dstm (OP)
|
|
September 08, 2017, 07:18:33 PM |
|
New Version 0.3.2
mp: improve stability con: support more pools con: more robust reconnection support for unreliable servers which often drop the connection ui: report GPU temperature
Windows version, Windows version, Windows version As fast as I can If you can't wait try one of the free linux distributions provided in this forum, like nvOC or UbuMiner. The community did a fantastic job to make the setup as comfortable as possible.
|
|
|
|
abudfv2008
|
|
September 08, 2017, 07:49:06 PM |
|
New Version 0.3.2
mp: improve stability con: support more pools con: more robust reconnection support for unreliable servers which often drop the connection ui: report GPU temperature
Windows version, Windows version, Windows version As fast as I can If you can't wait try one of the free linux distributions provided in this forum, like nvOC or UbuMiner. The community did a fantastic job to make the setup as comfortable as possible. No i'll wait. Rigs are working - no second to rest - mining 24/7/365
|
|
|
|
dstm (OP)
|
|
September 08, 2017, 07:51:58 PM |
|
New Version 0.3.2
mp: improve stability con: support more pools con: more robust reconnection support for unreliable servers which often drop the connection ui: report GPU temperature
Windows version, Windows version, Windows version As fast as I can If you can't wait try one of the free linux distributions provided in this forum, like nvOC or UbuMiner. The community did a fantastic job to make the setup as comfortable as possible. No i'll wait. Rigs are working - no second to rest - mining 24/7/365 You'll get support for more than 8GPUs out of the box
|
|
|
|
abudfv2008
|
|
September 08, 2017, 07:54:58 PM |
|
You'll get support for more than 8GPUs out of the box I don't have such rigs. 6*10x0 maximum. And in linux less options for profitswitching programs.
|
|
|
|
hatch789
|
|
September 08, 2017, 10:52:11 PM |
|
your new version 0.3.2 is working well for me right now. I'm testing it out in my build and no issues so far with zenmine.pro pool mining ZEN
|
|
|
|
dstm (OP)
|
|
September 11, 2017, 06:00:14 PM Last edit: September 11, 2017, 06:35:07 PM by dstm |
|
New Version 0.4.0temperature controller added cpu: reduce CPU usage con: improve pool support minor performance improvement --temp-target In °C - If set, enables temperature controller. The performance of each GPU will be continuously adjusted such that the temperature stays around this value. It is recommended to set your fan speed to 100% when using this setting.
|
|
|
|
Rabinovitch
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2030
Merit: 1076
A humble Siberian miner
|
|
September 11, 2017, 06:15:10 PM |
|
As fast as I can My 6x1070 rig is ready to test it.
|
|
|
|
dstm (OP)
|
|
September 11, 2017, 06:19:24 PM |
|
New Version 0.4.0temperature controller added cpu: reduce CPU usage con: improve pool support miner performance improvement --temp-target In °C - If set, enables temperature controller. The performance of each GPU will be continuously adjusted such that the temperature stays around this value. It is recommended to set your fan speed to 100% when using this setting.
Very cool, thank you. Can't wait to try the windows version. Any ETA on that? --ypsi I plan to start working on it next week.
|
|
|
|
Supercoiner111
|
|
September 11, 2017, 06:30:02 PM |
|
Cool alternative to ZWBF, always willing to give a new miner a go... I will do once I get home
|
|
|
|
killerelite
|
|
September 12, 2017, 04:57:38 PM |
|
Nice Progress in such sort time . It will be good to see a windows binary soon. Anyways I hope your miner can over come ewfb and sp private ccminer soon
|
|
|
|
farmtester1
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 54
Merit: 0
|
|
September 12, 2017, 08:53:07 PM |
|
I'm waiting for the windows version. I want to pay fee's for a dev who actually deserves for once.
|
|
|
|
QuaLiTyX
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 38
Merit: 0
|
|
September 12, 2017, 09:28:08 PM |
|
Following this thread and waiting for a windows version. I got nothing against linux, but i have windows installed on my rigs
|
|
|
|
chefbauer
|
|
September 13, 2017, 07:51:23 AM |
|
Im trying v4 again, if someone also want to log the output für taking automated actions: stdbuf -o 0 ./zm --server $ZPOOL --port $ZPORT --user $USER --temp-target 82 | tee -ia `hostname`.log
|
|
|
|
ShowMeCoins
Member
Offline
Activity: 129
Merit: 11
|
|
September 13, 2017, 08:30:46 AM |
|
GPU0 59°C Sol/s: 754.9 Avg: 725.8 I/s: 402.5 Sh/s: 0.193 +++ GPU1 65°C Sol/s: 766.5 Avg: 769.1 I/s: 411.4 Sh/s: 0.244 + GPU2 60°C Sol/s: 753.9 Avg: 758.0 I/s: 406.3 Sh/s: 0.207 +++++ GPU3 59°C Sol/s: 762.3 Avg: 765.4 I/s: 410.8 Sh/s: 0.204 GPU4 58°C Sol/s: 746.0 Avg: 757.6 I/s: 405.2 Sh/s: 0.200 ++++ GPU5 58°C Sol/s: 764.4 Avg: 766.7 I/s: 410.5 Sh/s: 0.159 ++++ ========== Sol/s: 4548.0 Avg: 4542.6 I/s: 2446.8 Sh/s: 0.159
Shouldn't the highlighted section be the SUM of all cards combined?
|
|
|
|
dstm (OP)
|
|
September 13, 2017, 10:19:48 AM |
|
GPU0 59°C Sol/s: 754.9 Avg: 725.8 I/s: 402.5 Sh/s: 0.193 +++ GPU1 65°C Sol/s: 766.5 Avg: 769.1 I/s: 411.4 Sh/s: 0.244 + GPU2 60°C Sol/s: 753.9 Avg: 758.0 I/s: 406.3 Sh/s: 0.207 +++++ GPU3 59°C Sol/s: 762.3 Avg: 765.4 I/s: 410.8 Sh/s: 0.204 GPU4 58°C Sol/s: 746.0 Avg: 757.6 I/s: 405.2 Sh/s: 0.200 ++++ GPU5 58°C Sol/s: 764.4 Avg: 766.7 I/s: 410.5 Sh/s: 0.159 ++++ ========== Sol/s: 4548.0 Avg: 4542.6 I/s: 2446.8 Sh/s: 0.159
Shouldn't the highlighted section be the SUM of all cards combined?
Right, thx
|
|
|
|
dstm (OP)
|
|
September 13, 2017, 11:37:40 AM |
|
New Version 0.4.1
improve performance
|
|
|
|
ShowMeCoins
Member
Offline
Activity: 129
Merit: 11
|
|
September 13, 2017, 11:48:52 AM |
|
GPU0 54°C Sol/s: 749.2 Avg: 755.2 I/s: 405.7 Sh/s: 0.190 + GPU1 59°C Sol/s: 783.0 Avg: 774.9 I/s: 414.1 Sh/s: 0.176 +++ GPU2 54°C Sol/s: 769.7 Avg: 770.2 I/s: 409.8 Sh/s: 0.133 + GPU3 53°C Sol/s: 777.9 Avg: 776.0 I/s: 414.3 Sh/s: 0.162 +++ GPU4 53°C Sol/s: 764.1 Avg: 762.5 I/s: 408.9 Sh/s: 0.186 GPU5 52°C Sol/s: 776.7 Avg: 772.7 I/s: 414.6 Sh/s: 0.181 ++ ========== Sol/s: 4620.7 Avg: 4611.6 I/s: 2467.5 Sh/s: 1.029 Just a tip. A 'renice' of -5 helps to stabalize the output (at least on my 2-core system)
|
|
|
|
dstm (OP)
|
|
September 13, 2017, 12:31:08 PM |
|
GPU0 54°C Sol/s: 749.2 Avg: 755.2 I/s: 405.7 Sh/s: 0.190 + GPU1 59°C Sol/s: 783.0 Avg: 774.9 I/s: 414.1 Sh/s: 0.176 +++ GPU2 54°C Sol/s: 769.7 Avg: 770.2 I/s: 409.8 Sh/s: 0.133 + GPU3 53°C Sol/s: 777.9 Avg: 776.0 I/s: 414.3 Sh/s: 0.162 +++ GPU4 53°C Sol/s: 764.1 Avg: 762.5 I/s: 408.9 Sh/s: 0.186 GPU5 52°C Sol/s: 776.7 Avg: 772.7 I/s: 414.6 Sh/s: 0.181 ++ ========== Sol/s: 4620.7 Avg: 4611.6 I/s: 2467.5 Sh/s: 1.029 Just a tip. A 'renice' of -5 helps to stabalize the output (at least on my 2-core system) That's how bug fixing should be Concerning the output: The miner uses an asynchronous design. Everything (each GPU, networking etc.) is independent and separated. This design should scale well even on large systems. So you're right, the scheduler affects the output.
|
|
|
|
qwep1
|
|
September 13, 2017, 02:12:24 PM |
|
what about win
|
|
|
|
chtat12
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 7
Merit: 0
|
|
September 13, 2017, 06:33:44 PM |
|
I think adding a power efficiency table would be a nice feature? Most ppl are used to EWBF style anyway.
|
|
|
|
|