[∞ YH] solo.ckpool.org 2% fee solo mining USA/DE 255 blocks solved!

[citronick]

Added 1 more S9 from main pool to solo.ckpool.org .... still a long way to go.... only 161,391,394,541 bestshare

[DanielRo]

After few months without mining I'm back in business with an old S5.
Wish you all the best.

[-ck]

Well I'm bored waiting for the next block... and the test pool is tiny again  I'm 15% of the hashrate myself with only one mining device 

[philipma1957]

Ck. I will rent 100th and point to test pool


Please show me pool address to use.


test address correct?

stratum+tcp://solo.ckpool.org:13333


USER

1JdC6Xg3ajT3rge3FgPNSYYFpmf53Vbtje


PASSWORD

123

[-ck]

Ck. I will rent 100th and point to test pool


Please show me pool address to use.


test address correct?

stratum+tcp://solo.ckpool.org:13333

That's correct, thanks, and good luck!

[Biffa]

Me too.. 

Once my wallets synched so I can rent some.

24 hours of 100TH goodness.

Least I can do 

[philipma1957]

okay I am running 50th I need to figure how to view it

okay 50th from nice hash

http://solo.ckpool.org/users2/1JdC6Xg3ajT3rge3FgPNSYYFpmf53Vbtje

[-ck]

okay I am running 50th I need to figure how to view it

http://stratum.ckpool.org/users2/1JdC6Xg3ajT3rge3FgPNSYYFpmf53Vbtje

[philipma1957]

thanks got it

will add 50th from west hash.

will they simply combine to 100th?

[Biffa]

hey phil is it better to run it split between the two like that?

Oh and ck, is it ok to use the same userid format as the main pool? e.g. address.Biffa-rental

[philipma1957]

hey phil is it better to run it split between the two like that?

well  one from nice and one from wesr  would reduce the chance of all bad hash getting rented.

it would also be a tiny bit extra like 0.0001 fee for each order

luck wise there should be zero difference.

and if all rentals hash  properly also zero difference.

so I do the two separate orders only if they have  some bad hashing gear.


and I am pushing 83 th for the two orders .

[kano]

thanks got it

will add 50th from west hash.

will they simply combine to 100th?

If you add a worker name at the source (rental/miner) you can tell where the source is for the hashes when reusing the same address.

e.g. 1JdC6Xg3ajT3rge3FgPNSYYFpmf53Vbtje_philXmas100

So then you'll see it broken down by worker here:
http://solo.ckpool.org/workers2/1JdC6Xg3ajT3rge3FgPNSYYFpmf53Vbtje

You can set the worker name as often as you like.

[Biffa]

cool, and better to do standard or fixed?

[philipma1957]

cool, and better to do standard or fixed?

standard tends to be cheaper

[Biffa]

cool, and better to do standard or fixed?

standard tends to be cheaper

Yes it does. Just waiting for my deposit to confirm.. haven't rented for ages Thanks for the idea.

[philipma1957]

thanks got it

will add 50th from west hash.

will they simply combine to 100th?

If you add a worker name at the source (rental/miner) you can tell where the source is for the hashes when reusing the same address.

e.g. 1JdC6Xg3ajT3rge3FgPNSYYFpmf53Vbtje_philXmas100

So then you'll see it broken down by worker here:
http://solo.ckpool.org/workers2/1JdC6Xg3ajT3rge3FgPNSYYFpmf53Vbtje

You can set the worker name as often as you like.

I added

1JdC6Xg3ajT3rge3FgPNSYYFpmf53Vbtje.west  1 order of 50th

1JdC6Xg3ajT3rge3FgPNSYYFpmf53Vbtje.nice  1 order of 50th

1JdC6Xg3ajT3rge3FgPNSYYFpmf53Vbtje   2 orders each 100th

grand total of 300th

all shows up below

but are the .west and .nice names okay or should they be    _nice  and _west

http://solo.ckpool.org/users2/1JdC6Xg3ajT3rge3FgPNSYYFpmf53Vbtje



{"hashrate1m": "292T", "hashrate5m": "229T", "hashrate1hr": "60.6T", "hashrate1d": "3.14T", "hashrate7d": "453G", "lastupdate": 1482284450, "workers": 5, "shares": 63902906, "bestshare": 666857572.76879168, "bestever": 666857572, "worker":


[{"hashrate1m": "195T", "hashrate5m": "161T", "hashrate1hr": "50.9T", "hashrate1d": "2.72T", "hashrate7d": "392G", "lastupdate": 1482284450, "shares": 55270638, "bestshare": 12219949.376608796, "bestever": 12219949, "workername": "1JdC6Xg3ajT3rge3FgPNSYYFpmf53Vbtje"},


{"hashrate1m": "67.6T", "hashrate5m": "41.1T", "hashrate1hr": "5.99T", "hashrate1d": "265G", "hashrate7d": "37.9G", "lastupdate": 1482284450, "shares": 5340444, "bestshare": 666857572.76879168, "bestever": 666857572, "workername": "1JdC6Xg3ajT3rge3FgPNSYYFpmf53Vbtje.west"},


{"hashrate1m": "41.9T", "hashrate5m": "28.5T", "hashrate1hr": "3.75T", "hashrate1d": "163G", "hashrate7d": "23.4G", "lastupdate": 1482284450, "shares": 3291824, "bestshare": 13660895.010287818, "bestever": 13660895, "workername": "1JdC6Xg3ajT3rge3FgPNSYYFpmf53Vbtje.nice"}]}

[kano]

...
but are the .west and .nice names okay or should they be    _nice  and _west
...

Either works. '.' or '_'

[philipma1957]

...
but are the .west and .nice names okay or should they be    _nice  and _west
...

Either works. '.' or '_'

thanks  I had 1 decent share so far but nothing close to 301b

I did a 30.3 b


 still swinging away for a few more hours

[iegservers]

Just curious.  Did someone not hit a block with a dif/best share of  "bestshare": 821809472417 ?   If you do http://solo.ckpool.org/pool/ it shows the best share at 801 billion.. is something wrong with it ?  orphaned, dead? Or am I misunderstanding the stats ?

Thanks!

[-ck]

Just curious.  Did someone not hit a block with a dif/best share of  "bestshare": 821809472417 ?   If you do http://solo.ckpool.org/pool/ it shows the best share at 801 billion.. is something wrong with it ?  orphaned, dead? Or am I misunderstanding the stats ?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=763510.msg17012035#msg17012035