Do you believe in ICO Ratings?

[Zorane]

yeah, i find my favorite project there - Sonder ICO, it will give me x10 min

[amila_cs]

Problem with ICO rating sites are they are biased sometimes. For many ICO's with highest ratings, you can probably find some members of the ICO rating site as advisers. Even though ICO raters give an honest review but the token sale shows otherwise is probably because of the hype. I have seen even though the tech/team is great your project needs to be hyped to sold out and give 20x, 30x ROI. So people buy hype, not the technology. That is whats wrong with current ICO's

[Pure01]

As I do not have much knowledge about ICO, I have had a little confusion with my friends who know today. They said they thought it was a guarantee that they could pull their Ethereum bottom-base money out to 2x, and ICOs were giving out their bonus extra bonus coins.

[inillo]

No, there are many cases in which the rating is good and the ICO turns out to be a disaster or even a scam. Ratings are as good as you own opinion on ICO.

[simapple]

Most of them are selling resources that are ready for a small amount of money to place positive information about the project. But among them there are good resources,such as Drops.

[fight-T]

I do not believe too much in ICO ratings because their purpose is to promote information and projects.

[dashi555]

Can not fully believe in ratings, but they can not without them, because they are a good reference, can be used as a basic reference standard. And referencing multiple rating websites at the same time will make your judgment more accurate.

[javerzky]

yes, some reason yes i do believe in ico rating found in different social medias because in my opinion before the site rates some project they did a research correspond to the projects updates and so upcoming updates within the year, its up to you to believe in the ico rating provided by the site or websites you just need to check the project whether it was true or nor.  

[Rida Zafar]

indeed I have faith in ICO evaluations since some of them are extremely useful to us to join or where to join ICOs and furthermore ico appraisals is only a guide but there's one plan of action icodrops.com which ended up being exceptionally solid.

[thefaucetrunner]

the point is not only listing some ICOs in their website attached with their opinion and rating their provide based on the potential project of ICO. most of ICO using it as their marketing campaign, there is no any guarantee ICO with high rating will succeed or reach hardcap even you can make a deal with them to boost your ICO. i know they have experienced and expert team doing research on every ICO and its potential, but investing on ICO only based on ICO rating will not benefit you as your wish.

[Savemore]

I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.

Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.

So let's discuss ICO Rating!

No! Most of the ICO rating are giving fake information, they are not giving reliable information. If we will make investment with ICOs it is better if will read first their whitepaper for us to easily find out if the project is reliable or not.

[kudryas]

I don't believe in ico rating any more. Many highly rated ico have cheated me, resulting in a huge investment loss.

That's why I only trust my nose and my instincts. If the story and the plan are solid than I invest in ICO. No ratings can persuade me to do something that I don't think it's right.

[whyrqa]

Yes personally I believe ICO rating.I think it's only a single way to identify good ico from most of way.You can't depend only ICO ratings.It can only help but it can't give 100% surety for successful ICO.

[artisarr]

I don't trust those ICO rating sites, because you can easily get listed by paying some money. I wonder how many out there actually a real review instead of advertising purpose. However, before joining an ICO, do your own research. It will save you from getting scammed.

[jeungo]

I do not believe all the ratings voiced by different agencies, there are quite a lot of reasons, one of the bottom is an interest in money investments. There are really good analytical materials, and there are very heavily paid one-day projects. But still I read the material and try to understand it myself, having weighed the pros and cons.

[Denigmatic]

I personally do not trust any ratings! The author of this topic is correctly specified, there is an ICO that does not have high ratings, but their ICO ends in 2-4 days, this is a measure of demand among users. I follow and trust my personal analysis, it is a complex process and takes a very long time. The only way I can be sure, my money will not go to garbage. Never listen to anyone, learn to analyze! At first it will be an impossible task, but after 3-5 projects you will learn how to do it effectively!

[coyote50]

I don't believe in any of those sites. I have seen ICOs on those get high ratings by expert reviewers and upon further investigation I discover they are outright scams. Fake team members, plagiarized white papers, etc. The reviewers on there do absolutely zero due diligence

[antolinicio1]

I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.

Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.

So let's discuss ICO Rating!

Yes, the analytical websites connected with ICO now became much. Earlier I gave to these ratings huge influence (especially ICOBench). But there are a lot of high ratings for which have paid projects for the advertizing. Now for me the website with ratings number one is ICODrops. It is the team of people which gives huge amount of time for the choice of qualitative ICO. Their ratings for me are very indicative. They find tremendous projects which make profit.

[FosterEgan]

I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.

Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.

So let's discuss ICO Rating!

No, it's always been my research and instincts. I would just you to stay away from the ratings and hypes, DYOR and see whats good for you.
Some projects like Liven and Ubex are looking good, I've read the white paper of Liven and I'm kinda impressed, Australian ICOs with over 250k users that are using its app to pay for their food. Do take a look at this project!

[Milka86]

Since in our time-all you can buy and sell - and including ratings, I would not trust the project, only because it will stand a good line in the ranking