Bitcoin Forum
June 06, 2024, 09:22:20 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 [139] 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 ... 248 »
2761  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Bounties (Altcoins) / Re: [BOUNTY][ANN] 🔥 Zixx.org - Automated, shared Masternode system 🔥 on: July 15, 2018, 06:24:58 PM
"Zixx Signature Campaign
Rules

    Minimum of 10 posts must be made weekly.
    Posts must be at least 100 characters long."

Where to write posts, here?

No, you're posting anywhere on the boards (minus the local sections I would assume) with the signature (and the avatar if you want the extra stakes) I wouldn't be spamming on this thread, as you're just going to end up making it harder for Lauda when he's looking to count up the other stakes.

It's like a regular signature campaign, you're just being paid in another coin rather then bitcoin.
2762  Economy / Economics / Re: Why do older people like investing in Gold/Silver? on: July 15, 2018, 05:53:34 PM
Well I ask my grandfather why he like investing in Gold and he says that investing in gold for a long term will made you rich because Gold value is always increasing and also it is proven and by alot of people already.

It all depends on the moment you enter as always, and the risk>reward ratio you are willing to expose yourself to.

If you bought Gold like 5 years ago, you are down ~2% plus 5 years worth of loss in purchasing power on top of that. People should accept that Gold in current form just won't perform well to the degree it did years and years ago. It has reached a point at which it will likely continue to stabilize and pretty much swallow everything that governments and other entities throw at it. It's one of the most liquid markets in existence. If people really believe it will increase another 100% in the coming 5-10 years they are delusional.

And then we don't even know what Bitcoin will do as the digital equivalent of Gold. It might very well grab a very large chunk of Gold's market to further suppress it.

This is something which I've attempted to tell my family. I've told them, there is only so much that Gold can go up. People aren't buying it in boatloads like they used to as the new generation isn't keen on buying things like that, we're more keen on buying either traditional investments (stocks, bonds, etc) or getting into risky things such as Crypto stuff (I'm not going to say that's all people, but I would say a good portion of this new generation likes these 'new investments'

Because they are old as you said,an older people most of them are recognized the gold and silver are most valuable metals,that's why they prefer to invest with full trust to have earn more profits. Because,gold/silver continuously growing up the value annually.

I suppose this is true, I would add on the fact that the old generation has seen the markets crash during the times of financial panic and don't want to get involved with such risky things such as Stocks/Bonds as they (could have) lost tons of money in these times.
2763  Other / Off-topic / Re: france military parade hahaha on: July 15, 2018, 05:31:40 PM
I'm surprised it wasn't all white, to show that they're surrendering even during parades. All jokes aside, this is some pretty funny stuff though-- kinda surprised with people not posting this sort of stuff here -- COME ON PEOPLE IT'S FRANCE FOR GOD SAKE LIGHTEN UP

2764  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Split from main thread Re: Supreme Court pick Brett Kavanaugh on: July 15, 2018, 05:13:32 PM
I fail to know how to quote certain things (someone, please help me!), but I'm just going to respond in general. I don't think Potus has taken it to the next level; it's just been a LONG TIME since we've had a Pro-Life President in office and it's hard to see what their policy is.

Let me tell you that I think the Church's stance on contraceptives/birth control is a little much-- or a lot much rather -- I think a baby is a bay when the egg has been fertilized. Anytime before that is fair game-- this is my opinion and the opinion of many. I'm not saying that we should ban protected sex, we should ALWAYS teach about protected sex to ensure that we don't have people who don't have the resources to take care of the human inside of them.

Again, hitting President Trump on saying that men don't care about them after they've fucked the mother of their child -- saying that this is the law of the land for GOP land (or at least Trump land) isn't true. If you are the breadwinner of the family, you will have to provide for that child if the mother wants child support, that's how it always has gone, and this is how it will continue.

The problem with the left is that they feel that the Supreme Court is present to make their laws, and it ISN'T present for that reason. Roe V Wade was the court overextending itself -- and the court should have NEVER gone down that road. The Court is present to determine the constitutionality of things, and Abortion is NEVER mentioned in the constitution or even alluded to. This is why I feel that the Federal Government has no place in it and it SHOULD be left to the states.

And to the point about 'why even have a federal government then' WELL this country follows a FEDERALISM system -- one where powers are shared between the states, local, and the federal government. This is an integral part of our nation and should always be. This is laid out in the constitution to ensure that the people will ALWAYS have more direct control over their lives.

2765  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Mr Trumps trade war is fair trade .. Slap more tariffs on everyone.. on: July 15, 2018, 05:03:07 PM
I'm hoping all these trade wars fuck up economies and fiat currencies all over the world. hehe.. Then everyone starts to buy BTC since its the only currency going up in value. Everyone accepts BTC and the world now runs on it. Sure, alts too. The end.





Yeah that's not how this is going to work, I don't know why people think that when people start losing money in their safe (traditional investments) they're going to go to the most risk prone one (Bitcoin) and invest here. We're a crazy volatile currency/asset. Probably not the best idea to run here if you're already in shambles.

But back on the issue, I believe in FREE AND FAIR TRADE. If other nations have tarriffs on our goods then we should have the same on theirs. I don't think anyone in America or around the world should have an issue with that? If we want free and fair trade then this is the only thing that we can do to ensure it occurs.
2766  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Who to blame: the people or the government? on: July 15, 2018, 03:36:04 PM
It matters what country we're in and the system of government and the power of that system of government. Lets take the United States for instance, I would say that you're not able to blame the government for financial hardships as you're the ones (the people) are the ones that are electing the very people who are controlling the government and are setting forth policy.

This is also assuming that the government isn't too involved in finance/business. As in America, they are only involved to a certain extent, which isn't seen in all countries -- as some have more or less government regulatory control.

This is a case by case issue, tough one to be honest.
2767  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Is there a reason why Bitcoin has to be the crypto in the future? on: July 15, 2018, 06:59:38 AM
I mean there really is NO REASON that bitcoin MUST be the crypto in the future. Though it's the only thing we can go off of now because Bitcoin has been the only Crypto that has MEANT ANYTHING during our time. I know that some people will point to ETH and coins like that, but they've always been (and in my mind) always will be the number 2 to bitcoin. Bitcoin is a revolutionary currency which can be changed and fixed, by the people, if they want to see change in the code (such as the LN, segwit, etc)

We don't NEED altcoins, we can pretty much take all of the good things about other coins and merge it into Bitcoin to make it the way that WE want to see Bitcoin. Some people may not agree with Bitcoin being changed like this, but if people can agree on it then it will be done. We'll see what the future holds though
2768  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: If there was a Bitcoin Transaction Confirmation time within 1 minute on: July 15, 2018, 06:54:33 AM
This is without a doubt going to cause problems in industries that truly do need the money instantly, and I know that this is a shit ton of industries. But there are also places that can be penetrated without solutions such as the Lightning Network which is in beta testing. I would think that a repairman would be able to tell someone that the estimate for the work is x number (We'll use $500 for the sake of it) and the customer will then pay this amount before they're done.

If any refund would have to occur or an increased payment, this could be done after the job is done. While the LN would simply this sort of transactions where people want Cash on Delivery, there are a ton of ways to work around this issue -- this is without thinking of the bitcoin merchants (such as BitPay) who can handle this for you with ease.

I do hope to see the LN network thrive though, that would be amazing to see Bitcoin handle that amount of TX's at credit card speeds.
2769  Other / Politics & Society / Split from main thread Re: Supreme Court pick Brett Kavanaugh on: July 15, 2018, 06:40:55 AM
I agree I haven't read anything yet to indicate his nom won't get through.

I wonder how much influence Kavanaugh's apparent dislike of the EPA had on Trump.

I get concerned when in 2018 people are talking about Roe v Wade and taking away the decision of a women on what the fuck to do with her own body.  Frankly speaking it disgusts me to see people want to take away a person choice.  Safe, educated legal abortion being under attack in 2018 is mind boggling to me, but I guess that's the liberal in me coming out as I get older!

I can't see Kavanaugh's stance on Roe v Wade but he does come across as a bit of a conservative, along with a nod from a stong anti abortion POTUS, I can see why some Americans might be concerned.

His nomination will go through because of him being a Bush/ Romney / any other establishment Republican pick. It's the reason that Trump picked him, as he knows that he'll be able to get through the hearings and the confirmation and that the courts will lean conservative for decades to come.

The thing with Roe V Wade isn't taking away the decision of a women to do whatever they want with their body, it's giving the states the ability to decide (through the people, as they are the ones who are electing their state reps/assemblypeople) to decide if they want abortion to be legal within their state. I personally don't think the Federal government has any ability to decide what the states should govern on this, let the people decide on a state by state basis.

While many people hated Scalia for his decisions on certain things, I do think that how he explained his opposition to Roe V Wade - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rj_MhS2u-Pk -- Check that out there.

Americans will be concerned of course, but abortion is (and will always be) a very contentious issue in the United States.
2770  Economy / Services / Re: [Brand New] 🚀 Sportsbet.io 🚀 [Signature Campaign] 🚀 [Earn up to $100/week] on: July 13, 2018, 08:30:44 PM
Btctalk name ✅ Squatz1
Rank ✅ Hero
BTC Address ✅ 1PRKnoaRsMNduds5AdNEgendtr2qFsGdbp
Wear Appropriate Signature: done
Wear Personal Text: Make winning bets on sports with Sportsbet.io! : done
Wear Avatar:  done

Sent you a message as well, let me know if this is alright. Thanks!
2771  Economy / Services / Re: [OPEN] Sportsbet.io [Signature Campaign] [Earn up to $100/week] on: July 13, 2018, 06:25:42 AM
Another few days for the current Campaign before we switch up the gears.

Those interested may apply for the next Campaign in this thread.

Thanks everyone for your participation and support thus far!

please keep me under consideration for this campaign or any future campaign with same rules and rates.

Btctalk name: BTCLovingDude
Rank: Legendary
BTC address: bc1qg8phl90wpe725sh0vsnxgt7fv492pm7ya0laje
(in case you don't accept SegWit addresses use this one: 1MgrhSqZCagedASxFWr5bjZDi7AhiiRhJB)


I'd like to be kept under consideration for the new campaigns as well if that's alright to post here.

I'll shoot ya a PM as well shortly.
2772  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Can Bitcoin Become Mainstream In The Next 10 Years? on: July 11, 2018, 07:20:01 AM
Well yeah, any study can say anything in order to help on side feel like they're going to get what they want. Don't beleive the bullshit and actually think for a second. Do you really think that world governments, multibillion-dollar banks, money transfer services, and so on and so forth are going to allow for Bitcoin (and the rest of Crypto) to go mainstream? Because if you do think this, I have a bridge in Brooklyn to sell you.

I do hope that this would happen, don't get me wrong. But I'm a realistic thinker, and I know that these groups aren't going to relinquish their control over what they have with ease. They're going to fight for it, and they're going to fight hard for it. I know it won't come easy at all.

I think and all countries understnad that and even China and India which are banning them better than others ,they do it just to have time to prepare to that nothing more.


They do this to crack down on something which they think is going to be a problem for their governments in the future -- that's not even a fraction of what they can do to screw crypto.

2773  Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: Does this sound realistic? on: July 11, 2018, 07:16:00 AM
I mean, while it does sound realistic and some people do ACTUALLY just go to the casino to have some fun. It usually isn't that way for people, as people don't ENJOY losing money. People without a doubt enjoy winning, that's the 'high' that gamblers feel when they're winning and they always want to get back to that point. Even if a person starts out with doing it for fun, it may end up catastrophic when the person starts losing money -- and attempts to regain their losses.

Sounds amazing on paper and in theory, but this isn't something that the human mind can cope with.

That’s the mindset responsible gamblers have. They spend a certain amount of money for entertainment, the same way they spend it when they go out to dinner or to the cinema. The difference is, they may go back home with more money, and that is the thrill that entertainment has.

I really wouldn't call too many people 'responsible gamblers' that has to be a VERY minute portion of the gambling community.

2774  Economy / Economics / Re: Why do older people like investing in Gold/Silver? on: July 11, 2018, 07:14:49 AM
Thats closely true fact as I have seen my parents doing that all the time. They always try to buy gold whenever the prices for them are dipping a little.

Well they are now old and they have seen the gold pricing at half of what it is today! So they believe in its continuous growth and who would agree upon that.

I have also read one article where it does mention that the Gold rate always increase by around 7-9% each year and its so true this year as well since the gold prices has soared up a lot.

May be they have seen the real profits (and stable) thats why they invest in it.

I mean I do see this, and there has been growth in gold over the years. But none of this growth is even close to comparable to the stock market (in the United States) over that same time period. If you are to compare the growth of Gold from the 1980's to the growth of the stock market, you're going to see that you could have made a SHIT TON more if you were invested in the stock market through that period.

The market increases at that same rate by the way, averaged overtime of course.

I'm not one who would invest in precious metals, but I have noticed that a good amount of the older generations are pretty keen in investing in these metals. They see it as a way to bet against the market, and a security that will always be safe -- even in the times of a market downturn/country failure as a whole.

I personally wouldn't even want to buy these metals in those events, as I don't see the reason to. I'd rather invest in securities that go up when the market shits itself (Payroll lending companies and so on and so forth)

Does anyone here know the reason behind people loving precious metals?

I think that most people buy precious metals as a long term store of value.

And obviously, there is some point to it. Both silver and gold has been used as currency and have proven to be good store of values throughout history, while fiat currencies have depreciated. Your observation of older generations more likely to invest in these assets could well be because they've actually seen these precious metals be used as currency and they see it as "money" itself.

Also, with gold and silver there is pretty much no counterparty risk which is something that you don't get with company investments. But then again, I think that bitcoin would be a much better investment to make right now.

Obviously being a permabull in anything isn't a good idea, nor is it in precious metals. I think that putting all your wealth in precious metals is pretty much a stupid thing to do, but right now, prices seem to be bottoming out for silver and gold and they may be worth a buy.

i just see a problem with the reasonsing, as people are using it as a 'if the world goes to shit' currency. When the only currency that's going to mean anything during a 'if the world goes to shit' is going to be food, water, other supplies, and defenses.

Maybe investing in Gold / Silver is not too risky, as older people are more easily stressed and panicky, so they are looking for a safer alternative/investment solution, which means far from the risk of loss.

i mean, there are so many other safer investments, Investing in gold/silver is like investing against the stock market.
2775  Economy / Exchanges / Re: Binance Eyes One Billion in Profits This Year on: July 11, 2018, 07:02:53 AM
Not surprised with this exchange at all, they're a model for all exchanges in crypto to follow. The servers are fast, they have an amazing support staff, and they're standing up to governments when they want them to hand over user information by simply leaving the country in question -- this is a wonderful company which is going to be a pillar for crypto to come.

I even think that Binance is supporting some sort of decentralized exchange as well -- don't understand why, as this is going to cut into their profits. But, they've been amazing during times of crisis (hacks and such) and making sure that the users know exactly what is going on and aren't left in the dark.

I'd rather them make money then Coinbase anyway.
2776  Economy / Economics / Why do older people like investing in Gold/Silver? on: July 09, 2018, 05:05:13 AM
I'm not one who would invest in precious metals, but I have noticed that a good amount of the older generations are pretty keen in investing in these metals. They see it as a way to bet against the market, and a security that will always be safe -- even in the times of a market downturn/country failure as a whole.

I personally wouldn't even want to buy these metals in those events, as I don't see the reason to. I'd rather invest in securities that go up when the market shits itself (Payroll lending companies and so on and so forth)

Does anyone here know the reason behind people loving precious metals?
2777  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: IF A NEW CRYPTO TRADING PLATFORM WILL RISE, YOU WOULD WANT IT TO HAVE... on: July 09, 2018, 04:00:19 AM
- NO KYC or if exchange is registered and bound to some regulation than they should still allow unverified account with high daily withdrawal limit.
- Zero trading fee for market maker and only fee for taker.
- Margin trading with upto 1:10 leverage and less price spread/commission
- Instant withdrawal for small amount and manual verification might be ok if amount is big
- No any sudden changes in policy, proper notification should be given to users before making any big changes.
- Also proper security of the account as well as cold wallet.

Decentralized exchanges are not worth these days because of poor functionality and user interface so if there will be new easy to use decentralized exchange without KYC than it can get massive attention in no time.

While this is a Nobel goal, it's just not going to happen. Governments are going to step in to make the first thing a reality -- yes, even if the company tries to setup shop in some random country the US SEC will reign down on them for doing transactions with US customers. At a certain point, you're going to have to do some KYC regulations. No withdrawals will EVER be processed without KYC (at least if the withdrawals are going to a bank account rather then staying in crypto)

Though the rest of the things I do like, this is a pretty solid list.x
2778  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: No use Escrow Service from bitify.com (for Seller) on: July 09, 2018, 03:37:52 AM
Avoid using third party escrow services which are operated by the damn bots. Looks like they have settled well with your money and don't plan to release it ever. Can you open a scam accusations against their service with the relevant proofs? That would certainly warn people who wish to use them in the future.

This right here. I would completetly avoid all of these random sites which attempt to make you feel secure, while simply being the people that are going to scam you in the end.

I'd much rather use an escrow that is going to take a bit longer (a escrow on the forum - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=855778.0) Which has a reputation to uphold here, and is going to without a doubt handle their side of the bargin. Use one of these escrows and you won't get screwed again.

The thing isn't really that Bitify favours buyers or anything.

From what I've heard, as long as you have got sufficient proof in order to prove that you're in the right and the other party is trying to scam you, they should be able to release your funds from escrow. You did respond within the 72h timeframe, so there is really nothing to worry about.

However, it's definitely unprofessional the way that they have dragged this case on for 1 week. Escrow shouldn't take that long to resolve disputes. Next time if it involves bitcoin, imo you should just go with a forum escrow. But for now - be patient, and keeping waiting.

No reason to even use these sites, within 3 days he probably could have gotten Ognasty or someone like him to handle this entire ordeal.
2779  Economy / Economics / Re: Facebook now joining btc? on: July 09, 2018, 03:15:47 AM
Here is the thing with business, they're not going to accept a new payment method and go through all the motions of setting it up unless it's going to profit them. At this point in the game, Zuckerberg and the rest of the corporate structure at Facebook doesn't really care about the tech anymore -- they're all in it for maximizing the amount of money that they can make. If bitcoin is going to lead to them making a few more million dollars a year in advertising revenue / whatever revenue they make it in. Then they're going to do it.

If it's not going to help them at all, they're not going to accept Bitcoin. That's just the simple way of laying it out.
2780  Economy / Economics / Re: America threatens China with $500 billion in US trade tariffs on: July 09, 2018, 12:29:47 AM
If the us china trade war happens in earnest, it will look like a messy divorce.   Undecided

I'm wondering if we'll notice a fluctuation in the price of cheap goods from china listed on amazon? If weeks or months from now I look at my amazon wishlist and there isn't a noticeable difference in prices--maybe it won't be a big deal after all?

There could be some exaggeration as to how much the cost of goods will increase. Unless a business has a monopoly or heavily centralized market with a dominant marketshare there is a limit to how much the cost of tariffs can be passed on to consumers. While there is some negative commentary in the media, it is possible tariffs will be hiked and the damage to consumers will be negligible. Chinese enterprise could be forced to eat a substantial portion of tariff hikes.

It will be interesting to see what the effects are as I remember the cost of 2 liter bottles of soda at the store roughly doubling from $1 to $2 over the past 10 or so years which would seem to indicate near to 10% price inflation per year. Will we likely price hikes anywhere near approaching that? I wonder.

I mean -- most of the goods targeted aren't those cheap Chinese goods that we buy on Amazon and eBay. So unless new tariffs are released targetting these items, you're not going to see a change at all.

China is at a huge disadvantage in this 'trade war' though, as Chinese manufacturing relies heavily on American consumers -- you can't just make 500b in consumers come out of nowhere. If the Trump administration really wants to, I think they're going to be able to force China to come to the table with real reform on free and fair trade and the protection of intellectual property. As of right now, America is getting SCREWED.

I'm happy to see this go on, China will lose at the end of this though. They just don't have the same set of defenses in place to beat us when they rely so heavily on our consumers.
Pages: « 1 ... 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 [139] 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 ... 248 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!