Do you believe in ICO Ratings?

[JustBetweenUs]

Partly yes! I'm used to base and analyze the project for its popularity! I think that no one will argue that popular projects are always faster and more likely to collect the necessary investments!

Good Ratings does not mean that a project is popular, rather it’s often the opposite when I see that projects that got some excellent expert ratings are hardly talked about and when check out the telegram groups you are often surprised how small the community is

[Brunoaoi007]

Truly, I trust in some ICO rating . There is a notable technique for ICO contributing: do your own examination. In the earlier year once I've been requested to help one ICO to send some messages to various ICO related sites (counting postings) and I've found that an entirely enormous piece of the ICO evaluations are expect installments to get your undertaking recorded on their site. That comes especialy about the neighborhood sites. The mail nesson was that ICO appraisals can never be 100% trusted. Ofcourse they may demonstrate the grneral buildup around the coin however you ought to dependably make your own particular research.

[Alex_ODN]

I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.

Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.

So let's discuss ICO Rating!

Not really...

[evichi]

In my opinion, I will take it as one of many other areas to consider when making decision. I consider it not proper to rely on someone's decision or rating. What if the person was paid to rate the coin or token or perhaps one of the promoters? The best way is to research on the token or Coin by yourself. The key points to note are: Aim of project- is it viable? The team behind the project- are they reputable people in the society? The country or area- is the country or area of operations cryptocurrency compliant? All these and many more are points to consider before participating in ICO.

[apur688]

I think there are only some rating websites that provide accurate information, where the review is someone who really expert in the field, such as ICOBENCH AND ICODROP. However, sometimes there are less good in rating, so the rating is not in accordance with the course of the project in the future. But at least you can make this as a reference in choosing the best altcoin, so it can be profitable.

[jrrhnjco]

ICO rating not so much give ensure for us to pick a decent ICO, as you say that occasionally the ICO with a decent appraising can't achieve they softcap. for me the ICO rating only for different references not for as the principle purpose behind to pick a decent ICO. I propose you to doing research without anyone else's input.

[pivxmen]

I doubt with ico rating site. many manipulation of valuation there by paying the site is more expensive then ico project will get great value. many investors are fooled by the ico rating on the rating site.

[bitcoinzen]

i believe in ico rating it is only because of ico rating we are able to see ico investing are healthy with less scam ico rating really helped the investors to select the best icos in the market through their rating

[rynanosih21]

It depends on the context.
If you want to invest in ICO should be noted is the soft cap and hard cap it.
These two points greatly affect the quality of an ICO in the Cryptocurrency business.
I see there is a lot of ICO now, much different from the past few ICO number.

[mdgabrielzim]

I've seen a few la la nudes where the writers rated them high and so I think sites like that have little credibility because they're rather shallow. They should do deeper analysis, check frauds and the provenance of everything before publishing any type of note.

[nonik]

I think ICO rating is one way to know is the ICO have good performance in marketcap, because many new ICO come up, its will give us to know is the ICO have great team to promoting and have inovatif  product they sell, and we can know the company can give us great benefit if we buy their altcoin before they list and launch on the exchange, so i think the ratings is good for us to decide investment ICO.

[cikey]

I believe ICO rating, although sometimes the result is not imaginary, but they helped us filter out a lot of scams.

[dangwapo311]

I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.

Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.

So let's discuss ICO Rating!

For me I only believe those ico rating sites with credibility and is well known like icobench. The most important thing for me is reading the whitepaper and participating ico that I find interesting and has potential. The ratings thing for me doesn't really matter so much at all.

[Ranillo79]

For me its good to use ICO rating site as referrence onlyand not totally depend for what my decusion if it good ico or not. Then after I see the ratings I follow to do research for landing page, team verifying, community check and product analyzing. I want eveything clear in an ICO. No hide details and be transparrent for the development

[lisapunt]

Can be a help but they can not be trusted. You need to do your own researchers.

[lucy5632]

I think the ratings are needed for each project, but I saw a lot of projects with ratings of 5/5 that did not even earn soft cap. It turns out that they do not always reflect the real state of affairs.

[kakawin]

I think the ratings are needed for each project, but I saw a lot of projects with ratings of 5/5 that did not even earn soft cap. It turns out that they do not always reflect the real state of affairs.

Of course, the ratings on these sites do not reflect anything, because these ratings can be purchased. And this is not a secret. It is better not to look at these ratings at all, the real ratings of projects should be in everyone's head.

[Valentina N]

Hello! I don't believe in any ICO ratings, experts, analytics and in any information which I can not check!

[digiadven]

Its better to do your own research because I am sure that most of ICO that has a good ratings there are advertisement and not based on the truths. They pay to looks like a very good ICO.

[maoasd99z99]

they are simply ratings sites, you do not need to blame them if your contributions are burned out, you yourself should evaluate the project in full and fully, see the team, goals