cheesylard
|
 |
May 27, 2013, 02:13:27 AM |
|
Thanks for the OSX makefile.
|
|
|
|
scintill
|
 |
May 27, 2013, 02:14:00 AM |
|
Mr. salfter and Mr. scintill, if you upload your windows binary, and sign it (or SHA256sum it), I will download it. I'll also be sure to scan it (or run it sandboxed.)
I've only got the Linux binaries I built for testing, which is a good point I should have said earlier: I've only tested on Linux. It should work on Windows though. I'll see if I can build for Windows, but it may take awhile.
|
1SCiN5kqkAbxxwesKMsH9GvyWnWP5YK2W | donations
|
|
|
Dabs
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3416
Merit: 1913
The Concierge of Crypto
|
 |
May 27, 2013, 03:55:36 AM |
|
Mr. salfter and Mr. scintill, if you upload your windows binary, and sign it (or SHA256sum it), I will download it. I'll also be sure to scan it (or run it sandboxed.)
I've only got the Linux binaries I built for testing, which is a good point I should have said earlier: I've only tested on Linux. It should work on Windows though. I'll see if I can build for Windows, but it may take awhile. Very much appreciated by all the windows noobs like me. I will wait patiently for it. I've been wanting to get a new compressed vanity address.
|
|
|
|
vv01f
|
 |
May 27, 2013, 11:31:53 AM |
|
I'll see if I can build for Windows, but it may take awhile.
Please provide some tip-jar / bitcoin-address (e.g. in your forum signature) for people who appreciate your effort  .
|
|
|
|
jaywaka2713
Sr. Member
  
Offline
Activity: 266
Merit: 250
aka 7Strykes
|
 |
May 27, 2013, 05:23:59 PM |
|
I'm getting 61 keys/s, will my 7 letter prefix take long with such an amount of keys/second?
Yes, it could take years if you are only getting 61 keys per second. The average time is shown in the output. ...[Prob 0.0%][50% in 5.6y]
Ah. I guess I'll go to a paid service then =P. I host a paid service. Cheapest vanity addresses that I've seen. And very secure
|
|
|
|
Boelens
|
 |
May 27, 2013, 05:47:13 PM |
|
I'm getting 61 keys/s, will my 7 letter prefix take long with such an amount of keys/second?
Yes, it could take years if you are only getting 61 keys per second. The average time is shown in the output. ...[Prob 0.0%][50% in 5.6y]
Ah. I guess I'll go to a paid service then =P. I host a paid service. Cheapest vanity addresses that I've seen. And very secure Seems cheap indeed! How quick is delivery? Also, how do I import this privatekey, and I can receive BTC with my vanity address like a normal address, right? And can I import it into my client? Also, do I have to put an 1 infront at the checkout? And would this add to the price? i.e, I want 7 characters, but would the 1 be an 8th? Thanks!
|
|
|
|
vlees
|
 |
May 27, 2013, 09:39:55 PM |
|
I never got oclvanitygen to work on my GPU (only CPU which gets 750kkeys/s) so I read here that I should downgrade to AMD Catalyst 12.8. So I did that, but still oclvanitygen does not work on my GPU: Device: Cayman Vendor: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (1002) Driver: 1084.4 (VM) Profile: FULL_PROFILE Version: OpenCL 1.2 AMD-APP (1084.4) Max compute units: 22 Max workgroup size: 256 Global memory: -2147483648 Max allocation: 536870912 OpenCL compiler flags: Compiling kernel, can take minutes...LLVM ERROR: Cannot select: 0x549e808: i8 = setcc 0x5494840, 0x5499070, 0x549a188 [ID=20] 0x5494840: i32 = AMDILISD::ADD 0x5499070, 0x54997e0 [ID=19] 0x5499070: i32,ch = CopyFromReg 0x418c8d8, 0x5499428 [ORD=166] [ID=15] 0x5499428: i32 = Register %vreg33 [ORD=166] [ID=3] 0x54997e0: i32,ch = load 0x418c8d8, 0x54948c8, 0x54928b8<LD4[getelementptr i nbounds ([8 x i32] addrspace(2)* @modulus, i32 0, i32 0)]> [ORD=165] [ID=18] 0x54948c8: i32 = Constant<192> [ORD=164] [ID=13] 0x54928b8: i32 = undef [ORD=165] [ID=2] 0x5499070: i32,ch = CopyFromReg 0x418c8d8, 0x5499428 [ORD=166] [ID=15] 0x5499428: i32 = Register %vreg33 [ORD=166] [ID=3] Anyone knows how to fix this?
|
BEEP BEP
|
|
|
autonomous42
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
 |
May 27, 2013, 10:31:07 PM |
|
I never got oclvanitygen to work on my GPU (only CPU which gets 750kkeys/s) so I read here that I should downgrade to AMD Catalyst 12.8. So I did that, but still oclvanitygen does not work on my GPU: Device: Cayman Vendor: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (1002) Driver: 1084.4 (VM) Profile: FULL_PROFILE Version: OpenCL 1.2 AMD-APP (1084.4) Max compute units: 22 Max workgroup size: 256 Global memory: -2147483648 Max allocation: 536870912 OpenCL compiler flags: Compiling kernel, can take minutes...LLVM ERROR: Cannot select: 0x549e808: i8 = setcc 0x5494840, 0x5499070, 0x549a188 [ID=20] 0x5494840: i32 = AMDILISD::ADD 0x5499070, 0x54997e0 [ID=19] 0x5499070: i32,ch = CopyFromReg 0x418c8d8, 0x5499428 [ORD=166] [ID=15] 0x5499428: i32 = Register %vreg33 [ORD=166] [ID=3] 0x54997e0: i32,ch = load 0x418c8d8, 0x54948c8, 0x54928b8<LD4[getelementptr i nbounds ([8 x i32] addrspace(2)* @modulus, i32 0, i32 0)]> [ORD=165] [ID=18] 0x54948c8: i32 = Constant<192> [ORD=164] [ID=13] 0x54928b8: i32 = undef [ORD=165] [ID=2] 0x5499070: i32,ch = CopyFromReg 0x418c8d8, 0x5499428 [ORD=166] [ID=15] 0x5499428: i32 = Register %vreg33 [ORD=166] [ID=3] Anyone knows how to fix this? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=25804.msg2187914#msg2187914
|
|
|
|
vlees
|
 |
May 27, 2013, 10:34:49 PM |
|
Well, that's exactly what I did. Use the official driver remove tool. Restart. Install CCC 12.8 with its old driver. Restart. Run oclvanitygen: same error as with 13.1
|
BEEP BEP
|
|
|
dirtysocks
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 19
Merit: 0
|
 |
May 28, 2013, 01:53:12 PM |
|
can someone compile it for windows xp ?
friendly greetings
|
|
|
|
salfter
|
 |
May 28, 2013, 04:26:07 PM |
|
Mr. salfter and Mr. scintill, if you upload your windows binary, and sign it (or SHA256sum it), I will download it. I'll also be sure to scan it (or run it sandboxed.)
I've only got the Linux binaries I built for testing, which is a good point I should have said earlier: I've only tested on Linux. It should work on Windows though. I'll see if I can build for Windows, but it may take awhile. Very much appreciated by all the windows noobs like me. I will wait patiently for it. I've been wanting to get a new compressed vanity address. I've built my CPU vanitygen under Cygwin and included the necessary DLLs here: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/57535575/vanitygen-win32-bin.zipPGP-signed MD5 and SHA1 sums are here (use the key in my profile to verify): https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/57535575/vanitygen-win32-bin.zip.sums-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
:::::::::::::: vanitygen-win32-bin.zip.md5sum :::::::::::::: aec4794bfc130b8c6e313716b185d277 *vanitygen-win32-bin.zip :::::::::::::: vanitygen-win32-bin.zip.sha1sum :::::::::::::: 153a68faab86bbeba6d198310c0b52ea61330ded *vanitygen-win32-bin.zip -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
iQGcBAEBAgAGBQJRpNlfAAoJEArTX6uSx2icwPAL/jgm9GvMckJw4wUHdvIXeB+5 rjxJKmkjHEVkVtWeG/BAaA41ETQ4B08McDLlb4uj9DbkliWRJ+qenV1IpwNS5dRo h7FYwCNrYlBM3hwlJlyfWLNIvLglb/TYeULnzz0aDqfBk7YvyAXqZBpt97e7yp8o 06LJE0bAjRkdHQtUr8yaMSFOqVh2uNnyQaNCv2Dq4z8DuiqtBlycPbYuu0BwHNYj K/xaEO0HVvusBUwU2wA+hk/YVQKsPM4Rguh/+599/K5hbOb5Ki+gYDzF4iF9Uceh 7bMSb/67kbqqmedUC3UsbBTaq7lGRQnj9SIwo+49oP/nh97Oc2H2zX/Dx4I6SIEM Rc6oztArnocgZOZlPtLHzoprJh67H7NnqlTBVjU+i0XRBL//Ex8CWKUSO2d26CBB QTcs6f1RBi3sj94frB+u0HToBQemToHrg3tBOLdZGLpAM+kD/L358rQhu17SDEX/ myBLBmAyhyPivLhR4fKhFzy06MUbHdyFvpncvKwQ0Q== =XLuq -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
If you already have Cygwin, all you need is vanitygen.exe. If you don't, unpack everything to the empty directory of your choice. I've tested this package on a clean WinXP SP3 VM that didn't have Cygwin installed on it already, so it should work anywhere.
|
|
|
|
dirtysocks
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 19
Merit: 0
|
 |
May 29, 2013, 07:01:12 PM |
|
thank yoU
|
|
|
|
kodo
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
 |
May 29, 2013, 10:05:55 PM |
|
This is great!!! TY!
|
|
|
|
Dabs
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3416
Merit: 1913
The Concierge of Crypto
|
 |
May 30, 2013, 01:04:57 AM |
|
Verified working. I ran it in my sandboxed machine. Verified Hashes. Not yet verified PGP signature, but I'm sure someone else can verify it. (I'll do it later if no one does.) I ran it to make my first compressed public vanity key. Pattern: 1Dabs Address: 1DabsXmraEr18jdEryck8jzcFku873xmRf Privkey: K***** I am now going to change my default BTC address in signature... later or something.
|
|
|
|
Dabs
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3416
Merit: 1913
The Concierge of Crypto
|
 |
May 30, 2013, 01:27:39 AM |
|
For Windows XP version with compressed keys support. 2013-02-12 06:45 AM 1,553,920 cygcrypto-1.0.0.dll 2011-10-25 21:26 PM 80,910 cyggcc_s-1.dll 2012-12-02 21:38 PM 264,733 cygpcre-1.dll 2013-04-19 01:40 AM 2,862,841 cygwin1.dll 2013-05-09 14:21 PM 74,269 cygz.dll 2013-05-28 09:11 AM 288 md5sums 2013-05-28 09:11 AM 336 sha1sums 2013-05-28 09:02 AM 171,408 vanitygen.exe 8 File(s) 5,008,705 bytes
type md5sums 8302cde3200c164893186c12dc0b2a93 *vanitygen.exe dea20efb451b020e8caf501fd2fa621c *cygcrypto-1.0.0.dll ff1396fa884db6433665e2232e3fe8ad *cyggcc_s-1.dll f7f0a105630e489b3e28a4d7fcd31948 *cygpcre-1.dll ec11de939e772ff4bb98f23eaf853046 *cygwin1.dll eb298351125d6d1d244126c874a0e450 *cygz.dll
type sha1sums f1d0233b2b8650f59929c2397e8c723df26402b2 *vanitygen.exe b69917926572828e21304480d2521e6c4c585bc7 *cygcrypto-1.0.0.dll a1c910ee00dd9d635d2abad40996e116e906aa85 *cyggcc_s-1.dll 19af0ca6d374c4430a3f08ebd068155848cac9a7 *cygpcre-1.dll f0e4fca8716402be2f95f95d3d70d978a2727a01 *cygwin1.dll 5f5394b8affc03416befa54a5f953139d9f573f6 *cygz.dll Just confirming the md5 and sha1 sums are as advertised. Confirming that the zip md5 and sha1 are also as stated.
|
|
|
|
Dabs
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3416
Merit: 1913
The Concierge of Crypto
|
 |
May 30, 2013, 01:39:57 AM |
|
Mr. salfter, Where is your key that you used to sign this? I went to your website and this is the key I found: Key-ID: 586535F7 Fingerprint: 605237D2007C0B2F6C12D171DFF771D8586535F7
|
|
|
|
hahahafr
|
 |
May 30, 2013, 02:10:42 AM |
|
I have a question, is the entropy source in Vanitygen reliable enough to use it as a simple Bitcoin address generator? Like just specify the pattern "1", the combination it then outputs, is it secure and not vulnerable?
|
|
|
|
K1773R
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1792
Merit: 1008
/dev/null
|
 |
May 30, 2013, 05:57:08 AM |
|
I have a question, is the entropy source in Vanitygen reliable enough to use it as a simple Bitcoin address generator? Like just specify the pattern "1", the combination it then outputs, is it secure and not vulnerable?
its based on OpenSSL's, so yes it should be fine.
|
[GPG Public Key]BTC/DVC/TRC/FRC: 1 K1773RbXRZVRQSSXe9N6N2MUFERvrdu6y ANC/XPM A K1773RTmRKtvbKBCrUu95UQg5iegrqyeA NMC: N K1773Rzv8b4ugmCgX789PbjewA9fL9Dy1 LTC: L Ki773RBuPepQH8E6Zb1ponoCvgbU7hHmd EMC: E K1773RxUes1HX1YAGMZ1xVYBBRUCqfDoF BQC: b K1773R1APJz4yTgRkmdKQhjhiMyQpJgfN
|
|
|
salfter
|
 |
May 30, 2013, 06:48:35 AM Last edit: May 30, 2013, 02:52:32 PM by salfter |
|
Mr. salfter, Where is your key that you used to sign this? I went to your website and this is the key I found: Key-ID: 586535F7 Fingerprint: 605237D2007C0B2F6C12D171DFF771D8586535F7 Hmm...I need to fix that. :-| Look next to this post for the key I'm using now (begins with 9, not 5). You should be able to pull it from any keyserver. Edited after posting: The correct key ID is 92C7689C. Edited again: my website is fixed. My current key is now at http://alfter.us/files/salfter.asc.
|
|
|
|
SinnerShanky
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 16
Merit: 0
|
 |
June 03, 2013, 02:00:27 AM |
|
I'm not very familiar with C but I was going through the source code. I wanted to know where the address is generated. Like, suppose I run vanitygen and it finds an address I want, I wanna know the line that prints the address and its private key on the console. Thank you 
|
|
|
|
|