I get what barb was saying about IRC and the moderation. If you oppose the view of anyone in the IRC with a moderate button, you get squelched. Really cute guys!
But go ahead, take the deal, jl777 will put you under his umbrella and make you rich. I am certain of it. All you ballers!
Mark this post, in 2-4 weeks you will see a whole new group of bagholders. But that is okay, because at least the people pumping this deal will have the opportunity to profit before people catch onto the game that is being played here.
I'll be buying shares as this is announced and sell it every chance I get on the way up knowing that full well this is not going to put vericoin in a position of future strength or growth. Just being real, Get this thing going on BS and I'll profit with you, that is fine, but it is not the right way to do things, and surely, those not smart enough to see through the BS will hold and be bagholder 3x
Uhh...fine, I guess. But why not? There will still be 90% of the coins in VRC's holders' hands. That 10% will be off the market. And the VRC developers can still go about their business to bring all of their promised features etc.
I'm trying to see the naysayers' point of view, but I really don't understand what they are saying.
Another way to look at the exact post above is that for a 10% commitment, VRC will be part of a new project. If it is successful -- excellent! If it is not, then the shares will be returned in 3 years (if I understand correctly) and in the meantime, those coins are off the market resulting in a smaller float. What is so awful about that risk/reward ratio?
Now, saying that I am still a bit confused about the "donation" part of the equation. Will those coin holders be compensated for their VRC once SuperNet's ICO is finished? Or is it more like a loan? Or is it a flat-out donation? All of those scenarios have different risk/reward ratios, of course.
EDIT:* I see that effectsToCause has cleared this up. This is NOT a donation. It is a sale for a fair price (above what it has been trading at lately). In that case, this risk/reward ratio seems to good to ignore!