truy
Member
Offline
Activity: 81
Merit: 10
|
|
August 31, 2013, 01:56:43 AM Last edit: August 31, 2013, 02:53:28 PM by truy |
|
Noticed the update to v1.98 but unfortunately the addon is still not working under linux firefox. The icon is appearing now, but clicking on it does nothing. Opening the url (resource://jid0-3vnsclfrwladqlsm1xgb50oxar0-at-jetpack/blockchain/data/en.html) manually does open the site but freeze at "Changing Wallet Identifier". So it doesn't work for me under linux. Any others with that problem? Under win7 I doesn't have these issues.
|
|
|
|
collegenitro
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
|
|
August 31, 2013, 03:49:41 PM |
|
This is a joke. Opening day of college football, and can't access my bitcoins. Great time to do a so called hour long update, its been 4 hours. What the fuck?
|
|
|
|
theDF
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
August 31, 2013, 03:53:46 PM |
|
Its happening again, this is such
|
|
|
|
minimalB
Donator
Hero Member
Offline
Activity: 674
Merit: 523
|
|
August 31, 2013, 04:22:03 PM |
|
Noticed the update to v1.98 but unfortunately the addon is still not working under linux firefox. The icon is appearing now, but clicking on it does nothing.
I have the same problem on OSX 10.6.8 and Firefox.
|
|
|
|
Otoh
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3108
Merit: 1166
|
|
August 31, 2013, 04:36:00 PM |
|
I'm unable to 'import directly' private keys to my wallet atm, I've tried with desktop Firefox & on Chrome, this used to work fine but now pressing the Import Directly button doesn't work at all, I haven't tried the sweep option as it's not what I need so don't know if that is broken also or not, any help appreciated.
The correct address shows up & it's balance in the warning window but clicking Import Directly does nothing, the address isn't already in my wallet btw, it's a newly generated vanity one.
Tried on a different computer & still not working, I hope this feature hasn't been disabled just because some ppl don't follow the warning & import insecure shared private keys - if so pse make the warning stronger & re-enable it as it is an extremely useful & necessary feature of the wallets, many thanks.
I'd hoped that the update would fix this but it's still not working, any news of when the wallet will be able to import private keys again?
|
|
|
|
Nemo1024
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1680
Merit: 1014
|
|
September 01, 2013, 11:29:41 AM |
|
Is there a problem with My Wallet. Yesterday I was suddenly unable to log in with GA. After 3 failed attempts sent a request for GA reset (1 more login attempt was still left according to the message). Trying to open the login page with my identifyer says that my account is locked for 240 hours. Today it still says 240 hours and I got another locking notification email.
What is wrong? I can create a new account and import my wallets from paper backup, but I'd rather have my initial account back.
|
“Dark times lie ahead of us and there will be a time when we must choose between what is easy and what is right.” “We are only as strong as we are united, as weak as we are divided.” “It is important to fight and fight again, and keep fighting, for only then can evil be kept at bay, though never quite eradicated.”
|
|
|
Krellan
Member
Offline
Activity: 106
Merit: 10
|
|
September 04, 2013, 10:09:28 PM |
|
Hi there.
Is it possible to identify p2pool mined blocks at blockchain.info?
Currently, they show up as individual IP addresses, or as Deepbit, so p2pool doesn't get credit when compared against the other pools.
As an example, Block 255951 and Block 255934 were mined by p2pool, but they are showing up as Deepbit and an IP address, respectively.
Josh
|
1JUZr4TZ5zuB4WdEv4mrhZMaM7yttpJvLG
|
|
|
willphase
|
|
September 04, 2013, 10:17:41 PM |
|
Hi there.
Is it possible to identify p2pool mined blocks at blockchain.info?
Currently, they show up as individual IP addresses, or as Deepbit, so p2pool doesn't get credit when compared against the other pools.
As an example, Block 255951 and Block 255934 were mined by p2pool, but they are showing up as Deepbit and an IP address, respectively.
Josh
can p2pool mark their coinbase with a p2pool signature? Looks like their coinbase does contain some weird stuff that blockchain.info could recognise anyway e.g. 916576c891b3f65c594841d786fee03b31075092caec61780015c41916f9c312 - ends with an OP_RETURN Will
|
|
|
|
Otoh
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3108
Merit: 1166
|
|
September 05, 2013, 01:26:54 PM |
|
The issue with importing private keys has been fixed I guess as it's now working fine, many thanks
|
|
|
|
faiza1990
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 420
Merit: 250
★☆★777Coin★☆★
|
|
September 05, 2013, 04:49:41 PM |
|
Thanks a lot for these new features
|
|
|
|
niko
|
|
September 05, 2013, 09:40:14 PM |
|
Can we please have redesigned graphs? Here are examples of what could be improved, mostly related to readability:
|
They're there, in their room. Your mining rig is on fire, yet you're very calm.
|
|
|
niko
|
|
September 06, 2013, 03:34:19 AM |
|
Can we please have redesigned graphs? Here are examples of what could be improved, mostly related to readability:
Clearly it is per month. And the graphs aren't that bad for a quick look. You have just demonstrated the problem. It is not per month, it turns out it is per day. And average person cannot see right away if we are talking millions or tens of millions or hundreds of thousands in this pile of digits: 37049113.99417443 - they need to stare it into pieces. Common sense, it doesn't take a PhD in graphic design.
|
They're there, in their room. Your mining rig is on fire, yet you're very calm.
|
|
|
Pale Phoenix
|
|
September 06, 2013, 05:37:56 AM |
|
Can we please have redesigned graphs? Here are examples of what could be improved, mostly related to readability:
Clearly it is per month. And the graphs aren't that bad for a quick look. You have just demonstrated the problem. It is not per month, it turns out it is per day. And average person cannot see right away if we are talking millions or tens of millions or hundreds of thousands in this pile of digits: 37049113.99417443 - they need to stare it into pieces. Common sense, it doesn't take a PhD in graphic design. Do you see the tick marks, it is clearly per month in a year So the movement between the tick marks is what? Noise? LOL It's CLEARLY plotting more frequently than monthly.
|
|
|
|
kaerf
|
|
September 06, 2013, 06:58:50 AM |
|
Can someone update blockchain.info/pools to reflect the hash rate from ghash.io? Supposedly, support tickets have not been answered.
|
|
|
|
gnar1ta$
Donator
Hero Member
Offline
Activity: 798
Merit: 500
|
|
September 06, 2013, 11:17:20 PM |
|
Anyone tried the OS X blockchain app from the app store? Wondering which directory/files contain the keys to be backed up.
|
Losing hundreds of Bitcoins with the best scammers in the business - BFL, Avalon, KNC, HashFast.
|
|
|
Stephen Gornick
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2506
Merit: 1010
|
|
September 08, 2013, 08:55:06 PM |
|
I do like the ability to import a private key and have it sweep (spend) the funds, however the address it gets swept to is another existing address from my wallet. This re-use of a previous address is not what I want, however I don't see any way I can force this sweep to create a new address for the sweep be spent to.
Is there some other way to import a private key and have it swept to a new address ... either via mobile , or Blockchain.info My Wallet (web)?
|
|
|
|
monbux
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1736
Merit: 1029
|
|
September 08, 2013, 10:59:35 PM |
|
Will there be any deposit options for Canada?
|
|
|
|
Krellan
Member
Offline
Activity: 106
Merit: 10
|
|
September 09, 2013, 12:45:06 AM |
|
Hi there.
Is it possible to identify p2pool mined blocks at blockchain.info?
Currently, they show up as individual IP addresses, or as Deepbit, so p2pool doesn't get credit when compared against the other pools.
As an example, Block 255951 and Block 255934 were mined by p2pool, but they are showing up as Deepbit and an IP address, respectively.
Josh
can p2pool mark their coinbase with a p2pool signature? Looks like their coinbase does contain some weird stuff that blockchain.info could recognise anyway e.g. 916576c891b3f65c594841d786fee03b31075092caec61780015c41916f9c312 - ends with an OP_RETURN Will We're in luck. There was talk on the p2pool thread about that, just recently. The p2pool donation address appears as the second-to-last input in the coinbase transaction of every p2pool solved block. 1Kz5QaUPDtKrj5SqW5tFkn7WZh8LmQaQi4 This address always appears as the second-to-last entry in the coinbase transaction. BTW, the very last entry, the "Unable to decode input address", contains a special hash which links up the p2pool sharechain with the Bitcoin blockchain. It changes all the time, so it's probably not as useful as a signature, though. It would be great if p2pool indicated its solved blocks in a more obvious way, but these are the cards we have been dealt.
|
1JUZr4TZ5zuB4WdEv4mrhZMaM7yttpJvLG
|
|
|
TheButterZone
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3080
Merit: 1032
RIP Mommy
|
|
September 09, 2013, 01:06:06 AM |
|
Just me, or is the https://blockchain.info/address/{address} page not beeping and/or updating live, without a refresh?
|
Saying that you don't trust someone because of their behavior is completely valid.
|
|
|
xcsler
|
|
September 10, 2013, 11:09:36 AM |
|
Don't know if this has been discussed:
For quicker and easier recognition of bitcoin amounts could the numbers to the left of the decimal be in one color and the numbers to the right be in a different color?
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|