toggle signature works! good job  Wow you are freaking fast It's ugly and maybe buggy but I don't have the time to enhance it for now Hope you enjoy FYI it's saved on the server so it keeps your blocked signatures on all your computers |
|
|
|
"Alt-Coin" is an alternate currency created off the original Bitcoin blockchain.
Wtf am I reading |
|
|
|
|
FWIW thanks to the change theymos made, BitcoinTalk++ will allow allows you to block signatures one by one
|
|
|
|
Satoshi Nakamoto is an anagram for "i am NSA, took oaths"
Make of that what you will.
 |
|
|
|
nope, just says bac password: ->
My password's in there, i can vote and all without issue. Please try again. It will likely fail again but I'm logging the data sent. New small update. |
|
|
|
Also FWIW pywallet can merge wallets
Excellent. How do I do it? Do I need to be a guru to safely do it? Because if I do, I need a front end with the ability to keep me from making an irreversable error. Do you have windows or Linux? You'll have to install python in any case: Can you wait 3days? Are you OK to use the command line? I'm okay using the CL in linux, but this is a mac. I retired the linux boxen so that my homeschooled kids wouldn't have so much trouble adapting to the dominate computer windows model. I was using BlackboxWM before. I honestly don't understand CL on a mac, and don't have either the time or motivation to learn anymore. Such as it is, I already found the spot to swap out the wallet.dat files, and when I restarted the client it automaticly rescaned. Turns out that it was a backup of an older wallet that I already emptied out, so there was nothing left on it. It's just installing macports and four lines of code: If you can't or don't want to, could you have access to a linux or a windows? I'm in the same boat as you. Being able to merge wallets would be great.
Look at the two links in my signature, they explain what to do. Post in the pywallet thread if you have problems. I think you could export all the private keys using PyWallet. Then you can import them all into one wallet. However you might as well merge them using the same tool.
Yes, both are possible |
|
|
|
|
Could bitcoin-qt devs implement a forced rescan triggered by a key inside the wallet.dat?
This would be useful when third party tools add or remove addresses from it
|
|
|
|
Also FWIW pywallet can merge wallets
Excellent. How do I do it? Do I need to be a guru to safely do it? Because if I do, I need a front end with the ability to keep me from making an irreversable error. Do you have windows or Linux? You'll have to install python in any case: Can you wait 3days? Are you OK to use the command line? |
|
|
|
You can run it with nohup or inside screen.
This, run screen |
|
|
|
They say the order #E(Fq) of the elliptic curve is divisible by a large prime number n (say n >= 2^160) So their n (random prime number) isn't our n (order of the EC) (?) With p=FFFFFFFF FFFFFFFF FFFFFFFF FFFFFFFF FFFFFFFF FFFFFFFF FFFFFFFE FFFFFC2F and n=FFFFFFFF FFFFFFFF FFFFFFFF FFFFFFFE BAAEDCE6 AF48A03B BFD25E8C D0364141 p^1 - 1 % n = 000000000000000000000000000000014551231950b75fc4402da1722fc9baed
p^2 - 1 % n = 9d671cd581c69bc5e697f5e1d12ab7e0bd57efff7678bda14d8f2b05a6047402
p^3 - 1 % n = ac7a8c3d903db4f5506b3cd06358dbb83c0356f1426f6154796949ebcaf2c963
p^4 - 1 % n = 4a9039c8e0cf1d2e546bf94562b4cdd3f931a37f7210ea3d2448e17471c13846
p^5 - 1 % n = 13257c198a85197265443fa89aac96ccdac5495c438984dc734659a59cd53681
p^6 - 1 % n = 48e1ad01feb908300c9be1bd9d9d7afe6b7d929d4954c6e73f5b35d6d38c8ce7
p^7 - 1 % n = 98c10d11ce5ba0e56349034ff8f0078cefdbb6462b5fadb02b77e6f9b15e63a0
p^8 - 1 % n = d450873664cc63bee8debf0810f4d3885087441407bdebb24ea9c33ab125b3cc
p^9 - 1 % n = 3763ce8ef848dd69408119a522e171d9ad2132e2eb349967bebdea391b96d024
p^10 - 1 % n = 3e07117dea68ea380611113c0988e37608059d1e8315f2dc397457536359b05a
p^11 - 1 % n = 1c16652e13748ed710097fe21c21c0ee3cf4dddca456a0d0900601f2c136da93
p^12 - 1 % n = 0a95c2539eba1d41b55552516bf5a46a2417109fb45813aecc859ccab824fd91
p^13 - 1 % n = a12715798e6b78096c12e8e73a5e1550e4184561cafbb5dbfb34ffcacbbeba6c
p^14 - 1 % n = 637f4698784525945df4080fa4334351f3a8137f01d1b2118cfe4f00a79ff5eb
p^15 - 1 % n = 4adf22895fd4ced7120a9b5bd1bedb0358b25073a52879da089054cef992b7f0
p^16 - 1 % n = cc43712c43c1b51af2e29020520ae03abccd9f5c3ffdeb0c94a585ac91372278
p^17 - 1 % n = ec473f03332198fd61c411b184e81b7093423dd2a245fa278e111aac1c9c7af6
p^18 - 1 % n = 2abbbd0960d7884ac5648cfd88fd6a8485fea0af29300256d827369ccd72db9b
p^19 - 1 % n = 4ced2137a0dc99c48f9203c2dd9b423fd31d95998b29165efb48bf868170e857
p^20 - 1 % n = ac95279e81042a93568de45d91f29ccdd83acb8097ec611ba84fcace3e140ed1 |
|
|
|
Just looking at Tits, isn't that great
maybe some reward for the Donor's ?
if the first can win a "Massage"
the funding could be probably done very fast.
Before and after pics?  This |
|
|
|
One of the reasons why I don't like to do escrow has always been that I don't want to hold the funds of someone else.
So, I had the idea of making that unnecessary for an escrower.
I'd like to offer a bounty of 1 BTC for a developer who will make a nice, clean software that creates a split 2-of-3-wallet and directly emails each one of the three keys to the email-adresses of the buyer, seller and escrower.
In the end, no single one of the involved parties will have access to the funds in that wallet, but whenever two of the three parties agree, they will be able to sweep the contents. If it's extendable to, for example, 3-of-5, that could even make a "voting" escrow team possible.
That will greatly reduce the amount of trust needed in an escrower.
I would like to see a software that may be installed as some kind of web service, where you would (unfortunately) have to trust the web site's owner again, but for the moment, I just can't think of a better solution.
I'm also open to any suggestion for improving this idea.
My bounty will be awarded solely on my discretion, I will decide whether or not I like your software, and whether or not I want to award it.
Obviously, it has to be full open source under a free license.
I can do it and I'm kinda interested in doing it Nope, if I understand your proposal correctly it's not the same thing. where you would (unfortunately) have to trust the web site's owner again
I think this can be avoided |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
