goldart
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 20, 2018, 06:47:48 AM |
|
when pump?
teh flippening?
I'm sure - it will be at a Monday. ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) BTC is 10 times more expensive than BCH and I think the price isn't that important for pumpers. Bitcoin Cash will rise when the whole market rise.
|
|
|
|
hv_
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2520
Merit: 1055
Clean Code and Scale
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 20, 2018, 07:12:17 AM |
|
It's not really being used by anybody for anything
Are you shamelessly lying, or just willfully ignorant, nutildah? [<<blah blah blah>> (paraphrased)] I will just point out here that merely a single use of BCH for merely a single purpose makes your blanket statement perfectly and completely false. I suppose you can consider speculation a use if you must. You got me. But so long as this lying douchebag has a voice, your coin has a serious credibility issue: https://www.ccn.com/satoshis-vision-craig-wright-to-launch-bch-node-to-restore-original-bitcoin-protocol/If Wright cared about anything other than his own ego, he would simply step away from the limelight and go silent. Actually, BitCoin cash seeks to be p2p cash. Each day more merchants accept it for payments for goods and services. Not some hodl lambo beanie baby coin for hobby devs to play with. BitPy just added BitCoin cash to their platform for example. Low fees and secure. This here might be a good thing to get really CLEAN protocol code, long term stability and bold industrial style expectation management - good for any decent integration on top of that protocol -> easy adoption for any solution provider / user. https://www.ccn.com/satoshis-vision-craig-wright-to-launch-bch-node-to-restore-original-bitcoin-protocol/And BTW - it keeps up to the nearly 10y proven concept of secure on-chain TXs, and fully excludes any other toy games (SW, LN, ...) from such a proven protocol. Also in terms of regulation ( see actual proceedings at SEC, Fincen ,... ) it is good since Bitcoin Cash will be only investment asset on the market, that is compliant with the only existing selling prospect - the Satoshi white paper. - I'm sure that not really many can think that through yet. ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif)
|
Carpe diem - understand the White Paper and mine honest. Fix real world issues: Check out b-vote.com The simple way is the genius way - Satoshi's Rules: humana veris _
|
|
|
jbreher
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3038
Merit: 1660
lose: unfind ... loose: untight
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 20, 2018, 07:14:27 AM Last edit: August 20, 2018, 02:39:20 PM by jbreher |
|
It's not really being used by anybody for anything
Are you shamelessly lying, or just willfully ignorant, nutildah? [<<blah blah blah>> (paraphrased)] I will just point out here that merely a single use of BCH for merely a single purpose makes your blanket statement perfectly and completely false. I suppose you can consider speculation a use if you must. One among many. (...not much of a save there...) You got me.
No shit. If Wright...
If Lukejr... If Back... If Vays... Funny how you feel you need to trot out personalities - rather than discuss concrete aspects of the chains and the implementations built thereupon. edit:spelling
|
Anyone with a campaign ad in their signature -- for an organization with which they are not otherwise affiliated -- is automatically deducted credibility points.
I've been convicted of heresy. Convicted by a mere known extortionist. Read my Trust for details.
|
|
|
trankhiem16
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 17
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 20, 2018, 07:21:34 AM |
|
I am very confident
|
|
|
|
bitcoinPsycho
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2590
Merit: 2321
$120000 in 2024 Confirmed
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 20, 2018, 09:43:26 AM |
|
I am very confident
Good for you
|
$100,000 BTC in one hour
|
|
|
nutildah
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3094
Merit: 8338
Happy 10th Birthday to Dogeparty!
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 20, 2018, 09:57:09 AM Last edit: August 20, 2018, 10:24:37 AM by nutildah |
|
If Lukejr... If Back... If Vays...
Funny how you fell you need to trot out personalities - rather than discuss concrete aspects of the chains and the implementations built thereupon.
The difference is you have the two biggest douchebags in all of crypto doing everything they can to fud bitcoin and promote bcash, that's the difference. Wright is a douchebag. He could never even admit outright that his entire "I am Satoshi" bit was an utter hoax. He's a sociopath who won't stop until the world addresses him as "God." Ver is a douchebag. He uses his control of bitcoin.com to mislead people into buying bcash when they are trying to buy bitcoin. It took a lawsuit for him to stop his atrocious behavior. Bitcoin doesn't need to resort to such tactics because it is the superior product. But if you want to discuss "concrete aspects," let's discuss how the popularity of bcash is concretely waning while the popularity of bitcoin is concretely growing. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2F3b9AR3E.png&t=665&c=nJJAO3fCntkJHA) On January 1st, BTC had a 38% dominance of the total market cap while BCH had 7%. Today, BTC has grown to a 52% dominance while BCH has slipped to 4.4%. Now if BCH was seen as "better," "less speculation-based" or simply "more popular" than BTC, this percentage would be on the rise as it could be considered a relatively stable store of value. However, its % dominance has been on the decrease along with every other altcoin because BTC has proved it can scale to demand. The inherent utility over BTC that BCH proposes is no longer necessary because BTC has adapted and evolved to find ways to scale. Really Roger should have come up with a more original name than "Bitcoin Cash" if he wanted it to succeed. It's confusing to new users and a blatant ripoff / coat-tail ride to veterans.
|
|
|
|
hornetsnest
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 20, 2018, 10:05:46 AM |
|
|
████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
|
|
|
CityLife Corp.
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 20, 2018, 11:49:10 AM |
|
BTC price likely to drop 10 to 20 percent on August 1st when the chain splits. Make sure to have your private keys when this happens so you don't lose funds.
Totally Agree ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
|
sacombank
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 20, 2018, 12:00:54 PM |
|
BTC price likely to drop 10 to 20 percent on August 1st when the chain splits. Make sure to have your private keys when this happens so you don't lose funds.
Totally Agree ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) I think btc price will grow up on next month, September 2017 ,bitcoin price was 4000$ and now btc is 6000$ ,bch is keep going up.
|
|
|
|
b0yptn
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 8
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 20, 2018, 12:02:20 PM |
|
This token will be very valuable. I see the potential of it. If I could, I would need more time to invest in it.
|
|
|
|
sirsplashalot
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 20, 2018, 12:37:05 PM |
|
If Lukejr... If Back... If Vays...
Funny how you fell you need to trot out personalities - rather than discuss concrete aspects of the chains and the implementations built thereupon.
The difference is you have the two biggest douchebags in all of crypto doing everything they can to fud bitcoin and promote bcash, that's the difference. Wright is a douchebag. He could never even admit outright that his entire "I am Satoshi" bit was an utter hoax. He's a sociopath who won't stop until the world addresses him as "God." Ver is a douchebag. He uses his control of bitcoin.com to mislead people into buying bcash when they are trying to buy bitcoin. It took a lawsuit for him to stop his atrocious behavior. Bitcoin doesn't need to resort to such tactics because it is the superior product. But if you want to discuss "concrete aspects," let's discuss how the popularity of bcash is concretely waning while the popularity of bitcoin is concretely growing. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2F3b9AR3E.png&t=665&c=nJJAO3fCntkJHA) On January 1st, BTC had a 38% dominance of the total market cap while BCH had 7%. Today, BTC has grown to a 52% dominance while BCH has slipped to 4.4%. Now if BCH was seen as "better," "less speculation-based" or simply "more popular" than BTC, this percentage would be on the rise as it could be considered a relatively stable store of value. However, its % dominance has been on the decrease along with every other altcoin because BTC has proved it can scale to demand. The inherent utility over BTC that BCH proposes is no longer necessary because BTC has adapted and evolved to find ways to scale. Really Roger should have come up with a more original name than "Bitcoin Cash" if he wanted it to succeed. It's confusing to new users and a blatant ripoff / coat-tail ride to veterans. Speaking of douchebags .... How much money have you donated/funded to the Crypto space?
|
Worried about my trust rating? I am too. Bitcointalk users ‘Lauda’ and ‘gmaxwell’ have abused their superior powers in trust system to align their views with the ‘correct views.’ In no legal system in any jurisdiction do we have a definition for what Bitcoin is, they do not have the power to tell us what it is based on the rule of law.
|
|
|
hv_
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2520
Merit: 1055
Clean Code and Scale
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 20, 2018, 02:44:04 PM |
|
Not that I m bored these days, but I 'll happily watch that - would it come in with an UASF ? Since a miner vote might be totally irrelevant for that altcoin? What white paper will it follow btw?
|
Carpe diem - understand the White Paper and mine honest. Fix real world issues: Check out b-vote.com The simple way is the genius way - Satoshi's Rules: humana veris _
|
|
|
jbreher
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3038
Merit: 1660
lose: unfind ... loose: untight
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 20, 2018, 02:49:06 PM |
|
If Lukejr... If Back... If Vays...
Funny how you fell you need to trot out personalities - rather than discuss concrete aspects of the chains and the implementations built thereupon.
The difference is you have the two biggest douchebags in all of crypto ... Small minds discuss people. But if you want to discuss "concrete aspects," let's discuss how the popularity of bcash is concretely waning while the popularity of bitcoin is concretely growing. https://i.imgur.com/3b9AR3E.pngOn January 1st, BTC had a 38% dominance of the total market cap while BCH had 7%. Today, BTC has grown to a 52% dominance while BCH has slipped to 4.4%. Indeed it is. I find this disappointing. However, popularity is not a proper basis for determination of superiority. And popularity metrics can turn on a dime. I am confident this trend will turn. If your only concrete aspect you wish to discuss is popularity, I guess I'm done with this branch of this conversation. BTC has proved it can scale to demand.
It most certainly has not proven so. In the last test of BTC's scaling properties -- 4q17-Jan18 -- BTC failed miserably.
|
Anyone with a campaign ad in their signature -- for an organization with which they are not otherwise affiliated -- is automatically deducted credibility points.
I've been convicted of heresy. Convicted by a mere known extortionist. Read my Trust for details.
|
|
|
jbreher
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3038
Merit: 1660
lose: unfind ... loose: untight
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 20, 2018, 03:00:34 PM |
|
"I will be giving a talk at #ScalingBitcoin on how a block size increase up to 3600x the present size and a change of proof-of-work can be achieved with a fully backwards compatible soft-fork—old clients see all transactions and valid SHA256 block headers." Sounds interesting, but I don't see how this translates as a threat to BCH. Core has already shown an incredible irrational resistance to scaling on-chain. The ugly hack of adopting SegWit as a so-called 'soft fork' has proven to have been the mechanism by which new security vulnerabilities have been introduced to BTC - will this 'soft fork' be any different? Lastly, experience with other chains has already conclusively demonstrated the folly of jettisoning $Billions of USD worth of dedicated security appliances. While the capacity increase is attractive, this looks to be facing at least a trifecta of real implementation problems. I must admit that as far as technical details, I am quivering with antici... . . . . . . . . . . . ...pation.
|
Anyone with a campaign ad in their signature -- for an organization with which they are not otherwise affiliated -- is automatically deducted credibility points.
I've been convicted of heresy. Convicted by a mere known extortionist. Read my Trust for details.
|
|
|
hv_
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2520
Merit: 1055
Clean Code and Scale
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 20, 2018, 05:56:36 PM |
|
|
Carpe diem - understand the White Paper and mine honest. Fix real world issues: Check out b-vote.com The simple way is the genius way - Satoshi's Rules: humana veris _
|
|
|
hornetsnest
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 20, 2018, 06:42:25 PM |
|
Sounds interesting, but I don't see how this translates as a threat to BCH. 4MB * 3600 = 14.4GBCore has already shown an incredible irrational resistance to scaling on-chain. Conspiracy theorists were insisting it was blockstream being behind the stopping of scaling bitcoin onchain yet here we have someone well associated with blockstream proposing this.
|
████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
|
|
|
Vojdel
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 126
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 20, 2018, 06:46:59 PM |
|
Hi, in your document is very useful information about your site. I'm interested in what languages you can translate it and how soon?
|
|
|
|
narking
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 20, 2018, 07:21:45 PM |
|
Sounds interesting, but I don't see how this translates as a threat to BCH. 4MB * 3600 = 14.4GBCore has already shown an incredible irrational resistance to scaling on-chain. Conspiracy theorists were insisting it was blockstream being behind the stopping of scaling bitcoin onchain yet here we have someone well associated with blockstream proposing this.I think that in any project there are those who always negatively concern him. So those who will support it regardless of any news. The fact that this team is one of the best both financially and in terms of who is behind it is generally without any questions. On account of what the future of the project? Everything depends in many ways on the market and on how much it will be possible to increase the bandwidth of the network itself.
|
|
|
|
jbreher
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3038
Merit: 1660
lose: unfind ... loose: untight
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 20, 2018, 07:31:19 PM Last edit: August 20, 2018, 09:44:01 PM by jbreher |
|
Sounds interesting, but I don't see how this translates as a threat to BCH. 4MB * 3600 = 14.4GB Core has already shown an incredible irrational resistance to scaling on-chain. Conspiracy theorists were insisting it was blockstream being behind the stopping of scaling bitcoin onchain yet here we have someone well associated with blockstream proposing this. Your quoting is broken. No proposal as of yet. So far, all that we have is a tweet announcing the topic of a presentation to be given at an upcoming conference. Demonstrably, Blockstream employees and contractors indeed argued vociferously against a simple block size increase leading up to the grand schism. Are you attempting to deny this reality? If indeed Blockstream intends to create 14.4GB blocks, how ever will that run on a Raspberry Pi? What will it do to non-mining validator centralization? (not that that is an actual negative to the Bitcoin system, but Coreans have been insisting that it is). More interesting yet is what they may plan on doing with that block size. As it stands today, due to the Core client's crappy multithreading design, the client bogs down at about 100 tx/s on today's commodity hardware. Maybe they'll finally get around to fixing that.
|
Anyone with a campaign ad in their signature -- for an organization with which they are not otherwise affiliated -- is automatically deducted credibility points.
I've been convicted of heresy. Convicted by a mere known extortionist. Read my Trust for details.
|
|
|
Piston Honda
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2730
Merit: 1068
Juicin' crypto
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 20, 2018, 08:05:07 PM |
|
someone needs to shut Ver up and kill this turd coin
|
$ADK ~ watch & learn...
|
|
|
|