where I get the Api report, I have looked and I do not see anything to have it. Please tell me how I do it

Sorry, I found it, I sent it to MP. Let's see if we can see what happens. Because to me the problem that it gives me is that it does not do a good control of the automatic fan and it is 80 degrees and 60% fan. I have to put profiles with the FAN fixed at 70 or 80% but I like more the performance of the car, but this confusion of cards must be.

Actually WhatToMine on 1st place did the job. Thanks, what is your recomend order for Statistic Providers and what difficulty is more precise for us?

I mean in Coin(wallet balance) mate, when i enter my wallet address. Otherwise CoinToMine is 3rd in priority, after CoinCalculator  and WhatToMine.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/udd9r53npzgcbu7/Captura%20de%20pantalla%202019-04-09%20a%20las%2021.27.52.png?dl=0


I have a problem that I do not know how to fix. Please see the image

The rig 4 you can see in the capture, down in GPU says that I have 1050, 1050, 1060 And that was before, some time ago.

In the MAP GPU box if you see correctly 5x1070 1x1080ti, that is correct. But even if I map the cards, I still see 1050, 1050, 1060 etc ... And above all I have problems with the automatic speed, as it assumes other GPUs because it uses a different speed, usually a low speed, with which the GPU heats me. I had to force 80% GPUs in that profile.

How can I make AM recognize my real cards in GPU with their real names and real characteristics? As much as I remove the Mapping mark and then map again, the old cards keep appearing.

It would also be interesting that if an api gives a failure (it can not read the api) it appears in notifications, thus I will not be hours undermining the same difficulty without knowing that something fails.

good decision, those two values ​​through http api as we are using difficulty or price, will make the data much more realistic.

I am not a user as advanced as moppidoo, I will not use an external Exel and handle my own data. But if you read the apis and Json, and the power to add blocktime and nethash, you could give us something of value by choosing between the two possible ways of doing the profit calculation that you explained to me.

We in our group use an online excel and we have pointed the urls of difficulty, price, request of the price, profit of the currency etc ... We have noticed that when a currency its blocktime is higher than 1, the profit is usually lower . If the blocktime is 1, the value is usually quite close to what AM indicates. There are coins that we have to use profit of 0.65 so that the estimate of AM and what is obtained is the same.

To be able to add these two data and be able to use them for self-profit in some way, instead of its classic formula, could be interesting. Have two types of profit to choose, two different formulas. One based more on the nethash and blocktime, and the classic one of you.

One last suggestion Is there any way that all the data in AM can be saved from the last time data has been requested from the APIs? I explain. I use CC and make a request every 7 minutes and read all the data, but then I make requests from loose currencies defined by us that if we do not find the Explorer or we can not read the explorer, we use WTM, CC or the one we see more realistic. But then we exhaust the requests per day, because each currency that I ask for a data, is a request to the api.

If in each complete request of api of WTM, CC, CTM, Coinwarz, the last one is stored in AM, and that data could be read from the cache of the last time within the AM itself, the problem of excess requests to these services.

But that's basic, we also make requests to Exchanges to extract the price, if every 7 minutes I read 24 coins of the same exchange, make 24 requests, and in a few hours I am unable to ask for more data to that exchange. I do not know if once an API is read, whatever it is, it is saved in a kind of cahe, whether it is an exchange or a provider, and only save the last time it was requested, in my case every 7 minutes. So if I have to read several prices of different currencies of the same exchange, I read it in local because I have the copy of the received in the api.

I hope you understand my idea.

Please fix this calculation in Balance for LTC i have 21 LTC that correspond to 121 584 USD , i wish to be true, but it`s not yet.

Hi Patrike,

we have many times the problem, that some miners (especially Antminer L3+) get the Status (in Red) Disconnected - API Access Denied
if we send the command: Reboot (via SSH), the miner is working fine again (after a reboot)

so we would like to make a rule for that event - but unfortunatly i don't find any trigger for this event?! there is the Trigger Offline detection... but no one for this specific event?! is there another option??

BR Ralf

Hi guys.

Can you tell me why you're listing so many scam exchanges as for example Coineal.com ??
Have you ever verify any of them ?
Just open an account with them and try to deposit any coins. Most deposit addresses generated by their system gonna be their own ETH or BTC address (same address no matter which coin you want to deposit).

Another thing is that if I filter unwanted exchanges from statistics please take them off the Coins list completely, not only grey them out.

something is wrong with sgminer, the workername is empty inside the config file with latest AM build.

Hello!
Tell me how to set up dual mining ETH + MAX?
-esm 2 -allpools 1 -allcoins 1 -dpool hub.miningpoolhub.com:20461 -dwal xxxx -dpsw xxxx -dcoin keccak -r 1 -dbg -1 -retrydelay 3 -dcri 5 -tt 72 -ttli 79 -tstop 82 -fanmin 50
It does not help me!

Hi Patrike,

I haven't tested the "accuracy" of the formula cause luck is also a factor + I used autoexchange on ZergPool which made it a little hard to track earnings, but it was what I was using for the past 2 days for experiment. (see pic)

https://imgur.com/HBOVlmx

so from the picture, you can see I'd need to add my own BlockTime where AM's API reported 0 due to coin providers, then some factors I consider important as below.

* The NetHash has to be accurate, cause else it'll affect the entire calculation as per the formula we discussed here
* BlockWorth for solo as some blockchains block reward just won't cover the cost even if you win 100% of blocks even the difficulty was low etc. This this is filtered to suit one's need (for me, 500 satoshis per minute)
* BlockWinChance, Simply used the hashRate / (hashRate + netHash) to work out percent chance I'm likely to hit a block
* BlockWin_IntervalSec, to keep consistent flow of earnings a big win every few days/weeks may not be as good as lots of little wins daily
* SatPerMinute, Just for earning reference in perfect fair conditions (not sure I used the terminologies correct at all, but you get the idea)
* Division <--- now, this is something I'm trying to find a way to prioritize pools with a balancing factor but like I have mentioned, my maths are bad so I don't even know if this is right (currently using SatPerMinute / BlockWin_IntervalSec).

Result for the past 2 weeks follows, AM estimate on earnings are averaging about 40 USD or more, I tried solo mining, conventional shared mining, switching interval of 5~10minutes. regardless, I'm only averaging about 200 satoshis per minute, which is far from the earnings estimate regardless of which formula I used, call it a streaks of bad lucks, but even shared mining didn't end up much better, the Yiimp pools (used Zerg, zPool mainly) tend to seem to have particularly bad lucks that usually sees block efforts 500% regardless solo/shared mining.

This is to report on the effect of the Dynamic Coin Properties Update on earnings I promised 2 weeks ago since it was made available.

Now it's only been 24 hours since I used the Excel custom profit factoring to prioritise pool, so I cannot say this is going to continue but so far I'm seeing vast improvements on earnings (doing solo mode on most chains where feasible for my farm's hashrate on ZergPool with AutoExchange), I'm averaging approx 400 satoshis per minute which is about double of what I get for the past 2 weeks via various methods as described above.

***

So if this works out, you might consider some similar sort of mathematically correct feature to implement some kind of profit factors based on the above metrics (since they are already all available in AM) similar to how you apply factors for Online Services vs Actual/Estimated earnings, I believe this will be then be a lot closer to SMART profit switching, more likely better than what NPLUS Miner's claimed PLUS logic ;p

***
3) Currently I worked around the need to apply pool profit factors by using the API to include the top 3 pools in the Excel List I showed here in my example, so ability to modify pool profit factor via API is not that much sought after anymore, since there are also benefits for a small selection of profitable pools to mine for, as some of my hardwares are low memory (1060 3GB) and they won't work on many of the new algos such as MTP, GRIN...etc.

Best Regards,

Yes, it’s for ASICs like Zig Z1, Antminer Z9, Antminer B7 etc.

Hey Patrik,

its mixed. Different brands, different models, different clocks. So it makes no sense to bench a single card and just multiple it or something similar. Benching a few cards together to run them in one profile, and benching other cards together to run in a different profile, and so on, is the idea behind. But maybe someday you find this idea great too and implement it

Yes, that's what I'd like

Ideal when you can export or view the data:
1 - how many actually worked for setting the time
2 - how many have been collected the ball, Rajkot and reboots
3 - average hashrate and average temperature

I have been using the program for several years and have several editions.
Was certainly unpleasant moments, but mostly everything was great!
But sometimes we run into some wall of misunderstanding or something.
Is it not possible to raise the local server distribution of programs miners from the server directly from which we control the machines?
Why load programs miner with servers? after all, it is much easier to distribute programs miners from a local server?

According to the statistics of mining - well, the idea is good but the implementation in the form of an incomprehensible concept is absolutely not clear! if there is a tab or stobar time Malinga then why is it in percent? and it is not clear how to use it if you see one and in fact get absolutely other data in the concept!!!
export data again, if it is in practice, its use is not very clear because it is not very convenient!
Generally want highly user-friendly interface and get very difficult and sometimes not logical mega the product.
Manage a large number of machines really convenient. But want normal improvements!
Great solution for ispolzovany GPU is super! but after the fall of the program. - dispersal of flies!
1. Want much direct local server storage miners! In order not to load and not to rule the path of the program from third-party sources.
2. Statistiku time as one and a pack of cars.
3. Failure and crash statistics
4. your own VPN service
5. statistics on accepted balls and bad balls - because they are reset in the program window after a restart of the miner...
Now it's almost all sold - but alas it is not convenient and hard to understand

Let's all be on the same wavelength ponimanija not like now - here is your instrument, do with it what you want - to fix and finish will all not soon!
And prices!
For branding 800 dollars!!! it's just too much!
include at least in the basic package of 100 machines for free!

Of course, you have done a lot of work in a few years and I think more will be done. Well, let's any way to communicate! let's discuss innovations - for example to vote for new features which are well, just really need and put them in priority order!

Hope you will understand

Hey Patrik,

in the benchmark you can only bench 1 card at a time or all together. Is it possible to change this to multiple selectable cards, like bench with just the cards number 2, 4, 5 and 8?

Maybe with a selectable mark at the left side and two buttons "Select All" and "Select None" at the bottom. But if so, please select all cards as the pre-filled standard.

This would be awesome for multiple cards rigs to bench just specific cards together.

Hi Patrike,

Small requests as related to the above discussion if possible.

1) Include (non-dynamic) properties to set block time for coins (CTM happens to return 0 for a good number of them, and I'm being maths incompetent, would prefer method 2 above for calculation in Excel regarding possibility of solo mining)

1-1) (Not Important), most wallet JSON can report time elapsed since last block was solved (I think in seconds, or relative linux UTC timestamp), again, might be useful if this metric can be included for solo-mining (also display via AM HTTP API response (GET http://mypc:17790/api/coins/stats method) and coins tab)

2) Include (dynamic) properties to fetch network hash rate via custom sources (again, CTM is either displaying 0 or mostly incorrect data as sometimes Yiimp pool APIs it uses report hashrate incorrectly), again, this is probably going to be useful metric for solo-mining.

***Really want to have feature***
3) Ability to set pool profit factor via HTTP-API

Best Regards,

@patrike - Can you add an option (in miner properties) to use average hash rate to calculate profit instead of 5s hash rate? Some miners have wild fluctuations in 5s rate, which does not give right figures.

If so, then it works. But is not it easier to know the blocking time than the exponential factor? They are just my doubts.

That is, it is essentially a useless tool turns out.
It is impossible to calculate the actual operation of the software. And bring the average hash rate.

Although those machines that have been idle in the middle of the week show and 65 percent of the work.
Is there any way to make this tool work?
To show the time of mining as in the time equivalent and percentage. As also shown, the average real hash rate. With the ability to export this data - when a lot of rigs.

Well, in General it is logical to understand if you put 3 days or 7 days - I want to get the percentage of the real work of machinery in this period...