Bluestreet
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 988
Merit: 1000
|
|
October 12, 2015, 04:24:16 PM |
|
Mainstream purchases at this level is far more important then the volume we had over the weekend. Good to see over 1k USD purchases. That is true litesire. Pure crypto volume is important but you never know if its long or short term investors.
|
|
|
|
Gulden
Member
Offline
Activity: 60
Merit: 100
|
|
October 12, 2015, 05:01:02 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
veertje
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 952
Merit: 1000
|
|
October 12, 2015, 05:36:48 PM |
|
Downloaded and installed.
|
|
|
|
bram_vnl
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1000
|
|
October 12, 2015, 05:41:11 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Spakler
|
|
October 12, 2015, 06:12:09 PM |
|
I just love the continues development of this coin.
|
|
|
|
Jero
|
|
October 12, 2015, 06:47:04 PM |
|
I just love the continues development of this coin. Me too! It goes a bit too fast... I am downloading now
|
|
|
|
TamiLee
|
|
October 13, 2015, 02:40:02 AM |
|
One word of warning about setting up a foundation. It's normally ends up with a bunch of old farts being political hacks, if you want to slow down progress start a foundation.
|
|
|
|
Bluestreet
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 988
Merit: 1000
|
|
October 13, 2015, 03:08:40 AM |
|
One word of warning about setting up a foundation. It's normally ends up with a bunch of old farts being political hacks, if you want to slow down progress start a foundation.
Who said anything about a foundation?
|
|
|
|
LTEX
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1025
Merit: 1000
ltex.nl
|
|
October 13, 2015, 07:00:37 AM |
|
One word of warning about setting up a foundation. It's normally ends up with a bunch of old farts being political hacks, if you want to slow down progress start a foundation.
Who said anything about a foundation? This old fart of course
|
A fool will just look at the finger, even if it points to paradise!
|
|
|
|
Trackcoins
|
|
October 13, 2015, 08:06:17 AM |
|
foundation is good idea for success
|
|
|
|
Yoshi Livo
|
|
October 13, 2015, 08:15:45 AM |
|
One word of warning about setting up a foundation. It's normally ends up with a bunch of old farts being political hacks, if you want to slow down progress start a foundation.
Who said anything about a foundation? This old fart of course I know e gulden foundation where you can start tomorrow
|
|
|
|
TamiLee
|
|
October 13, 2015, 09:42:58 AM |
|
A foundation to a startup business is the same as a anchor on a ship.
|
|
|
|
MaNI
|
|
October 13, 2015, 09:43:59 AM Last edit: October 13, 2015, 09:56:05 AM by MaNI |
|
A foundation to a startup business is the same as a anchor on a shipcanoe.
A million points to this man, though I improved on it just a little :p
|
|
|
|
TamiLee
|
|
October 13, 2015, 10:47:13 AM |
|
A foundation to a startup business is the same as a anchor on a ship.
If a storm occurs you'd be happy with such an anchor otherwise your ship would have crashed on the rocks... With a foundation your ship would become a empty vessel very quickly and not worth saving but at least i wont be onboard anymore
|
|
|
|
BioMike
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1658
Merit: 1001
|
|
October 13, 2015, 10:49:42 AM |
|
I made it clear that it would be better to pack the organisation in a legal entity (whether that is a foundation, "vereniging" or "cooperatie" remains open for me) for various reasons. One thing, for example, I asked Rijk about is the taxes that he possibly has to pay over the pre-mine, due to the fact that it is in his possession (it is part of his wealth under the current construction). If he is not paying tax over it he is evading taxes, which is possible punishable by Dutch law. I have yet to hear about this from him. Other things happening in his personal environment (accidents, legal problems, financial problems, marriage/divorce, etc.) could also have consequences for the pre-mine.
What is done within the legal entity remains open for discussion for me, but as long one natural legal entity (currently Rijk) is the thing controlling NLG by law, NLG remains vulnerable. This is what worries me (and I guess also LTEX, who started this). From a development point of view this might not be a good decision (as MaNI and c_e_d claim, I'm not sure about that), but from a investing (not the speculation mentioned here often) point of view it would reduce uncertainties quite a bit.
And people mentioning the Bitcoin foundation... it wasn't initiated from the community. They were just some (shady) CEOs of Bitcoin companies that tried to influence Bitcoin through that structure.
|
|
|
|
BioMike
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1658
Merit: 1001
|
|
October 13, 2015, 11:02:23 AM |
|
LTEX, I and a few others just want a civil discussion about things that worry us (and holds us back in doing things for NLG) and how the team would handle the obvious problems when they arise. The foundation was proposed as one of the many solutions, not THE solution. Yet, we only receive negative sounding comments from the dev team about how bad this one solution is.
If the dev team doesn't want this discussion, I'll get the hint (I don't speak for others). Just say it, then I know I have to obey the benevolent dictator.
|
|
|
|
BioMike
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1658
Merit: 1001
|
|
October 13, 2015, 11:19:48 AM |
|
About the foundation talk, this is not on our roadmap. However because we do understand some concerns of other members in the community we have added the issuing of a statement on our to-do list.
Thank you for recognizing our concerns. Looking forward to the statement. I hope we can continue the discussion afterwards, when things remain not clear.
|
|
|
|
Dutchyyy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1197
Merit: 1001
|
|
October 13, 2015, 11:28:15 AM |
|
LTEX, I and a few others just want a civil discussion about things that worry us (and holds us back in doing things for NLG) and how the team would handle the obvious problems when they arise. The foundation was proposed as one of the many solutions, not THE solution. Yet, we only receive negative sounding comments from the dev team about how bad this one solution is.
If the dev team doesn't want this discussion, I'll get the hint (I don't speak for others). Just say it, then I know I have to obey the benevolent dictator.
There is 2 leaders . LTEX and RIJK .one will be a dictactor to the grp that does not agree. Like Ltex is ur your leader because of ur joint effort with aur. You also talk with Ltex more and his ideas will have more effect on you. It will be the same for the followers of Rijk.
|
|
|
|
BioMike
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1658
Merit: 1001
|
|
October 13, 2015, 11:39:53 AM |
|
LTEX, I and a few others just want a civil discussion about things that worry us (and holds us back in doing things for NLG) and how the team would handle the obvious problems when they arise. The foundation was proposed as one of the many solutions, not THE solution. Yet, we only receive negative sounding comments from the dev team about how bad this one solution is.
If the dev team doesn't want this discussion, I'll get the hint (I don't speak for others). Just say it, then I know I have to obey the benevolent dictator.
There is 2 leaders . LTEX and RIJK .one will be a dictactor to the grp that does not agree. Like Ltex is ur your leader because of ur joint effort with aur. You also talk with Ltex more and his ideas will have more effect on you. It will be the same for the followers of Rijk. LTEX is not my leader and don't pull AUR in this. It has NOTHING to do with it. Stop spreading FUD. The dev team is currently leading NLG, nobody else. We just want them to do a proper job and raising questions about issues we see and propose possible solutions.
|
|
|
|
|