Eastwind
|
|
February 01, 2015, 08:54:29 PM |
|
I think Claymore has milked the last bit from his excellent miner.
|
|
|
|
Claymore (OP)
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
|
|
February 02, 2015, 07:44:57 AM |
|
Claymore, i remember very often updates of your miner, what causes of stopping ? No potential of improving ?
Currently I don't see any ways to improve performance. But I promised to release a minor update, I'm uploading it right now.
|
|
|
|
Claymore (OP)
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
|
|
February 02, 2015, 07:46:00 AM |
|
v9.2 is available:
- Improved stability in some cases. - Added 285 card native support.
|
|
|
|
tearsdontfall
Member
Offline
Activity: 66
Merit: 10
|
|
February 15, 2015, 04:36:56 AM |
|
in my core i5 4th generation i get about 186+ h/s ... but the speed is not constant 186+ ... most of the time it goes down to 100+ ... is there any way i can make it constant speed of 180+ ?? please tell me
|
|
|
|
minerador
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
|
|
February 22, 2015, 08:37:55 PM |
|
Claymore: can you build v9.2 for Linux?
|
|
|
|
Claymore (OP)
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
|
|
February 23, 2015, 07:47:52 AM |
|
Claymore: can you build v9.2 for Linux?
Not right now, but I will do it.
|
|
|
|
FakeAccount
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 248
Merit: 100
I'm not real
|
|
February 26, 2015, 04:09:25 AM |
|
ESET detects a virus in the latest download zip from mega.
|
|
|
|
Claymore (OP)
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
|
|
February 26, 2015, 07:26:50 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
MarkMJ
|
|
February 26, 2015, 08:41:06 AM |
|
Hello dear, I will testing this next month,in my opinion currently it is waste of time.
|
I'm RED and that's GOOD, i will never be GREEN and that's not BAD! there's no one i'd rather be than me. DEV for cryptocurrency but I HATE forks
|
|
|
Hueristic
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3962
Merit: 5384
Doomed to see the future and unable to prevent it
|
|
March 16, 2015, 04:31:03 PM |
|
What are the li options? Just "1"? I would like to lower the intensity further as it seems to interfere with my 2d renders. I've tried "0" and "2" with no success. This is not clear at all. -li Low intensity mode. Specify "-li 1" if you don't want Windows to freeze. Also both of these setting say Fastest for R9-270/x, which is it or are the equal? "-a 1" fastest mining mode for 290/290x and 270/270x cards. "-a 4" fastest mining for recent cards (280x, 270/270x etc). HD7950 Tahiti (basically 280 right?) To see your current hashrate remember to hit "m" key and then you have to select the GPU number usually "0" on single card systems. -h 832 does work best -a parameter rates (these are with low intensity -li 1) no command (auto mode) == 472 - 473 h/s <<-- alot of variance so I cannot tell what mode was chosen -a 0 == 474 h/s -a 1 == 466 h/s -a 2 == 455 h/s -a 3 == 448 h/s -a 4 == 472 h/s Using this command line for anyone that wants to try it and might be having issues with the syntax (getting unrecognized command errors). NsGpuCNMiner.exe -o stratum+tcp://xmr.crypto-pool.fr:6666 -a 1 -tt 80 -h 832 -li 1 -di 0 -wd 1 -u 44VYnAXVVH2bRvpC2vSYuZPpdXUpsVyc8WkSymZuPQNKSD3485C8PKPGPMbT53mRNBS7y2q9FkQCS1N 1zmt5YLWMQ8es9gH -p x The line is so long sometimes things like wordwrap in notepad will ad a carriage return after the space character before the wallet address so make sure there is only one space between every parameter.
|
“Bad men need nothing more to compass their ends, than that good men should look on and do nothing.”
|
|
|
Claymore (OP)
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
|
|
March 16, 2015, 06:31:16 PM |
|
What are the li options? Just "1"? I would like to lower the intensity further as it seems to interfere with my 2d renders. I've tried "0" and "2" with no success. This is not clear at all. -li Low intensity mode. Specify "-li 1" if you don't want Windows to freeze. Any values that are not specified in readme file are not supported. Same for all options. So either don't specify "-li" option, or use "-li 1". Also both of these setting say Fastest for R9-270/x, which is it or are the equal? "-a 1" fastest mining mode for 290/290x and 270/270x cards. "-a 4" fastest mining for recent cards (280x, 270/270x etc). This is because for some cards some modes have very similar speed. no command (auto mode) == 472 - 473 h/s <<-- alot of variance so I cannot tell what mode was chosen
Miner always reports what mode was chosen, like this: "GPU #0: -a 1 mode selected".
|
|
|
|
Hueristic
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3962
Merit: 5384
Doomed to see the future and unable to prevent it
|
|
March 16, 2015, 09:00:12 PM |
|
What are the li options? Just "1"? I would like to lower the intensity further as it seems to interfere with my 2d renders. I've tried "0" and "2" with no success. This is not clear at all. -li Low intensity mode. Specify "-li 1" if you don't want Windows to freeze. Any values that are not specified in readme file are not supported. Same for all options. So either don't specify "-li" option, or use "-li 1". Also both of these setting say Fastest for R9-270/x, which is it or are the equal? "-a 1" fastest mining mode for 290/290x and 270/270x cards. "-a 4" fastest mining for recent cards (280x, 270/270x etc). This is because for some cards some modes have very similar speed. no command (auto mode) == 472 - 473 h/s <<-- alot of variance so I cannot tell what mode was chosen
Miner always reports what mode was chosen, like this: "GPU #0: -a 1 mode selected". OK so It's li 1 or nothing, got it. THX
|
“Bad men need nothing more to compass their ends, than that good men should look on and do nothing.”
|
|
|
Jamsheed
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 31
Merit: 0
|
|
March 18, 2015, 03:18:50 PM |
|
Nice specs
|
|
|
|
bitwolf
|
|
March 18, 2015, 03:38:46 PM |
|
Will there be an update for some performance improvement or a little fee decrease after the rise of the price?
|
|
|
|
adaseb
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3878
Merit: 1733
|
|
March 22, 2015, 05:15:18 AM |
|
I added an old 6870 GPU to one of my Pitcarin rigs. And for some reason it keeps disconnecting from the pool and getting errors such as "Low Difficulty Share".
My 6990 doesn't have any issues and my R9 270X alone don't run into any of these issues.
Any ideas?
|
|
|
|
Claymore (OP)
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
|
|
March 22, 2015, 09:22:12 AM |
|
I added an old 6870 GPU to one of my Pitcarin rigs. And for some reason it keeps disconnecting from the pool and getting errors such as "Low Difficulty Share".
My 6990 doesn't have any issues and my R9 270X alone don't run into any of these issues.
Any ideas?
1. Make sure that you use Catalyst 14.6 or older. 2. Make sure that you use "-a 3" for 5xxx/6xxx cards. 3. For tests make sure that you don't overclock GPUs and PSU can handle all GPUs.
|
|
|
|
adaseb
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3878
Merit: 1733
|
|
March 23, 2015, 03:47:05 AM |
|
I added an old 6870 GPU to one of my Pitcarin rigs. And for some reason it keeps disconnecting from the pool and getting errors such as "Low Difficulty Share".
My 6990 doesn't have any issues and my R9 270X alone don't run into any of these issues.
Any ideas?
1. Make sure that you use Catalyst 14.6 or older. 2. Make sure that you use "-a 3" for 5xxx/6xxx cards. 3. For tests make sure that you don't overclock GPUs and PSU can handle all GPUs. Ahh thanks a -3 seems to have fixed the issue, before it was on a -4 for that older 6870 card.
|
|
|
|
adaseb
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3878
Merit: 1733
|
|
March 23, 2015, 09:18:18 AM |
|
Ran into another issue. Every few 20-30 mins or so I keep getting this 02:58:02:697 974 watchdog - thread 0, hb time 1060 02:58:02:697 974 watchdog - thread 1, hb time 2714 02:58:02:697 974 watchdog - thread 2, hb time 1731 02:58:02:697 974 watchdog - thread 3, hb time 686 02:58:02:697 974 watchdog - thread 4, hb time 1809 02:58:02:697 974 watchdog - thread 5, hb time 624 02:58:02:697 974 watchdog - thread 6, hb time 62 02:58:02:697 974 watchdog - thread 7, hb time 66986 02:58:02:697 974 WATCHDOG: Thread 7 hangs in OpenCL call, you need to restart miner 02:58:02:697 974 WATCHDOG: GPU memory error, you need to restart miner 02:58:02:697 974 Restarting OK, exit... 02:58:02:787 854 Job changed, drop current round Any idea how to find out which thread 7 is?
|
|
|
|
Claymore (OP)
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
|
|
March 23, 2015, 10:18:19 AM |
|
Ran into another issue. Every few 20-30 mins or so I keep getting this
Any idea how to find out which thread 7 is?
Make sure you use v9.2. If so, GPU_id = Thread_id / 2. So it's GPU #3 (i.e. 4th card).
|
|
|
|
MrJay
Member
Offline
Activity: 115
Merit: 10
|
|
March 25, 2015, 09:44:47 AM Last edit: March 25, 2015, 11:17:21 AM by MrJay |
|
Any idea what could be causing this:
09:29:03:320 f9c buf: {"id":1,"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":null,"result":{"id":"124601006298325","job":{"blob":"0100beffc9a80519953029eb35686e6603c415a5ce146464a18fc5d4a2ba148c54fce948f82f4e0 0000000e347b57b530720a0174765f22dd11afec72266a4aca2468563cb9692cc5c52ee03","job_id":"148032830562442","target":"7b5e0400"},"status":"OK"}}
09:29:03:320 f9c parse packet: 303 09:29:03:325 f9c new buf size: 0 09:29:03:325 f9c DevFee: Pool Diff 15000 09:29:04:244 f64 GPU 2, GpuMiner k1a failed -4 09:29:04:246 6ec GPU 3, GpuMiner k1a failed -4 09:29:04:249 f64 GPU memory allocation failed. Try to set at least 16 GB of Virtual Memory: Computer Properties / Advanced System Settings / Performance / Advanced / Virtual Memory
5x 290 rig, I have virtual memory set to 16GB, no overclock, I've actually set memory down to 1250 from stock 1300.
Thanks.
Edit: using 13.12 drivers with 9.2 13.12.
|
|
|
|
|