Do you believe in ICO Ratings?

[Platon ES]

Frankly speaking I don’t believe in ratings. There are many other ways how to choose ICO for investments and for baunty.

[futuristishe]

I don't believe completely! I'm looking at the ratings.. then further analyze himself.. if you match my conclusion with the rating I will take part in this passage!

[BitcoinGuruOne]

NO, I do not turst them and I recommend you not to trust them.

They can be bought, just google this topic and you will see that some people has exposed how easily the raiitngs can be bought on major sites, this is how they make their money.

[Bonenx14]

I believe but I always do a re-analysis of the rating given to the ICO project. because if I only trust the website completely I do not trust it completely. so I always do another selection of ico projects that have a good rating on the website

[cliffdex]

those that do these online ratings are individuals like anyone of us, so why solely rely on this sites, i will advise everyone to do an individual research on the ICO of interest, get your facts, ask questions before making choices. I do not solely believe in ICO ratings because i do my reach on the choice of bounty to partake in.

[padsbzub6666]

I think rating is also major information to know a project. I believe in ico rating. Many people search about project and then they rate on it. So in my opinion ico rating is a great factor.

[tazmannia]

I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.

Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.

So let's discuss ICO Rating!

ICO rating is a relative value. I wouldn't trust them.

[rodney0404]

To be honest, yes I only look for ICO ratings especially when I getting a bounty campaign, I didn't read whitepaper or review the website or anything but if you want to participate in an ICO, you must read the whitepaper, review the website, inspect the team and rate the project on your own.

[Ekosistim]

No. i didnt, because some ico was scammed and his ico rating was good, around 4.5 star, so i think ico rating is not guarantee for saying good ico.

[clvchb]

I think this is important. Although the ico rating website can only be used as one of our references, if it doesn't even have this, will you choose it?
If we want to know more about this project, we still need you to do more research. Then judge for yourself.

[bledex17]

I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.

Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.

So let's discuss ICO Rating!

They are quite helpful, and I appreciate it. Maybe I'm one of those who believe, at least with the basic information they provide. I think the ico rankings only help to illustrate a project, not a guarantee of success or failure.

[Bitcoincole]

I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.

Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.

So let's discuss ICO Rating!

ICO rating is a relative value. I wouldn't trust them.

Well, it can be optimistic on what its ICO really demands for the investors and participants making there rating are above expectation to other but there should re-analyzing the ico before you do it start participanting if its true base on your observation and result then its good.

[Old God]

I think that you should not rely on the opinions of such sites. The rating there is built on the opinion of the majority of ppl, and there is like 100 new ICO's each month now, so it is impossible to track them all, and i think these rating sites based on selling advertising, so no need to believe just for rating, always make your own research before investing

[Serangany]

as for me, the ICO ratings are most beneficial for me because before investing in any ICO first of all I will check the ratings and reviews of that particular ICO and then i will invest

[Etherlevis128]

I think that you should not rely on the opinions of such sites. The rating there is built on the opinion of the majority of ppl, and there is like 100 new ICO's each month now, so it is impossible to track them all, and i think these rating sites based on selling advertising, so no need to believe just for rating, always make your own research before investing

I agree, this ratings could be good as your second opinion or option to see how they rate that particular ico. I am firstly doing my research and reading next is to find reliable informational materials and go with ico ratings. Some of their reviews was biased or not good because manay good ico was a low rating for them and that is not so much good to invest some of it was on top rated.

[Psychee]

no, but I believe in new crypto projects that have a future like that of Socratus

[yjupio]

Well, how to say,trust but verify)Better course look myself,the company and its prospects,but I'm sure one will say now, regardless of how interesting the project,the team,how cool is that,any project now after ISO umatyvaet just shit in the bottom of the charge of such a tactic these people who trample down

[UAE Seasider]

I like the ICO rating sites for being able to give you a quick overview of a project and helping you to find the resource locations for a project. At the end of the day the review scores come from the opinions of the "experts" so I would still be inclined to do my own research to complement what I read from them.

[andeonnut]

I saw a Medium post about how easy it is to pay for expert reviews and other work arounds. So no cant trust completely.

[santouao]

Actully I don't believe immediately in the ico ratings of the project in icobench. I will agree only on their ico ratings after I finished reviewing spcific projects. One of my tool that can help for detailed review of the project is icoholder and this is like icobench.