BitCoin is better than cash. It is the backbone for the new secure internet structure As George Gilder nicely described here https://youtu.be/cidZRD3NzHg |
|
|
|
|
Like the SEC chairman said on his interview about a year ago, all ICO coins ARE securities and needs to be regulated as such.
Go down the list in coinmarketcap and mark em
ETH, XRP ,... all such are, no rocket Science.
|
|
|
|
I hope BTC-e give them zero.
Who do these people think they are? They have no authority outside their remit, and certainly no authority on the Bitcoin network (unless they have private keys to some BTC, to which they would of course have a legitimate right of ownership)
Only that u are able of running some tech doesn't make u live outside any law. If u play with financial tech, u will always need to be aware of regulations and non- tech trust. US still has strongest powers in terms of law enforcement, check what they have done to Liberty Reserve... More shitty unregulated stuff will get their bills soon imo |
|
|
|
aus gut unterrichteter quelle habe ich erfahren, dass die deutsche börse plant in den handel mit bitcoin einzusteigen.  Da könnte was dran sein...  |
|
|
|
There is way more use in a scalable eCash SYSTEM
Allowing huge blocks is a good idea if you want to store large amounts of data, like weather stats or whatever. But you know what else is good for storing data? A regular hard drive. You don't need a blockchain to store weather data, which is what makes up the majority of SV blocks. Thx for telling that. Sure there should be all sorts of audit and contract, settlement (my last post for that got deleted again...) data hashed into the blockchain. Scientific work and other IP like code timestamped ... but time will tell where to start. For now someone decided to try weather . The internet is open  |
|
|
|
Another leap forward, 248MB block on Mainnet! Nothing else comes close Before already a 236.67 MB block https://satoshi.io/block-height/593116Whats that 4 days of BTC confirming time? Quick lets find the defibrillator the orange line is flat-lining, red one is pumping nice.  "Bitcoin, an electronic peer to peer cash system". Remember ? Your gigameg wanabee block: less than 2.5M USD of value (2,489,450) Bitcoin blocks: 587487 5,760,800.00 587486 24,705,600.00 587485 21,488,700.00 587484 10,788,500.00 587483 22,153,900.00 587482 73,447,300.00 587481 90,123,300.00 587480 42,493,200.00 587479 8,834,990.00 Biggest block size of these above ? 1,478MB (obviously block 587481) So: - BSV: 2,489,450USD for 248MB. - Bitcoin: 90,123,300USD for 1.478MB. BSV block size is almost 168 times bigger for 36 times less value than Bitcoin Bitcoin is 6000X more efficient to transfer value / money. Keep your gigameg blocks. There is way more use in a scalable eCash SYSTEM https://Twitter.com/andrew_boho/status/1155120166856024069 |
|
|
|
Nobody here or in the world - outside of BSV brainlets such as yourself - gives a shit about your farcical Faketoshi crap. Wake me up when BSV flips BCH in market cap.
There exists a problem: Microsoft is enforcing geofencing on the repository undergirding the world's most prominent FOSS VCS. There exists a solution under development: An eventual git-workalike whose repository is built upon a decentralized, permissionless blockchain. And all you can see is: Aussie man bad! SMH Regardless, its a bit intellectually dishonest to pretend BSV would be anything without Wright. I disagree. Surprise. Gee, And I thought the topic of discussion was Microsoft's closing down access to github, and potential solutions thereupon. We've been through this a dozen times already -- its market cap subsists tremendously on the farce that Wright is Satoshi.
I acknowledge that a large input to BSV's market cap is likely the question of the Satoshiness of CSW. However, given the endemic presence of Craig Derangement Syndrome (e.g., the topic of discussion vs. your imperative to making the potential solution a referendum on CSW), it is rather unclear as to whether CSW's association with SV is price-positive, or price-negative. You're acting like there's not already a hundred coins out there with some at least slightly innovating new tech that are trying to solve certain problems -- there are, and nobody gives a shit about them
Funny that. It's not about new tech trying to solve certain problems. It is about established tech that has already solved the problem of permissionless non-inflationary money. And the ONLY chain that is progressing back to that original design. ++ |
|
|
|
Yes. Put it all dark and criminal tainted. LN not laundry friendly enough? What investors ( users - lol ) u wanna atrackt ? Sigh |
|
|
|
Av Joe is not a System supporter - BTC is scaming such poor guys to spent ther Money on tech shit and leave them with less Money for their live
Av Joe can just enjoy cheap and safe Bitcoin - it scales for many big industries to run miners. Here is the future.
PoW is thinking about happy future.
The only scam is CSW posing as Satoshi, and this "Satoshi vision BS". BSV safe ? https://bitinfocharts.com/comparison/hashrate-btc-bsv.html#1yWe do not Need CSW to call it Bitcoin - it is such simple to see with some guts - same as to see that it is safe to use for any Av Joe on the planet - much more than Segshit & LieNing. See - you never can stay on the Topic - troll away Let me quote you how you don't relate BSV and CSW posing as Satoshi. ... What jurisdiction ya mean? Nah... Edit. Read and get the reason here https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536.33.0.pdfIt is only about starting fishing AFTER , based on 1) condolences from CSW 2) what Ira got from (core) social media Not even getting down to correct jurisdiction, Australia So expect only proof that CSW is Satoshi And put ur money where u see truth is behind against what u might wish to believe U might see such actions / "protections" from some ppl who KNOW it before you...  ............... Any decent proof you can provide WHO really altered ? Was that you ? Who btw wants to discred ppl without proof ? You ?  Wrong. CSW posted the edited version of this on his own twitter feed: Dr Craig S Wright (@ProfFaustus) - then seemingly subsequently deleted his entire twitter feed presumable to cover up evidence. This is not the only example of this. You seemingly have a real problem with trying to twist hard facts and the truth. Did he really MADE the Change himself or was it to show it WAS changed ? Was he closing his Twitter or was it closed by Twitter ? Still - you wanna be blind or wanna create bias ..... Some will never like him I fear https://coingeek.com/craig-wright-libel-suits-crypto-critics/ Guess Satoshi s been forced into reaction mode?...... It wouldn't be out of the ordinary for a bench warrant to be issued. That would authorize the police to arrest him, but I'm guessing there's no chance of extradition.
Basically, Wright would need to avoid stepping foot in the United States.
As Satoshi, and a proven internet forensics expert, wouldn't he not be of some help for cleaning up the Bitcoin space from many (old) criminals?.........................
I don't understand, Craig Wright would have lied  
https://cointelegraph.com/news/craig-wright-uses-falsified-docs-to-prove-innocence-in-kleiman-case
from https://cointelegraph.com/news/craig-wright-uses-falsified-docs-to-prove-innocence-in-kleiman-caseBy Helen Partz Craig Wright Uses Falsified Docs to Prove Innocence in Kleiman Case: Report 19465 Total views 283 Total shares Listen to article 1:41 Craig Wright Uses Falsified Docs to Prove Innocence in Kleiman Case: ReportNEWS Self-proclaimed Bitcoin (BTC) creator Craig Wright has allegedly provided fabricated court documents to prove a trust deed with his plaintiffs, as seen from documents revealed by trial lawyer Stephen Palley on Twitter on July 3. https://twitter.com/stephendpalley/status/1146527019326496769?fbclid=IwAR1dUaIH43GVrHwLgj7CkM0h42O4P-jixgdqnzh37NbeGfY2KjNciY7-ajMAccording to Palley, the self-styled Satoshi Nakamoto has failed to prove his case by presenting court documents that Palley alleges to be fake, as they contain multiple chronological discrepancies. https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/6309656/kleiman-v-wright/?filed_after=&filed_before=&entry_gte=&entry_lte=&order_by=descAmong the exhibits filed with the District Court for the Florida Southern District on July 3, there is a document submitted as proof of cooperation between Wright and the now-deceased David Kleiman, whose lawyers filed the case against Wright in February 2018. Kleiman’s lawyers accuse Wright of stealing hundreds of thousands of Bitcoin — at press time valued at over $5 billion — after Kleiman’s death in April 2013. While the presented deed of trust document is ostensibly dated Oct. 23, 2012, the metadata of the file indicates that the document was actually created after the death of Kleiman, as Palley found. The trust document apparently uses a 2015 copyright notice related to Calibri, the Microsoft Word font, indicating that the document could not be from earlier. Alleged falsification of trust deed documents by Craig Wright Alleged falsification of trust deed documents by Craig Wright. Source: Stephen Palley Following the apparent accusation of Wright for forging the court documents, Palley wrote: “I mean it makes sense that the inventor of bitcoin can time travel. Your honor.” In late June, Wright declared that he cannot comply with a court order to provide a list of all his early bitcoin addresses, claiming that he gave a key piece of information regarding the funds and wallets to Kleiman before his death.
Can someone explain to me what's going on? Is this guy a liar or not? 
How poor is that ? Who provided those docs ? When fabricated ? What u want to tell / beleive here ? nothing And At 1TB week is 52 TB year
I thought Craigy's policy all along was that they don't want little people involved in the running of BSV. Anything that makes it more centralised is a welcome development in their eyes. Presumably the end game is one datacentre with him masturbating furiously every time those 'gigamegs' get bigger. No, the good thing is that many trustworthy institutions will run enough infrastructure for anyone in the world, and hobby guys can still run btc raspi shit. What is needed is an electronic payment system based on cryptographic proof instead of trust, allowing any two willing parties to transact directly with each other without the need for a trusted third party. Thx for reading and reposting all my good posts here again What you need is understanding all that in proper context with what the globe needs and original Bitcoin can provide with no block size cap. Dunno what u little ano think other anos want, try to fck up btc more for that , it is a free world. I wish u best with that experiment But seems u still need to hang around here and learn, that's even better |
|
|
|
Av Joe is not a System supporter - BTC is scaming such poor guys to spent ther Money on tech shit and leave them with less Money for their live
Av Joe can just enjoy cheap and safe Bitcoin - it scales for many big industries to run miners. Here is the future.
PoW is thinking about happy future.
The only scam is CSW posing as Satoshi, and this "Satoshi vision BS". BSV safe ? https://bitinfocharts.com/comparison/hashrate-btc-bsv.html#1yWe do not Need CSW to call it Bitcoin - it is such simple to see with some guts - same as to see that it is safe to use for any Av Joe on the planet - much more than Segshit & LieNing. See - you never can stay on the Topic - troll away |
|
|
|
It is Bitcoin - but not ur BTC (what is altered SegwitCoin)
Never will be: centralized, False. unsustainable,
While unknowable a priori, that is quite unlikely. average Joe can't run a full node
False. so it's very unBitcoin.
Well, you're batting zero for three in your stated criteria. So... ::bzzzt!:: wrong! It's the most Bitcoiniest of the Bitcoins. At least from the standpoint of the design of the protocol itself. The only legitimate claim BTC/Segwit/Core has on the title is popularity. Which can be fleeting. Few mining pools, few nodes and less and less. It's centralizing, that's a fact. Average Joe won't spend 1600usd (HDDs only) to run a full node, you're wrong again. Av Joe is not a System supporter - BTC is scaming such poor guys to spent ther Money on tech shit and leave them with less Money for their live Av Joe can just enjoy cheap and safe Bitcoin - it scales for many big industries to run miners. Here is the future. PoW is thinking about happy future. |
|
|
|
Its not based on anything other than a preference of belief, yours is that BSV is closer to being the Bitcoin that Satoshi intended. There's no way to prove that of course
May be no way of knowing what Satoshi intended. However, we do know what Satoshi initially bequeathed us (haha - bequeathed - almost like religion again:) ). And we know that BSV is much closer to that than is BTC. And getting closer with each release. Just like religion, bitcoin is allowed to evolve. Nobody said it _has_ to stay a particular way, that is, unless you believe Satoshi was some omnipotent, perfect being and the white paper itself is some sort of divine text. I personally don't recognize the power of that selling point as being substantial, but if others do then that is their right. Freedom of religion, I suppose. And now it evolves into 3 different ticker-tagged directions. No need to get one 'un-allowed' - esp not the most closetst to the original. And yes - BSV works because the White Paper and Version 0.1 was most perfectly designed - that is the only thing that haters could hate. |
|
|
|
Sure, cause 9301 are floppy raspis - good luck |
|
|
|
It is Bitcoin - but not ur BTC (what is altered SegwitCoin)
Stop whining and grow up
It's not. Never was (fork of BCH) Never will be: centralized, unsustainable, average Joe can't run a full node so it's very unBitcoin. Nope - all these(Segwit, ABC) are altered protocols - BSV fixes the immature alterings. thx for asking that again Average Joe should'nt spent any mony on node running / any infrastructure - because that Quality is lower than average - rather enjoy low fees and stable Systems and use his bit of Money for his life. |
|
|
|
 BSV 14000 tps Komodo 10000 tps Xem 4000 tps Eos 3000 tps Xrp 1500 tps BTC 6 tps World Record for True Blockchain with PoW !!! live version https://bitcoinblocks.live/It says bitcoin... that's not bitcoin, you diptwat. That is bcash sv. So, whether you can rely on it, as being accurate, who knows. I doubt that there are very many value based transactions happening on bcash sv. Maybe you get 10 transactions per day? And, you rely upon newbies to get mislead into transacting on that scamcoin. It is Bitcoin - but not ur BTC (what is altered SegwitCoin) Stop whining and grow up |
|
|
|
|
All the fights started with try and alter the original BitCoin - specced up by the Satoshi White Paper.
BitCoin did not start with a ticker - think about.
|
|
|
|
BSV 14000 tps Komodo 10000 tps Xem 4000 tps Eos 3000 tps Xrp 1500 tps World Record for True Blockchain with PoW !!! |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
