[ANN][BURST] Burst | Efficient HDD Mining | New 1.2.3 Fork block 92000

[seasonw]

[miner]

new version Burst-miner v1.150223
http://www.dropbox.com/s/9p6p5mxfjvfcspx/miner-burst-1.150223.zip?dl=0

+ Added memory cleaning.
   After reading all plots, miner clears the cache Windows




+ Added an option to disable the log.
   "UseLog" : false,
   (by default - true)

+ Added an option to process files with non-matching filesize / filename
  "SkipBadPlots" : false
   (by default - true)

src: https://github.com/Blagodarenko/miner-burst

Cool update, thanks Blago 

[1715410291]

1715410291

[1715410291]

1715410291

[go6ooo1212]

[miner]

new version Burst-miner v1.150223
http://www.dropbox.com/s/9p6p5mxfjvfcspx/miner-burst-1.150223.zip?dl=0

+ Added memory cleaning.
   After reading all plots, miner clears the cache Windows




+ Added an option to disable the log.
   "UseLog" : false,
   (by default - true)

+ Added an option to process files with non-matching filesize / filename
  "SkipBadPlots" : false
   (by default - true)

src: https://github.com/Blagodarenko/miner-burst

Thank you , my friend , you ROCK

[Elmit]

What the hell is wrong with burst.ninja? It's been 24 hours now and no payout and yes i know payout minimum is higher but i got 4TB("~capacity" shows 1,5 tb whatever that means) mining with no payout for far too long. On other pools i got 500-1k burst per day so there should have been a payout already. Because of the hiccups i switched pool for a while and my earnings where 5 times higher, now i come back hoping for some improvement and i get nothing. This is fucking suspicious. If i ever get a payout i will be gone for sure.

There is always the factor "Luck" included. If nobody in the pool finds a block, then nothing can be splitted!

Or sarcastic said, you plotted the wrong data, ... lol

[Merick]

is there another fork hapening now?
my wallet is not consistent, for example noticed a difference on block 70125

this info http://burstcoin.eu/block/8988347699161693125 is not what is in my wallet...

anyone else seeing discrepancies?

Interesting.

My Wallet:
Payload Length:   176
Total Amount NQT:   42785896496
Generator:   13465607760192201497
Generator Public Key:   7d4f7107c919cd1c610577075323a23e0c2094b136d418407944a66a74ea5f5a
Base Target:   1446470
Generator RS:   BURST-ZSST-X9ZH-7F97-DLVRP
block_reward:   7350
Next Block:   8106475507075994568
request_processing_time:   1
scoop_num:   3933
Number of Transactions:   1
Block Signature:   3a8d0ff7ca7cfb8f39153ae7efeb2d6751d1859ef670ab427e77e525b58b3d0994f27aae8daa76a 4a227025ff338e7c07465ce8b6ef18f65cf55529e89432de1
nonce:   120576096
Version:   3
Total Fee NQT:   100000000
Previous Block:   5458342756169498915
Height:   70125
Timestamp:   16982025


BurstCoin.eu
umber Of Transactions   0
Total Amount   0.00000000 Burst (0.00000000 BTC)
Transaction Fees   0 Burst
Timestamp   2015-02-23 16:12:44
Generator   BURST-QR5K-FFHZ-3RCD-9SL7T
Block Generation Time   2.52 minutes
Base Target   1427836
Size   0.00 KB
Version   3
Nonce   476128634
Block Reward   7,350.00 Burst


Bunch of weird stuff.  So, who's right?
I have 52 connected peers, 71/79 are up-to-date.   The other 8 are still using various wallets back to 1.1.0... I wish the wallet would auto ban them,  maybe it's a setting in the conf file

There really is no point in growing too fast, PR is great but growing to fast before a solid foundation is formed is going to be very painful.  Technical issues like this should be put to bed.  Again, I am all for PR campaigns, but the more people that come into this community who are not very tech savy the more people who are going to have a bad first impression.

The above example seems like a fundamental crypto-currency issue.  I'm re-quoting because I don't want this to get buried underneath PR high-fiving.

So, how about this issue?

[Mergesort]

What the hell is wrong with burst.ninja? It's been 24 hours now and no payout and yes i know payout minimum is higher but i got 4TB("~capacity" shows 1,5 tb whatever that means) mining with no payout for far too long. On other pools i got 500-1k burst per day so there should have been a payout already. Because of the hiccups i switched pool for a while and my earnings where 5 times higher, now i come back hoping for some improvement and i get nothing. This is fucking suspicious. If i ever get a payout i will be gone for sure.

There is always the factor "Luck" included. If nobody in the pool finds a block, then nothing can be splitted!

Or sarcastic said, you plotted the wrong data, ... lol

You are relying to much on that factor

[Merick]

What the hell is wrong with burst.ninja? It's been 24 hours now and no payout and yes i know payout minimum is higher but i got 4TB("~capacity" shows 1,5 tb whatever that means) mining with no payout for far too long. On other pools i got 500-1k burst per day so there should have been a payout already. Because of the hiccups i switched pool for a while and my earnings where 5 times higher, now i come back hoping for some improvement and i get nothing. This is fucking suspicious. If i ever get a payout i will be gone for sure.

There is always the factor "Luck" included. If nobody in the pool finds a block, then nothing can be splitted!

Or sarcastic said, you plotted the wrong data, ... lol

You are relying to much on that factor

Busrt.ninja just had few payouts, what did you make for the last 24hrs ?

[Mergesort]

What the hell is wrong with burst.ninja? It's been 24 hours now and no payout and yes i know payout minimum is higher but i got 4TB("~capacity" shows 1,5 tb whatever that means) mining with no payout for far too long. On other pools i got 500-1k burst per day so there should have been a payout already. Because of the hiccups i switched pool for a while and my earnings where 5 times higher, now i come back hoping for some improvement and i get nothing. This is fucking suspicious. If i ever get a payout i will be gone for sure.

There is always the factor "Luck" included. If nobody in the pool finds a block, then nothing can be splitted!

Or sarcastic said, you plotted the wrong data, ... lol

You are relying to much on that factor

Busrt.ninja just had few payouts, what did you make for the last 24hrs ?

None and it's more like 36 h moving towards 48h.

[Elmit]

What the hell is wrong with burst.ninja? It's been 24 hours now and no payout and yes i know payout minimum is higher but i got 4TB("~capacity" shows 1,5 tb whatever that means) mining with no payout for far too long. On other pools i got 500-1k burst per day so there should have been a payout already. Because of the hiccups i switched pool for a while and my earnings where 5 times higher, now i come back hoping for some improvement and i get nothing. This is fucking suspicious. If i ever get a payout i will be gone for sure.

There is always the factor "Luck" included. If nobody in the pool finds a block, then nothing can be splitted!

Or sarcastic said, you plotted the wrong data, ... lol

You are relying to much on that factor

Hey, as with all "pretty girls", you got to wait till they are finished with their make up / body paintings.

[peater]

[miner]

new version Burst-miner v1.150223
http://www.dropbox.com/s/9p6p5mxfjvfcspx/miner-burst-1.150223.zip?dl=0

+ Added memory cleaning.
   After reading all plots, miner clears the cache Windows

https://i.imgur.com/rpEgV02.jpg


+ Added an option to disable the log.
   "UseLog" : false,
   (by default - true)

+ Added an option to process files with non-matching filesize / filename
  "SkipBadPlots" : false
   (by default - true)

src: https://github.com/Blagodarenko/miner-burst

Thank you , my friend , you ROCK

[Mergesort]

What the hell is wrong with burst.ninja? It's been 24 hours now and no payout and yes i know payout minimum is higher but i got 4TB("~capacity" shows 1,5 tb whatever that means) mining with no payout for far too long. On other pools i got 500-1k burst per day so there should have been a payout already. Because of the hiccups i switched pool for a while and my earnings where 5 times higher, now i come back hoping for some improvement and i get nothing. This is fucking suspicious. If i ever get a payout i will be gone for sure.

There is always the factor "Luck" included. If nobody in the pool finds a block, then nothing can be splitted!

Or sarcastic said, you plotted the wrong data, ... lol

You are relying to much on that factor

Hey, as with all "pretty girls", you got to wait till they are finished with their make up / body paintings.

I don't think this is funny

[peater]

Hi, I ran the new version of burst me do and miner, the last two items. Is it okay? In the previous version I had only one entry, and it's the last.

https://i.imgur.com/9tbVUYY.jpg

[Blago]

Hi, I ran the new version of burst me do and miner, the last two items. Is it okay? In the previous version I had only one entry, and it's the last.

...

PM to you

[duncan_idaho]

atcroedufndind is empty. Something wrong with AT? I restarted wallet but same situation.

[pinkman12345]

atcroedufndind is empty. Something wrong with AT? I restarted wallet but same situation.

Its defo working i just looked at it, have you got the atcrowdfund.html in the right location? should be html>UI folder in the wallet package. After that paste http://localhost:8125/atcrowdfund.html into your browser and you should see the crowdfund cases.

I had this problem too when i first tried to look at it.

[pinkman12345]

Last night there was a good post about the idea of betting on sports fixtures using BURST. I am open for taking bets on all of the champions league games tonight. Max bet on any field is 10,000 BURST. I will be giving you the same odds as are on Sky Bet at the time i post this. I will start with Home/Draw/Away choices, but if you have a specific bet then message me and i will check the odds and be happy to take the bet on with you.

TUESDAY - 24th Feb 2015

Juventus 10/11 ---- Draw 12/5 ---- Dortmund 7/2

Manchester City 14/5 ---- Draw 11/4 ---- Barcelona 19/20

WEDNESDAY - 25th Feb 2015

Porto 1/2 ---- Draw 100/30 ---- FC Basel 5/1
   
Real Madrid 1/5 ---- Draw 11/2 ---- Schalke 12/1

THURSDAY - 26th Feb 2015

Bayern Munich 1/6 ---- Draw 6/1 ---- Shakhtar Donetsk 14/1
   
Chelsea 10/11 ---- Draw 12/5 ---- Paris St Germain 3/1


If this is popular i will create a website and build from this, this is purely to gather any interest in the idea.

Thanks

P

[callmejack]

i thought a bit about options to utilize the at technology to do a distributed mining pool for the big miners who find blocks on regular basis.
currently i am not aware of the exact way the rewardreceipient works and if it is possible to mine with local wallets instead of submitting shares.
if i remember correctly the posts when the reward receipient has been introduced the idea was to be able to reuse solo plots while the first pool only held the private keys for the miners.

my approach would be to mine solo with a local wallet with an active at for the account transfering mined block rewards directly to a miningpool at which holds and distributes the funds.
the decentralized miningpool at would have to somehow be told by the miners at that the miner joined the pool and to log its send burst to the at.
regarding the situation someone has joined and stopped mining for the pool the period of time for the coin distribution would have to be set to a time in which 50-100tb would be able to find at least a few blocks. if someone stopped to mine for the pool after half of this period the dynamic payout ratio would respect this cause the pool at would know how much everyone has sent to it.
after the defined time (5-20 days) all funds get distributed to the miners based on their coin ratio.

this may sound a bit complex and i am not sure if a at would be able to gather the required data for the distribution but due to the quite big payout delay after blocks have been mined the distribution should be as fair as possible.
the at running costs i cannot estimate due to a lack of knowledge but the local ats would be payed by the miner themselve and the pool at would have to be funded.

does all this sound possible or is it a too complex usecase for the current at implementation?
 

[CIYAM]

Although an AT can work well as a way of distributing funds (within limits of the number of accounts it could do so due to memory constraints) the main issue I see is that AT has little knowledge of what is "going on" within the blockchain it sits on (and this is pretty much by design so it can be "portable" across different blockchains that use different "proofs").

Perhaps we could add some "platform specific" AT API functions to help with this kind of thing but it for now I doubt it is going to be a priority for our team (we are always happy to have others join us if others want to push to get platform specific features provided).

[callmejack]

Although an AT can work well as a way of distributing funds (within limits of the number of accounts it could do so due to memory constraints) the main issue I see is that AT has little knowledge of what is "going on" within the blockchain it sits on (and this is pretty much by design so it can be "portable" across different blockchains that use different "proofs").

Perhaps we could add some "platform specific" AT API functions to help with this kind of thing but it for now I doubt it is going to be a priority for our team (we are always happy to have others join us if others want to push to get platform specific features provided).

for me the idea that one AT "speaks" to another is the interesting part in this pool concept.
this way i hope to be able to secure the mined balance for the pool.

setting up an AT which handles the coin sending to the pool AT may be sufficient.
a simple trigger if the balance of a mining AT reaches a block reward level increase should still work.
to prevent that nobody can simply send coins to the pool AT to become included in the coin distribution the pool AT shall only consider coins send by the mining AT as valid. but if someone adds a triggerable amount of coins to his mining account it should not break the overall coin distribution dramatically simply because this miner may get on average less coins back than send.

regarding the fees i am not sure if all this makes sense.
based on a timeframe of one week the miners AT would have to run about 2520 times.
if the cost for code executions are evaluated on runtime the short version would be to exit if the balance increase does not trigger and the longer to send out coins to the pool.
set the fact that the miner mines at least 10 blocks in that timeframe of one week the fees would be about 3.5% with current rewards.  
for the pool wallet AT it should be enough to run only once after the timeframe has ended.

i think if i find some time i will take a look onto the assembler and try it out. i still have some burst to play with.

[bensam123]

Is there anyway to view what the deadline was that won a block?

[xizmax]

Is there anyway to view what the deadline was that won a block?

Burst.ninja displays it on its stats page. How the info is extracted though I am not sure. Catbref can answer that for sure