[XMR] Monero Speculation

[johnfoss]

The Monero Moon (Issue 10) is now available for your reading pleasure. It's better than s....

https://medium.com/@johnfoss/the-monero-moon-issue-10-557b768e7717

[wavessurfing]

inverted head and shoulders on kraken:

https://cryptowat.ch/markets/kraken/xmr/eur

[titusr1]

Hello,

A year ago (November 2017) just this week began the rise in the price of XMR. It seems that history can be repeated. What do you think?
https://ibb.co/hKeDcq

[BldSwtTrs]

So the guy who can't prove he's Satoshi is going to prove who everyone else is? I'm wondering what a psychoanalyst would make of that...

On a practical note, those 3 systems work in very different ways, so wouldn't he need 3 separate mechanisms for analysis? I guess we'll have to wait the year out biting our nails in feverish anticipation for doom's day or purchase whatever is sure to be the "better" solution. Crypto has anhilated my faith in mankind's motives--which isn't a bad thing, just makes me long for my youthful ignorance.

This was my first thought as well. The fact that all three of those privacy projects use very different techniques means a unified solution to uncover them all and also throwing Tor in the mix on top of that seems pretty disingenuous. This is the reason that I think he's actually throwing this out for one of two other reasons.  One... just to make other projects outside of Bitcoin SV look bad or two... he's wanting to depress the price in the so-called privacy sector for some other reason.

I am tempted to say he is just talking out of his ass. But actually I think the guy is a little bit too crafty for just that. I think he and Calvin Aire and possibly even Jihan and Ver are making moves.

XMR is currently in rollercoaster mode.  

He talks about networking and IP addresses. As far I know, these 3 systems use networking and IP.

Fwiw I think CSW is probably Satoshi. That doesn't mean I like him. But I pay attention to what he says.

And, should he managed to take over BCH, I urge every body to pay attention to him. Because he doesn't like altcoins at all, and if he succed in taking over one PoW chain, then Monero could be very well be his next target.

[boomboom]

Fwiw I think CSW is probably Satoshi. That doesn't mean I like him. But I pay attention to what he says.

And I urge every body to pay attention to him, should he managed to take over BCH. Because he doesn't like altcoins at all, and if he succed in taking over one PoW chain, then Monero could be very well be his next target.

I agree, CSW was involved in the earliest days of bitcoin and ignoring what he says because he comes across like a dickhead is dangerous, like ignoring Trump in 2016 because he was a failed businessman turned reality TV personality. CSW wants to be disliked, probably to make the fuck you sweeter if/when he moves satoshi bitcoin in 2020. He wants to destroy alts like XMR.

[Whtwabbit]

Quite amazing, the 2 Fakesatoshi beLIEvers first registered 3 days apart in this forum, talk about coincidences

[kurious]

So the guy who can't prove he's Satoshi is going to prove who everyone else is? I'm wondering what a psychoanalyst would make of that...

On a practical note, those 3 systems work in very different ways, so wouldn't he need 3 separate mechanisms for analysis? I guess we'll have to wait the year out biting our nails in feverish anticipation for doom's day or purchase whatever is sure to be the "better" solution. Crypto has anhilated my faith in mankind's motives--which isn't a bad thing, just makes me long for my youthful ignorance.

This was my first thought as well. The fact that all three of those privacy projects use very different techniques means a unified solution to uncover them all and also throwing Tor in the mix on top of that seems pretty disingenuous. This is the reason that I think he's actually throwing this out for one of two other reasons.  One... just to make other projects outside of Bitcoin SV look bad or two... he's wanting to depress the price in the so-called privacy sector for some other reason.

I am tempted to say he is just talking out of his ass. But actually I think the guy is a little bit too crafty for just that. I think he and Calvin Aire and possibly even Jihan and Ver are making moves.

XMR is currently in rollercoaster mode.  

He talks about networking and IP addresses. As far I know, these 3 systems use networking and IP.

Fwiw I think CSW is probably Satoshi. That doesn't mean I like him. But I pay attention to what he says.

And, should he managed to take over BCH, I urge every body to pay attention to him. Because he doesn't like altcoins at all, and if he succed in taking over one PoW chain, then Monero could be very well be his next target.

Probably Satoshi?  No way. For me he is plainly an ill-tempered, nasty and totally flawed liar.   I have no doubt he was around, but significantly? A key to Bitcoin's development?  I doubt it.  He is ready to lie and fake anything and if he has access to any significant keys, I doubt it was honestly.  He is happy to fake a signature and backdate a document, it seems. So he has no credibility whatsoever.  That doesn't mean he isn't dangerous, or won't pick up followers; it does mean anything he says must be taken with a very large pinch of salt.

[BldSwtTrs]

So the guy who can't prove he's Satoshi is going to prove who everyone else is? I'm wondering what a psychoanalyst would make of that...

On a practical note, those 3 systems work in very different ways, so wouldn't he need 3 separate mechanisms for analysis? I guess we'll have to wait the year out biting our nails in feverish anticipation for doom's day or purchase whatever is sure to be the "better" solution. Crypto has anhilated my faith in mankind's motives--which isn't a bad thing, just makes me long for my youthful ignorance.

This was my first thought as well. The fact that all three of those privacy projects use very different techniques means a unified solution to uncover them all and also throwing Tor in the mix on top of that seems pretty disingenuous. This is the reason that I think he's actually throwing this out for one of two other reasons.  One... just to make other projects outside of Bitcoin SV look bad or two... he's wanting to depress the price in the so-called privacy sector for some other reason.

I am tempted to say he is just talking out of his ass. But actually I think the guy is a little bit too crafty for just that. I think he and Calvin Aire and possibly even Jihan and Ver are making moves.

XMR is currently in rollercoaster mode.  

He talks about networking and IP addresses. As far I know, these 3 systems use networking and IP.

Fwiw I think CSW is probably Satoshi. That doesn't mean I like him. But I pay attention to what he says.

And, should he managed to take over BCH, I urge every body to pay attention to him. Because he doesn't like altcoins at all, and if he succed in taking over one PoW chain, then Monero could be very well be his next target.

Probably Satoshi?  No way. For me he is plainly an ill-tempered, nasty and totally flawed liar.   I have no doubt he was around, but significantly? A key to Bitcoin's development?  I doubt it.  He is ready to lie and fake anything and if he has access to any significant keys, I doubt it was honestly.  He is happy to fake a signature and backdate a document, it seems. So he has no credibility whatsoever.  That doesn't mean he isn't dangerous, or won't pick up followers; it does mean anything he says must be taken with a very large pinch of salt.

That what I thought before investigating the question: This guy has no credibility. But actually, forging documents, lying, being ill-tempered... all that doesn't preclude him from being (part of) Satoshi.

Satoshi probably doesn't care a lot what other are thinking of him. CSW just don't care what other think, he doesn't behave like that to stole money from someone, he just doesn't care. It might even be a strategy to filter out people.

Anyway, him being Satoshi or not is irrelevant to the fact that he may be the first guy, with his fellow Ayre, to manage take over an important PoW chain. And that alone is worthy of consideration.

If he fails Thursday, then everybody can keep thinking at him as a clown. But if he succeed, then please, pay attention.

[Hueristic]

The may make or break his reputation in 2019 and 2020 too.

I just hope that he's not involved in MoneroV and other Monero forsk that requires private keys and other info from Monero.

What reputation? anyone who knows anything already knows he's full of bullshit.

Like Mcafee minus the hookers and blow.

Completely Retarded Post about FakeToshi

w0w I havn't put a Lengendary account on ignore in I can't remember when. Congrats!

FYI, I went back and read your post history as well. At least it doesn't drop into the red territory.

[Febo]

Anyway, him being Satoshi or not is irrelevant to the fact that he may be the first guy, with his fellow Ayre, to manage take over an important PoW chain. And that alone is worthy of consideration.

POW chain that is owned by Bitman as so many others, one of them is also Monero classic?  Let him have it LOL.

[kurious]

The Monero Moon (Issue 10) is now available for your reading pleasure. It's better than s....

https://medium.com/@johnfoss/the-monero-moon-issue-10-557b768e7717

Keep up the good work, mate. Merited.

[BldSwtTrs]

Completely Retarded Post about FakeToshi

w0w I havn't put a Lengendary account on ignore in I can't remember when. Congrats!

FYI, I went back and read your post history as well. At least it doesn't drop into the red territory.

Why do you think I care about what you are doing?

[boomboom]

If he fails Thursday, then everybody can keep thinking at him as a clown. But if he succeed, then please, pay attention.

Independent rational thinking without emotion is needed which many here lack, some struggle with the idea that people involved with the 'satoshi entity' and the creation of bitcoin might be arrogant dickheads with nasty personal habits, and even might have acted dishonestly in many provable ways. That is ALL irrelevant in what is to come, if satoshi bitcoins start moving in 2020 it doesn't matter diddly squat about the personality and character of the people moving them, just WHERE they move them, and how much hash they control.

Humanity is conditioned to using great innovations created by dishonest dickheads.

[Hueristic]

The Monero Moon (Issue 10) is now available for your reading pleasure. It's better than s....

https://medium.com/@johnfoss/the-monero-moon-issue-10-557b768e7717

Keep up the good work, mate. Merited.

I didn't know about that New Hampshire referendum.

Thats pretty cool, it would be nice to see it nationally!

[owlcatz]

I didn't know about that New Hampshire referendum.

That's pretty cool, it would be nice to see it nationally!

It would be nice, but their state motto is "Live free or die", so I'm not surprised they would do that. 

[Hueristic]

I didn't know about that New Hampshire referendum.

That's pretty cool, it would be nice to see it nationally!

It would be nice, but their state motto is "Live free or die", so I'm not surprised they would do that.  

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and Personal Privacy.  pursuit of Happiness.

Pursuit of Happiness has already lost in court.

[leorjakum]

Now with this new algo, already all exchanges using a low fee or still not?

[Adam D Levine]

some struggle with the idea that people involved with the 'satoshi entity' and the creation of bitcoin might be arrogant dickheads with nasty personal habits, and even might have acted dishonestly in many provable ways.

Vitalik and Ver both say if CSW is Satoshi it would not increase their opinion of him, just lower their opinion of satoshi ... the point is it doesn't make any difference to Bitcoin tech, only weak minds care about who does things, strong minds focus on the 'things' themselves.

If a pedo released a cold fusion whitepaper with working prototype only weak minded fools would focus on the character and backstory of the one who released it, who cares about CSW the man, if he tries to destroy privacy coins like XMR, good, if he can monero wasn't good tech.

[boomboom]

Vitalik and Ver both say if CSW is Satoshi it would not increase their opinion of him, just lower their opinion of satoshi ... the point is it doesn't make any difference to Bitcoin tech, only weak minds care about who does things, strong minds focus on the 'things' themselves.

^ This, Bitcoin & blockchain are all about what provably happened, CSW loves to trigger people, it doesn't alter how much hash he controls, and we'll soon see how much that is.

[tokeweed]

some struggle with the idea that people involved with the 'satoshi entity' and the creation of bitcoin might be arrogant dickheads with nasty personal habits, and even might have acted dishonestly in many provable ways.

Vitalik and Ver both say if CSW is Satoshi it would not increase their opinion of him, just lower their opinion of satoshi ... the point is it doesn't make any difference to Bitcoin tech, only weak minds care about who does things, strong minds focus on the 'things' themselves.

If a pedo released a cold fusion whitepaper with working prototype only weak minded fools would focus on the character and backstory of the one who released it, who cares about CSW the man, if he tries to destroy privacy coins like XMR, good, if he can monero wasn't good tech.

That's the thing tho.  There's a difference between a man who actually knows what to do and tries to find what he can exploit in privacy coins and a man who's just f*ckin talking in order to attract some attention