ewibit
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 2955
Merit: 1049
|
 |
October 01, 2013, 03:32:47 PM |
|
still not able to build un Linux (Ubuntu 13.04) make -f makefile.unix
make -C ../i2psam -f makefile.unix
make[1]: Betrete Verzeichnis '/home/xxx/git/anoncoin/i2psam'
make[1]: Für das Ziel »first« ist nichts zu tun.
make[1]: Verlasse Verzeichnis '/home/xxx/git/anoncoin/i2psam'
/bin/sh ../share/genbuild.sh obj/build.h
g++ -c -O2 -pthread -Wall -Wextra -Wformat -Wformat-security -Wno-unused-parameter -g -DBOOST_SPIRIT_THREADSAFE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -DUSE_IRC -I/home/xxx/git/anoncoin/src -I/home/xxx/git/anoncoin/src/obj -DUSE_NATIVE_I2P -I"../i2psam" -DUSE_UPNP=0 -DUSE_IPV6=1 -I/home/xxx/git/anoncoin/src/leveldb/include -I/home/xxx/git/anoncoin/src/leveldb/helpers -DHAVE_BUILD_INFO -fno-stack-protector -fstack-protector-all -Wstack-protector -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -MMD -MF obj/checkpoints.d -o obj/checkpoints.o checkpoints.cpp
In file included from /usr/include/boost/variant.hpp:17:0,
from script.h:12,
from main.h:11,
from checkpoints.cpp:10:
/usr/include/boost/boost/variant/variant.hpp:51:63: Schwerwiegender Fehler: boost/type_traits/is_nothrow_move_constructible.hpp: Datei oder Verzeichnis nicht gefunden
Kompilierung beendet.
make: *** [obj/checkpoints.o] Fehler 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
meeh (OP)
|
|
October 01, 2013, 04:20:08 PM
Last edit: October 01, 2013, 04:33:44 PM by meeh |
|
still not able to build un Linux (Ubuntu 13.04) make -f makefile.unix
make -C ../i2psam -f makefile.unix
make[1]: Betrete Verzeichnis '/home/xxx/git/anoncoin/i2psam'
make[1]: Für das Ziel »first« ist nichts zu tun.
make[1]: Verlasse Verzeichnis '/home/xxx/git/anoncoin/i2psam'
/bin/sh ../share/genbuild.sh obj/build.h
g++ -c -O2 -pthread -Wall -Wextra -Wformat -Wformat-security -Wno-unused-parameter -g -DBOOST_SPIRIT_THREADSAFE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -DUSE_IRC -I/home/xxx/git/anoncoin/src -I/home/xxx/git/anoncoin/src/obj -DUSE_NATIVE_I2P -I"../i2psam" -DUSE_UPNP=0 -DUSE_IPV6=1 -I/home/xxx/git/anoncoin/src/leveldb/include -I/home/xxx/git/anoncoin/src/leveldb/helpers -DHAVE_BUILD_INFO -fno-stack-protector -fstack-protector-all -Wstack-protector -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -MMD -MF obj/checkpoints.d -o obj/checkpoints.o checkpoints.cpp
In file included from /usr/include/boost/variant.hpp:17:0,
from script.h:12,
from main.h:11,
from checkpoints.cpp:10:
/usr/include/boost/boost/variant/variant.hpp:51:63: Schwerwiegender Fehler: boost/type_traits/is_nothrow_move_constructible.hpp: Datei oder Verzeichnis nicht gefunden
Kompilierung beendet.
make: *** [obj/checkpoints.o] Fehler 1
Could you check if you could build Litecoin, Bitcoin or any other coin? Because this does not seems like a Anoncoin problem, more like a boost development installation problem. I guessing you will get the same error there as well. |
|
|
|
|
meeh (OP)
|
|
October 01, 2013, 04:21:29 PM |
|
Nice! I'll update the blog! |
|
|
|
ewibit
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2955
Merit: 1049
|
|
October 01, 2013, 04:48:48 PM |
|
Could you check if you could build Litecoin, Bitcoin or any other coin? Because this does not seems like a Anoncoin problem, more like a boost development installation problem. I guessing you will get the same error there as well.
Litecoin, Bitcoin and PPC I have build before upgrading from Ubuntu 12.04 LTS to 13.04... |
|
|
|
|
|
meeh (OP)
|
|
October 01, 2013, 06:23:32 PM |
|
Could you check if you could build Litecoin, Bitcoin or any other coin? Because this does not seems like a Anoncoin problem, more like a boost development installation problem. I guessing you will get the same error there as well.
Litecoin, Bitcoin and PPC I have build before upgrading from Ubuntu 12.04 LTS to 13.04... Well, build them again just for testing, so you'll see that this is a boost problem. It has nothing to do with the Anoncoin client. This could be multiple installs of boost, or just fuckup after upgrade. I suggest you try uninstall all your boost libraries with: apt-get --purge remove and then install one version at a time, to find out which works for you. I use boost 1.49.0 from the standard dpkg system on Ubuntu 13.04 as well, and it works fine here. |
|
|
|
branefreez
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 33
Merit: 0
|
|
October 01, 2013, 07:57:19 PM |
|
I had to change the mydestination= in my config for some reason. It would not use it and would use a dynamic address. So heres the new b32 one: viptekiiwmx4ibszmtkev5loexw2qonojgdtb7qdcct3mgeiowmq.b32.i2p if you want the long one, PM me and I'll send it your way.  Also, here's my review on CoinCloud.no: I love it. It is simplistic and Aesthetically pleasing to my eyes. I know it is in Alpha-Testing so I am not being too strict; I'm being strict enough. I am able to quickly and easily upload files that I choose. There is a Calendar, and other things that you can fill in [I'm not sure right now because I'm unable to log in atm]. All of all, it's a pretty neat service for ANC. Keep up the good work! |
|
|
|
|
|
meeh (OP)
|
|
October 07, 2013, 08:21:03 AM |
|
A mandatory upgrade is on it's way. The difficulty adjustment that is in place now didn't go so good that we expected.Blog update: https://anoncoin.net/blog/?p=24Pull request (Protocol 3. Total rewrite): https://github.com/Anoncoin/anoncoin/pull/16I'll get back to you shortly with more information! If you'd like to contribute/say what you mean to the adjustments, with helping out finding the right percentage etc. Please visit https://github.com/Anoncoin/anoncoin/pull/16or you can just comment in our blog post about the pull request! https://anoncoin.net/blog/?p=26 (Note; comments need manual approval at the moment, and can be slowly approved. But you comment still helps!) Note: You don't need C++ skills here. This is adjustment and math.
|
|
|
|
|
kriwest
|
|
October 07, 2013, 11:04:54 AM |
|
Is it a multi pool problem or some other kind of exploitation?
If multi pool.. have you had a look at Megacoin's solution? (based on J-coins SSDRA Retarget system, but I think Kimoto changed something.. not sure)
It seems to be working very well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
meeh (OP)
|
|
October 07, 2013, 11:11:05 AM |
|
Is it a multi pool problem or some other kind of exploitation?
If multi pool.. have you had a look at Megacoin's solution? (based on J-coins SSDRA Retarget system, but I think Kimoto changed something.. not sure)
It seems to be working very well.
Haven't read the source code to Megacoin, nor have I looked much. But thanks for the tip, I will bring it up with the rest of the team |
|
|
|
|
meeh (OP)
|
|
October 07, 2013, 06:21:44 PM |
|
Is it a multi pool problem or some other kind of exploitation?
If multi pool.. have you had a look at Megacoin's solution? (based on J-coins SSDRA Retarget system, but I think Kimoto changed something.. not sure)
It seems to be working very well.
Haven't read the source code to Megacoin, nor have I looked much. But thanks for the tip, I will bring it up with the rest of the team We have tested it for some hours now, so far, awsome! This might be the change. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
BroTroxer
|
|
October 07, 2013, 10:10:24 PM |
|
This patch is the most likely to make it into production as it shows huge benefits in countering exploitation by the big pools, and stabilizing transactions. We are very happy with the way this patch behaves. Testing using variable hashrates shows the difficulty adjusts according to plan. This will effectively take away the unfair advantage of huge miners like middlecoin pool by invalidating/rejecting blocks when the hashrate increases drastically. Only the blocks that fit the target will be approved, which will prevent instamining when the diff is low. As a result the amount of blocks are more likely to be distributed evenly between potential "attackers" and the regular pools, as well as provide stable transactions. The target time will be changed to 3 minutes, increasing the blocks per 24 hours from 420 to 480. If anyone has any input (good or bad) regarding the implementation of this patch, we would like to hear from you ASAP. |
|
|
|
|
|
kriwest
|
|
October 07, 2013, 10:16:36 PM |
|
I'm just very happy to hear that the implementation was a success. It helped MEC a lot and I think it will do the same for ANC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
meeh (OP)
|
|
October 08, 2013, 12:22:30 AM |
|
Is it a multi pool problem or some other kind of exploitation?
If multi pool.. have you had a look at Megacoin's solution? (based on J-coins SSDRA Retarget system, but I think Kimoto changed something.. not sure)
It seems to be working very well.
You deserve a donation for the tip. ANC address? |
|
|
|
|
nicksmith
|
|
October 08, 2013, 12:47:36 AM |
|
This is great news!
|
|
|
|
|
meeh (OP)
|
|
October 08, 2013, 10:22:31 AM |
|
Protocol switch!!https://github.com/Anoncoin/anoncoin/pull/17 is accepted. Based on Kimoto's change to the J-coins SSDRA Retarget system. The protcol will also switch to 3 minutes block. This happens 10k blocks after last switch. Block 87777. From now that's 1957 blocks in the future. I will build new builds within the day, and announce it as many places as I can. For those of you that have compiled yourself, redownload and recompile now!!
|
|
|
|
|
kriwest
|
|
October 08, 2013, 11:21:53 AM |
|
You deserve a donation for the tip. ANC address? I'm just glad to help, but thanks. My address: Aey1ArgQgWEVYhL94TMNvoERya8zNpMEQN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
klee
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1000
|
|
October 08, 2013, 11:47:49 PM |
|
Great idea - and BMR too! |
|
|
|
|
|
nicksmith
|
|
October 08, 2013, 11:58:20 PM |
|
Protocol switch!!https://github.com/Anoncoin/anoncoin/pull/17 is accepted. Based on Kimoto's change to the J-coins SSDRA Retarget system. The protcol will also switch to 3 minutes block. This happens 10k blocks after last switch. Block 87777. From now that's 1957 blocks in the future. I will build new builds within the day, and announce it as many places as I can. For those of you that have compiled yourself, redownload and recompile now!! I was able to compile this version, but it crashes out after a bunch of orphan block messages, does something need to be done other than compile? |
|
|
|
|
