Three things:

One, it is correct that you're wrong on your thread placement. To make it simple, scam accusation board exist for people to report scam, and service announcement board is for --surprise, surprise-- announcing one's service. As your thread serves a purpose to announce your service, disregarding if it's paid or free, and not to accuse anyone, your thread should belong to the service board. If any, your thread title could mislead people who just read the title and not the posts within, backfire to you by giving an impression that "(I am posting a) scam report (thread about) Glasschain.org."

Two, your reasoning of using this board and not the others --because you feels that this is the right place as people came here to report scam-- is somewhat rather weak and could indicate a minimum effort to really chase scammers and contribute to cryptocommunity, because if you're really dedicate yourself to eradicate scam projects, you could actually post on the service ann board and frequently visit this board yourself to update your database by yourself based on the reports posted --and proven-- here instead of waiting for them to come to you.

Three, just out of curiosity, you claimed that your site, I quote, "do not store anything but the report." however, it appears to me that visitors on your website didn't have an option to decline your ToS upon accessing your website, that you will store some personal details, as there's only one button and it reads "accept". Why?

Let's see if I get this correctly, you want to sell NFT from a free NFT generator platform, so that you can fund your website, to promote your project, which will later conduct token sale?

Another question, why don't the users... holders, create their own NFT and have to buy from you? Given fhat the NFT you sell can be generated by themselves, for free, with the same platform.

I don't think I understand you correctly and, as a result, I failed to grasp what you tried to propose. Based on your "official website" link, you tried to offer an investment in form of NFT, with NFT that's created from a free generator inst of having a professional made them specifically for your project?

By "no fee blockchain framework", were you meaning an absolute 0 fee on each transaction, or were it a tad bit exaggerated for marketing purpose and there's still some --infinitesimals, perhaps-- fees involved?

Thank you for this follow up information. Stabila is off my radar, I didn't even expect Moneta to continue their works this far, given their account is no longer active since last year, and your tips helped me. I'm reinvestigating both project.

The situation in the past was --aside from the hilarious witch-hunt of accusing everybody of blackmailing them-- Moneta plagiarized whitepaper from many sources. I didn't think Stabila followed this path, especially because one third of their whitepaper is already allocated for terminology, which... by itself, is already prone to the art of ctrl+c+v. However, to prove myself wrong, I ran a duplichecker, and indeed the result is negligible.

With that out of our way, I want to lay some foundation about how Moneta and Stabila is connected. Just like the link you provide as well as stated on Moneta's website and Stabila's whitepaper, Stabila is the child company of Moneta and teamed by the same people.



Several things that raised my concern upon reinvestigating them are:

1. The change of their office(s).
Although it is quite understandable for company to relocate themselves, it is quite uncanny for them to close all of their office on big cities --and country-- and move to a rather remote umm... town?



Something that's perhaps worth mentioning about the building where they're located, it is notoriously known for being listed as the address of a shady offshore trading company, at least that's the impression I get from reading the auto-translated review from people cross contries.

2. The lack of details about their team.
Moneta listed 9 people as their team according to their website, but from 9 of these people, I can only verify 3 of them as a real person, in a sense that their name and record is searchable outside Moneta, and all 3 are the higher ups. From these three people, only 1 acknowledged his empoyment with Moneta, the other two didn't mention Moneta on their profile. These person are:

1. Daniel Varzari
Out of the three people, Mr. Varzari is the only one that shows and declare his relationship with Moneta, which should help us decide whether the project is real or not --if the only one person associated with the project is not provable as a real person, then it will be justified to question the project's legitimacy. However, there is an article published --and written by himself-- on the website of other companies that he's been a board director of.



2. Igor Scvortov
Mr. Scvortov mentioned an employment with Paragon Capital on his LinkedIn, but not Moneta. However, sadly, if you try to access Paragon's website --I deliberately put the entire link here instead of shorten the link with bbcode for fair play-- http://www.paragoncapital.com/, the site will redirect you to a website called e-lease, which rather feels like that the site as well as the project itself has failed and the site is now used by other user.



3. Anastasia Kovaleva
With a little dig, I managed to get a means of contact with Ms. Kovaleva. Well, to be honest, she's very active on social media and has a lot of press published about her, indicating that out of the three, she is the most real person. Details about her is deliberately not served here to respect her privacy, because of that very reason. However, below is the proof of contact.



With all of the evidences I can gather in a day laid for public, the ball is now out of my court. I'll notify Stabila about this thread and hopefully they'll be able to clarify things. The way I see it, the easiest way to strengthen their credibility is by asking Ms. Kovaleva to reply my DM and vouch for them.

---

P.s.: hmm... that's odd, their ann thread as well as other threads they owned are all locked. It is also brought to my attention that the thread is tagged by GazetaBitcoin as thread that utilizes bumping service. I guess I don't have other way but to contact them via PM.

Edit: proof of notifying Stabila

The conception that sport is luxury is brought by you. The general conception that the rest of the world held and believe is --common-- sport is very cheap. While for the exclusive and exotic sport, let's say horse-riding, as stated above based on anecdotal evidence by me, their community will be more than happy to pitch in.

And, again, repeated, governments on developing countries will most likely lend their hand to help talented athletes. Unless this part of statement [paragraph 2] is based on a research, kindly cite me the source of this claim.

In regards to nutrition, the common trend thus far is actually the opposite of your perception. Unless you're still living in the 90s, social media works really great for talented people who in need of support. Many talented athletes are paid to promote health products, which not only helps their income, it alo gives them proper nutrition from the product they represent. Thus your project is rather useless unless you can offer something more, which you don't.


Wait... what? So why'd you even here? The numbers are low, the government and society do their works, thank you very much.

This part is from your whitepaper:


This means, during the first tier which also will happen in the first year of team token release, team will own [(2B x 20%) / 2.5B] 16% of the current circulating supply. And given your first tier will ends when the tipping reached 200M USD, there will be a probability that the first tier ended in 1+ years, which means your team will own more token ratio to the current circulating supply.

Second, before we start, just to be sure, your basis is a tipping platform, correct?

I prefer this one, LOL.


What do you think about this thread [ANN][PX][PRESALE] ProtocolX Decentralized Trading Protocol on BSC [METAVERSE]⚡⚡? Their thread started to get infested by the bumping accounts on the list referred above as well as several bumping accounts tagged by lovesmayfamilis, such as:

--sorted in order of the oldest to newest post on their thread--
Z1_FINANCIAL - tagged by rikafip on the aforementioned list
LaCucina - on my additional list that completes rikafip's list
Predict Vision - Rikafip's
i8v8i - tagged by lovesmayfamilis
LunaFox - lovesmayfamilis'
SAWACrypto - mine
SDKmaster - lovesmayfamilis'
METASENSE - new one, untagged¹
TmHsHel - lovesmayfamilis'

However, it might be wise to mention that Protox.App deviates from the group's pattern as they never posted on other's thread.

As the likelihoodness of the group to do bumping for free --and that thread is certainly being bumped-- if we assume Protox.App is not part of the group, then they're either hired those shillers or --I rather doubted this theory-- those posts are made deliberately to throw off their scent.²

---

¹[ANN] ✨✨✨ METASENS ✨✨✨ Build the universal amusement park another with similar characteristics of bumping group that apparently missed from our initial sweep, their thread is no longer active, though
² I think I need to start tagging those bumping accounts for my future reference and convenience on tracking which account already reviewed and which account is new

---

Edit: [in reply to Welsh's post below] Noted, will report these accounts from this point forward whenever I stumbled upon them. I see that you've cleaned those posts on ProtocolX's thread, that was fast.

It might be biased due to the lack of other supportive evidence and my lack of knowledge on navigating through the site --this is my first time utilizing this analytic site-- but I wouldn't say that creating this thread or other accusation threads works in their favor.

True that the more mention about them across the forum directly impacting the visibility and optimization of the search engine for them, as evidenced by the increment in visitors graph, but if we judge from the time spent on site --about 2 mins-- I don't think those visitors really visits the site and played, I can't imagine why would people only play for 2 mins on a betting site.

Most likely --I imagined-- they stumbled upon the site maybe by referral or by own search for gambling site on google --or like naim027 raised concern, from the youtube channel-- got curious, looked around the site, and googled further about their legitimacy --as evidenced how 9% of those visitors goes to google right after-- before deciding it's not worth playing. Hopefully because they googled "1xbit scam" or something alike and served with results of threads after threads of accusations from bitcointalk forum. This forum still held a huge credibility and research-source for crypto community.



Source: https://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/1xbit.com

Oh, wow! Not only innovative, you're deeply philosophical as well. Swole.

Let's see, I pondered upon the existential question the entire day and it shook my entire awareness... if I have to try to answer such magnificent question, and failed miserably, I'll start with my first attempt when I tried to address the question from literal perspective, the merriam-webster define matrix as:


and I thought, "no, this can't be it! Maybe the king was talking about something less literal and more metaphorical." It was after a full hour of deep meditation marinated in himalayan salt that I thought maybe you're referring to The Matrix, where everybody lives through a motion monotonously without being aware of the other outside factors, nor realizing the real world, the bigger picture out there, which means, being in the matrix means I am oblivious to the outside factors that's actually simple: you will not be in the same system as other crypto, or other matters, you live in the jungle! A metaphysical jungle! And, oh lord, how loud I gasped that night when I meet this realization: you're Morpheus! Or... Jaguar Paw. Honestly, can't decide between both. But fret not, as you've shaken my entire awareness of existence, I'll return the favor by giving you a question: what does it mean to have a delusion of grandeur?

Anyway, I am also in awe with your love to nature. Tell me, what happened with your initial plan that every holder has to plant one tree? You removed that part from your website.



Does the king care less and less of his throne that he decide the reforestation is futile? Hmm... then you have to be Morpheus! I'll take the blue pill, thank you.

Meanwhile, please explain to me again, in a very simple manner as I am still living in the matrix and couldn't see the bigger picture, what'll be your project's attempt to ensure price growth? Certainty it can't be as simple as "community vote", because I can't imagine that just because the community --I'll use the term "high council" so we can fit the themes better-- voted that the price will rise from 10 USD to 100, it instantly happened, no body want to buy 100 without any base.

Unfortunately, my king, I am afraid that you being failed to answer these questions --the clear plan of your project and the people behind the team-- would raise another red flag.

Aaannnddd... ladies and gentleman and attack helicopter, if you're looking for a sign, this is your first red flag. Please proceed with caution.


So you're saying that all transaction will happen OTC and/or p2p, forever? That'll be very convenient and liquid, what a breakthrough that'll be very appealing to investors and holders!!! Please tell me more, aside from this very innovative trading method, what's the other feature you offered to ensure growth?

LOL, seriously? In spite of your site, I'll bite.

You plan to go against 3 world problems; volatility, crashes, and inflation. How? You claimed that you've been around crypto for a really long time, what evidences can be used to prove this claim? You didn't even use your main account. And third, how exactly will your token price grow? What measures will you take to enforce these growth?

Hmm... it is very unfortunate that my concern is proven to be correct, that you're over-generalizing. What you claimed as "luxury" is clearly a sports that's rather unique --or exotic, if you prefer that term-- but that is clearly not the case for the entire branch of sports. There is nearly zero fee to join football game, or marathon, or basketball, or other "general" sport. Claiming that sport is luxury would rather be unjust.

On the other hand, if we have to be a member of a group or a gym to cultivate our skill in certain sport that's only catered on that group, the most likely scenario is the sport branch is exclusive --like horse riding, for example, or fencing, or archery-- and people who look into that sports should already have the resources to join the club and/or, especially since the club would rather be exclusive and I can imagine would also be rather high-end, they wouldn't mind to give free membership to an athlete who shows great talent but has limited budget to pay the membership. I don't think people who joins an exclusive sport club or "luxury" gym would be burdened to allocate extra dollars to chip in for that athlete. I know this from first hand experience as I once joined a rather unique branch of sport with quite above-the-average membership fee, and the people on that branch would fully support newcomers with limited budget to join for free if they shows talent and interest.

The other case would be an "exclusive" club where everybody is closely knitted like street workout. For this case, I also didn't think the members would mind to open themselves to support a talented athlete, especially as the membership for such activities is rather... on entry-level.

So, to summarize, your basis for your project is flawed and it is not wrong to questions the validity and senses behind your project. Unless, of course, if I still misunderstood your specific meaning. So please enlighten me, the easies way to make sure we're on the same page is by giving me 5 to 10 examples of sport branch that you're referring to, that you want to support. This information should be very easy to pull as they should already have been on your mind when you laid foundation for this project.

One of the problem you tried to solve according to your whitepaper is that sport is perceived as luxury, please cite us the source or the published paper or surveys that made you give this statement, because this is a rare occasion I heard that sports is seen as a luxury activity.

Arguably not important, some would think it is rather crucial for decision making. No matter what people think, there's no harm in providing that info. It is easy --easier than typing excuses and evasion like you keep doing-- and readily available as it should've been on your core strategy

As this is not OP's first questionable project, I wondered if a newbie-flag is necessary. For example:

BabyEuro was created back in 13 August 2021, seemingly without website or anything other than telegram, which... in less than a year, is no longer accessible, most likey an abandoned project.

Fegnomic also didn't have any website, was first announced on 14 October with their telegram group last activity was back in 7 November and their ann channel is no longer accessible, another abandoned project.

Polynomic has a website... which I can't access. No telegram group and channel, though, So I can't really tell how long did it take before the project sunk.

Fegzilla has a "better" fate with their website still running and their telegram group still accessible, but wait... the chat on that group is extremely sporadic, jumping from November to January to March, and filled with trashy announcements and useless chats.

Zillamatrix? Same fate. Inaccessible website and their telegram's last activity was on 26 November, a mere two weeks from their initial ann thread.

Even if they're not the owner of the project and just paid to publish the ann --which IMO, judging from how 11 of their 11 posts are project announcement where they didn't even bother to post any update, is kinda likely to be the case here-- they still deserves a warning flag as newbies could fall into their "lucrative" project(s).

I will edit this post with link to the flag or create a thread regarding accusation against the user --not the project, to cover the whole cases-- if needed.

Uhh... 13, you're missing some others. I color coded them here. Aside from bumping --and shilling as their post shows fake enthusiasm-- they also cheated several bounties by enrolling their accounts altogether. Proof of connection in form of transactions between wallets are also documented.

Since you're so insistent that you're wrongly accused and those accounts were not related to you at any degree, that you're the victim here and those users use your credentials without your knowledge, these are the addresses you ever used to enroll to bounties:

0xE816462EA2812c91028C5f406EE9Ef0Fe6140122 ¹
0x34C9C81398a57D2248d2f3327947b3D55b914E13
0x253269a4386BF8104b67DAd22FE46f3f5aad36A2
0x68c31f4e128fb6257280b5685e5f919ada7f3e93
0xF85c3cF3F81C9fc92FaBaec532493cAC886b6365
0x5B98bF1B1AAbd44bc40182D8BFDe8d558cA5B40b
0x59181d515a44daf4d1a7e1f8f923811c6e15eb9c²
0x01b3829a062cAa6fE7aBEaA9B5A081E1DDeBe19F
0x2b53afbc3acab8fbcfec426e3ae5361ecdf295ea <sup>3

1</sup>0xE816462EA2812c91028C5f406EE9Ef0Fe6140122 was used by the following users other than yourself: TahminaMim with your details which later edited to their own, NuhaNurul with your details which later also edited to their own, and Ohid2021 which later deleted.

²This is the address in question which ties you to Hrlove. In your defense, those are not your account and they stole your identity --which, more or less, is like the case of address number 1 above, where they stole your ID and later changed them. But interestingly, if we look at point number 3 below, you did the same with below address

³According to the autorecord  before you ninja edit the post, the address was used by you, with username BountyManager99, at first to enroll for username TahminaMim, which later changed to your own username and details.

Point number 3 would at least ties you to TahminaMim, unless if you tried to claim that by some miracle you both copied each other PoA and later edited them. And if you're tied to TahminaMim, it won't be too far fetched to assume that the other accounts accused on the posts above are also tied to you

Wait... So you're planning to withheld such crucial information that'll help people determine the profitability --well, possible profitability-- of your project and what they'll get upon investing on you, and decide to let them join private sale --and possibility latter, suppose the info is still not made public during public sale-- based on faith?

I am failed to see the logical reason or the benefits of withholding such info if those information is ready and available --you have those details on your initial concept, right?-- as those info can be really helpful for investors to estimate your project.

You missed my question about the exact fees rate for each of your feature.

For 2 and 5, if you hold the IDO for 1 month, wouldn't it delays the development for funds that require the IDO fund to proceed with their milestones, and with the thing delayed for 1 month, we couldn't be sure if the project is scam or not, given they couldn't come with any result