Bitcoin Forum
December 15, 2018, 05:51:25 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.17.0 [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 [40] 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 ... 182 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Vanitygen: Vanity bitcoin address generator/miner [v0.22]  (Read 1114564 times)
samr7
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 140
Merit: 138

Firstbits: 1samr7


View Profile
October 24, 2012, 08:11:15 AM
 #781

I finally had a chance to look at the source and apparently the units of the "value" shown are simply BTC/Mkey, but multiplied by 3600, or in code:

Code:
wip->value = (reward * 1000000.0 * 3600.0) / difficulty;

This is not BTC/MKeyHr, this is a meaningless number. More correctly, you could say the units are BTC*s/Mkey*hr. I suggest removing the 3600 and just displaying the value as BTC/Mkey. If the number is too small (too many decimals to be easily readable), change it to BTC/Gkey, since most people are calculating at least a Gkey every minute. If you would like to go one step further, you can show BTC/hr as:

Code:
3600 * rate * reward / difficulty

Where rate is the calculated Mkey/s for your hardware (so vg_output_timing() will have to been called already).

Hi fizzisist,

You're right, it's an entirely arbitrary and not 100% correctly labelled unit.  I just wanted it to display some semi-comparable notion of value.  The idea was to create something along the lines of kilowatt-hours, whereas the proper unit would be megajoules, but the power company doesn't publish their electricity rates per megajoule.

Anyway, I'll take your patch on GitHub to convert the display unit to GKeys.  Thanks!
1544853085
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1544853085

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1544853085
Reply with quote  #2

1544853085
Report to moderator
1544853085
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1544853085

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1544853085
Reply with quote  #2

1544853085
Report to moderator
PLAY NOW
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
zvs
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1610
Merit: 1000


House Nogleg


View Profile WWW
October 24, 2012, 10:21:40 AM
 #782

Please help me understand this:

Just started experimenting with samr7/oclvanityminer and have dedicated a 5850 to the task. According to the calculator, I'll earn a little over .11BTC per day with this card doing normal (non-vanity) mining.

It's currently hashing around 20.20 Mkey/s and working on this problem:

"1vanity" Reward: 0.079600 Value: 0.000323 BTC/MkeyHr.

So that's 0.000323 * 20.20 * 24 = 0.1565904 BTC, right? So I should be earning more than I would if I mined straight? But then they take 20 percent out first or does that figure already have the 20 percent taken out?

It also says 50% in 8.0h, I take that to mean there's a 50 percent chance it will find the solution in 8 hours. So approximately 100% (statistically) in 16 hours, that means the reward (0.796) for 16 hours average work?  So 24/16 * 0.0796 BTC = 0.1194 BTC which is not close to 0.1565904 BTC. Where is my math failing?

Does my Mkey/s look reasonable for that card?

i get >20 on a 5830 running at 980/1025 1280x1024

bitcoindaddy
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 479
Merit: 500


View Profile
October 24, 2012, 12:58:25 PM
 #783

i get >20 on a 5830 running at 980/1025 1280x1024

I find it strange that I get 25 Mkey/s on Windows 7, but only 20 Mkey/s on linux. I tried upgrading to the bleeding edge xorg PPA and that made no difference.
K1773R
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1792
Merit: 1008


/dev/null


View Profile
October 24, 2012, 01:01:10 PM
 #784

i get >20 on a 5830 running at 980/1025 1280x1024

I find it strange that I get 25 Mkey/s on Windows 7, but only 20 Mkey/s on linux. I tried upgrading to the bleeding edge xorg PPA and that made no difference.
use bfgminer -> set intensity to d -> enjoy

[GPG Public Key]  [Devcoin Builds]  [BBQCoin Builds]  [Multichain Blockexplorer]  [Multichain Blockexplorer - PoS Coins]  [Ufasoft Miner Linux Builds]
BTC/DVC/TRC/FRC: 1K1773RbXRZVRQSSXe9N6N2MUFERvrdu6y ANC/XPM AK1773RTmRKtvbKBCrUu95UQg5iegrqyeA NMC: NK1773Rzv8b4ugmCgX789PbjewA9fL9Dy1 LTC: LKi773RBuPepQH8E6Zb1ponoCvgbU7hHmd EMC: EK1773RxUes1HX1YAGMZ1xVYBBRUCqfDoF BQC: bK1773R1APJz4yTgRkmdKQhjhiMyQpJgfN
bitcoindaddy
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 479
Merit: 500


View Profile
October 24, 2012, 01:27:12 PM
 #785

i get >20 on a 5830 running at 980/1025 1280x1024

I find it strange that I get 25 Mkey/s on Windows 7, but only 20 Mkey/s on linux. I tried upgrading to the bleeding edge xorg PPA and that made no difference.
use bfgminer -> set intensity to d -> enjoy

Sorry, what does bfgminer have to do with oclvanityminer?
stevegee58
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 918
Merit: 1003



View Profile
October 24, 2012, 01:28:34 PM
 #786

Sorry, what does bfgminer have to do with oclvanityminer?

Absolutely nothing.

You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
K1773R
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1792
Merit: 1008


/dev/null


View Profile
October 24, 2012, 02:53:13 PM
 #787

i get >20 on a 5830 running at 980/1025 1280x1024

I find it strange that I get 25 Mkey/s on Windows 7, but only 20 Mkey/s on linux. I tried upgrading to the bleeding edge xorg PPA and that made no difference.
use bfgminer -> set intensity to d -> enjoy

Sorry, what does bfgminer have to do with oclvanityminer?
sry wrong thread Tongue

[GPG Public Key]  [Devcoin Builds]  [BBQCoin Builds]  [Multichain Blockexplorer]  [Multichain Blockexplorer - PoS Coins]  [Ufasoft Miner Linux Builds]
BTC/DVC/TRC/FRC: 1K1773RbXRZVRQSSXe9N6N2MUFERvrdu6y ANC/XPM AK1773RTmRKtvbKBCrUu95UQg5iegrqyeA NMC: NK1773Rzv8b4ugmCgX789PbjewA9fL9Dy1 LTC: LKi773RBuPepQH8E6Zb1ponoCvgbU7hHmd EMC: EK1773RxUes1HX1YAGMZ1xVYBBRUCqfDoF BQC: bK1773R1APJz4yTgRkmdKQhjhiMyQpJgfN
fizzisist
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 706
Merit: 500



View Profile WWW
October 24, 2012, 04:55:59 PM
 #788

I finally had a chance to look at the source and apparently the units of the "value" shown are simply BTC/Mkey, but multiplied by 3600, or in code:

Code:
wip->value = (reward * 1000000.0 * 3600.0) / difficulty;

This is not BTC/MKeyHr, this is a meaningless number. More correctly, you could say the units are BTC*s/Mkey*hr. I suggest removing the 3600 and just displaying the value as BTC/Mkey. If the number is too small (too many decimals to be easily readable), change it to BTC/Gkey, since most people are calculating at least a Gkey every minute. If you would like to go one step further, you can show BTC/hr as:

Code:
3600 * rate * reward / difficulty

Where rate is the calculated Mkey/s for your hardware (so vg_output_timing() will have to been called already).

Hi fizzisist,

You're right, it's an entirely arbitrary and not 100% correctly labelled unit.  I just wanted it to display some semi-comparable notion of value.  The idea was to create something along the lines of kilowatt-hours, whereas the proper unit would be megajoules, but the power company doesn't publish their electricity rates per megajoule.

Anyway, I'll take your patch on GitHub to convert the display unit to GKeys.  Thanks!

Great! I completely understood where you were coming from once I switched it to BTC/Mkey and all the values displayed as 0.000000! BTC/Gkey is definitely better than BTC/Mkey. BTC/MkeyHr isn't that confusing (bitcoindaddy figured it out above), but it's unclear enough.

I'm more happy to see the "Total value" line, especially when there are a lot of patterns available from a single public key, like there are right now! Thanks for pulling that in!

wigglyuk
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 120
Merit: 100



View Profile
October 24, 2012, 06:10:04 PM
 #789

Code:
C:\Users\...\vanitygen-0.22-win>oclvanityminer -u https://vanitypool.appspot.com/ -a 1N#########################k
Get work request failed: SSL connect error

Oclvanitygen uses libcurl, and unfortunately it won't read your proxy settings for MSIE or Firefox.  If you need to set a proxy, you can set the http_proxy or HTTPS_PROXY environment variables.  For example:

Code:
H:\>set HTTPS_PROXY="http://172.16.0.1:8080/"
H:\>oclvanityminer -u https://vanitypool.appspot.com -a 1XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
thanks worked perfectly.
Is it possible to run two devices at once or can I only do this by opening oclvanityminer twice?
and how can I select a particular pattern to mine?

List of Active Altcoin Giveaways and Altcoin Faucets | https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=322446.0
bitcoindaddy
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 479
Merit: 500


View Profile
October 24, 2012, 08:23:12 PM
 #790

i get >20 on a 5830 running at 980/1025 1280x1024

I find it strange that I get 25 Mkey/s on Windows 7, but only 20 Mkey/s on linux. I tried upgrading to the bleeding edge xorg PPA and that made no difference.

I neglected to mention that these two figures are from the SAME MACHINE - dual booted between windows 7 and Ubuntu 12.04. So, same video card, same motherboard, etc.
K1773R
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1792
Merit: 1008


/dev/null


View Profile
October 24, 2012, 11:12:51 PM
 #791

i get >20 on a 5830 running at 980/1025 1280x1024

I find it strange that I get 25 Mkey/s on Windows 7, but only 20 Mkey/s on linux. I tried upgrading to the bleeding edge xorg PPA and that made no difference.

I neglected to mention that these two figures are from the SAME MACHINE - dual booted between windows 7 and Ubuntu 12.04. So, same video card, same motherboard, etc.
thats simple, ati drivers for linux are same as winblows; crap, on linux even alot more!
try upgrade to the latest fglrx and picking the right SDK, good luck Wink

[GPG Public Key]  [Devcoin Builds]  [BBQCoin Builds]  [Multichain Blockexplorer]  [Multichain Blockexplorer - PoS Coins]  [Ufasoft Miner Linux Builds]
BTC/DVC/TRC/FRC: 1K1773RbXRZVRQSSXe9N6N2MUFERvrdu6y ANC/XPM AK1773RTmRKtvbKBCrUu95UQg5iegrqyeA NMC: NK1773Rzv8b4ugmCgX789PbjewA9fL9Dy1 LTC: LKi773RBuPepQH8E6Zb1ponoCvgbU7hHmd EMC: EK1773RxUes1HX1YAGMZ1xVYBBRUCqfDoF BQC: bK1773R1APJz4yTgRkmdKQhjhiMyQpJgfN
Red Emerald
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 742
Merit: 500



View Profile WWW
October 25, 2012, 02:25:50 AM
 #792

i get >20 on a 5830 running at 980/1025 1280x1024

I find it strange that I get 25 Mkey/s on Windows 7, but only 20 Mkey/s on linux. I tried upgrading to the bleeding edge xorg PPA and that made no difference.

I neglected to mention that these two figures are from the SAME MACHINE - dual booted between windows 7 and Ubuntu 12.04. So, same video card, same motherboard, etc.
thats simple, ati drivers for linux are same as winblows; crap, on linux even alot more!
try upgrade to the latest fglrx and picking the right SDK, good luck Wink
Also, what versions of openssl?

bitcoindaddy
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 479
Merit: 500


View Profile
October 25, 2012, 01:07:44 PM
 #793

i get >20 on a 5830 running at 980/1025 1280x1024

I find it strange that I get 25 Mkey/s on Windows 7, but only 20 Mkey/s on linux. I tried upgrading to the bleeding edge xorg PPA and that made no difference.

I neglected to mention that these two figures are from the SAME MACHINE - dual booted between windows 7 and Ubuntu 12.04. So, same video card, same motherboard, etc.
thats simple, ati drivers for linux are same as winblows; crap, on linux even alot more!
try upgrade to the latest fglrx and picking the right SDK, good luck Wink
Also, what versions of openssl?

On linux:
libcurl4-openssl-dev                   7.22.0-3ubuntu4
openssl                                1.0.1-4ubuntu5.5

On windows - I think the executable is statically linked with SSL? It's the latest version of oclvanityminer64
K1773R
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1792
Merit: 1008


/dev/null


View Profile
October 25, 2012, 01:32:54 PM
 #794

i get >20 on a 5830 running at 980/1025 1280x1024

I find it strange that I get 25 Mkey/s on Windows 7, but only 20 Mkey/s on linux. I tried upgrading to the bleeding edge xorg PPA and that made no difference.

I neglected to mention that these two figures are from the SAME MACHINE - dual booted between windows 7 and Ubuntu 12.04. So, same video card, same motherboard, etc.
thats simple, ati drivers for linux are same as winblows; crap, on linux even alot more!
try upgrade to the latest fglrx and picking the right SDK, good luck Wink
Also, what versions of openssl?

On linux:
libcurl4-openssl-dev                   7.22.0-3ubuntu4
openssl                                1.0.1-4ubuntu5.5

On windows - I think the executable is statically linked with SSL? It's the latest version of oclvanityminer64

libcurl4-openssl-dev

[GPG Public Key]  [Devcoin Builds]  [BBQCoin Builds]  [Multichain Blockexplorer]  [Multichain Blockexplorer - PoS Coins]  [Ufasoft Miner Linux Builds]
BTC/DVC/TRC/FRC: 1K1773RbXRZVRQSSXe9N6N2MUFERvrdu6y ANC/XPM AK1773RTmRKtvbKBCrUu95UQg5iegrqyeA NMC: NK1773Rzv8b4ugmCgX789PbjewA9fL9Dy1 LTC: LKi773RBuPepQH8E6Zb1ponoCvgbU7hHmd EMC: EK1773RxUes1HX1YAGMZ1xVYBBRUCqfDoF BQC: bK1773R1APJz4yTgRkmdKQhjhiMyQpJgfN
crazyates
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 952
Merit: 1000



View Profile
October 26, 2012, 04:36:26 PM
 #795

I just found this, and I must say, it's awesome! Getting ~30Mkey/s on my 7970 @ 1150/1485.
Quote
on 7970:
(seems it is finding matches, but disregarding due to mismatch?
Code:
CPU hash: 6707a76e848f5e9368c2d9d9ec6d60880df44891
GPU hash: 020b0bda39a9bbb2eeddd194a8be20934835dff6
Found delta: 94027 Start delta: 1
When you get the CPU hash/GPU hash mismatch, it means the OpenCL device is producing incorrect results.  I have not had a chance to test it on an AMD 7XXX series GCN card yet, but others have reported that it works.  Try running it with -V on that card for a little while and see what you get.  Since it's producing incorrect results, the performance numbers may or may not mean anything.
Looks like I spoke too soon, cuz I'm actually getting this this error on my 7970, with 12.8 drivers. I tried a few different flag options, but nothing really worked.
Well I only get 9Mkey/s instead of 30, but the -S option produces valid results.
Still not working with the newer 12.10 drivers. Is this a problem with the program? If oclvanitygen produces invalid results, i'm assuming oclvanityminer will be the same?

Tips? 1crazy8pMqgwJ7tX7ZPZmyPwFbc6xZKM9
Previous Trade History - Sale Thread
K1773R
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1792
Merit: 1008


/dev/null


View Profile
October 26, 2012, 04:48:40 PM
 #796

I just found this, and I must say, it's awesome! Getting ~30Mkey/s on my 7970 @ 1150/1485.
Quote
on 7970:
(seems it is finding matches, but disregarding due to mismatch?
Code:
CPU hash: 6707a76e848f5e9368c2d9d9ec6d60880df44891
GPU hash: 020b0bda39a9bbb2eeddd194a8be20934835dff6
Found delta: 94027 Start delta: 1
When you get the CPU hash/GPU hash mismatch, it means the OpenCL device is producing incorrect results.  I have not had a chance to test it on an AMD 7XXX series GCN card yet, but others have reported that it works.  Try running it with -V on that card for a little while and see what you get.  Since it's producing incorrect results, the performance numbers may or may not mean anything.
Looks like I spoke too soon, cuz I'm actually getting this this error on my 7970, with 12.8 drivers. I tried a few different flag options, but nothing really worked.
Well I only get 9Mkey/s instead of 30, but the -S option produces valid results.
Still not working with the newer 12.10 drivers. Is this a problem with the program? If oclvanitygen produces invalid results, i'm assuming oclvanityminer will be the same?
probably just usual ATI crap driver, hopefully it will get fixed or there will be a workaround.

[GPG Public Key]  [Devcoin Builds]  [BBQCoin Builds]  [Multichain Blockexplorer]  [Multichain Blockexplorer - PoS Coins]  [Ufasoft Miner Linux Builds]
BTC/DVC/TRC/FRC: 1K1773RbXRZVRQSSXe9N6N2MUFERvrdu6y ANC/XPM AK1773RTmRKtvbKBCrUu95UQg5iegrqyeA NMC: NK1773Rzv8b4ugmCgX789PbjewA9fL9Dy1 LTC: LKi773RBuPepQH8E6Zb1ponoCvgbU7hHmd EMC: EK1773RxUes1HX1YAGMZ1xVYBBRUCqfDoF BQC: bK1773R1APJz4yTgRkmdKQhjhiMyQpJgfN
crazyates
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 952
Merit: 1000



View Profile
October 26, 2012, 05:47:53 PM
 #797

I just found this, and I must say, it's awesome! Getting ~30Mkey/s on my 7970 @ 1150/1485.
Quote
on 7970:
(seems it is finding matches, but disregarding due to mismatch?
Code:
CPU hash: 6707a76e848f5e9368c2d9d9ec6d60880df44891
GPU hash: 020b0bda39a9bbb2eeddd194a8be20934835dff6
Found delta: 94027 Start delta: 1
When you get the CPU hash/GPU hash mismatch, it means the OpenCL device is producing incorrect results.  I have not had a chance to test it on an AMD 7XXX series GCN card yet, but others have reported that it works.  Try running it with -V on that card for a little while and see what you get.  Since it's producing incorrect results, the performance numbers may or may not mean anything.
Looks like I spoke too soon, cuz I'm actually getting this this error on my 7970, with 12.8 drivers. I tried a few different flag options, but nothing really worked.
Well I only get 9Mkey/s instead of 30, but the -S option produces valid results.
Still not working with the newer 12.10 drivers. Is this a problem with the program? If oclvanitygen produces invalid results, i'm assuming oclvanityminer will be the same?
probably just usual ATI crap driver, hopefully it will get fixed or there will be a workaround.
But I've heard of other using 5xxx cards, and it works fine. This just seems to be an issue with the 7xxx cards. Like I said, the -S option works fine, but at 1/3 of the speed.

Tips? 1crazy8pMqgwJ7tX7ZPZmyPwFbc6xZKM9
Previous Trade History - Sale Thread
K1773R
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1792
Merit: 1008


/dev/null


View Profile
October 26, 2012, 06:11:51 PM
 #798

I just found this, and I must say, it's awesome! Getting ~30Mkey/s on my 7970 @ 1150/1485.
Quote
on 7970:
(seems it is finding matches, but disregarding due to mismatch?
Code:
CPU hash: 6707a76e848f5e9368c2d9d9ec6d60880df44891
GPU hash: 020b0bda39a9bbb2eeddd194a8be20934835dff6
Found delta: 94027 Start delta: 1
When you get the CPU hash/GPU hash mismatch, it means the OpenCL device is producing incorrect results.  I have not had a chance to test it on an AMD 7XXX series GCN card yet, but others have reported that it works.  Try running it with -V on that card for a little while and see what you get.  Since it's producing incorrect results, the performance numbers may or may not mean anything.
Looks like I spoke too soon, cuz I'm actually getting this this error on my 7970, with 12.8 drivers. I tried a few different flag options, but nothing really worked.
Well I only get 9Mkey/s instead of 30, but the -S option produces valid results.
Still not working with the newer 12.10 drivers. Is this a problem with the program? If oclvanitygen produces invalid results, i'm assuming oclvanityminer will be the same?
probably just usual ATI crap driver, hopefully it will get fixed or there will be a workaround.
But I've heard of other using 5xxx cards, and it works fine. This just seems to be an issue with the 7xxx cards. Like I said, the -S option works fine, but at 1/3 of the speed.
and thats what ive said, the OpenCL driver is broken for 7*** cards.

[GPG Public Key]  [Devcoin Builds]  [BBQCoin Builds]  [Multichain Blockexplorer]  [Multichain Blockexplorer - PoS Coins]  [Ufasoft Miner Linux Builds]
BTC/DVC/TRC/FRC: 1K1773RbXRZVRQSSXe9N6N2MUFERvrdu6y ANC/XPM AK1773RTmRKtvbKBCrUu95UQg5iegrqyeA NMC: NK1773Rzv8b4ugmCgX789PbjewA9fL9Dy1 LTC: LKi773RBuPepQH8E6Zb1ponoCvgbU7hHmd EMC: EK1773RxUes1HX1YAGMZ1xVYBBRUCqfDoF BQC: bK1773R1APJz4yTgRkmdKQhjhiMyQpJgfN
crazyates
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 952
Merit: 1000



View Profile
October 26, 2012, 06:23:46 PM
 #799

Still not working with the newer 12.10 drivers. Is this a problem with the program? If oclvanitygen produces invalid results, i'm assuming oclvanityminer will be the same?
probably just usual ATI crap driver, hopefully it will get fixed or there will be a workaround.
But I've heard of other using 5xxx cards, and it works fine. This just seems to be an issue with the 7xxx cards. Like I said, the -S option works fine, but at 1/3 of the speed.
and thats what ive said, the OpenCL driver is broken for 7*** cards.
Why does it work for BTC, scrypt, and everything else?

Tips? 1crazy8pMqgwJ7tX7ZPZmyPwFbc6xZKM9
Previous Trade History - Sale Thread
K1773R
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1792
Merit: 1008


/dev/null


View Profile
October 26, 2012, 10:06:57 PM
 #800

Still not working with the newer 12.10 drivers. Is this a problem with the program? If oclvanitygen produces invalid results, i'm assuming oclvanityminer will be the same?
probably just usual ATI crap driver, hopefully it will get fixed or there will be a workaround.
But I've heard of other using 5xxx cards, and it works fine. This just seems to be an issue with the 7xxx cards. Like I said, the -S option works fine, but at 1/3 of the speed.
and thats what ive said, the OpenCL driver is broken for 7*** cards.
Why does it work for BTC, scrypt, and everything else?
either its a bug in the CL from the miner or its a bug in ati drivers with specific parameters (as for you) which is more likely.

[GPG Public Key]  [Devcoin Builds]  [BBQCoin Builds]  [Multichain Blockexplorer]  [Multichain Blockexplorer - PoS Coins]  [Ufasoft Miner Linux Builds]
BTC/DVC/TRC/FRC: 1K1773RbXRZVRQSSXe9N6N2MUFERvrdu6y ANC/XPM AK1773RTmRKtvbKBCrUu95UQg5iegrqyeA NMC: NK1773Rzv8b4ugmCgX789PbjewA9fL9Dy1 LTC: LKi773RBuPepQH8E6Zb1ponoCvgbU7hHmd EMC: EK1773RxUes1HX1YAGMZ1xVYBBRUCqfDoF BQC: bK1773R1APJz4yTgRkmdKQhjhiMyQpJgfN
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 [40] 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 ... 182 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!