[ANN][BURST] Burst | Efficient HDD Mining | New 1.2.3 Fork block 92000

[Elmit]

1. How to get a node in Burst running?
http://wiki.nxtcrypto.org/wiki/How-To:CreatePublicNode - Works fine for me, you have been asking this question for about a month, what exactly is your definition of a node?

2. Why no projects are any more shown in ATcrowdfunding.html?
Works fine on my end and others, sounds like something is wrong on your end.

3. When the Donation button will we included in ATcrowdfunding.html?
Seems like nothing but feature bloat to me.  Just use the actual method.

4. Who are the developer of Burst?
BurstDev.

1. I followed exactly that instructions.
Since you got it to run:
What wallet version did you use?
Did you create a hallmark? For me this step did not work, but maybe with an older version of wallet it would.

2. restart of burst helped

3. I finished now one case and will make a document soon

4. BurstDev? ist that a Bitcoin Forum user?
Maybe I rephrase this problem. Average Joe maybe not be able to answer some questions. MMaybe if he says something, I can safely ignore it. However, if somebody apparently with knowledge (developer) would answer, I can trust it would work ;-)

The way I read the definition of "Hallmark" it only applies to the NXT code.  A hallmark verifies that a specific node belongs to a specific account. "If you are operating a public NXT node and have a non-trivial balance then hallmarking is strongly recommended"  NXT is a POS coin and NSC aka NXT security coins are distributed to NXT Hallmarked-Nodes. (https://nxtforum.org/assets-board/%28ann%29-nsc-nxt-security-coin/).  Hallmarking a NXT node allows more traffic to be processed through it (https://nxtforum.org/general/why-should-i-hallmark-my-node/?PHPSESSID=0tqdvh6uu0ql16rfikvp86kea6).  

None of this Hallmarking information appears to apply to a BUST NODE.  A BURST node could care less what accounts are associated with it, your job as a node is to relay block information to other wallets.  Just like in any other POW coin, a "node" is just a database interface "wallet" that has a very high uptime, close to 100%, has a high bandwidth, and can accept a high amount of connected peers.  You can adjust your peer count within the burst config file, and you can make sure your "node" is reachable by others by setting your external IP within the config file.

What exactly are you trying to accomplish with this NXT hallmark reference that your current "node" is not doing?

Your questions confuse me, I may be an average Joe, but my Google-Foo is at a decent level.

I understood that a Hallmark is necessary to operate a TRUSTED node, while a "peer" does not need to be. I thought that with the Hallmark a trust level is achieved.
By following the NXT description how to setup the node to fill in the Hallmark came up and it is in the conf file of BURST as well.

BTW, I also did not find the Burst equivalent of:
//Get public node from nxtpeers.com
$getServer = file_get_contents('http://nxtpeers.com/api/index.php');

Something like that must be exist, otherwise how would the wallet find other peers, except the hard coded ones in the config file?

[TetraHect0rCannabinol]

Hey Guys,

Do me a favor, please consider retweeting my latest tweet here : https://twitter.com/Hect0rius/status/567147019022925824

Im trying to get kim dotcom on board and use burstcoin as a alternative payment on mega.co.nz.

I think enough and he may see the potential burst has to offer, so tweet away to him

His Handle : https://twitter.com/KimDotcom

Thanks, have a good night all

[richiela]

Could dev team or someone in the community let us know before an update like this in the future?  Would help reduce disruption on our end...

thanks
richie@bittrex

[q327K091]

Hey Guys,

Do me a favor, please consider retweeting my latest tweet here : https://twitter.com/Hect0rius/status/567147019022925824

Im trying to get kim dotcom on board and use burstcoin as a alternative payment on mega.co.nz.

I think enough and he may see the potential burst has to offer, so tweet away to him

His Handle : https://twitter.com/KimDotcom

Thanks, have a good night all

will do makes perfect sense.. will retweet tomorrow, will start on my handle.. seems I am "trusted"  have a great night. tomorrow is President's Day  

reserved


https://twitter.com/q327K091

[crazyearner]

Hey Guys,

Do me a favor, please consider retweeting my latest tweet here : https://twitter.com/Hect0rius/status/567147019022925824

Im trying to get kim dotcom on board and use burstcoin as a alternative payment on mega.co.nz.

I think enough and he may see the potential burst has to offer, so tweet away to him

His Handle : https://twitter.com/KimDotcom

Thanks, have a good night all

will do makes perfect sense.. will retweet tomorrow, will start on my handle.. seems I am "trusted"  have a great night. tomorrow is President's Day  

reserved


https://twitter.com/q327K091

Would be nice to see mega support burst coin but the million $ question is that is mega going to follow the same BS that happened when it use to be mega upload in the past. Lost a lot of documents though what happened in the past but lucky I had back ups and didnt lose anything as was stored on another cloud too. Problem is mega got into trouble last time and no doubt if things not done correct this time will end up following same problems as before getting closed down.

[q327K091]

right... maybe not a best avenue of approach thanks for this eloquent analysis we want to keep crypto extremely clean, i am serious

simplest would be to have BURST to be injected to global payment systems just like a crypto currency would be just because it uses storage does not mean companies selling storage would get preferential treatment, storage as an algorithm and low cost of mining in terms of energy expenditures ... let me think how I will support this coin really... but thanks again for the above...

https://twitter.com/q327K091 remains empty and silent

[Irontiga]

4. @burstcoin

Is that a Twitter handle? or to what are you referencing to?

[/quote]

Uhm.....have u read the OP?          

[Irontiga]

right... maybe not a best avenue of approach thanks for this eloquent analysis we want to keep crypto extremely clean, i am serious

simplest would be to have BURST to be injected to global payment systems just like a crypto currency would be just because it uses storage does not mean companies selling storage would get preferential treatment, storage as an algorithm and low cost of mining in terms of energy expenditures ... let me think how I will support this coin really... but thanks again for the above...

https://twitter.com/q327K091 remains empty and silent

Mega may be more interested in storj....they have the bandwidth.

[mmmaybe]

Hello,

I just made a simple GUI to generate Batch file for cpu plotter.

Is someone can tell me how share a picture and deploy source code please ?

If you can't share a picture, I don't think many people will trust "a simple GUI" made by you.
Alas, there are many gullible people around, so... good luck.

Well, I think the issue might be also in the fact that newbies aren't permitted to post links

kurairaito, did you put your code on github or somewhere?

I posted source at https://github.com/Kurairaito/batch_plot_generator
There is also a png in the repo wich illustrate the gui.

WHY ARE WE NOT FUNDING THIS?! GUIs for simpler use of this coin are needed! Make it a Full-package Plotter + miner and you might get more users! I don't get why you guys play around with lottery while this is not done yet?! There is competition out there with millions of funding you can't keep this a community project forever! You are supposed to develope a decentralized online storage solution, mining useless files(files without any purpose) on your HDD doesn't make sense!

A GUI is discussed rather intensively with several members.

[Elmit]

right... maybe not a best avenue of approach thanks for this eloquent analysis we want to keep crypto extremely clean, i am serious

simplest would be to have BURST to be injected to global payment systems just like a crypto currency would be just because it uses storage does not mean companies selling storage would get preferential treatment, storage as an algorithm and low cost of mining in terms of energy expenditures ... let me think how I will support this coin really... but thanks again for the above...

https://twitter.com/q327K091 remains empty and silent

Mega may be more interested in storj....they have the bandwidth.

You are at the right place, ... just walk over to Kim ;-)

[mmmaybe]

Hey Guys,

Do me a favor, please consider retweeting my latest tweet here : https://twitter.com/Hect0rius/status/567147019022925824

Im trying to get kim dotcom on board and use burstcoin as a alternative payment on mega.co.nz.

I think enough and he may see the potential burst has to offer, so tweet away to him

His Handle : https://twitter.com/KimDotcom

Thanks, have a good night all

Done!

Please follow https://twitter.com/real_BURSTCOIN and https://twitter.com/BURSTCOINof if you want to stay up-to-date.

The same goes for the Newletter on burstcoin.info

It's very important to get info if devs need to fork or similar

[bensam123]

So I sent someone my log files, but removed my secret which I assume was only in one form and not split up, does anyone know if there is anyway for someone to mess around with your miner or wallet just having the logs?

This happened on Friday and since then my mining has went down to nothing (yesterday I found no blocks, compared to last week I was finding a few blocks per day). I thought maybe the block chain was having issues, but this coincides nicely with when I sent them my logs.

I really don't want to replot everything, but I will if needed. There haven't been any rogue transactions in my wallet. Is there anyway to check what the rewardassignment is currently set to or if blocks have been going to a different address? I checked the page, but it doesn't have any information besides blanks (it'd actually be nice if this had a real spot in the wallet instead of a URL).

[mmmaybe]

About LuckyAT

We have discussed changes and new forms of LuckyAT today. As you know, work is being done to make it much easier to use (and create) ATs (read: no more .html downloads). That also means the platform can offer much more.

Two points were raised regarding possibly changing LuckyAT:


1. To have much faster payout system. Today the winner gets she's/he's money about a week after the current LuckyAT. But this can be changed into faster payouts, like every 3rd day or even daily. A certain delay most exist so people have the time to buys their tickets though.

Which payout system would you prefer, fast, slow, or perhaps both?



2. To have different levels of price of tickets. Some people have few BURST, while some are whales. As changing the time for payout, it is also possible to create variances in ticket price.

How much should a ticket cost, according to you, to suit both regular gamblers, whales and the minor holders: 50 - 2,000 - 50,000, or something else?



We want to hear what you thing about this to suit as many as possible

Creating different prices for tickets and payout time, of course also means there will be more than one lottery running, so they have to be clearly marked and named.

An earlier comment of about not only showing remaining blocks, but an estimate of time until the draw will also be implemented - even if an exact number is hard to predict.

Please discuss this here, but we will also make threads at BurstForum.com, where you will be able to vote.


Here are the relevant threads on BF:

Background: https://burstforum.com/index.php?threads/burst-successively-launched-a-decentralized-lottery-pr-and-the-future.593/
The cost of tickets: https://burstforum.com/index.php?threads/luckyats-vote-on-ticket-price.670/
The intervals of finding a winner: https://burstforum.com/index.php?threads/luckyats-how-often-should-payouts-be.672/



Edit: links to voting

*Bump*For*Votes*

[mmmaybe]

I supported this CF, but not with as much has deserves 

[Elmit]

So I sent someone my log files, but removed my secret which I assume was only in one form and not split up, does anyone know if there is anyway for someone to mess around with your miner or wallet just having the logs?

This happened on Friday and since then my mining has went down to nothing (yesterday I found no blocks, compared to last week I was finding a few blocks per day). I thought maybe the block chain was having issues, but this coincides nicely with when I sent them my logs.

I really don't want to replot everything, but I will if needed. There haven't been any rogue transactions in my wallet. Is there anyway to check what the rewardassignment is currently set to or if blocks have been going to a different address? I checked the page, but it doesn't have any information besides blanks.

Are you solo mining or in a pool?
If you are solo mining, I would suggest to restart your wallet, your miner is using. Maybe it helps.
Also have you upgraded your wallet to 1.2.2?

If you are mining in a pool, then the pool should have upgraded to the wallet 1.2.2 already and you are not using your wallet anyway.


If your sect goes out, then you are screwed and you may want to re-plot your hard disks with a new BURST address!!!
For exactly that reason, I suggest to use for each manageable hard disk space a different BURST address! E.g., if you have 60 TB, then I would use at least 3 different BURST addresses for that disk space.
To my knowledge there is not difference in mining speed, nor earnings, since the average is still the same!

[bensam123]

Hello,

I just made a simple GUI to generate Batch file for cpu plotter.

Is someone can tell me how share a picture and deploy source code please ?

If you can't share a picture, I don't think many people will trust "a simple GUI" made by you.
Alas, there are many gullible people around, so... good luck.

Well, I think the issue might be also in the fact that newbies aren't permitted to post links

kurairaito, did you put your code on github or somewhere?

I posted source at https://github.com/Kurairaito/batch_plot_generator
There is also a png in the repo wich illustrate the gui.

WHY ARE WE NOT FUNDING THIS?! GUIs for simpler use of this coin are needed! Make it a Full-package Plotter + miner and you might get more users! I don't get why you guys play around with lottery while this is not done yet?! There is competition out there with millions of funding you can't keep this a community project forever! You are supposed to develope a decentralized online storage solution, mining useless files(files without any purpose) on your HDD doesn't make sense!

Yeah, I don't think people have any idea what 'cloud storage' entails. Cloud storage as done by big companies right now is they have five data centers across the world or maybe even nine if they're big enough and send data between them on Tier 1 lines (if that). Data inside the datacenters is shared across 100GB or 1TB fiber lines between servers.

There is no way you can do a truly decentralized storage on a 'neighborhood' scale. The bandwidth requirements for the average user to take part in it would be ginormous (putting aside bandwidth caps). Accessing files would take 10-60 seconds, assuming it's split up rather then all in one place. The coin would then be more about bandwidth rather then about storage capacity or a equal relationship across both (more storage capacity means you need more bandwidth to 'mine' it).

Even though Burst is all about capacity, it's not about bandwidth and that's a major component in any sort of cloud storage operation. It's just not meant to be for this coin unless they completely redo the coin (which they may). You could found a coin based on this though and it would be pretty easy to calculate payouts as it would be based on capacity + bandwidth and then you could make a weighted formula that takes into account both of them, then distribute a few copies across multiple piers and have a bittorrent type data sharing.

Time to access the file would still be ridiculous like I said, but it would be doable. Maybe something along the lines of archive storage. You could throw in encryption as well and make it anonymous storage. Split up the parts more so one 'host' never has a whole file and it's even more anonymous if not completely impossible to put it back together without the keys. There would have to be limitations on 'max' sizes per host as well. If one person has too much of the network capacity then it dilutes the redundancy aspect.

That is possibly something burst could do. Decentralized storage for 'sensitive' information with high encryption levels and complete anonymity. That's not really about capacity anymore though, but it fits Bursts MO.

So I sent someone my log files, but removed my secret which I assume was only in one form and not split up, does anyone know if there is anyway for someone to mess around with your miner or wallet just having the logs?

This happened on Friday and since then my mining has went down to nothing (yesterday I found no blocks, compared to last week I was finding a few blocks per day). I thought maybe the block chain was having issues, but this coincides nicely with when I sent them my logs.

I really don't want to replot everything, but I will if needed. There haven't been any rogue transactions in my wallet. Is there anyway to check what the rewardassignment is currently set to or if blocks have been going to a different address? I checked the page, but it doesn't have any information besides blanks.

Are you solo mining or in a pool?
If you are solo mining, I would suggest to restart your wallet, your miner is using. Maybe it helps.
Also have you upgraded your wallet to 1.2.2?

If you are mining in a pool, then the pool should have upgraded to the wallet 1.2.2 already and you are not using your wallet anyway.


If your sect goes out, then you are screwed and you may want to re-plot your hard disks with a new BURST address!!!
For exactly that reason, I suggest to use for each manageable hard disk space a different BURST address! E.g., if you have 60 TB, then I would use at least 3 different BURST addresses for that disk space.
To my knowledge there is not difference in mining speed, nor earnings, since the average is still the same!

I've been on 1.2.2 at day one, solo mining, I'll restart my wallet.

I'm pretty certain I removed all the secret entries from the log file, but if it was split up or in a different place where it's not together I would have missed parts of it. Is there anyway to check if something weird has been going on? I haven't seen rogue transactions. How do you check the current rewardrecepient?

I could just be getting unlucky too, but based on my mining last week I should be at least getting 1-2 blocks per day.

[Mergesort]

Hello,

I just made a simple GUI to generate Batch file for cpu plotter.

Is someone can tell me how share a picture and deploy source code please ?

If you can't share a picture, I don't think many people will trust "a simple GUI" made by you.
Alas, there are many gullible people around, so... good luck.

Well, I think the issue might be also in the fact that newbies aren't permitted to post links

kurairaito, did you put your code on github or somewhere?

I posted source at https://github.com/Kurairaito/batch_plot_generator
There is also a png in the repo wich illustrate the gui.

WHY ARE WE NOT FUNDING THIS?! GUIs for simpler use of this coin are needed! Make it a Full-package Plotter + miner and you might get more users! I don't get why you guys play around with lottery while this is not done yet?! There is competition out there with millions of funding you can't keep this a community project forever! You are supposed to develope a decentralized online storage solution, mining useless files(files without any purpose) on your HDD doesn't make sense!

Yeah, I don't think people have any idea what 'cloud storage' entails. Cloud storage as done by big companies right now is they have five data centers across the world or maybe even nine if they're big enough and send data between them on Tier 1 lines (if that). Data inside the datacenters is shared across 100GB or 1TB fiber lines between servers.

There is no way you can do a truly decentralized storage on a 'neighborhood' scale. The bandwidth requirements for the average user to take part in it would be ginormous (putting aside bandwidth caps). Accessing files would take 10-60 seconds, assuming it's split up rather then all in one place. The coin would then be more about bandwidth rather then about storage capacity or a equal relationship across both (more storage capacity means you need more bandwidth to 'mine' it).

Even though Burst is all about capacity, it's not about bandwidth and that's a major component in any sort of cloud storage operation. It's just not meant to be for this coin unless they completely redo the coin (which they may). You could found a coin based on this though and it would be pretty easy to calculate payouts as it would be based on capacity + bandwidth and then you could make a weighted formula that takes into account both of them, then distribute a few copies across multiple piers and have a bittorrent type data sharing.

Time to access the file would still be ridiculous like I said, but it would be doable. Maybe something along the lines of archive storage. You could throw in encryption as well and make it anonymous storage. Split up the parts more so one 'host' never has a whole file and it's even more anonymous if not completely impossible to put it back together without the keys. There would have to be limitations on 'max' sizes per host as well. If one person has too much of the network capacity then it dilutes the redundancy aspect.

That is possibly something burst could do. Decentralized storage for 'sensitive' information with high encryption levels and complete anonymity. That's not really about capacity anymore though, but it fits Bursts MO.

At first it will be slow for sure, but i expect it to evolve like the internet did, more speed more bandwith more storage. But someone needs to start somewhere! If it's so slow at first i don't mind using it as archive, if it's secure that is. Pictures, videos and porn all forced the internet providers toupgrade their network, because the people demanded faster speeds. The internet is growing don't forget that.

[bensam123]

Hello,

I just made a simple GUI to generate Batch file for cpu plotter.

Is someone can tell me how share a picture and deploy source code please ?

If you can't share a picture, I don't think many people will trust "a simple GUI" made by you.
Alas, there are many gullible people around, so... good luck.

Well, I think the issue might be also in the fact that newbies aren't permitted to post links

kurairaito, did you put your code on github or somewhere?

I posted source at https://github.com/Kurairaito/batch_plot_generator
There is also a png in the repo wich illustrate the gui.

WHY ARE WE NOT FUNDING THIS?! GUIs for simpler use of this coin are needed! Make it a Full-package Plotter + miner and you might get more users! I don't get why you guys play around with lottery while this is not done yet?! There is competition out there with millions of funding you can't keep this a community project forever! You are supposed to develope a decentralized online storage solution, mining useless files(files without any purpose) on your HDD doesn't make sense!

Yeah, I don't think people have any idea what 'cloud storage' entails. Cloud storage as done by big companies right now is they have five data centers across the world or maybe even nine if they're big enough and send data between them on Tier 1 lines (if that). Data inside the datacenters is shared across 100GB or 1TB fiber lines between servers.

There is no way you can do a truly decentralized storage on a 'neighborhood' scale. The bandwidth requirements for the average user to take part in it would be ginormous (putting aside bandwidth caps). Accessing files would take 10-60 seconds, assuming it's split up rather then all in one place. The coin would then be more about bandwidth rather then about storage capacity or a equal relationship across both (more storage capacity means you need more bandwidth to 'mine' it).

Even though Burst is all about capacity, it's not about bandwidth and that's a major component in any sort of cloud storage operation. It's just not meant to be for this coin unless they completely redo the coin (which they may). You could found a coin based on this though and it would be pretty easy to calculate payouts as it would be based on capacity + bandwidth and then you could make a weighted formula that takes into account both of them, then distribute a few copies across multiple piers and have a bittorrent type data sharing.

Time to access the file would still be ridiculous like I said, but it would be doable. Maybe something along the lines of archive storage. You could throw in encryption as well and make it anonymous storage. Split up the parts more so one 'host' never has a whole file and it's even more anonymous if not completely impossible to put it back together without the keys. There would have to be limitations on 'max' sizes per host as well. If one person has too much of the network capacity then it dilutes the redundancy aspect.

That is possibly something burst could do. Decentralized storage for 'sensitive' information with high encryption levels and complete anonymity. That's not really about capacity anymore though, but it fits Bursts MO.

At first it will be slow for sure, but i expect it to evolve like the internet did, more speed more bandwith more storage. But someone needs to start somewhere! If it's so slow at first i don't mind using it as archive, if it's secure that is. Pictures, videos and porn all forced the internet providers toupgrade their network, because the people demanded faster speeds. The internet is growing don't forget that.

End consumers which would be the ones offering storage are not ISPs or major players in the internet market. They take what they can get. The people you'd be forcing to upgrade are end users and they only have whatever their ISPs offer.

[burstcoin]

Hello,

I just made a simple GUI to generate Batch file for cpu plotter.

Is someone can tell me how share a picture and deploy source code please ?

If you can't share a picture, I don't think many people will trust "a simple GUI" made by you.
Alas, there are many gullible people around, so... good luck.

Well, I think the issue might be also in the fact that newbies aren't permitted to post links

kurairaito, did you put your code on github or somewhere?

I posted source at https://github.com/Kurairaito/batch_plot_generator
There is also a png in the repo wich illustrate the gui.

WHY ARE WE NOT FUNDING THIS?! GUIs for simpler use of this coin are needed! Make it a Full-package Plotter + miner and you might get more users! I don't get why you guys play around with lottery while this is not done yet?! There is competition out there with millions of funding you can't keep this a community project forever! You are supposed to develope a decentralized online storage solution, mining useless files(files without any purpose) on your HDD doesn't make sense!

Yeah, I don't think people have any idea what 'cloud storage' entails. Cloud storage as done by big companies right now is they have five data centers across the world or maybe even nine if they're big enough and send data between them on Tier 1 lines (if that). Data inside the datacenters is shared across 100GB or 1TB fiber lines between servers.

There is no way you can do a truly decentralized storage on a 'neighborhood' scale. The bandwidth requirements for the average user to take part in it would be ginormous (putting aside bandwidth caps). Accessing files would take 10-60 seconds, assuming it's split up rather then all in one place. The coin would then be more about bandwidth rather then about storage capacity or a equal relationship across both (more storage capacity means you need more bandwidth to 'mine' it).

Even though Burst is all about capacity, it's not about bandwidth and that's a major component in any sort of cloud storage operation. It's just not meant to be for this coin unless they completely redo the coin (which they may). You could found a coin based on this though and it would be pretty easy to calculate payouts as it would be based on capacity + bandwidth and then you could make a weighted formula that takes into account both of them, then distribute a few copies across multiple piers and have a bittorrent type data sharing.

Time to access the file would still be ridiculous like I said, but it would be doable. Maybe something along the lines of archive storage. You could throw in encryption as well and make it anonymous storage. Split up the parts more so one 'host' never has a whole file and it's even more anonymous if not completely impossible to put it back together without the keys. There would have to be limitations on 'max' sizes per host as well. If one person has too much of the network capacity then it dilutes the redundancy aspect.

That is possibly something burst could do. Decentralized storage for 'sensitive' information with high encryption levels and complete anonymity. That's not really about capacity anymore though, but it fits Bursts MO.

At first it will be slow for sure, but i expect it to evolve like the internet did, more speed more bandwith more storage. But someone needs to start somewhere! If it's so slow at first i don't mind using it as archive, if it's secure that is. Pictures, videos and porn all forced the internet providers toupgrade their network, because the people demanded faster speeds. The internet is growing don't forget that.

The biggest problem with cloud storage is proving that the data is actually retrievable, and not just being stored by someone who wants to collect fees for storing it but has no intention of uploading it back, and this tends to stem from bandwidth. I've talked to a lot of people while running this, and most people tend to value their bandwidth much more than their hdd space. There are many people willing to store 10s of TBs, but are worried about using 10s of GBs of bandwidth. This makes the situation of having the data actually stored but unretrievable very realistic. The only way I can see to resolve that is to have the network randomly assign 3rd partys to relay the data between downloaders and storers, to have some way of auditing what actually happens on attempted transfers. This would be far more complicated to construct than all other parts of cloud storage combined, and would further increase bandwidth usage significantly. So for now ATs are being prioritized, as we actually have good solutions for what we need to do.

As for 'mining useless files', that will continue to exist regardless of what happens with storage. User data cannot be used to secure the network. If user data was allowed to be used for blockchain security, attackers could 'store' their own highly compressible or deterministically generated data to achieve much higher hashrate per actual storage space than honest users could.

[coinits]

I supported this CF, but not with as much has deserves 

LOL

Being honest anyways heh heh.