Unfortunately, the USA will not tolerate a buildup of Russian or Chinese troops in Venezuela. The people of Venezuela will have to choose who they want to support, because if you try to sit on the fence, you will become the next grounds for proxy war. Not saying it is fair, but it is reality.

Just send him the merits. I recently sent 20 points to a user I was aware of from outside the forum because I recognized his previous work and concluded he would be a valuable contributor to the forum even though his account was new. As long as you clearly aren't propping up alts, or just rewarding people for parroting your opinions, I don't think anyone would object.

Sorry but building a nuclear reactor is not equivalent to a choice between bodily autonomy and freedom of movement. They are purposely building a very dangerous precedent to desensitize people to these kinds of actions.

As long as it isn't like some goat porn site or something I think you should be fine.

I find it interesting people are unwilling to use this same tolerant logic when they feel people associated with Christianity do something wrong.

0.014

As usual you are only interested in what serves your own narrative, not the truth, logic, or learning new things.

Don't you get it yet? When Russia and China interfere it is A-OK, when the US interferes the sky is falling. Get with the program subject.

The media has always been full of shit. The only difference is now people are starting to realize it, and as a result they have to maintain a constant treadmill of lies, which exposes them even more.

In order:





As you can see your quote was an out of context earlier reply, not a direct reply to the comment I just made. These are the kind of disingenuous semantic games I am talking about. BTW thanks for proving my point that you simply added direct to democracy so you could use it as a semantic change of goal posts.

Selectively edited version:


[again tells me to make a valid point, proceeds to make totally meaningless statements backed by nothing]

You just see what you want to see, and no one can change that but you. As long as you are this intellectually dishonest and lazy I am going to treat you as the intellectual poser bottom feeder you are. I don't care what you did in another thread, it is very much on topic and I have no desire to participate in a carefully curated thread that just so happens to segregate critique of your preferred ideology.

If the state does not use force of law to take inheritance, then the inheritance tax is not taking from inheritance, thus taking inheritance? You see your gap in logic here? Of course not, you only see your preferred reality. Fuck causality and economics, I GOTS TO HAS MUH COMMUNISM!

0.0133

Again you are doing that thing where I say a word like democracy, then you add little qualifiers to it in order to give yourself an out by saying, "yeah but this is a different kind of democracy". I didn't say direct democracy. I said democracy is mob rule. What is the problem with that? Most people are lazy, selfish, and ignorant just like you, and they don't have the time or inclination to do anything about that.

Did you know half of people are of below average intelligence?  I bet you didn't

 Additionally humans have an evolutionary need to be accepted and part of the "in crowd", which means democracies can be lead around by the nose by the elite all the while believing they are in charge. Finally, as I previously stated, under democracy, the individual has no rights. The individual is the minority, and in democracy only the majority decides, leaving the minority with no source of redress or influence.

I know you don't read my sources for a fact. Do you know how I know this (other than your shockingly obvious ignorance on all these subjects)? Because any time I post something your RESPOND INSTANTLY, and unless you are reading at a rate of 3 pages a second, you aren't reading the sources I provide. Also I have seen you claim to have read things here before, but then when pressed you demonstrate complete and undeniable ignorance of the subject matter. Whatever small portion you do bother to attempt to read you then skim over, never really paying attention or thinking critically about it, but only looking for points you can most easily argue. So not only are you ignorant, you are also a liar.

If your brain was a muscle you had to work out to stay in shape, you would be a huge tub of lard with Cheetos stuck in his fat rolls drinking from a 2 liter of Mountain Dew. This is just a joke to you. I have literally spent years of effort trying to learn the ins and outs of Communism and related topics which I personally consider very important, and you roll up with your lazy ass disingenuous approach, you might as well spit in my face. Your ignorant self assured lackadaisical attitude is an insult, and if you want to treat this like a game, I might as well make a game out of you because you waste my time.

That said, again you only addressed ONE of the 10 planks listed on that page, I have a feeling you only looked them over until you could find something you felt you could make a point on then quickly ended any semblance of a thought process. I would love to see you try to argue the other planks.

One simple question. Is or is not a fact that the state uses the force of law to take inheritance? I didn't ask you how much. This is a yes or no question. I patiently await your semantic gymnastics fat man.

[tells me to make a valid point, proceeds to make a totally meaningless statement backed by nothing]

So what part of what I explained is not making it impossible for this theoretical family to keep their inheritance of their farm? Oh right they are literally forced to sell it to pay the taxes. This is literal removal of inheritance rights. I don't give a shit if your opinion is it should be defined as 100% tax to meet your metric. This is the same game you always play, and exactly why I have no respect for you. You don't argue logic you argue semantics. You don't refute any of the points, you just call them wrong and crazy. You don't read any sources I present you just dismiss them and declare yourself correct. You are the ideological equivalent of a person with syphilis spreading it all around without a care in the world for anyone it effects, you just want some fuk. You don't give a damn if anything you say makes logical sense, just gimme muh Communism.

So, you want me to argue your point for you? That's cute you criticizing my use of logic when your usual strategy is "NO U!", also you are literally contradicting yourself from one sentence to the next. Democracy is the rule of the majority or mob rule, and under mob rule the minority has no rights because... they are the minority...

Yeah I really doubt you have read that paper, because if you did you would see it contained government documents, records, and publicly verifiable events to back up these claims. Of course it is way easier to just keep believing what you believe rather than to do the work to learn something new when you might not agree with the implications of it. That seems to be your favorite way to handle these subjects fat man.

No, 1 + 1 = 2. Inheritance has been systematically stripping the backbone of this nation, and I will tell you how. One very straight forward simple example is a family farm. It may have been in the family for generations, and when it is left to the next generation, suddenly they owe taxes on what the family already owns and have already been taxed for over and over again. Usually coming up with such a large lump sum of money is not possible, and suddenly that farm which has been in the family for generations is forced to be sold because they cant pay the inheritance tax. Then companies like Monsanto swoop in and buy this prime land for pennies on the dollar. This is one primary way the industry of this nation has been systematically dismantled. Furthermore it removes incentive for people to work as hard to leave something for the next generation, because they know the government is just going to take it from their children anyway.

Again this is just ONE point of the entire ten planks which you didn't bother addressing. As usual you take the lazy way out, call it crazy, declare yourself correct and move on as if you just had a debate.



The problem with Anarchy is it only really tends to work in small homogeneous groups much like Socialism or Communism. Furthermore, Anarchy is also a useful delivery mechanism for Communism. The core tenet of Communism has always been to destroy the existing institutions in order to displace them with Communist versions of them. Anarchy again provides for this power vacuum and allows it to grow. Also frankly most people I have come into contact with that consider themselves "Anarchist" are really just confused and or disingenuous Socialists/Communists. Socialists and Communists rarely try to gain power openly, it is always a game of subversion, displacement, and redirection of resources toward Communist goals covertly.