You are right it does not prove anything but then again in the larger context it is still worth discussing all avenues since a wider discussion is now taking place and now more potential points are being discovered and posted about. ...
Are the members that were listed by FatFork the only ones using the word ideal instead of idea (regardless of pidgin or not)? If most of the Nigerian local board are not making that error then it could be isolated to that group mentioned by FatFork and the issue suspicion is rightly attributed to them.
...
Quick forum search in Nigeria (Naija) section says that majority knows the word idea (dozens of results) and there is one person who uses the word ideal instead. But it proves nothing this way I guess. |
|
|
|
Not entirely sure if this is a regular occurrence among the Nigerian community - anyone care to enlighten me? As for what to make of it, I have a hunch that it might give someone some ideal worth exploring further.  The plot thickens  I'll explain briefly the connection with those accounts, Martyns, Blackened515, Omgitsmehehe.
Thanks for taking time to read through. Are the members that were listed by FatFork the only ones using the word ideal instead of idea (regardless of pidgin or not)? If most of the Nigerian local board are not making that error then it could be isolated to that group mentioned by FatFork and the issue suspicion is rightly attributed to them. This issue reminds me of another thread where one group was making an error spelling the name of a Premier League footballer Several Accounts Misspelling Manchester City Footballer "Kelvin De Bruyne" |
|
|
|
Here are the results from the games played on 27th April 2023: Everton 1-4 Newcastle United
Southampton 0-1 Bournemouth
Tottenham Hotspur 2-2 Manchester United Here are the results from the games played on 26th April 2023: Nottingham Forest 3-1 Brighton and Hove Albion
Chelsea 0-2 Brentford
West Ham United 1-2 Liverpool
Manchester City 4-1 Arsenal Arsenal may have lost the title already but their accomplishments this season should not be ignored. Arsenal will finish second in the table and Manchester City will end up as premier champions again. They did well this season but will they keep up momentum next season? @JollyGood what an embarrassment Lampard’s appointment is turning out to be, and I won’t be surprised if he’s sacked soon now because how much longer can the board allow him to embarrass the club. Furthermore Manchester City won a huge game, however I won’t say it’s all over for Arsenal just yet because if City player’s get over confident then Arsenal can yet find their way back provided they start winning matches again. Even if Arsenal end up winning games they will have to rely on Manchester City to drop points. It is highly unlikely Arsenal will win the Premier League this season. As for Lampard, what a disastrous career he had and has as Chelsea manager but the owners will not sack him because he was only there as temporary/interim manager until the end of the season. They have 6 games remaining, it makes sense to allow him to see those games out and then allow a new manager to come in pre-season. It is somewhat sad the first tenure and now the second tenure of Lampard as Chelsea manager has been a massive failure when you take in to consideration the record he has as Chelsea manager. |
|
|
|
A high ranked account is only bought for the following reasons:
- perform a scam One type scam not really discussed in the forum is the number of sold accounts that end up receiving loans and then defaulting and allowing the account to receive negative trust. Is something like that even happening regularly? But as long as we don't have a working strategy to "legalize" account sales, it's best in my opinion to give out negative trust if there's enough evidence about sold / hacked accounts. I wonder what comments others will make about your strategy because it effectively means a blanket ban for buying/selling accounts and dismisses by default any notion of mitigation (and any sympathy along with it). Will account sales ever be accepted, I doubt it but there could be exceptional circumstances we have not contemplated yet. |
|
|
|
If we talk about aunts, uncles, and all other relatives, then the time of the last visit to the forum apparently ends with a signal or a whistle. If we are talking numbers and it is just a conservative guess, how many accounts in the farm do you think are operated by the martyns puppeteer? So, I've taken an aggressive approach on the subject.
I've updated my trust list, btw. I look forward to reading your updated trust list but the problem without having consensus on the issue (in other words by having a case-by-case basis in matters such as these) you will always find those who agree and those who disagree with a particular stance. |
|
|
|
It is official, the first ever all-Manchester FA Cup final will be played on 3rd June 2023 at 3pm. A usual the FA Cup final will take place at Wembley Stadium. The odds have to be on favour of Manchester City to win but Manchester United will try their best to stop their neighbours winning. It will be an interesting match to watch  |
|
|
|
This excellent post ended up being the last post on page 4 therefore am quoting it in order for it appear in the latest page. This post deserves to be seen by those that skip to the last page because of the effort that has gone in to making the discoveries. I've followed a pattern (Receive Signature earning and move to some exchange or other address) and I have got some more accounts connected here: martyns uses address: bc1q49hwmxd4hxxx4g7xxugwptmhcx2d7l0d5pde0l here https://archive.is/GBcQi#selection-2877.19-2877.61Now this bc1q49hwmxd4hxxx4g7xxugwptmhcx2d7l0d5pde0l [ e33e33f5bf] sends his earnings to 33GPgbaJuSaMyBo8tuhe6HhRunptrE8xVS[ 274f2311ad] , for example: https://www.walletexplorer.com/txid/129693a4cfb6743c9a6b24c0ea3b282e702c8eca6b6577ea71dde75dfa60589b and there are more 33GPgbaJuSaMyBo8tuhe6HhRunptrE8xVS [ 274f2311ad] hasn't sent any coins till now and has only received coins till date from multiple wallets which are linked to more accounts which are: bc1q42nl6hnt78kuum7vp8le79smtl4rytx6d8glk8 [ ccbaee06ae] is used by blackened515 here Current number of post (Including this one): 2505
Rank: Sr. Member
bech32 address: bc1q42nl6hnt78kuum7vp8le79smtl4rytx6d8glk8
Merit earned in the last 120 days: 6
(Archive: https://archive.ph/3TFyf#selection-2269.16-2269.58) bc1qkr6f4y5egy35e0w5532jnxzgppgcqx93j6u5z4 [ 14e77b3d9a56b11e] is used by LordHermes here Request For a No Collateral Loan
Amount of loan: $200 USDT
Estimated Loan Duration: 60 days
USDT Receiving Address (TRC20 Binance): TGChA9qSFehkJdzCZDzhdR1DHCVhY82mMn
-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
I'm Lordhermes requesting for a loan of $200 from Darkstar
-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNATURE-----
Version: Bitcoin-qt (1.0)
Address: bc1qkr6f4y5egy35e0w5532jnxzgppgcqx93j6u5z4
HzwYWVh7fB5Ylrqs1i7QUu+HpAfkVmiOM7IojXTGysmYWAJkyaZxgoEfGmNsPit1ftb9CuF6TgwaKw19MPqfDCA=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNATURE-----
(Archive: https://archive.ph/uOQ6s#selection-10355.9-10355.51) bc1q6dxg7kt74kwdsfmldjdtrjvnwklpx58pprc9pf [ 8b44e93a24] is used by omgitsmehehe (low UID Account) here Bitcointalk username: Omgitsmehehe
Segwit BTC address: bc1q6dxg7kt74kwdsfmldjdtrjvnwklpx58pprc9pf
Merit earned in the last 120 days: 5
What calculator do you use to get five merits? (Archive: https://archive.ph/MT0KW#selection-5459.20-5459.62) I've used walletexplorer for this and according to that 33GPgbaJuSaMyBo8tuhe6HhRunptrE8xVS [ 274f2311ad] has 71 transactions- all incoming, out of which 60 transactions have been made by the accounts mentioned above a) bc1q42nl6hnt78kuum7vp8le79smtl4rytx6d8glk8 [ ccbaee06ae] - 39 transactions b) bc1qkr6f4y5egy35e0w5532jnxzgppgcqx93j6u5z4 [ 14e77b3d9a] - 13 transactions c) bc1q49hwmxd4hxxx4g7xxugwptmhcx2d7l0d5pde0l [ e33e33f5bf] - 6 transactions d) bc1q6dxg7kt74kwdsfmldjdtrjvnwklpx58pprc9pf [ 8b44e93a24] - 2 transactions If you want to verify this then just click on this: 33GPgbaJuSaMyBo8tuhe6HhRunptrE8xVS [ 274f2311ad] and copy the identifier tag against the addresses and use the find function of browser to check this. That's not all they also send their address in the same way to another address which I think is an address from an exchange . 1BVhf8FgxS5oNDhyCBP97tmv9P8WJYGKBs [ 000177bc41] a) bc1qkr6f4y5egy35e0w5532jnxzgppgcqx93j6u5z4 [ 14e77b3d9a] has many transactions which goes back from Feb, 2021 till 23rd April 2023 (still to count no. of transactions) b) bc1q42nl6hnt78kuum7vp8le79smtl4rytx6d8glk8 [ ccbaee06ae] has good no. of transactions but not like the one above. Timeline: April, 2021 to December, 2021 c) bc1q49hwmxd4hxxx4g7xxugwptmhcx2d7l0d5pde0l [ e33e33f5bf] has 1 transaction on 23rd April,2023 sending to 1BVhf... address via TXID https://www.walletexplorer.com/txid/e53f5a62d1f9aed85dd234eddcb36623a5107d9bd2d8e4811166b84afa046e68d) bc1q6dxg7kt74kwdsfmldjdtrjvnwklpx58pprc9pf [ 8b44e93a24] has 6 transactions sending to 1BVhf... address. Timeline: 15th March, 2023 to 23rd April 2023 I've found another user with wallet sending to 1BVhf8FgxS5oNDhyCBP97tmv9P8WJYGKBs [ 000177bc41] address. They've dealt 2 times but what more interesting is that the user has sent/received merits also from this ring of accounts. Also this user has posted in this thread too. Although, I am not much sure about him. There's a 1xbit participant as well. (not the one already connected, its a different one) Anyway, I am gonna focus on these 4 accounts - blackened515, martyns, LordHermes, omgitshehe and proceed [1] I've checked BPIP.org and here are some screenshots sending merits to each other Merit Overview from BPIP of blackened515 Merit Overview from BPIP of martyns LordHermes: https://loyce.club/Merit/history/1803138.html (omgitsmehehe, martyns have sent/received merits) Merit Overview from BPIP of omgitsmehehe [2] This is interesting and what I have seen from spammers & multi-accounts during 16-17. These users also posts quoting each other just generating posts between themselves in order to meet post quota. With what i'm seeing in the premier league after the first game so far today,Some big teams will find it difficult to get to the top this season, imagine Liverpool drawing Fulham in their first game of the season,this really surprised me because Liverpool's odd against Fulham was very small,but they ended up seeing a draw,and I must confess the way Fulham played today,if they can continue in this kind of form,I think they will surprise people this season.
Totthenham won their first game as well as their bitterest rival Arsenal who broke their every first match jink yesterday with a 2-0 convincing win.The pressure was much on Crystal palace that they scored an own goal.
The premier league game opening is a little bit tough for big team like Liverpool that narks out a draw against Fulham, although the results isn't a better one for Jurgen Klopp as he needs to tops the table presently, afterall there would be enough teams that are willingly to compete for the new season. Games results were battling and brilliant to some extent, like Tottenham trashing Southampton 4 goals to 1, Fulham drawing Liverpool 2-2. Chelsea managing to beat Everton 1 nil. I really enjoyed every bit of the premier league. (Archive.is: https://archive.ph/qTv88#selection-4086.6-4189.532) Zidane is set to manage PSG next season according to reports.Zidane is seen as one of the best coaches in the world,and PSG has suffered incompetency in the aspect of the coaches that manage the club,considering the high profile players at the club.Lionel Messi,Neymar and Mbape are three big recognised names in the club,and yet,they are unable to win the champions league,therefore,it is understood that if a good coach like Zidane should manage the team,there is every possiblity that PSG will win the Champions league.PSG were not able to reach the final of the Uefa champions league final last season,and all were narrowed down to the incompetency of the manager.
Zidane will bring a new dimension of football to the club,and I believe his tenure will be the best.
Zidane is considered as an experienced coach, who can probably take PSG to the Champions League final, and possibly make them lift the Champions League trophy. Yes, we all expected them to struggle for the title last season since they had one of the strongest squad. But, Unfortunately they couldn't. Although, Zidane will have to introduce a new strategy that will enable them to resist other tough teams which they might encounter next season, and also help them in win consistently in their games. (Archive.is: https://archive.ph/rzU9h#selection-8563.0-8571.500) You guys will find more posts like this. I am not sure how campaign managers sees this but that's for definitely not the right way to use the forum. Clearly they are doing anything for the sake of earning money. Who knows maybe in dire need of money they can use one account to escrow and on other one to start the deal and then scam. That's one account gone and then go to next one. Some of these accounts have been neutral marked by JollyGood for gap in history and there has been once instance where lovesmyfamilis has poked him too at his attempt to get into campaign by increasing merit count on the application post. My opinion: I think this is a big alt ring, Martyns is just a piece and there could be lot more. Right now my impression is that he just wants to earn as much as from signature campaigns and therefore he posts every chance he gets. Even if there is none, he creates one. I mean look at the address: https://explorer.btc.com/btc/address/33GPgbaJuSaMyBo8tuhe6HhRunptrE8xVS , there is 0.166BTC (approx $4,800) being moved to that wallet. That's not how forum is intended to be used. Is it? In addition to that, the one I have my suspicion on has been part of the campaign for 100 weeks and believe me its a good paying campaign as I have been part of that earlier. There are some more (including 1xbit one I mentioned above) but its based on just not much strong links I guess but I am still digging on those. Everyone should be given chance to explain themselves so I asking @blackened515, @LordHermes and @omgitsmehehe to post here to explain the situation here and will see how the community sees this. |
|
|
|
What happens if a ban evader has several high ranking alt-accounts and uses them to support the ban evaders application for having the ban overturned? Even if it not related to a scam, surely in that scenario action should taken across all accounts if they are discovered. I want to clarify if I'm not supporting ban evader, but I don't know why you can think the account will cause a further harm to the forum. It's more like your own assumption rather than being objective about what he had done in this forum. |
|
|
|
Aston Villa defeated Fulham 1-0 to go to fifth place. Totteham is currently in sixth place, and tomorrow they must dig their own grave. Look at how well Aston Villa have performed ever since Gerrard was sacked and Emery replaced him as manager. As for Tottenham, seriously though what is going on with them? Erikson was a key man in the team, but he was sold for a reason I can't even tell. I cannot be sure but I believe Eriksen wanted another challenge because Tottenham had reached a peak and could not progress including losing the Champions League final to Liverpool therefore he moved on to Inter Milan (I believe). After that there was the sad incident when he collapsed on the field. Since he recovered and started playing again, he has been instrumental in the recovery road that Manchester United have been on while at the same time Tottenham have shown glimpses of brilliance but again are struggling to chase the pack for a top four finish to the season. Here are the games taking place this evening: Nottingham Forest vs Brighton and Hove Albion
Chelsea vs Brentford
West Ham United vs Liverpool
Manchester City vs Arsenal |
|
|
|
I think they mentioned using TOR would be the best way to browse their website because there is an ongoing issue with the clearnet which really has no resolution in sight because those that are perpetrating the DDoS are determined. I figured since you just went live with the new update and the site was supposed to stay online, I'd let you know :/ |
|
|
|
I'm mobile getting ready for my procedure but while reading some replies I started wondering why people seek out some of these accounts? I know this is somewhat off-topic but I never knew you were going to have a new procedure and if there was a thread (or comments) about it, I missed it/them. The last I read about your health was in your extensive thread which was later locked. I wish you success and good health  I feel like so much time is probably wasted by users finding accounts that potentially did nothing but were bought. Eyes should be more focused on bigger things IMO. Buying accounts to me is nothing. You have a point but maybe when members are searching for scams, scammers or suspicious behaviour that these sorts of account farmings are discovered and made available to members. If there's no scam why bother though. Again you have a point but that is where difference of opinion comes in to play. As of yet there is no real single instruction from the forum admins or theymos about how to deal with such a scenario. |
|
|
|
Why does the forum need users who cannot grow on their own, but resort to such methods? A forum's account is history, it is status, it is reputation, it is knowledge, and all this should be assigned to only one user and should not be transferred somehow. The forum does not need them but it is them that need the forum therefore they purchase and trade accounts in the hunt for bounty and signature campaigns. Should all accounts be tagged that are guilty of or presumed bought? Is a neutral tag appropriate for accounts that are bought that have no reputation, or should accounts be ruined period? I told you in the other thread. Who commits a crime does not change the typology of the crime. Giving different penalties depending on who commits the misconduct goes against the fundamental principles of law. All this is stirred up by someone who not only bought an account, but is a ban evader and willingly participated in advertising a known scam site. Being from a poor country and getting away with buying an account is a comparative aggravation against your compatriots from poor countries who do not take the fast track and with their effort little by little rank up the account. What would happen if say for example the forum had an open policy of accepting with open arms those that buy and sell accounts. Surely the quality of posting would drop further from what it already has and not only that, it would most probably increase the number of posts (most of which would be nonsensical incoherent ramblings) being made in order to meet the minimum character criteria to earn the weekly fee. But the recent change of ownership and a blatant lie—look how Martyns writes about his brother— The fact that he died was not announced immediately. He corrected this, realizing that we would ask the brother. And also ignoring and subsequently lying about another blocked account—doesn't that deserve a negative tag? Does anyone here like to look like an idiot for believing this? He has no choice but to present lie after lie because he wanted to protect the account from neutral and/or negative feedback. To that degree he just kept fabricating stories and we do not know what the truth is or was about him. Forgetting about the banned BlackViruse account for a moment, martyns never posted a reply about his alleged connections forum members merintishidup and dreamsnight. It would be interesting to read what he has to say. In addition, if someone buys someone else's account, he must understand that one day a ray of suspicion will be directed at him. If someone was Indonesian from the very beginning, why go to another locale? If at that point of suspicion other members decide that the suspect has contributed enormously towards the forum then he might get away from being tagged at all however that does not send the best signal to others as they can try to use that same defence when trying to protect their traded accounts from being tagged. After all, when a particular member (now a campaign manager) was accused of having purchased his account several years ago and a thread was opened to discuss him, he ended up being defended by several members. There is no consistency in the way DT and DT members approach this matter. If the forum policy is simple as purchased/traded account = negative tag then it is settled and there is nothing else to discuss but when it comes to being subjective and opinionated about whether exceptions should be made or whether mitigation should be considered on a case by case basis, we end up having disagreements. As a result, I think that each case and each bought and caught account deserves separate consideration. When a person thinks people are idiots, the red tag fits well with his reputation. Fair enough but that would again make it subjective. One member may feel a negative tag is warranted/justified but another member may feel a neutral or none is appropriate and then we all go back to same point debating the subject all over again. |
|
|
|
Congratulations to the winners! I like the format and hopefully JollyGood can sort out another one?  I will try to run another competition soon GazetaBitcoin nice win, didn't take you for someone that was into sports, Congratulations  Woodie you won the Carabao Cup competition and both GazetaBitcoin and Bitzizzix won this FA Cup semi-final competition. All three of you ended up with $25 each. Congratulations. I will make the other payment directly to GazetaBitcoin after he posts his address here. Thank you, JollyGood! Please send the payment to this address: bc1qgfluvq03jcqzvaz6dc00qqgvyvmfuxra6etsd2. Done: fd48871bb795ee0c834c77bae27745a81538a6661101824bf828e55c47682753 I will ask Igebotz to make his $25 payment directly to bitzizzix to this address: 1AUr5FyZJvEL8eV97moDV16WnLQDTUX5Xj
I will make the other payment directly to GazetaBitcoin after he posts his address here.
$25 sent to Bitzizzix wallet address 1AUr5FyZJvEL8eV97moDV16WnLQDTUX5Xj Hash: 1edec81647e5c30d542f38a1054ad2ba4bdb4ead0694fa84e9e6f9154e20fe18 Thank you Igebotz |
|
|
|
|
These are the games taking place today:
Wolverhampton Wanderers vs Crystal Palace
Aston Villa vs Fulham
Leeds United vs Leicester City
These are the results from the games played on Sunday 23rd April 2023:
Bournemouth 0-4 West Ham United
Newcastle United 6-1 Tottenham Hotspur
Newcastle United gave a very harsh lesson to Tottenham as they sit in 3rd place. Tottenham will probably miss out on automatic qualification for the Champions League and leave it Manchester United and Newcastle United to battle it out for 3rd and 4th place finishes to the season.
West Ham took a massive step to safety with a big win away at Bournemouth but they can still mathematically be dragged in to the relegation zone.
I was sure I posted about these results before but upon a second look I had to re-write the post because it was not there
|
|
|
|
Seriously? More lies? Your feeble attempts to manipulate the truth are utterly transparent, and your credibility is non-existent. His reputation is in tatters now because of the lies but the thing to note before that was he did have opportunities to redeem himself. It seems as though he concocted elaborate stories about how he ended up in control of the martyns accounts and he did it for the sake of attempting to gain sympathy because he wanted to use it for enrolling in signature campaigns and that is the reason why he will not be taken seriously in the forum again. Stop trying to pull the wool over our eyes with your blatant falsehoods. After reading everything in this thread, I have absolutely no sympathy for you. If you had been honest from the start, you might have received a few neutral trust ratings on your account to indicate the change in account ownership. However, your dishonesty has exposed your true character. Even if we ignore your repeated attempts at ban evasion, playing the pity card has only resulted in earning you negative trust. With a few neutral and maybe a negative trust he could have continued to post without concern and over time maybe his tags would have been removed or revised in a beneficial manner to him but as his stories were designed to seek pity rather explain the truth he lost that opportunity too. I originally left a neutral tag but revised it to negative after reading subsequent posts. Poker Player correctly updated his negative tag to include the ban evasion part, I think I will do that too but right now I will see what else is being posted before I revise it just in case other things also need to be added. Can your indonesian brother come here on Bitcointalk and write an indonesian post? Isn't it interesting that two brothers in personal communication via WhatsApp do not speak in their natural (Naija) language, but in English? Stranger things have happened I have tried to give martyns a chance to tell his story but even then, his outright lies are obvious.
He should just create a new account, write good posts and earn his Merit as everyone else does. You are right, it really is as simple as that. If he creates a new account and contributes to the forum and earns merits, he will be joining signature campaigns again but how many accounts does he use in the forum? ----------------- So what is martyns going to say about his alleged connections forum members merintishidup and dreamsnight? |
|
|
|
Thank you JollyGoodm Igebotz and Utopia for this contest! I am more than glad to hear I was one of the winners Regarding the proposal to extend the contest -- I don't want to be the party pooper here, but in Romania we have a saying: What's in hand is not a lie Meaning that you better keep what you have in hand than risk it for a possible other winning. So please don't take me wrong, but I'll keep my 25$ prize Thanks again for organizing this very nice contest! Thank you to you and all those that participated in the competition. I will try to send you your prize within 24 hours, please post the address to send the funds to. Me too, I chose to keep the $25 gift. And I also didn't expect to get it and it makes me feel good, because I always enter your contests and now I'm lucky. once again I thank JollyGood Igebotz and Utopia for this contest. my wallet : 1AUr5FyZJvEL8eV97moDV16WnLQDTUX5Xj Congratulations on sharing the prize. Payment will be made within 24 hours to the address you posted. ---------------- I will ask Igebotz to make his $25 payment directly to bitzizzix to this address: 1AUr5FyZJvEL8eV97moDV16WnLQDTUX5Xj I will make the other payment directly to GazetaBitcoin after he posts his address here. Thank you JollyGood, i sent you a PM I just replied |
|
|
|
Now I am getting it. It is not too late for Fortune-Jack to iron the issue. Because all what I see is misunderstanding. Neither side is claiming it is a misunderstanding, in fact both are adamant they are correct and that is why they are unable to find a solution. There is still a chance this can get settled out of court privately but that would be up to both parties to find a way to do it. |
|
|
|
Many users kept questioning if the account had commit scam or cheat in the past, let's see this below.
~snip~
So if anyone think leaving negative feedback with changed hands reason isn't correct in this case, you can give negative feedback with a reason of cheating using multiple accounts. Same applies with users who leave neutral feedback, I think this case already clear. It seems to get worse for martyns as he tried very hard to save the account from receiving negative tags. It is curious to see how certain people see the negative feedback as excessive, but instead see the negative feedback on my profile, which the author himself has admitted is in a grey area, as justified. It is simply another example of hypocrisy and there are many cases, as you and others must have noticed. The one on your profile is clearly revenge based and as it is retaliatory it should not even be there. This case reminds me a lot of Naim027's case. Everybody defending him because poor guy, he only plagiarized in the past several times, and he didn't do it again, and he only sent himself some merits among his alts, but poor guy, he didn't do it again, etc. etc. etc. etc. etc. He received a lot of sympathy at the beginning but in the end when the lies and alt-accounts were exposed, members should have learned from supporting such cases. I know each issue should be taken on case-by-case basis but there has to be a degree of flexibility. In this case, as in that one, the more you stretch, the more things come out. In some ways it is good martyns is defending himself but lie after lie is not exactly a good defence to put forward. I cannot work out why he/she/they simply cannot register new accounts and build up rank in order to join signature campaigns rather than go down the "it was given to me" or "I am poor" route. I have reported this case in the ban evading thread, but maybe even he will be lucky and will not be banned again, as happened with Naim027, with the moderation of this forum you never know. There is a possibility moderators could take action but you have done the right thing by reporting him. Now it is up to them. Its just a full member rank.
Look, stop crying and pushing for pity. If you say it's "just a full member account," why don't you start developing it yourself? There is no excuse for any member to not build up their own account even if they are farming them for multiple bounty and campaign participation. Why the need to buy? In addition, you bought an account, which means you are not completely poor if you allow yourself to bypass the rules of the forum.
Learn to lose with dignity. He will try his best to keep posting a new story (even more extravagant than the previous one) while he tries to put forward a sympathetic case asking for the tags to be revised or removed. For all those who feel sorry for this "cunning" guy: Can the forum do charity and give out high ranks to such crybabies who, being young, do not want to do anything themselves? And maybe even pay them extra? Yes, there are many bought and stolen accounts here, but many were bought a long time ago. The same story is fresh; in 2021, the forum condemned such transformations of changing hands. And I always assumed that if you bought someone else's account, maybe you should check everything that the previous owner did in the past. No one would have noticed anything if he had not started writing in his local section It seems with the previous banned accounts linked to him, he could even more accounts under his controlled. The problem is that he has lied repetitively and now there is no way to trust him regardless of what he will say. |
|
|
|
The points awarded to each participant are in red and if my calculations are correct, GazetaBitcoin and bitzizzix both have 11 points each therefore have won the competition Now, this was not part of the original competition but in order to add a little more excitement for the winners: do the winners want to share the $50 prize by receiving $25 each or would they like to have a competition just between the two of them for the FA Cup final and the winner takes the whole $50? Let me know. 10 POINTS
1: Manchester United and Manchester City
2: 6
3: 0
4: 4
5: 1
6: 0
7: 0
11 POINTS
1: Manchester United and Manchester City
2: 5
3: 0
4: 5
5: 2
6: 0
7: 0
6 points
1: Manchester United and Manchester City
2: 7
3: 1
4: 5
5: 1
6: 1
7: 1
10 POINTS
1: Manchester United and Manchester City
2: 3
3: 0
4: 6
5: 1
6: 0
7: 0
3 POINTS
1: Brighton & Hove Albion and Manchester City
2: 11
3: 0
4: 3
5: 1
6: 1
7: 0
5 POINTS
1: Manchester United and Manchester City
2: 6
3: 0
4: 7
5: 2
6: 1
7: 1
4 POINTS
1: Manchester United and Manchester City
2: 8
3: 0
4: 6
5: 0
6: 1
7: 0
8 POINTS
1: Manchester United and Manchester City
2: 5
3: 0
4: 6
5: 2
6: 0
7: 0
8 POINTS
1: Manchester United and Manchester City
2: 8
3: 0
4: 5
5: 0
6: 0
7: 0
7 POINTS
1: Manchester United and Manchester City
2: 9
3: 0
4: 4
5: 1
6: 1
7: 0
0 POINTS
1:Brighton and hove Albion vs Manchester city
2: 8
3:1
4:8
5:0
6:1
7:2
4 POINTS
1: Manchester United and Manchester City
2: 6
3: 0
4: 6
5: 2
6: 2
7: 2
5 POINTS
1: Brighton and Manchester City
2: 9
3: 0
4: 6
5: 0
6: 0
7: 0
11 POINTS
1: Manchester United and Manchester City
2:5
3:0
4:6
5:0
6:0
7:0
1 POINT
1: Brighton, Manchester City
2: 7
3: 0
4: 8
5: 2
6: 1
7: 0
1 POINT
1: Brighton and Manchester City
2: 7
3: 2
4: 6
5: 0
6: 1
7: 1
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
