasn't even merited, from 2013

obama started the total censorship very early in his watch, as soon as DJT asked a simple question. I know where DJT was born and raised... more exactly, I learn from him when he speaks about it... but I don't need to proof any of that... I believe him .

obama started his total censorship campaign with a french satire... strange how it went hebdo later on...

someone wanted to spill the bean on the guidestonians?

There a couple of possibilities here.  

We either have a minimum standard of behaviour (no genocide allowed) or we can fork the thread.  I don’t doubt our good moderator has the best of intentions but it is embarrassing to be associated with some of this stuff, even if only anonymously.  Ain’t nobody got time for Stormfront Word Salad.  

why do you believe your opinion is worth writting? did someone do it for you? hehehe. loser.

[Arriemoller]

And if you complain about migrants on facebook or twitter, you go to jail. At least in germany and england, same pattern everywhere, just a matter of degrees.

Slight exaggeration. If true, the 51.9% of UK population who voted for Brexit primarily due to immigration concerns would be in jail.  You can complain about migrants, it's racism which is illegal and rightly so.

In other news....it's a sea of green in cryptoland  

The problem is the word 'racism' has been changing definitions at least colloquially.

Where it used to mean the belief that one race is superior to another, it now includes people making racial stereotypes.

Plus why on earth should racism be illegal?  A belief should not be illegal.  Acts should be.

OK, let's try and make this a little bit clearer. Racism is not illegal in Europe, saying racist stuff is not illegal in Europe, but spreading racist stuff to a wider audience is. So it's not the idea that's outlawed, it's the spreading of the idea. Is this wrong? Hell yes, all ideas must be allowed to be spread if you want to call yourself a democratic country.

[B1tUnl0ck3r]

And if you complain about migrants on facebook or twitter, you go to jail. At least in germany and england, same pattern everywhere, just a matter of degrees.

Slight exaggeration. If true, the 51.9% of UK population who voted for Brexit primarily due to immigration concerns would be in jail.  You can complain about migrants, it's racism which is illegal and rightly so.

In other news....it's a sea of green in cryptoland  

The problem is the word 'racism' has been changing definitions at least colloquially.

Where it used to mean the belief that one race is superior to another, it now includes people making racial stereotypes.

Plus why on earth should racism be illegal?  A belief should not be illegal.  Acts should be.

OK, let's try and make this a little bit clearer. Racism is not illegal in Europe, saying racist stuff is not illegal in Europe, but spreading racist stuff to a wider audience is. So it's not the idea that's outlawed, it's the spreading of the idea. Is this wrong? Hell yes, all ideas must be allowed to be spread if you want to call yourself a democratic country.

But the guidestonians disagree... how could they allow only 500'000'000 when CHINA is already 1'000'000'000 (sorry I forget a few hundred millions but didn't wanted to forget anyone, and it fluctuate so fast to be precise ).

[Rosewater Foundation]

Ain't it funny what you can get away with saying when you're a sassy fag tho.

[infofront]

Racism is illegal? Despite our problems, I'm often glad I live in America, where at least we have truly free speech.

Whoa there, little buddy - I think you've overshot the mark.

I have a tendency to do that. 

[HairyMaclairy]

And if you complain about migrants on facebook or twitter, you go to jail. At least in germany and england, same pattern everywhere, just a matter of degrees.

Slight exaggeration. If true, the 51.9% of UK population who voted for Brexit primarily due to immigration concerns would be in jail.  You can complain about migrants, it's racism which is illegal and rightly so.

In other news....it's a sea of green in cryptoland  

The problem is the word 'racism' has been changing definitions at least colloquially.

Where it used to mean the belief that one race is superior to another, it now includes people making racial stereotypes.

Plus why on earth should racism be illegal?  A belief should not be illegal.  Acts should be.

OK, let's try and make this a little bit clearer. Racism is not illegal in Europe, saying racist stuff is not illegal in Europe, but spreading racist stuff to a wider audience is. So it's not the idea that's outlawed, it's the spreading of the idea. Is this wrong? Hell yes, all ideas must be allowed to be spread if you want to call yourself a democratic country.

Arrie that’s just bullshit.  Off the top of my head, there are all sorts of limits on the free spread of ideas:

*employee confidentiality agreements

*official secrets acts

*intellectual property law

*export controls on dual use software

*prohibited pornographic material

*conspiracy to commit terrorist acts

*prohitions on making bomb threats

*prohibtions on making death threats to public officials

You cannot say that you don’t live in a democratic society just becaus you have one or more of the above limitations on free speech. Inciting racial hatred is just another category of speech subject to limitations.  

[realr0ach]

You can complain about migrants, it's racism which is illegal and rightly so.

Rightly what? Illegal opinions? That's the last stage of cucked.

It's a female.  Don't bother.  Women are large children that are not capable of logic and reason.  Through the course of human evolution, 99.9% of the time women are 100% incapable of surviving on their own.  They were never good at resource gathering or trying to compete against men as a group, while their brains also demand hypergamy - meaning they want someone else to provide for them anyway.  Due to these circumstances, it's FAR MORE detrimental for a woman to be ostricized from her tribe/group/whatever than for a man, who is far more self sufficient.  

This means the female brain is incapable of doing anything besides trying to adhere to whatever they perceive popular opinion is, because they don't want to be ostricized from the group at any cost since it's death for them and their desired way of life.  This moronic female in question perceives the (((media's))) constant spam of cultural Marxism as being the social norm, even though it's not, so that's what she's going to try and adhere to.  If she believed Nazism was the popular opinion of the day, then she would be a Nazi instead.  

Women don't have any type of ideals or anything like that.  They're just mindless hedonists that adapt to whatever they think gives the best benefits for them and their offspring.  The so called "women's empowerment" movement simply means empowering whatever propaganda is put out by the state and media because that's what women are going to adhere to, just like the bumper sticker "support our troops" really means "support your tyrannical govt" and has zero to do with troops.

[infofront]

Masterluc:

I adjusted 2nd trend line according to support/resistance levels.

I think price trace historical wave 4. Wave 5 top would be above $20k. Probably, even above $100k.

Price may start climbing 5th wave either right now or after doing another low - not less than $3300. Hitting lower zone would invalidate bullish long term count.

[explorer]

You can complain about migrants, it's racism which is illegal and rightly so.

Rightly what? Illegal opinions? That's the last stage of cucked.

It's a female.  Don't bother.  Women are large children that are not capable of logic and reason.  Through the course of human evolution, 99.9% of the time women are 100% incapable of surviving on their own.  They were never good at resource gathering or trying to compete against men as a group, while their brains also demand hypergamy - meaning they want someone else to provide for them anyway.  Due to these circumstances, it's FAR MORE detrimental for a woman to be ostricized from her tribe/group/whatever than for a man, who is far more self sufficient.  

This means the female brain is incapable of doing anything besides trying to adhere to whatever they perceive popular opinion is, because they don't want to be ostricized from the group at any cost since it's death for them and their desired way of life.  This moronic female in question perceives the (((media's))) constant spam of cultural Marxism as being the social norm, even though it's not, so that's what she's going to try and adhere to.  If she believed Nazism was the popular opinion of the day, then she would be a Nazi instead.  

Women don't have any type of ideals or anything like that.  They're just mindless hedonists that adapt to whatever they think gives the best benefits for them and their offspring.  The so called "women's empowerment" movement simply means empowering whatever propaganda is put out by the state and media because that's what women are going to adhere to, just like the bumper sticker "support our troops" really means "support your tyrannical govt" and has zero to do with troops.

What you describe are sheep.  Average People.  Not necessarily women.  You should talk to [be destroyed by] some of the women in my family/circle.  Not that I'd introduce you.

[realr0ach]

You can complain about migrants, it's racism which is illegal and rightly so.

Rightly what? Illegal opinions? That's the last stage of cucked.

It's a female.  Don't bother.  Women are large children that are not capable of logic and reason.  Through the course of human evolution, 99.9% of the time women are 100% incapable of surviving on their own.  They were never good at resource gathering or trying to compete against men as a group, while their brains also demand hypergamy - meaning they want someone else to provide for them anyway.  Due to these circumstances, it's FAR MORE detrimental for a woman to be ostricized from her tribe/group/whatever than for a man, who is far more self sufficient.  

This means the female brain is incapable of doing anything besides trying to adhere to whatever they perceive popular opinion is, because they don't want to be ostricized from the group at any cost since it's death for them and their desired way of life.  This moronic female in question perceives the (((media's))) constant spam of cultural Marxism as being the social norm, even though it's not, so that's what she's going to try and adhere to.  If she believed Nazism was the popular opinion of the day, then she would be a Nazi instead.  

Women don't have any type of ideals or anything like that.  They're just mindless hedonists that adapt to whatever they think gives the best benefits for them and their offspring.  The so called "women's empowerment" movement simply means empowering whatever propaganda is put out by the state and media because that's what women are going to adhere to, just like the bumper sticker "support our troops" really means "support your tyrannical govt" and has zero to do with troops.

What you describe are sheep.  Average People.  Not necessarily women.  You should talk to [be destroyed by] some of the women in my family/circle.  Not that I'd introduce you.

Bullshit.  Nature always overrides nurture, and women are defacto socialists by their biology.  If a woman claims to be a "traditional conservative woman", it simply means they want a man to worship them and provide for them.  As opposed to some new age freak, leftist woman that wants the govt to be their metaphorical husband and provider - an unwilling coalition of the aggregate of all men.  

Women can not be allowed to have any input in any type of decision making.  Since women value security over freedom, and demand hypergamy, how it works out in the end is them always trying to create some type of socialist dystopia solely to benefit themselves with zero regards to how it affects anything else.  The weak and unproductive trying to enslave the strong and productive in other words.  This is the real Atlas Shrugged, not Ayn Rand's bullshit writings.

Hypergamy means women are somewhat sociopathic in regards to the feelings of men.  They do not care about ideas such as impartiality, fairness, or the golden rule.  They only care about trying to set up the most hedonistic, lopsided, broken system to benefit themselves that would just collapse anyway.  It's not a coincidence things like republics were invented by >100 IQ white men.  Such systems are completely alien to women and incompatible with their desires, which is why if women were allowed to vote, they would instantly destroy them.

[infofront]

Ain't it funny what you can get away with saying when you're a sassy fag tho.

Being rich, gay, black, and mostly conservative has some absolutely fantastic privileges !  

You can screw guys in a lambo while eating watermelon and fried chicken.
Then feel guilty about it later. 

[Arriemoller]

And if you complain about migrants on facebook or twitter, you go to jail. At least in germany and england, same pattern everywhere, just a matter of degrees.

Slight exaggeration. If true, the 51.9% of UK population who voted for Brexit primarily due to immigration concerns would be in jail.  You can complain about migrants, it's racism which is illegal and rightly so.

In other news....it's a sea of green in cryptoland  

The problem is the word 'racism' has been changing definitions at least colloquially.

Where it used to mean the belief that one race is superior to another, it now includes people making racial stereotypes.

Plus why on earth should racism be illegal?  A belief should not be illegal.  Acts should be.

OK, let's try and make this a little bit clearer. Racism is not illegal in Europe, saying racist stuff is not illegal in Europe, but spreading racist stuff to a wider audience is. So it's not the idea that's outlawed, it's the spreading of the idea. Is this wrong? Hell yes, all ideas must be allowed to be spread if you want to call yourself a democratic country.

Arrie that’s just bullshit.  Off the top of my head, there are all sorts of limits on the free spread of ideas:

*employee confidentiality agreements

*official secrets acts

*intellectual property law

*export controls on dual use software

*prohibited pornographic material

*conspiracy to commit terrorist acts

*prohitions on making bomb threats

*prohibtions on making death threats to public officials

You cannot say that you don’t live in a democratic society just becaus you have one or more of the above limitations on free speech. Inciting racial hatred is just another category of speech subject to limitations.  

With the possible exception of pornography your examples are not examples of what is traditionally seen as infringements of free speech.

Furthermore, the law is very vague and is used to try to stop political opponents from airing their opinion.

Said by Justice Neil Gorsuch in Sessions v. Dimaya.
"Vague laws invite arbitrary power. Before the (American) Revolu­tion, the crime of treason in English law was so capa­ ciously construed that the mere expression of disfavored opinions could invite transportation or death."
The same applies to anti racism laws in Europe today. (Well, not death or transportation (yet))