binaryFate
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1003
Still wild and free
|
 |
August 28, 2013, 11:16:54 AM |
|
|
Monero's privacy and therefore fungibility are MUCH stronger than Bitcoin's. This makes Monero a better candidate to deserve the term "digital cash".
|
|
|
hcburger
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
|
|
August 28, 2013, 11:19:37 AM |
|
Nice! I wonder how/why that happened. |
|
|
|
|
binaryFate
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1003
Still wild and free
|
|
August 28, 2013, 11:21:36 AM |
|
Nice! I wonder how/why that happened. In a transaction, the fee is just the difference between the amount in inputs, and the amount in outputs, it is not a number explicitly written anywhere. A mistake can happen when you build a transaction "by hand", usually using your own lines of code that have a bug somewhere. |
Monero's privacy and therefore fungibility are MUCH stronger than Bitcoin's. This makes Monero a better candidate to deserve the term "digital cash".
|
|
|
joele
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1022
Merit: 1000
|
|
August 28, 2013, 11:21:59 AM |
|
Nice! I wonder how/why that happened. Easy 200 bitcoin edit: probably forgot to add the period, 00200 |
|
|
|
|
binaryFate
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1003
Still wild and free
|
|
August 28, 2013, 11:27:52 AM |
|
With one more '0', it would have been significant on dividends  Probably the poor programmer responsible for the mistake will try to contact AM. Some pool operators have kindly returned the amount or a part of it in similar situations. I hope for him honestly: it's a 25,000$ mistake, and maybe it's not even his money. |
Monero's privacy and therefore fungibility are MUCH stronger than Bitcoin's. This makes Monero a better candidate to deserve the term "digital cash".
|
|
|
Mutated btc
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
|
August 28, 2013, 11:30:27 AM |
|
Nice! I wonder how/why that happened. In a transaction, the fee is just the difference between the amount in inputs, and the amount in outputs, it is not a number explicitly written anywhere. A mistake can happen when you build a transaction "by hand", usually using your own lines of code that have a bug somewhere. i dont understand XD is it like AM owns that 200 btc? |
|
|
|
|
|
bbxx
|
|
August 28, 2013, 11:32:00 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
binaryFate
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1003
Still wild and free
|
|
August 28, 2013, 11:36:34 AM |
|
Nice! I wonder how/why that happened. In a transaction, the fee is just the difference between the amount in inputs, and the amount in outputs, it is not a number explicitly written anywhere. A mistake can happen when you build a transaction "by hand", usually using your own lines of code that have a bug somewhere. i dont understand XD is it like AM owns that 200 btc? The fees of a transaction goes to the miner of the block into which it is included, so yes AM owns that 200BTC because they mined this block. |
Monero's privacy and therefore fungibility are MUCH stronger than Bitcoin's. This makes Monero a better candidate to deserve the term "digital cash".
|
|
|
joele
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1022
Merit: 1000
|
|
August 28, 2013, 11:38:16 AM |
|
Nice! I wonder how/why that happened. In a transaction, the fee is just the difference between the amount in inputs, and the amount in outputs, it is not a number explicitly written anywhere. A mistake can happen when you build a transaction "by hand", usually using your own lines of code that have a bug somewhere. i dont understand XD is it like AM owns that 200 btc? The fees of a transaction goes to the miner of the block into which it is included, so yes AM owns that 200BTC because they mined this block. He can ask AM to return the excess fee if sent by mistakes |
|
|
|
|
binaryFate
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1003
Still wild and free
|
|
August 28, 2013, 11:40:03 AM |
|
Wow huge price drop! This is awesome news!!! |
Monero's privacy and therefore fungibility are MUCH stronger than Bitcoin's. This makes Monero a better candidate to deserve the term "digital cash".
|
|
|
Dexter770221
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1029
Merit: 1000
|
|
August 28, 2013, 11:42:03 AM |
|
Less BTC for dividends  Bitfury draws 8 times less power, and device with 4 bitfury chips (2,5GH/s each) would cost <300$ so it's definitevly not killed. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=266235.0 |
Under development Modular UPGRADEABLE Miner (MUM). Looking for investors.
Changing one PCB with screwdriver and you have brand new miner in hand... Plug&Play, scalable from one module to thousands.
|
|
|
|
supert
|
|
August 28, 2013, 11:45:04 AM |
|
Bitfury 400G is still cheaper and will get cheaper still if BTC rises. But... it does not ship until October at best... ...and AM will have gen 2 out about then... ...and AM will have cleared out its old blades... conclusion:  |
|
|
|
|
|
bbxx
|
|
August 28, 2013, 11:46:17 AM |
|
but device will be in late october 50% roi for bitfurystrikesback offer |
|
|
|
|
|
San1ty
|
|
August 28, 2013, 11:49:40 AM |
|
Looks like AM will be back up to 3.5-4 levels before you can say "Oh... Snap..."
|
Found my posts helpful? Consider buying me a beer :-)!:
BTC - 1San1tyUGhfWRNPYBF4b6Vaurq5SjFYWk NXT - 17063113680221230777
|
|
|
|
VeeMiner
|
|
August 28, 2013, 11:59:00 AM |
|
Wow huge price drop! This is awesome news!!!  |
|
|
|
|
JordanL
Donator
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
|
|
August 28, 2013, 12:13:01 PM |
|
Holy shit, crazy price drop on blades. friedcat for president indeed.  https://2asic.comGet your cheap blades while you can, folks! |
|
|
|
|
|
stslimited
|
|
August 28, 2013, 12:19:31 PM |
|
wow, 93% off hahahaaha wow
|
|
|
|
|
|
VeeMiner
|
|
August 28, 2013, 12:22:36 PM |
|
I'm just facepalming myself for buying at 50 BTC  |
|
|
|
|
|
Rival
|
|
August 28, 2013, 12:26:00 PM |
|
Tasty Fried Cat!
|
|
|
|
|
|
JimiQ84
|
|
August 28, 2013, 12:28:32 PM |
|
I'm just facepalming myself for buying at 50 BTC You mean when difficulty was 1/10th of current diff? |
|
|
|
|
|
