HashFast announces specs for new ASIC: 400GH/s

[cedivad]

That asterisk leading nowhere is asking what he is doing there.
http://us7.campaign-archive2.com/?u=43a3515a4cff1032dafe95c87&id=e64422c47d&e=929ad40431
Posted from Bitcointa.lk - #lfa9yQyE9fD8hltG

[MrTeal]

I guess now we know why it was important that the Yoli Evo boards are advertised as "Up To 800GH/s" even though they haven't been demonstrated to hit that. There's a big difference between shipping two boards and shipping three for the MPP.

[perezoso]

In addition, HashFast will likely lose resulting in insolvency. New and existing customers will receive nothing.

And Garret will be recycling $1M per day for HF, to get everything out of the company before this happens.
Posted from Bitcointa.lk - #8VM1j283MNjU8zXe

Hashfast's latest e-mails seem to indicate that teen 'wunderkid' Garrett's assembly line is what Hashfast is depending upon to fill the MPP and EVO orders/upgrades. 

As somebody else said, what could possibly go wrong? 

[TooDumbForBitcoin]

Hashfast's latest e-mails seem to indicate that teen 'wunderkid' Garrett's assembly line is what Hashfast is depending upon to fill the MPP and EVO orders/upgrades.

And when those deliveries fail, HF will say it's Garrett's fault.

[xstr8guy]

Excuse my ignorance but what happened to the super manufacturing facility Ciara?  Not trolling, but weren't they supposed to crank out all if the preorders in days.

[GalaxyASIC]

I would like to point out that per following page
http://hashfast.com/shop/chipsales/

Hashing Output: Up to 800 GH/s (overclocked)
Hashing Output: 400 GH/s (nominal)

those are the same chips that will go into Yoli Evo boards that are advertized as

Typical Bitcoin Mining Performance:  675 GH/s +/- 20% [540-810 GH/s]

That above 400 GH/s performance is from already overclocking the equipment. Since MPP supposed to be based on nominal hashing rate of 400 GH/s and not on overclocked rate and be 4x not 2-3x of overclocked board.

Also, how are you supposed to cool 675 GH/s ~ 740W board ?

[solarion]

Also, how are you supposed to cool 675 GH/s ~ 740W board ?

Those parts will have to be in direct contact with hillary clinton's...

[raskul]

will this be extended to batch 2,3 and 4 after 31st March?

I'm not in a position to say. You'd have to ask de Gallo. I speculate that it might, if enough batch 2, 3, and 4 customers got on board.

got a response back about my refund, so i'm going with that. to hell with waiting another 3 months for a rig that isn't going to break even.
i'd be better of putting it into my 5 year cloudhashing account. i see that as less of a gamble!

[Legend21]

raskul  You  got a response about your refund? When was the first time u ask for your refund. I am already ask them since end january. And they will only request in the order they receive... I am now waiting nearly 3 months... and they still havent send my refund.
I mail , call them 1000 times and they ingore.. trust me, they also dont have clear answers.. they cant tell specefic datums or name up a week when they send u the refund.

First of all, even if they react, it dont mean nothing, they lie and they have excuses to delay everything, thats why they cant name up a datum. They are to scare to answer that kind of e-mails, because they know they want to hold as long as they can your money.

I heard from people that already ask their refund in december and still havent receive it, so the thing is, they dont request in the order they receive, they tried to delay everything up, because they have lawsuits and they are developing,  that is their priority.. the support and paying customers are not their priority, they can stuck.. that is what Hashfast thinking.

For people that ask or request now for their refund can wait another 3-4 months minimal before they send u a refund. trust my words. Hashfast is worser then Butterfly, they should go on CNN for amazing fraud.

[SolarSilver]

raskul  You  got a response about your refund? When was the first time u ask for your refund. I am already ask them since end january. And they will only request in the order they receive... I am now waiting nearly 3 months... and they still havent send my refund.

I guess you must be the type of client Gallo wants to represent?

I tried to apply (their website is retarded up to a point, can't fill in a European phone number due to US syntax checking) but I got my Batch #1 ones (no MPP though

Thanks for your answers.  Unfortunately, based on them, we cannot currently agree to represent you.  Currently, we are only representing Batch1 customers who purchased by September 5, 2013, paid in bitcoin, did not recieve a bitcoin refund, and did not cash a check for a dollar refund.  We will contact you if that changes and we believe you have claims that can be economically arbitrated.  In the meantime, remember that every claim is subject to a statute of limitations. In  California, a claim for breach of contract must be brought within four years of the date of the breach, and a claim for fraud must be brought within three years of the date of the breach.  So, do not wait too long to pursue your claims if you wish to do s o.

[cedivad]

I guess you must be the type of client Gallo wants to represent?

Gallo aims at a BTC refund, he probably signed that refund and release agreement and agreed to a USD refund. Also, what gallo is not quoting is that such customers must have requested a refund before the 15th of January, as per tos...
Posted from Bitcointa.lk - #KDhoAriXMBjEYm7j

[cedivad]

They sold out their second batch of EVOs
http://hashfast.com/shop/sierraevo/
Posted from Bitcointa.lk - #XTWCCNj0PNvkgFYL

[perezoso]

They sold out their second batch of EVOs
http://hashfast.com/shop/sierraevo/
Posted from Bitcointa.lk - #XTWCCNj0PNvkgFYL

I guess De Castro's mom gave him his allowance and, with that, the second batch was closed at two orders.  (Simon's dad paid for the other.  In Bitcoin mining, time is everything.)

[cedivad]

http://digitaljournal.com/pr/1819167

Deans & Lyons Lawyers Obtain a TRO against HashFast Technologies, "Freezing" its Bitcoin Wallets
Posted from Bitcointa.lk - #EiSnJ07GtWCWlpdE

[minternj]

"Consequently, the Court finds that a temporary restraining order is necessary because it appears to the Court that Defendants are presently engaged in, or will imminently engage in, unlawful activities..."

[jimmothy]

http://digitaljournal.com/pr/1819167

Deans & Lyons Lawyers Obtain a TRO against HashFast Technologies, "Freezing" its Bitcoin Wallets
Posted from Bitcointa.lk - #EiSnJ07GtWCWlpdE

Great news!

Its about time hashfast gets slammed by the law.

[solarion]

amen to that brother. I don't even care if I get nothing at this point, as long as those crooks get some come-upins.

[cedivad]

Its about time hashfast gets slammed by the law.

Once that we see them in jail we can call this closed. That court order doesn't really mean a lot.
Posted from Bitcointa.lk - #kRgDFCxhxU6uCPoS

[ProfMac]

Does the HashFast design work?  That is, are there a significant number of working machines?

[solarion]

It works with some issues. Icedrill is running sierras.

I'd be able to tell you a whole lot more if I had the sierra I paid for last frickin september.