Casinos not asking for KYC to register and play, but do require it to withdraw

[Casdinyard]

Just a warning in case it prevents someone from falling into this shitty scheme.

I was checking a crypto-casino with very easy entry just asking email and country, and allowed deposits in the main cryptos. I didn't need to deposit anything to realize that to withdraw funds they did require a complete KYC with ID, etc. I also tested registering from a banned country and even indicating it on the form, and it does not prevent you from making a deposit.

I guess I stated the obvious, but I don't see the point for gamblers in using this.
 
EDIT
I'll share the site since so much people is asking, but I guess this is usual:
https://elroyalecasinobonuses.com/ with a referal who leads you to the domain you'll be logged

In FAQ you find it clearly: https://elroyalecasinobonuses.com/faq/

Do I have to submit any documents when depositing money?
There are no documents needed for making a deposit at El Royale Casino. However, in some rare cases, we might ask you to provide a Credit Card Validation form to ensure the safety of your transactions.

How do I request a payout?
After you have submitted all the necessary documents for proving your identity, you will be able to request a payout in the Cashier section of your account. If you are using your mobile device, you need to go to “Menu,” and then to the section “Payout”.

El Royale is operated by Wonder Play Company N.V. having its office in Willemstad, Curacao. Company Registration number 162233.

When a user makes an aggregate lifetime total of deposits exceeding USD 2000 or requests a withdrawal of any amount at El Royale, they are obliged to undergo a full KYC procedure, wherein the user shall submit some basic details about themselves and then upload the files listed below:

A copy of Government Issued Photo ID (in some cases front and back depending on the doc)
A selfie of themselves holding the ID doc
A bank statement/Utility Bill

Yeah, pretty fair: give me 2K with no questions, but you won't be able to get a penny without fulfilling the rules. I'ts a regulatory joke. Even is a gambler trap: " I'll try to make it a big ammount so it's worth it to do the paperwork, then you loose. Unacceptable

A lot of reputable casinos fall under the same boat when it comes to handling KYC. The thing is that the average gambler's gonna steer away from KYC no matter what and some of these casinos would have to be very tricky in implementing these mechanisms. Is it unfair and shitty? Yes, can we really do something about it especially if the gambling site's base of operation's country requires them to do so for customer protection laws? Not really. So it's best that we really get into the jive of how these gambling sites and KYC work if we wanna gamble, otherwise it's time to focus on a whole new hobby this time around lol.

In any case, there are casinos out there like Stake (shameless plug not intended) that veer away from this exploitative activity, they still require users to undergo KYC don't get me wrong, but for the most part, as is the case for Stake, they not only require people to do this during withdraws which is a massive blindside to gamblers especially those who have already deposited their money into the site, but also for deposit, sometimes even as soon as you create the account. This makes sure that the gambler knows that they are dealing with a KYC casino without having to be surprised that one day they couldn't take out their money all because they couldn't undergo a KYC verification. I couldn't speak for the reputability of the casino you posted OP but from the looks of it that's some bogus shit that I wouldn't let near me.

[Easteregg69]

Most casinos that I have played on, don't ask for KYC at the point of registration and even though they are KYC compliant, they still do not take it as a priority to demand for that all the time unless on special cases.
But if a casino suddenly wakes up overnight and asks for KYC only when a player makes a withdrawal attempt,  it will become a targeted attack and if care is not taken, the gambler may not be able to make any withdrawal even if he gets all the necessary KYC material and submitted them.

When things are tried to be done in a casino, we know very well that KYC has to be done, acutely all casinos have to comply with those things, there is no way that things can be backed up with KYC, any casino They ask for the KYC, now when the casinos try to do everything possible to avoid having ugly and bad times, it is better to do the KYC before making a deposit, because when the deposit is made the casino can have the luxury of not approve the KYC quickly, but if they do it before the deposit they are forced to approve it quickly, but it is preferable that the casinos that we choose are the most reliable.

The things that we see is that when the minimum withdrawal is met everyone wants to withdraw their funds, it is the most common thing, and the most unpleasant thing is that we are going to withdraw and that cannot be done because they have to approve the KYC, that to me It takes away my desire, and I don't even go back to that casino, so to avoid this, it is better to comply with the KYC first.

"Hit and run dice". Glad I am out of that now.

Edit. Betfury. I left the LP on. V3. 1%. I am lighting joints on a toaster here.

[Odusko]

Casino company have the right to request KYC from any client. Because TOS states that a gambler is bound to abide by their terms and conditions. When a gambler creates a new account they agree to gamble there according to all the terms and conditions of that company or site. No casino organization should be blamed in this case. Moreover, most casinos make it very clear that if a gambler finds evidence of something suspicious, they can certainly ask that gambler for a variety of information. I think all casino company try to give maximum benefits to their customers. They never purposefully get anyone into any KYC complications. Also I don't think asking for KYC is a crime. Although we prioritize crypto gambling to remain anonymous, there is no alternative to knowing who is a real gambler as various types of illegal financial transactions or money laundering activities always occur so casino companies will be aware of it.

The thing with KYC is that any casino that is regulatory compliance will already state in their terms and conditions about their KYC requirements, and for that, they will do all that is needed to keep to the standard that will not affect their customers.

But we have some other casinos that are pour scams and this set of casinos will always trick players into registering on their site and the moment the gamblers start making some big wins, they will request for documents that are out of the gambler's reach to achieve and also locking the account when their win big price bringing in kyc issues that are not clearly stated in the terms of service.

[shasan]

Almost all the casinos that requires for kyc will not demand for that when you're starting, it will be only requested when you're trying to make withdrawal, we are the ones that should always be getting ready for something of this nature to happen with us while using it, not only when we want to make withdrawal alone, some will give you a particular time frame in making provisions to the necessary information's they requested from us, if we cant cope with any of these, we had rather be on look for the ones that does not require kyc at all.

You are right as they usually do not ask for KYC until there is a withdrawal request it is not required KYC. But when you win and try to withdraw they ask for KYC. And many a site do not mention anything about KYC. In this case situation makes more harder to know whether they need KYC or Not.

[junder]

However, in my opinion, there are also casinos that do not require gamblers to understand KYC rules, because in my opinion, KYC is not important, so there is an important side and an unimportant side. but what is clear is that for the comfort and safety of gambling, it is best to just fulfill the terms and conditions that the casino applies, such as requiring you to understand KYC or something else, as you said, KYC is not a big problem, that's true, but sometimes I also think KYC has an important role.

that's true, indeed the problem that occurs with the gambling that we do is because we ourselves may not be careful or neat enough in gambling, because in my opinion there are people who ignore the rules, terms and conditions and KYC in gambling, to the point where they If they experience problems with gambling, then they will see and understand the rules or terms and conditions that the casino applies. Problems will not arise if we do everything well and correctly, if we really want comfortable gambling then we should do the best we can, because of course we all want good comfort with the gambling we do, and that is determined by ourselves.

Casinos require KYC primarily because of the regulators. The list of undesirable countries is constantly being updated, so everyone is required to check if a person is a resident of such a country. Of course, all this strikes a blow to a person's freedom and anonymity, but either the casino chooses a resident country where KYC is more freely tolerated or restricts players

that makes sense, it might be true to prove that someone is a resident of his residence. Therefore, KYC is quite important in this case, especially when it comes to money, of course confirmation is needed, even though this can be said to be a small and important thing, there are still some people who ignore it. In my opinion, those who ignore this may not look at the security side later. In some cases, there are people who have problems with their gambling because they are not careful about things they should pay attention to.

but in my opinion this only happens in online casinos, it seems like this won't happen in offline casinos. but I don't know either because I myself have never set foot in an offline casino. With online casinos, it's normal for casinos to ask a number of questions regarding their own information, including the bank account used, because if they get winnings at an online casino and want to cash it out, it will go into their own bank account.

[Quidat]

Almost all the casinos that requires for kyc will not demand for that when you're starting, it will be only requested when you're trying to make withdrawal, we are the ones that should always be getting ready for something of this nature to happen with us while using it, not only when we want to make withdrawal alone, some will give you a particular time frame in making provisions to the necessary information's they requested from us, if we cant cope with any of these, we had rather be on look for the ones that does not require kyc at all.

You are right as they usually do not ask for KYC until there is a withdrawal request it is not required KYC. But when you win and try to withdraw they ask for KYC. And many a site do not mention anything about KYC. In this case situation makes more harder to know whether they need KYC or Not.

Actually this kind of line is really that common on most of terms and conditions of those sites;

"We do have the rights to ask some KYC information or verification blah blah blah...."
And on the time that argumentations that is happening then they could really be simply throwing out this kind of line on which it would really be leading for you
on having no choice but to accept your fate.

This is why it would really be that always best that we should really be sticking into those platforms on which we do saw that its been mainly been supported or deal off
with the community on which we could at least tell ourselves that we are on the right place.

[EarnOnVictor]

Almost all the casinos that requires for kyc will not demand for that when you're starting, it will be only requested when you're trying to make withdrawal, we are the ones that should always be getting ready for something of this nature to happen with us while using it, not only when we want to make withdrawal alone, some will give you a particular time frame in making provisions to the necessary information's they requested from us, if we cant cope with any of these, we had rather be on look for the ones that does not require kyc at all.

You are right as they usually do not ask for KYC until there is a withdrawal request it is not required KYC. But when you win and try to withdraw they ask for KYC. And many a site do not mention anything about KYC. In this case situation makes more harder to know whether they need KYC or Not.

Just because the casinos didn't mention KYC doesn't mean that they will not ask you for the KYC. It is not until you read it clearly on their website, or/and in their terms and conditions that they are no-KYC casinos, that is only when you should relax about this. In the absence of that, you should be prepared for the KYC completion, and I advise you to even do it as fast as possible because it becomes an issue for some people later on. I've read from so many users that fault the casinos for asking for the KYC, but come to think of it, is it not their right? Are they not the ones that the regulators are on their necks? A lot is happening behind the scenes that you will not be privy to, so asking for the KYC is also saving their necks in case you do not know.

Also, one thing is sure here, if you can check the website of a casino and find out that they are duly registered and regulated by a certain authority, whether the authority or the jurisdiction is weak or strong, one thing that should first come to your mind is that such casino will highly likely ask you for the KYC completion sooner or later. I do not know how the regulation operates but they are certainly answerable to the regulator(s) as the case may be. It might not be so strict at present but when something happens in the future and investigations come to that and require the information, it will be a criminal offence for them not to thoroughly furnish the authorities with the required details and documents. Not to mention the fact that it is a financial transaction you are talking about, the AML Act must prevail. This is not to take any side but to be truthful and explain how it works.

However, some casinos are using it as an excuse to be overbearing in nature and even seize customers' funds for themselves. Notwithstanding, if you have nothing to hide, you will certainly be able to furnish them with all the necessary details and documents for your account to be verified as required by the law, of which they are not the ones who created it.

[Dunamisx]

Almost all the casinos that requires for kyc will not demand for that when you're starting, it will be only requested when you're trying to make withdrawal, we are the ones that should always be getting ready for something of this nature to happen with us while using it, not only when we want to make withdrawal alone, some will give you a particular time frame in making provisions to the necessary information's they requested from us, if we cant cope with any of these, we had rather be on look for the ones that does not require kyc at all.

You are right as they usually do not ask for KYC until there is a withdrawal request it is not required KYC. But when you win and try to withdraw they ask for KYC. And many a site do not mention anything about KYC. In this case situation makes more harder to know whether they need KYC or Not.

Just because the casinos didn't mention KYC doesn't mean that they will not ask you for the KYC. It is not until you read it clearly on their website, or/and in their terms and conditions that they are no-KYC casinos, that is only when you should relax about this. In the absence of that, you should be prepared for the KYC completion, and I advise you to even do it as fast as possible because it becomes an issue for some people later on. I've read from so many users that fault the casinos for asking for the KYC, but come to think of it, is it not their right? Are they not the ones that the regulators are on their necks? A lot is happening behind the scenes that you will not be privy to, so asking for the KYC is also saving their necks in case you do not know.

Maybe we should even digress a bit and talk about trust on these casinos, how possible is it for us to be using a gambling platform we don't trust their dealings, what they are up and what they can deliver, the absence of this trust is part of what makes people to feels bad immediately they discover that the gambling platform is requesting for their information, the next is to feels unsecure, why cant we put ourself in their shoes, how can someone reclaim his compromised account without having any kyc experience with the platform, how can our identity be verified without going through all these, this is not a matter of them asking for kyc later, its about the importance of doing that.

[mak013]

Most casinos that I have played on, don't ask for KYC at the point of registration and even though they are KYC compliant, they still do not take it as a priority to demand for that all the time unless on special cases.
But if a casino suddenly wakes up overnight and asks for KYC only when a player makes a withdrawal attempt,  it will become a targeted attack and if care is not taken, the gambler may not be able to make any withdrawal even if he gets all the necessary KYC material and submitted them.

Almost all the casinos that requires for kyc will not demand for that when you're starting, it will be only requested when you're trying to make withdrawal, we are the ones that should always be getting ready for something of this nature to happen with us while using it, not only when we want to make withdrawal alone, some will give you a particular time frame in making provisions to the necessary information's they requested from us, if we cant cope with any of these, we had rather be on look for the ones that does not require kyc at all.

It becomes a problem to find casino without KYC. The main part of them looks suspicious. Some others tell us that they have no KYC, but if we read ToS we can find that it means "no KYC until withdraw".
As for me the main problem not a KYC - the main problem is that casino KYC you during withdraw. You can KYC, but you can`t get your money for some time. The best way is to initialize KYC yourself if it possible.

[Eternad]

It becomes a problem to find casino without KYC. The main part of them looks suspicious. Some others tell us that they have no KYC, but if we read ToS we can find that it means "no KYC until withdraw".
As for me the main problem not a KYC - the main problem is that casino KYC you during withdraw. You can KYC, but you can`t get your money for some time. The best way is to initialize KYC yourself if it possible.

There’s a lot of casino that doesn’t have KYC but most of them are those Decentralized casino that offers on-chain games only. You probably pertaining to Centralized casino since all of them has the tendency to ask you a KYC due to AML policy.

KYC is not a big deal for most crypto gamblers since most of us undergo on it with our exchange account that already strictly implement the mandatory KYC. I think we have no choice now to play on a CEX with complete non KYC rule since a small suspicion of money laundering or other illegal activities will surely trigger the KYC verification of our casino account therefore you shouldn’t play on CEX if you don’t like KYC even if they stated a no KYC term.

[virasog]

Casino company have the right to request KYC from any client. Because TOS states that a gambler is bound to abide by their terms and conditions. When a gambler creates a new account they agree to gamble there according to all the terms and conditions of that company or site. No casino organization should be blamed in this case. Moreover, most casinos make it very clear that if a gambler finds evidence of something suspicious, they can certainly ask that gambler for a variety of information. I think all casino company try to give maximum benefits to their customers. They never purposefully get anyone into any KYC complications. Also I don't think asking for KYC is a crime. Although we prioritize crypto gambling to remain anonymous, there is no alternative to knowing who is a real gambler as various types of illegal financial transactions or money laundering activities always occur so casino company will be aware of it.

I sometimes consider such casino as scammers who only want that people keep on depositing on the casino without any restrictions of KYC but they only want them to do KYC when they are withdrawing?

This only shows that they are interested in getting money from the people and offering them without KYC deposits and gambling. As soon as the gamblers triggers the withdraw command, all of sudden they realizes that the gambler have not done KYC and they held the withdraw and request the gambler to do the KYC. It is better to avoid such casinos.

The honest casino will always want you to do the KYC even more you play at the casino or if it is KYC free casino, then they will not ask for casino even at the withdrawal time.

[Mr. Magkaisa]

Casino company have the right to request KYC from any client. Because TOS states that a gambler is bound to abide by their terms and conditions. When a gambler creates a new account they agree to gamble there according to all the terms and conditions of that company or site. No casino organization should be blamed in this case. Moreover, most casinos make it very clear that if a gambler finds evidence of something suspicious, they can certainly ask that gambler for a variety of information. I think all casino company try to give maximum benefits to their customers. They never purposefully get anyone into any KYC complications. Also I don't think asking for KYC is a crime. Although we prioritize crypto gambling to remain anonymous, there is no alternative to knowing who is a real gambler as various types of illegal financial transactions or money laundering activities always occur so casino company will be aware of it.

      -     I'm a gambler, but KYC is not a big deal to me as long as I know if the casino is reputable in the crypto gambling business. Then I find out first when a casino is new in this field of crypto space. It is important that we read the Tos first so that we know the dos and don'ts just in case.

Because there are others who don't really have KYC,  there are also times when the gamblers may have committed a violation, so they are suddenly asked for KYC for verification because the gambler may have become suspicious.

[Fivestar4everMVP]

Casino company have the right to request KYC from any client. Because TOS states that a gambler is bound to abide by their terms and conditions. When a gambler creates a new account they agree to gamble there according to all the terms and conditions of that company or site. No casino organization should be blamed in this case. Moreover, most casinos make it very clear that if a gambler finds evidence of something suspicious, they can certainly ask that gambler for a variety of information. I think all casino company try to give maximum benefits to their customers. They never purposefully get anyone into any KYC complications. Also I don't think asking for KYC is a crime. Although we prioritize crypto gambling to remain anonymous, there is no alternative to knowing who is a real gambler as various types of illegal financial transactions or money laundering activities always occur so casino company will be aware of it.

      -     I'm a gambler, but KYC is not a big deal to me as long as I know if the casino is reputable in the crypto gambling business. Then I find out first when a casino is new in this field of crypto space. It is important that we read the Tos first so that we know the dos and don'ts just in case.

Because there are others who don't really have KYC,  there are also times when the gamblers may have committed a violation, so they are suddenly asked for KYC for verification because the gambler may have become suspicious.

I think if we are or were to focus on today's online gambling casinos, kyc requirements is no longer dependent on whether a gambler committed any offence or violation, casinos can decide to ask a gambler for kyc information so the gambler account can be verified, this can be requested for at any time, for whatever reasons, and sometimes, for even no reason at all.

So, for me, I would say that being careful not to violate any of the casinos rules is no longer a way to avoid being asked to verify your account by submitting kyc documents, this is why to avoid being asked for account verification when you are not prepared, it's much better to (on your own) verify your account before the casino askes you to, account verification one decided to do on his or her own is always way simpler and easier, than when one waits until the casino makes the verification mandatory for the player.

[PX-Z]

I'm a gambler, but KYC is not a big deal to me as long as I know if the casino is reputable in the crypto gambling business.

Exactly, but the difference is if it's those new casino you're trying to register which is reading its ToS could save you.

Because there are others who don't really have KYC,  there are also times when the gamblers may have committed a violation, so they are suddenly asked for KYC for verification because the gambler may have become suspicious.

No, they always mention in on their ToS that they might ask KYC anytime, now if the site doesn't mention any KYC then asked it's users, they deserve negative reputation by any means.

[shasan]

No, they always mention in on their ToS that they might ask KYC anytime, now if the site doesn't mention any KYC then asked it's users, they deserve negative reputation by any means.

As far as I can remember Bitsler has not mentioned KYC and they also usually do not ask for KYC. But once Upon a time I earned multiple times on sportsbook and they asked me to provide KYC. In this case, will it be a wise decision to tag negatively?

[Fivestar4everMVP]

No, they always mention in on their ToS that they might ask KYC anytime, now if the site doesn't mention any KYC then asked it's users, they deserve negative reputation by any means.

As far as I can remember Bitsler has not mentioned KYC and they also usually do not ask for KYC. But once Upon a time I earned multiple times on sportsbook and they asked me to provide KYC. In this case, will it be a wise decision to tag negatively?

Well, I think by now, most of us should have realized that, kyc has become a normal thing with most centralized online gambling casinos, many casinos may not have to mention kyc directly in their terms of service, but when ever they request kyc verification from a user who seems or argues that they(the casino) did not mention kyc in their term of service, you did be shocked when they will point you to the part of their terms of service that either directly or In-directly talks about kyc.

And also, let's not forget that some casinos do sometimes include rules permitting them to add or subtract rules from their terms of service at will, so, if a matter like yours was to be taken to court to be judged, and the casino have such lines as I mentioned above in their terms of services, that alone could In-directly cover for kyc.

[mak013]

It becomes a problem to find casino without KYC. The main part of them looks suspicious. Some others tell us that they have no KYC, but if we read ToS we can find that it means "no KYC until withdraw".
As for me the main problem not a KYC - the main problem is that casino KYC you during withdraw. You can KYC, but you can`t get your money for some time. The best way is to initialize KYC yourself if it possible.

There’s a lot of casino that doesn’t have KYC but most of them are those Decentralized casino that offers on-chain games only. You probably pertaining to Centralized casino since all of them has the tendency to ask you a KYC due to AML policy.

KYC is not a big deal for most crypto gamblers since most of us undergo on it with our exchange account that already strictly implement the mandatory KYC. I think we have no choice now to play on a CEX with complete non KYC rule since a small suspicion of money laundering or other illegal activities will surely trigger the KYC verification of our casino account therefore you shouldn’t play on CEX if you don’t like KYC even if they stated a no KYC term.

Yes, i see such casinos, but i don`t like it. Most part of them looks unfriendly as for me. I prefer to KYC and gamble with comfort.  The same time CEX casinos mostly have an opportunity to use fiat money and it is important for me - sometimes i need to bet fiat money and get the profit back as fast as possible.

[EarnOnVictor]

It becomes a problem to find casino without KYC. The main part of them looks suspicious. Some others tell us that they have no KYC, but if we read ToS we can find that it means "no KYC until withdraw".
As for me the main problem not a KYC - the main problem is that casino KYC you during withdraw. You can KYC, but you can`t get your money for some time. The best way is to initialize KYC yourself if it possible.

There’s a lot of casino that doesn’t have KYC but most of them are those Decentralized casino that offers on-chain games only. You probably pertaining to Centralized casino since all of them has the tendency to ask you a KYC due to AML policy.

KYC is not a big deal for most crypto gamblers since most of us undergo on it with our exchange account that already strictly implement the mandatory KYC. I think we have no choice now to play on a CEX with complete non KYC rule since a small suspicion of money laundering or other illegal activities will surely trigger the KYC verification of our casino account therefore you shouldn’t play on CEX if you don’t like KYC even if they stated a no KYC term.

Yes, i see such casinos, but i don`t like it. Most part of them looks unfriendly as for me. I prefer to KYC and gamble with comfort.  The same time CEX casinos mostly have an opportunity to use fiat money and it is important for me - sometimes i need to bet fiat money and get the profit back as fast as possible.

You guys are now confusing me, what is CEX doing here again? Perhaps it's a mistake as we are not gambling with exchanges but trading and investing. Let me believe you wanted to mention the centralised system in gambling, and this is actually the system that most casinos are using. Even the so-called no-KYC casinos are operating under the centralised system in most cases unless a few of them that is decentralised. And those who are decentralised would let you know how the system is working not to mention that you would know the system naturally based on how it operates.

As usual, the patronage of the centralised casinos is nothing compared to that of the centralised casinos just as we also see with the centralised exchanges and other businesses. The decentralised system cannot match the ease, cheapness and simplicity of the centralised system which is what people would always prefer over the decentralisation of the system in the same field. Regardless, it is not until you are decentralised that you offer no-KYC casinos, many are just so unlawful, so we should choose them with care.

If a casino is no-KYC, I just excuse myself immediately, and when the casino is a KYC style, I see no reason why I should not complete the KYC immediately. But for any reason, if I did not complete the KYC at that time, then I should not blame them if they later asked me to do so, after all, I knew what I signed for.  Above all, the true casinos that will never ask you for KYC completion are the centralised casinos. The centralised ones that are forming no-KYC still ask some customers to complete the KYC with time to show how dubious they are.

[mak013]

You guys are now confusing me, what is CEX doing here again? Perhaps it's a mistake as we are not gambling with exchanges but trading and investing. Let me believe you wanted to mention the centralised system in gambling, and this is actually the system that most casinos are using. Even the so-called no-KYC casinos are operating under the centralised system in most cases unless a few of them that is decentralised. And those who are decentralised would let you know how the system is working not to mention that you would know the system naturally based on how it operates.

As usual, the patronage of the centralised casinos is nothing compared to that of the centralised casinos just as we also see with the centralised exchanges and other businesses. The decentralised system cannot match the ease, cheapness and simplicity of the centralised system which is what people would always prefer over the decentralisation of the system in the same field. Regardless, it is not until you are decentralised that you offer no-KYC casinos, many are just so unlawful, so we should choose them with care.

If a casino is no-KYC, I just excuse myself immediately, and when the casino is a KYC style, I see no reason why I should not complete the KYC immediately. But for any reason, if I did not complete the KYC at that time, then I should not blame them if they later asked me to do so, after all, I knew what I signed for.  Above all, the true casinos that will never ask you for KYC completion are the centralised casinos. The centralised ones that are forming no-KYC still ask some customers to complete the KYC with time to show how dubious they are.

Yes, it is. The most part of casino can be called CEX. Of course, it used with exchanges, but i don`t know how we can call the same casinos. DEX and CEX allows us to understand what we want to say.
About KYC i said lots of times - i don`t see any problem with KYC, except KYC, when you can`t choose its time. If i withdraw money i want to be sure that i get it right now.

[ScamViruS]

No, they always mention in on their ToS that they might ask KYC anytime, now if the site doesn't mention any KYC then asked it's users, they deserve negative reputation by any means.

If a casino tries to keep their customers in the dark without clear information about ToS and plays an excuse game, the reputation of that casino is already in doubt. How transparent a casino is should be understood in advance. Gamblers are also responsible to read the ToS properly at the time of registration in any casino so that they do not face any problem with KYC in future.