That is what you claim but they have not responded to your allegation. Going by the way their forum representative posts I doubt they will address your claim too.

Apart from the one screenshot can you provide the transaction id when you sent the crypto?

I have some recollection of downloading Exodus (and Coinomi) to see what they were like but cannot recall using them therefore I will not be able to vouch for either unless I download and test them. Like you, what I will say about Exodus is that I am not impressed with them for selecting partners that have some sort of bad reputation.

If this situation were to continue maybe the number of complaints against them here will increase but even then I see no reason why Exodus would be interested in addressing the issue.

Can you post any transaction ids that be seen on the blockchain or any screenshots of emails/chats? If you cannot provide any evidence it will be difficult for members in the forum to simply take your word for it.

A quick search of the forum would give you the answer. By far the majority would probably say 1xbit1.com and all associated websites are selectively scamming their customers but making an allegation is one thing and backing it up with some sort of evidence is another.

What are the odds being given on Leicester City being relegated just 7 years after winning the Premier League title in the 2015/16 season? It is not impossible but it is very hectic at the foot of the table. Any three of the bottom seven clubs could be relegated. Bournemouth need one point to ensure they cannot be relegated and West Ham United need three points to ensure they do not get relegated.

I think it is clear Southampton are certain to be relegated but it is too difficult to comment on which other teams will join them.

The way I see it they have no reason to delay transaction for this length of time and furthermore, if they decide to go down the AML/KYC route (as an excuse to indefinitely hold on to funds without returning them) then basically nobody should trust them.

The only time you should send KYC to an exchange is if they are 100% reputable and you are sure they will never sell your KYC/AML data on the black market to international criminals and scammers. If you are looking to receive fiat in to your bank then clearly exchanges have to enforce KYC therefore it is reasonable to send KYC to them for AML purposes.

This is a valid point but I would go one step further.

Let us say for example Manchester United beat Manchester City in the FA Cup final and Real Madrid beat Manchester City in the second leg semi-final of the Champions League, what remains is the Premier League. If Arsenal somehow manage to win the title and Manchester City lose against Real Madrid and Manchester United they end up with nothing.

If they stand any chance of winning the treble they will have to put out full strength teams for the FA Cup final and the Champions League semi-final but put out a strong enough team to win their Premier League matches while resting some of their top players.

Well from your perspective yes on the surface it is wrong but we have no idea what they will say in their defence. If they open an account here and post about it we can ask them for their version of events.

If what you stated earlier is true, maybe they are thinking if they returned your deposit they are sending out the wrong signal to members they suspect of trying to scam them. I am not saying what they did is right or wrong, all I am saying is we should hear from them. Personally, I would at least return the deposit and close the account but many of these online casinos are like the wild west they do whatever they want.

Do you have the transaction id which can be checked and confirmed on the blockchain? That would provide your claim with a little more substance. Right now, I cannot say if their reason for closing your account is a correct course of action or not because I do not know their side of the story.

At the very least they should return your deposit but the lesson for you and everyone else to learn here is you must read terms and conditions when you sign up to any casino or gaming website and you must be prepared to still not have your funds released even after you send your KYC.

There are many scam websites that claim to be legitimate but they are a front designed to fool people in to sending their personal documents to them. I cannot say this is what is happening here but you should be careful.

I agree, the case is pretty much closed because of the text you quoted. Even if either sympathy or mitigation is attached to the OP, he was in breach of the terms of service he signed up to.

For any user playing at their website (as with all other gaming and betting websites) and being in breach of the contract they signed up to when they registered, basically means they have to adhere to the rules otherwise they have to face the consequences.

If Sportsbet decided to make an exception with the OP that would be something generous but I do not see it happening.

Exodus should at the very least make exchange partnerships with third parties that do not have a tainted reputation. If people are using their service in good faith and are then being held in a system (that they did not ask to be held hostage to) then the onus has to be on Exodus to do something about it.

Manchester City travel to Everton on Sunday in a game they should ordinarily win but Everton are fighting to avoid relegation therefore anything can happen. Let us not forget Everton beat Arsenal earlier this season when they signed Sean Dyche as their new manager in his first game. Manchester City will be distracted by having one eye on the Champions League second leg against Real Madrid therefore Everton definitely have a chance to at the very least get a point with a draw.

What are the chances Arsenal will be forced in to a draw when face Brighton on Sunday?

That might be true and that could lead to diversion tactics which are aimed at stopping people from talking about (or learning about) the scam allegations against their brand I would also stress here that I do not believe all the scam allegations made against 1xbit/1xbit1 because not all of them have provided evidence to back their claim.

That is the repetitive cycle when it comes to people using the forum for their own nefarious purposes, they can return using a new identity whenever they want and push forward any agenda. Thankfully, on many occasions they get caught out and others are warned about their conduct.

I am late to this thread but it has to be said that all those neutral feedbacks are clearly justified and mine is added too. To use any form of payment to receive positive feedback, review or merits is simply unacceptable. It is these types of activities that bring bad reputation to the forum and if we all try to tag these types of accounts it will cause them some short term delay in their plans though it might not stop them in the long run.

As long as there is a market for this sort of thing, it will continue to happen in the forum. In order to post false reviews for any services the promoter would probably create a series of accounts to push their agenda rather than have low ranking members posting lies in search of receiving bounties.

This is the first semi-final (first leg) taking place today:

Real Madrid vs Manchester City

You would have to go with the notion that if Real Madrid win this evening without conceding a goal, they will qualify for another Champions League final no matter what happens in the return leg in Manchester. I would expect Real Madrid to score in Manchester therefore they could qualify via the away goals rule. As for Manchester City, well done for them to get this far again but they still have not been crowned Champions of Europe.

If Manchester City lose to Real Madrid and then lose the FA Cup final to Manchester United, they will only win the Premier league this season when they were on the verge of a treble.

A whole variety of wide ranging questions have been put forward in this threads and full credit to you for addressing (or trying to) each of those questions and comments. Since you mentioned it, how long will it approximately take before the process and be used by end users?

As we all know the Fulham vs Leicester City game ended 5-3 but after being 4-0 and then 5-1 down, Leicester really played well as they tried to get back in to the game. Fulham managed to contain them otherwise it could have ended 5-5.

As for Leicester City winning the Premier League several years ago and then possibly being relegated now, a similar thing happened to Blackburn Rovers. Looking at it now, maybe they should not have sacked Ranieri just 9 months in to the new season after he led them to the Premier League title. If he had stayed maybe things would have worked out differently.

Do you think that surprise result against Brighton will push Everton on to gain enough points to avoid relegation? And on the other side, what can be said about Brighton and their dreams of playing in the Europa League next season by finish 5th? Liverpool occupy 5th place but Brighton were pushing them and even now can still catch them if Liverpool drop points.

Everton taught Brighton a harsh lesson with that 1-5 win.

When Brighton played Manchester United they were dominant through most of the game. They won that game but lost the next one when it should have been an easy home win.

Brighton clearly thought they would defeat Everton without hassle but they underestimated them. This was an unexpected and very bad loss for Brighton and it goes to show they work hard to ensure they give problems to the bigger teams but they have a degree of inconsistency when it comes to playing teams at the bottom of the table.

In the previous game Brighton outperformed Manchester United yet in this game they did not play with the same intensity. Everton are obviously fighting to stay in the Premier League by avoiding relegation and they deserved to have won that game based on merit. Everton are now two points above the relegation zone.