Bitcoin increases blocksize and shows it was indeed needing to have larger blocks (which then are filled with nonsense and can push nodes off)
Larger blocks are inanimate. Regardless of size, blocks do not have the power to 'push (so-called) nodes off' of anything. Bitcoin does not owe you a position in its network. Either expend the resources required, or drop to the side in your inability to keep up. Decision is fully yours. Own it.
Cool so how about if someone spammed Bchsv (I think that's the shitcoin flavor you're favoring now)
Hmm. Don't know. I'm not aware of any coin that is routinely referred to as the moniker 'Bchsv'. I suppose you mean Bitcoin-SV? I must admit that my most-used abbreviation of 'SV" is non-standard as well, with the most common ticker being 'BSV'. Oh well, I'll just assume that's what you refer to.
and pumped out multiple spam attacks to the 128mb blocks for only 1 week. Now that would be an increase of 129gb. Let's say some bad actor like Roger came and kept at it (like he did to btc) and kept I up for let's say 2 months.
If, indeed, the mimers included all those txs. As those with the most non-liquid investment on the line, we trust the miners with enough rope to shoot themselves in the foot. They're not going to make blocks big enough to alienate the economic majority.
OTOH, it does kind of lay bare the lie promulgated by The Wizards Of Core
[tm], who pronounced that block size increases were impossible.
That's an extra 1.032 Terabyte, that's not too much to handle
'zackly
but i bet you'd have those on the bsv subreddits and forums complaining that they can't keep up, and being mad about spam.
Of course. Bitcoin Core does not have a monopoly on overly-entitled whiners.
Especially since that community is moreso mad broke kids who missed out on real btc and want a redo.
I think you are grievously mistaken. While anecdotal, the evidence I have seen suggest that there is a higher percentage of well-capitalized Bitcoin OGs in the big block corner than there is in the BTC camp.
TBH a bad actor could easily inflate bsv to 6.7 terabyte a year
Oh. Emm. Gee. exclamation_point. I'd have to pay ... umm ...
$160 in order to store all that. The horror.
Of course, it would again require the cooperation of at least half the mining hash power. Otherwise, less storage needed.
Poll
