Casinos not asking for KYC to register and play, but do require it to withdraw

[Fivestar4everMVP]

No, they always mention in on their ToS that they might ask KYC anytime, now if the site doesn't mention any KYC then asked it's users, they deserve negative reputation by any means.

As far as I can remember Bitsler has not mentioned KYC and they also usually do not ask for KYC. But once Upon a time I earned multiple times on sportsbook and they asked me to provide KYC. In this case, will it be a wise decision to tag negatively?

Well, I think by now, most of us should have realized that, kyc has become a normal thing with most centralized online gambling casinos, many casinos may not have to mention kyc directly in their terms of service, but when ever they request kyc verification from a user who seems or argues that they(the casino) did not mention kyc in their term of service, you did be shocked when they will point you to the part of their terms of service that either directly or In-directly talks about kyc.

And also, let's not forget that some casinos do sometimes include rules permitting them to add or subtract rules from their terms of service at will, so, if a matter like yours was to be taken to court to be judged, and the casino have such lines as I mentioned above in their terms of services, that alone could In-directly cover for kyc.

[mak013]

It becomes a problem to find casino without KYC. The main part of them looks suspicious. Some others tell us that they have no KYC, but if we read ToS we can find that it means "no KYC until withdraw".
As for me the main problem not a KYC - the main problem is that casino KYC you during withdraw. You can KYC, but you can`t get your money for some time. The best way is to initialize KYC yourself if it possible.

There’s a lot of casino that doesn’t have KYC but most of them are those Decentralized casino that offers on-chain games only. You probably pertaining to Centralized casino since all of them has the tendency to ask you a KYC due to AML policy.

KYC is not a big deal for most crypto gamblers since most of us undergo on it with our exchange account that already strictly implement the mandatory KYC. I think we have no choice now to play on a CEX with complete non KYC rule since a small suspicion of money laundering or other illegal activities will surely trigger the KYC verification of our casino account therefore you shouldn’t play on CEX if you don’t like KYC even if they stated a no KYC term.

Yes, i see such casinos, but i don`t like it. Most part of them looks unfriendly as for me. I prefer to KYC and gamble with comfort.  The same time CEX casinos mostly have an opportunity to use fiat money and it is important for me - sometimes i need to bet fiat money and get the profit back as fast as possible.

[EarnOnVictor]

It becomes a problem to find casino without KYC. The main part of them looks suspicious. Some others tell us that they have no KYC, but if we read ToS we can find that it means "no KYC until withdraw".
As for me the main problem not a KYC - the main problem is that casino KYC you during withdraw. You can KYC, but you can`t get your money for some time. The best way is to initialize KYC yourself if it possible.

There’s a lot of casino that doesn’t have KYC but most of them are those Decentralized casino that offers on-chain games only. You probably pertaining to Centralized casino since all of them has the tendency to ask you a KYC due to AML policy.

KYC is not a big deal for most crypto gamblers since most of us undergo on it with our exchange account that already strictly implement the mandatory KYC. I think we have no choice now to play on a CEX with complete non KYC rule since a small suspicion of money laundering or other illegal activities will surely trigger the KYC verification of our casino account therefore you shouldn’t play on CEX if you don’t like KYC even if they stated a no KYC term.

Yes, i see such casinos, but i don`t like it. Most part of them looks unfriendly as for me. I prefer to KYC and gamble with comfort.  The same time CEX casinos mostly have an opportunity to use fiat money and it is important for me - sometimes i need to bet fiat money and get the profit back as fast as possible.

You guys are now confusing me, what is CEX doing here again? Perhaps it's a mistake as we are not gambling with exchanges but trading and investing. Let me believe you wanted to mention the centralised system in gambling, and this is actually the system that most casinos are using. Even the so-called no-KYC casinos are operating under the centralised system in most cases unless a few of them that is decentralised. And those who are decentralised would let you know how the system is working not to mention that you would know the system naturally based on how it operates.

As usual, the patronage of the centralised casinos is nothing compared to that of the centralised casinos just as we also see with the centralised exchanges and other businesses. The decentralised system cannot match the ease, cheapness and simplicity of the centralised system which is what people would always prefer over the decentralisation of the system in the same field. Regardless, it is not until you are decentralised that you offer no-KYC casinos, many are just so unlawful, so we should choose them with care.

If a casino is no-KYC, I just excuse myself immediately, and when the casino is a KYC style, I see no reason why I should not complete the KYC immediately. But for any reason, if I did not complete the KYC at that time, then I should not blame them if they later asked me to do so, after all, I knew what I signed for.  Above all, the true casinos that will never ask you for KYC completion are the centralised casinos. The centralised ones that are forming no-KYC still ask some customers to complete the KYC with time to show how dubious they are.

[mak013]

You guys are now confusing me, what is CEX doing here again? Perhaps it's a mistake as we are not gambling with exchanges but trading and investing. Let me believe you wanted to mention the centralised system in gambling, and this is actually the system that most casinos are using. Even the so-called no-KYC casinos are operating under the centralised system in most cases unless a few of them that is decentralised. And those who are decentralised would let you know how the system is working not to mention that you would know the system naturally based on how it operates.

As usual, the patronage of the centralised casinos is nothing compared to that of the centralised casinos just as we also see with the centralised exchanges and other businesses. The decentralised system cannot match the ease, cheapness and simplicity of the centralised system which is what people would always prefer over the decentralisation of the system in the same field. Regardless, it is not until you are decentralised that you offer no-KYC casinos, many are just so unlawful, so we should choose them with care.

If a casino is no-KYC, I just excuse myself immediately, and when the casino is a KYC style, I see no reason why I should not complete the KYC immediately. But for any reason, if I did not complete the KYC at that time, then I should not blame them if they later asked me to do so, after all, I knew what I signed for.  Above all, the true casinos that will never ask you for KYC completion are the centralised casinos. The centralised ones that are forming no-KYC still ask some customers to complete the KYC with time to show how dubious they are.

Yes, it is. The most part of casino can be called CEX. Of course, it used with exchanges, but i don`t know how we can call the same casinos. DEX and CEX allows us to understand what we want to say.
About KYC i said lots of times - i don`t see any problem with KYC, except KYC, when you can`t choose its time. If i withdraw money i want to be sure that i get it right now.

[ScamViruS]

No, they always mention in on their ToS that they might ask KYC anytime, now if the site doesn't mention any KYC then asked it's users, they deserve negative reputation by any means.

If a casino tries to keep their customers in the dark without clear information about ToS and plays an excuse game, the reputation of that casino is already in doubt. How transparent a casino is should be understood in advance. Gamblers are also responsible to read the ToS properly at the time of registration in any casino so that they do not face any problem with KYC in future.

[Hamphser]

You guys are now confusing me, what is CEX doing here again? Perhaps it's a mistake as we are not gambling with exchanges but trading and investing. Let me believe you wanted to mention the centralised system in gambling, and this is actually the system that most casinos are using. Even the so-called no-KYC casinos are operating under the centralised system in most cases unless a few of them that is decentralised. And those who are decentralised would let you know how the system is working not to mention that you would know the system naturally based on how it operates.

As usual, the patronage of the centralised casinos is nothing compared to that of the centralised casinos just as we also see with the centralised exchanges and other businesses. The decentralised system cannot match the ease, cheapness and simplicity of the centralised system which is what people would always prefer over the decentralisation of the system in the same field. Regardless, it is not until you are decentralised that you offer no-KYC casinos, many are just so unlawful, so we should choose them with care.

If a casino is no-KYC, I just excuse myself immediately, and when the casino is a KYC style, I see no reason why I should not complete the KYC immediately. But for any reason, if I did not complete the KYC at that time, then I should not blame them if they later asked me to do so, after all, I knew what I signed for.  Above all, the true casinos that will never ask you for KYC completion are the centralised casinos. The centralised ones that are forming no-KYC still ask some customers to complete the KYC with time to show how dubious they are.

Yes, it is. The most part of casino can be called CEX. Of course, it used with exchanges, but i don`t know how we can call the same casinos. DEX and CEX allows us to understand what we want to say.
About KYC i said lots of times - i don`t see any problem with KYC, except KYC, when you can`t choose its time. If i withdraw money i want to be sure that i get it right now.

You wont really be having no problems if you do really just that simply make yourself that able to deal with those known casinos or reputable ones on which you could really be able to assure yourself that you would be getting paid up on the time that you would really making those withdrawal request, somewhat we should really be thinking that there would really be that a particular threshold on which time comes that they would really be asking something about verification or some sort on which this isnt shocking or really not that totally new considering that these places are already that centralized or under regulations
on which it wont really be that something new.

To make yourself not getting in shock then it would be always better that you should really be having at least the  time on reading up those terms and conditions
on which you could really be able to make yourself wary about those things and wont really be shocked on the time that you've been asked out
when you do make out some request.

[mak013]

Yes, it is. The most part of casino can be called CEX. Of course, it used with exchanges, but i don`t know how we can call the same casinos. DEX and CEX allows us to understand what we want to say.
About KYC i said lots of times - i don`t see any problem with KYC, except KYC, when you can`t choose its time. If i withdraw money i want to be sure that i get it right now.

You wont really be having no problems if you do really just that simply make yourself that able to deal with those known casinos or reputable ones on which you could really be able to assure yourself that you would be getting paid up on the time that you would really making those withdrawal request, somewhat we should really be thinking that there would really be that a particular threshold on which time comes that they would really be asking something about verification or some sort on which this isnt shocking or really not that totally new considering that these places are already that centralized or under regulations
on which it wont really be that something new.

To make yourself not getting in shock then it would be always better that you should really be having at least the  time on reading up those terms and conditions
on which you could really be able to make yourself wary about those things and wont really be shocked on the time that you've been asked out
when you do make out some request.

If you read my previous posts you can see that i don`t afraid KYC. I want to have an opportunity to KYC when the gambler want. If i need money right now and i haven`t KYC yet - it take some money, mostly at least one day. If i can ask KYC myself - i don`t have such problems.
And don`t tell me about ToS. There are always the same thing - "The casino can KYC your any moment" with some small difference in text. I don`t see "The gambler can ask KYC himself" their.

[Quidat]

Yes, it is. The most part of casino can be called CEX. Of course, it used with exchanges, but i don`t know how we can call the same casinos. DEX and CEX allows us to understand what we want to say.
About KYC i said lots of times - i don`t see any problem with KYC, except KYC, when you can`t choose its time. If i withdraw money i want to be sure that i get it right now.

You wont really be having no problems if you do really just that simply make yourself that able to deal with those known casinos or reputable ones on which you could really be able to assure yourself that you would be getting paid up on the time that you would really making those withdrawal request, somewhat we should really be thinking that there would really be that a particular threshold on which time comes that they would really be asking something about verification or some sort on which this isnt shocking or really not that totally new considering that these places are already that centralized or under regulations
on which it wont really be that something new.

To make yourself not getting in shock then it would be always better that you should really be having at least the  time on reading up those terms and conditions
on which you could really be able to make yourself wary about those things and wont really be shocked on the time that you've been asked out
when you do make out some request.

If you read my previous posts you can see that i don`t afraid KYC. I want to have an opportunity to KYC when the gambler want. If i need money right now and i haven`t KYC yet - it take some money, mostly at least one day. If i can ask KYC myself - i don`t have such problems.
And don`t tell me about ToS. There are always the same thing - "The casino can KYC your any moment" with some small difference in text. I don`t see "The gambler can ask KYC himself" their.

Some people do really afraid about exposing their identity and there are some who dont really care at all since there's nothing that they would really be tending to hide. This is why it would really be just that depending on a certain person because we arent all sharing up on the same interest and idea in mind. The main thing on why crypto casinos did make out such noise and recognition is that because of that anonymity feature on which to those people who are privacy concerned is that they do see this stuff to be revolutionary and this is why they would really be loving and preferring on playing
on crypto casinos due to this very reason. The sad thing is that these platforms used to be fully anonymous but on the time that regulation do kicks in then they do become that strict
when it comes to implementing regulation which it would really be that affecting its users.

[danadc]

Yes, it is. The most part of casino can be called CEX. Of course, it used with exchanges, but i don`t know how we can call the same casinos. DEX and CEX allows us to understand what we want to say.
About KYC i said lots of times - i don`t see any problem with KYC, except KYC, when you can`t choose its time. If i withdraw money i want to be sure that i get it right now.

You wont really be having no problems if you do really just that simply make yourself that able to deal with those known casinos or reputable ones on which you could really be able to assure yourself that you would be getting paid up on the time that you would really making those withdrawal request, somewhat we should really be thinking that there would really be that a particular threshold on which time comes that they would really be asking something about verification or some sort on which this isnt shocking or really not that totally new considering that these places are already that centralized or under regulations
on which it wont really be that something new.

To make yourself not getting in shock then it would be always better that you should really be having at least the  time on reading up those terms and conditions
on which you could really be able to make yourself wary about those things and wont really be shocked on the time that you've been asked out
when you do make out some request.

If you read my previous posts you can see that i don`t afraid KYC. I want to have an opportunity to KYC when the gambler want. If i need money right now and i haven`t KYC yet - it take some money, mostly at least one day. If i can ask KYC myself - i don`t have such problems.
And don`t tell me about ToS. There are always the same thing - "The casino can KYC your any moment" with some small difference in text. I don`t see "The gambler can ask KYC himself" their.

Some people do really afraid about exposing their identity and there are some who dont really care at all since there's nothing that they would really be tending to hide. This is why it would really be just that depending on a certain person because we arent all sharing up on the same interest and idea in mind. The main thing on why crypto casinos did make out such noise and recognition is that because of that anonymity feature on which to those people who are privacy concerned is that they do see this stuff to be revolutionary and this is why they would really be loving and preferring on playing
on crypto casinos due to this very reason. The sad thing is that these platforms used to be fully anonymous but on the time that regulation do kicks in then they do become that strict
when it comes to implementing regulation which it would really be that affecting its users.

The identity of the Peroans is something that we will always see poorly, I am one of those who do not like that I have to leave identity everywhere, because it is something that does not seem correct to me, I have enough with the banking systems and the of taxes that I have to pay that can do everything, so that a casino with similar experiences also does it when we are operating with crypto, I have always thought then what sense does it make that we are in a casino with crypto where we can't even have privacy.

I don't say anything in casinos that are fiat money that you have to leave documents, but it is quite annoying and meaningless that now to make a withdrawal in a casino you have to leave KYC, I don't agree with that, because they are Just like the exchanges, for everything it is an identification, for everything it is a problem, so that's tiring, annoying and Besides annoying , I don't like that very much, that's why I only play in casinos that I have always considered the most reliable for me.

[junder]

Some people do really afraid about exposing their identity and there are some who dont really care at all since there's nothing that they would really be tending to hide. This is why it would really be just that depending on a certain person because we arent all sharing up on the same interest and idea in mind. The main thing on why crypto casinos did make out such noise and recognition is that because of that anonymity feature on which to those people who are privacy concerned is that they do see this stuff to be revolutionary and this is why they would really be loving and preferring on playing
on crypto casinos due to this very reason. The sad thing is that these platforms used to be fully anonymous but on the time that regulation do kicks in then they do become that strict
when it comes to implementing regulation which it would really be that affecting its users.

I agree with you, obviously each of us has different thoughts, so when there are requirements like KYC, maybe some people don't believe it and are afraid of this, but for some people who already understand maybe they will do it and believe everyone will Just fine. It's natural that regulations are always updated because of course they also have their own goals which may be good for them, but what you say is true, sometimes new regulations have a bad impact on users. Some people might object or sort of not understand why there are new rules that they think don't make sense, but what's OK is that users don't have the right to change the rules that have been set.

There are some people who are very careful and are afraid that they will leave their personal identity everywhere, but when they get a win which of course can be cashed in and maybe they are required to fill in their personal identity then there is no other way but to fill it in instead of the winnings not can take. I think everyone has their own way of doing what must be done, the only thing you have to pay attention to is being careful in doing things.

[Asuspawer09]

~

It was for sure a common case on a lot of gambling casino websites, I mean it's a pretty common tactic for sure for some platforms in order to leave their users no choice but to do the KYC, personally, I dont really trust any gambling casino platform that wanted some kind of KYC because I just think that it wasn't really needed, plus giving up such information is a big risk, especially on a gambling website where there are so many scams or hacks happening, there are also a lot of cases where data are being sold, including sensitive data like this so if you're not going to be careful it could end up worst.

Just make sure to read everything before even starting to put some money on a gambling website because this could easily be the case if that is the case it's kinda your fault for not reading the details and now doing enough research on that before even starting to put some funds, It is easy to pick since there are tons of gambling websites here in the forum that are already trusted here, it could easily be a green flag if your trying or finding a good gambling website that you wanted to play with, Also most of the trusted website here doesnt required some kind of KYC at least in most of the gambling website that I tried.

I mean I dont really see KYC as a thing anymore in a lot of gambling websites since a lot of gamblers instantly don't like having some kind of KYC, probably some would be willing to on top gambling websites that they know and trust.

[benalexis12]

No, they always mention in on their ToS that they might ask KYC anytime, now if the site doesn't mention any KYC then asked it's users, they deserve negative reputation by any means.

As far as I can remember Bitsler has not mentioned KYC and they also usually do not ask for KYC. But once Upon a time I earned multiple times on sportsbook and they asked me to provide KYC. In this case, will it be a wise decision to tag negatively?

Well, I think by now, most of us should have realized that, kyc has become a normal thing with most centralized online gambling casinos, many casinos may not have to mention kyc directly in their terms of service, but when ever they request kyc verification from a user who seems or argues that they(the casino) did not mention kyc in their term of service, you did be shocked when they will point you to the part of their terms of service that either directly or In-directly talks about kyc.

And also, let's not forget that some casinos do sometimes include rules permitting them to add or subtract rules from their terms of service at will, so, if a matter like yours was to be taken to court to be judged, and the casino have such lines as I mentioned above in their terms of services, that alone could In-directly cover for kyc.

Yes, you are right there. All gamblers who enter crypto gambling online should be aware when it comes to KYC submission, because that's really normal, to be honest. It doesn't make any difference that you apply as an applicant; that's all.

Today's times are different because not all times are the same, so most people accept that kind of thing as long as we choose the casinos we know are legitimate, and we also learn to choose the right casino that is not just for gamblers to prey upon.

[PX-Z]

No, they always mention in on their ToS that they might ask KYC anytime, now if the site doesn't mention any KYC then asked it's users, they deserve negative reputation by any means.

As far as I can remember Bitsler has not mentioned KYC and they also usually do not ask for KYC. But once Upon a time I earned multiple times on sportsbook and they asked me to provide KYC. In this case, will it be a wise decision to tag negatively?

Are you sure it's not mentioned on their ToS, or you didn't/forgot to read the updated ToS when they required KYC after some time? Because casinos should be transparent with their ToS since it's their defense legally especially when they ban their users. If it's not on their ToS then asked KYC, then again, they deserve negative reputation on any platform as well as negative tag in this forum. Their license is not excuse to ask KYC when it's not on their ToS. Some casinos here doesn't ask KYC even they are licensed.

[mak013]

If you read my previous posts you can see that i don`t afraid KYC. I want to have an opportunity to KYC when the gambler want. If i need money right now and i haven`t KYC yet - it take some money, mostly at least one day. If i can ask KYC myself - i don`t have such problems.
And don`t tell me about ToS. There are always the same thing - "The casino can KYC your any moment" with some small difference in text. I don`t see "The gambler can ask KYC himself" their.

Some people do really afraid about exposing their identity and there are some who dont really care at all since there's nothing that they would really be tending to hide. This is why it would really be just that depending on a certain person because we arent all sharing up on the same interest and idea in mind. The main thing on why crypto casinos did make out such noise and recognition is that because of that anonymity feature on which to those people who are privacy concerned is that they do see this stuff to be revolutionary and this is why they would really be loving and preferring on playing
on crypto casinos due to this very reason. The sad thing is that these platforms used to be fully anonymous but on the time that regulation do kicks in then they do become that strict
when it comes to implementing regulation which it would really be that affecting its users.

I have no problem with people who afraid of KYC. It is their decision and i have to respect their opinion, even if i disagree with it. A have a problem when someone recommend me to read ToS, that contains the same points every time.
PS. And as for me it is naively enough to believe in anonymity in cryptocurrencies.

[Hirose UK]

Well, I think by now, most of us should have realized that, kyc has become a normal thing with most centralized online gambling casinos, many casinos may not have to mention kyc directly in their terms of service, but when ever they request kyc verification from a user who seems or argues that they(the casino) did not mention kyc in their term of service, you did be shocked when they will point you to the part of their terms of service that either directly or In-directly talks about kyc.

And also, let's not forget that some casinos do sometimes include rules permitting them to add or subtract rules from their terms of service at will, so, if a matter like yours was to be taken to court to be judged, and the casino have such lines as I mentioned above in their terms of services, that alone could In-directly cover for kyc.

Yes, you are right there. All gamblers who enter crypto gambling online should be aware when it comes to KYC submission, because that's really normal, to be honest. It doesn't make any difference that you apply as an applicant; that's all.

Today's times are different because not all times are the same, so most people accept that kind of thing as long as we choose the casinos we know are legitimate, and we also learn to choose the right casino that is not just for gamblers to prey upon.

KYC is really something that scares some gamblers even though there are many who accept the existence of KYC requirements, this is requirement that not all gambling sites will ask for at the start of registering but they provide clear explanations in the tos.
When the requirements are clearly stated in the tos and the casino used is also large casino then it is clear that there is no need to worry or feel afraid about the personal identity provided.
After all, this will all also be related to the comfort of each gambler in the casino, I sure that no gambler wants to have series of problems and no gambler wants to stall when they win big and have to complete withdrawal requirements such as KYC.

I agree with you that when you use large casino that is trusted and has good reputation, everything will still run well.
Moreover, they always provide notifications and also ask for approval from customers if there are changes to applicable rules or regulations.

[bettercrypto]

No, they always mention in on their ToS that they might ask KYC anytime, now if the site doesn't mention any KYC then asked it's users, they deserve negative reputation by any means.

If a casino tries to keep their customers in the dark without clear information about ToS and plays an excuse game, the reputation of that casino is already in doubt. How transparent a casino is should be understood in advance. Gamblers are also responsible to read the ToS properly at the time of registration in any casino so that they do not face any problem with KYC in future.

I agree with what you said that a gambler should be responsible for reading the TOS, because I noticed that when they don't read the TOS, that's when they have a problem and think they are right and reasonable.

And when there is an investigation, it will be seen that it will be known that the fault lies with the complainant; they will be embarrassed, and then suddenly they will say that they did not notice, but they themselves know that they are really wrong.

[ultrloa]

No, they always mention in on their ToS that they might ask KYC anytime, now if the site doesn't mention any KYC then asked it's users, they deserve negative reputation by any means.

If a casino tries to keep their customers in the dark without clear information about ToS and plays an excuse game, the reputation of that casino is already in doubt. How transparent a casino is should be understood in advance. Gamblers are also responsible to read the ToS properly at the time of registration in any casino so that they do not face any problem with KYC in future.

I agree with what you said that a gambler should be responsible for reading the TOS, because I noticed that when they don't read the TOS, that's when they have a problem and think they are right and reasonable.

And when there is an investigation, it will be seen that it will be known that the fault lies with the complainant; they will be embarrassed, and then suddenly they will say that they did not notice, but they themselves know that they are really wrong.

People should normalize to read the TOS of the casino they are playing since everything is written there so that there's no surprising things will happen and for them to be aware on any future implementation. Gamblers should know that it doesn't mean that the casino didn't ask a KYC at first they would never ask this forever since there would be sudden changes if the casino became a government policy compliance that's why its important for them to know future changes that may came so they could every prepare once they had been ask for a requirements if they ask to go in this process.

Some may hate to do KYC but since this has been a normal requirements on each reputable casino then maybe they should start to know for theirselves if they are ready to submit their details.

[Hamphser]

Yes, it is. The most part of casino can be called CEX. Of course, it used with exchanges, but i don`t know how we can call the same casinos. DEX and CEX allows us to understand what we want to say.
About KYC i said lots of times - i don`t see any problem with KYC, except KYC, when you can`t choose its time. If i withdraw money i want to be sure that i get it right now.

You wont really be having no problems if you do really just that simply make yourself that able to deal with those known casinos or reputable ones on which you could really be able to assure yourself that you would be getting paid up on the time that you would really making those withdrawal request, somewhat we should really be thinking that there would really be that a particular threshold on which time comes that they would really be asking something about verification or some sort on which this isnt shocking or really not that totally new considering that these places are already that centralized or under regulations
on which it wont really be that something new.

To make yourself not getting in shock then it would be always better that you should really be having at least the  time on reading up those terms and conditions
on which you could really be able to make yourself wary about those things and wont really be shocked on the time that you've been asked out
when you do make out some request.

If you read my previous posts you can see that i don`t afraid KYC. I want to have an opportunity to KYC when the gambler want. If i need money right now and i haven`t KYC yet - it take some money, mostly at least one day. If i can ask KYC myself - i don`t have such problems.
And don`t tell me about ToS. There are always the same thing - "The casino can KYC your any moment" with some small difference in text. I don`t see "The gambler can ask KYC himself" their.

Me too neither but it would be always best that there should be no KYC because this is where we do prefer on since we are dealing with crypto space then everything should really be that anonymous.

There should be no asking about those documents and verification.If you have win up a particular big amount and as long it was hit up on a fair way then they should release it right away
wtihout questions asked. Just like on what been mentioned above that since there would really be those expecting changes like regulation then these businesses having
no choice but to comply with those things which it is true that they dont have no choice.

For us users if you dont like KYC then you could be able to skip out and look for another place which we know that we do have tons of sites
on which you can be able to choose upon.

[ScamViruS]

No, they always mention in on their ToS that they might ask KYC anytime, now if the site doesn't mention any KYC then asked it's users, they deserve negative reputation by any means.

If a casino tries to keep their customers in the dark without clear information about ToS and plays an excuse game, the reputation of that casino is already in doubt. How transparent a casino is should be understood in advance. Gamblers are also responsible to read the ToS properly at the time of registration in any casino so that they do not face any problem with KYC in future.

I agree with what you said that a gambler should be responsible for reading the TOS, because I noticed that when they don't read the TOS, that's when they have a problem and think they are right and reasonable.

And when there is an investigation, it will be seen that it will be known that the fault lies with the complainant; they will be embarrassed, and then suddenly they will say that they did not notice, but they themselves know that they are really wrong.

Most of the time we see that gamblers are careless and face the problem at maximum time, and their complaints are not properly addressed. But gamblers don't want to admit their own mistakes even if they are wrong that they didn't read the ToS properly while registering, but in the end they blame the casino. But not all gamblers are at fault, many low reputation casinos play games with their customers with many conditions hidden within the ToS.

So as much as it is important for gamblers to read the ToS, it is more important to choose a reputable casino to gamble in so as not to face any kind of problem later on in cases where it is impossible to resolve.

[Wiwo]

Most of the time we see that gamblers are careless and face the problem at maximum time, and their complaints are not properly addressed. But gamblers don't want to admit their own mistakes even if they are wrong that they didn't read the ToS properly while registering, but in the end they blame the casino. But not all gamblers are at fault, many low reputation casinos play games with their customers with many conditions hidden within the ToS.

So as much as it is important for gamblers to read the ToS, it is more important to choose a reputable casino to gamble in so as not to face any kind of problem later on in cases where it is impossible to resolve.

The thing is that, most casino supports.already know the inability of gambler's to follow simple rules and at that tend to make alot of mistakes and then shift the blame to the casino, such issues as when the gambler fails to read the terms and conditions of the casino and to know what are the documents that are demanded to get verifications in the sense that, their may not have the requirements to pass through the casino KYC there by being unable to get through with verification when it is demanded.

But for us to have a fair deal on casinos, we need to have all the necessary requirements as in documents that are accepted to get verified, this way they tend to pass through kyc with ease, instead of creating account and making deposits without knowing the conditions and there by trying to pass through verification by proxy which is impossible even if the documents belong to you.