|
Facefuck = Lifelog = DARPA
|
|
|
|
Sharing experience about sells products shouldn't consider troll in my opinions. I don't think OP post wrong and I will not consider it as a troll or spam. But seller could request to delete post since it would be effect on his sells. It doesn't mean seller should threatening to poster for share experiences.
OP you shouldn't worry about his feedback's since seller isn't on DT network. Green trusted doesn't mean he is DT members. So I don't think you need argue with that since you have reported to admin.
Seeing as you have almost no trading experience here you wouldn't know this, but this is common behavior on this forum and not acceptable. Since this forum is very pro-free speech people often feel like any part of the forum is open and free for their random commentary. While technically this is true, it is also true every jamoke in the world who does this always has an excuse such as "oh I was just trying to help" or some other similar form of concern trolling. When making sales people make decisions in a split second, and bullshit like this legitimately drives away buyers. Then as a seller you are forced to make a choice between a self moderated thread which also drives away buyers, or dealing with the concern troll. This behavior is not acceptable, and if it becomes acceptable the marketplace will become unusable very quickly. |
|
|
|
Reynaldo is not in DT. The threat via PM is stupid, but your trolling of a sale thread is not cool either. Move on.
First of all, threats were stupid, especially for newbie member searching his place around. Threats about abusing the trust system based on false and fake arguments and lies were never also stupid. I never trolled anyone sales thread but only shared my bad experience with the Corsair's keyboards. I should move on after someone threaten to abuse his "powers" because i share my experience ?  Is this some stupid joke from your side or i miss something ? As some one who has also experienced this behavior, you most certainly are trolling. The marketplace section is for people to trade, not for you to entertain yourself in the single place people are allowed to post their wares for trade. You don't mind fucking with his sales but you want to cry when he comes after you? Get a life. |
|
|
|
Sorry I stopped reading here :
"So the French government, lead by Prime Minister Emmanuel Macron"
Ahahahah I find it beautiful cause... That's not totally wrong xD We should call him French Prime President Minister. Cause he has both powers. I am glad everyone thinks this is a joke. I guess that's what I get for sourcing a socialist website. It's ok though, I am sure the protests are winding down any day now  |
|
|
|
So what part of your rambling makes the fact that you were welling to sell your account to be abused by con artists for profit acceptable?
You can dismiss my point-by-point refutation to be "rambling" if you like but again it just goes to show how your judgment is clouded by the vengeful nature of your personality. OK, now that the entire debate is narrowed down to this one item: I obviously shouldn't have done it. Being hard up for cash or taking into consideration the possibility that it might not have been "abused by con artists" aren't good excuses. If you think vengeance should be exacted upon me now for making a mistake 3 years ago, an issue for which there is no set precedent, I can't stop you. The way which I offered my account was extremely forthright, leaving little chance for somebody to successfully use it to conduct a scam. When I applied for a loan several months back, this issue was brought up by the loaner, who asked me to sign a message from the address that I signed earlier in this thread. That was good enough proof for him, so frankly it doesn't matter whether its good enough for you, as we've never conducted business. I have nothing more to say about this. I'm sure you do though, have at it if you must. It is still a valid point no one knows if your account has been sold or not. People can choose what they want to believe but by all other standards applied to the user base here, your account should be red tagged because the fact is there is no way to prove you didn't. Most of the trust police consider the attempt alone worthy of negative rating, but you put in the work washing the right balls, so you get special exceptions. Just because you made a thread does not mean it would not be used to scam other people, and there is no guarantee any potential victims would see it. The trust toadie brigade are willing to condemn people wholesale for doing exactly the same thing while they laugh in their faces about any excuses, but your excuses... your excuses mean something! |
|
|
|
|
So what part of your rambling makes the fact that you were welling to sell your account to be abused by con artists for profit acceptable?
|
|
|
|
I have no reputation to remove. As far as my rep shows to you, it should be a nice red color since iCEBREAKER is in your trust list. All for reasons you deem "fair." Also, there is no "standard" for how to deal with a 3 year old attempt at a sale of one's own account, as the issue had never arisen before you made it an issue. There's also no way to prove to you that the account is still in my hands. There are ways to prove it to other people who are willing to entertain rational thought, but since the whole reason for you being here is because of a personal vindictiveness, you do not fall into this category. Is it time for me to lock the topic, today? I started the topic, but have not had anything to discuss. Additionally, the case of @nutildah solved long days ago (two weeks ago).  As tecshare has never lost an argument (or even a debate), he will continue posting in this thread for all of eternity. I would say please do and let tecshare open his own thread about me. The problem with your logic is that any time anyone attempts to sell an account it is assumed it has been sold, because in spite of what anyone chooses to believe the FACT is there is no way to prove that the account was not transferred. This is the standard the trust police take on this forum, but for some "unknown" reason you get a pass. I wonder if it has anything to do with all the brown on your nose. What is also a fact is regardless of the time passed, even assuming the account was not transferred, you still publicly admitted you were willing to put the community at risk here by selling your reputation for money. This tells me quite a bit about your standards. I am sorry to break it to you, but I don't care enough about you to be vindictive. The fact that you follow me around to be extra douchey just makes me not feel bad about exposing you. You do however serve as a convenient tool to demonstrate to this entire forum that there are not only double standards for the "special" people who kiss the right asses, but that those same people passing judgement themselves don't care if you put the community at risk, just as long as it is their brown on your nose. |
|
|
|
<snip>
Eh, okay. Then don't expect anyone to reply to any of your accusations, as nobody has any obligation to do so. Debate over. [waves magic wand] aaand debate open again I never asked for any of your commentary. I did however pose a direct question to Nutilduuh. None of your childish demands that I answer to this weird interrogation designed to distract from the fact that Nutilduuh tried to sell their account change anything. The fact is Nutilduuh was ready to sell out this user base and expose them to scams for money, and this behavior would be grounds for total loss of reputation if Nutilduuuh wasn't protected by people like you who refuse to act on it and would be ready to act in retaliation if anyone bothered to hold them to the same standards they hold others to. Exactly when did the Pharmacist become a DT member? I'm not certain why us newer Dt members need to sift through old garbage looking for people to tag. I already went through the archived secolgs and did not find that Nutilda changed their password between October 2016 when he opened the thread and August 2017, after he announced the account was no longer for sale. I don't see why any new account holder would not change their password after obtaining the account and attempting to throw us off the scent by announcing the account was no longer for sale. I suppose that original Nutilda could have posted it and then sold it on the down low. However, it already took me an inordinate amount of time to sift through the old seclogs looking for changed password. If anyone cares to take over, so be it. I for one am not going to red tag an account that was offered for sale 3 years ago and then the sale retracted, when it appear to be a case of no harm, no foul. Perhaps if this was a fresh incident, I would have tagged it. Who said they need to? The fact is they do this on a regular basis, especially when it comes to people that speak out about being abused by them and no one ever has an issue with it. Now that it is one of the in crowd suddenly everyone is making excuses for them and defending them, but if it was anyone else they would be red tagged with zero controversy. The fact is Nutilduuh intended to allow this forums users to be robbed because they wanted money. It is also a fact no one knows for sure if it was sold or not, and this would be more than enough justification to totally remove any reputation for that account. Unfortunately there are a set of standards for the trust mob and their toadies, and a standards for everyone else. |
|
|
|
New Zealand just banned all semiautomatic weapons (other than .22) Certain semi-automatic firearms declared to be military style semi-automatic firearms "For the purposes of the Arms Act 1983, the following firearms are declared to be military style semi-automatic firearms: (a) a semi-automatic firearm that is capable of being used in combination with a detachable magazine (other than one designed to hold 0.22-inch or less rimfire cartridges) that is capable of holding more than 5 cartridges: (b) a semi-automatic firearm that is a shotgun and that is capable of being used in combination with a detachable magazine that is capable of holding more than 5 cartridges." http://www.legislation.govt.nz/regulation/public/2019/0055/latest/LMS173651.html?search=ts_act%40bill%40regulation%40deemedreg_arms+order_resel_25_a&p=1 |
|
|
|
People would change profile pics, light candles, form a circle and pray, rinse, repeat. Same with Orlando, Paris, etc.
They'll make these gestures but people never learn. They still allow mentally unstable people to have easy access to guns. They still allow fundamentalist groups of every flavor platform for propagating their message.
Congratulations on reacting exactly the way the shooter hoped you would by pushing censorship and gun control. I'd be the last to ask for censorship and gun ban but there should be limits. People advocating for violence should not be allowed to stay on social media recruiting people. People with mental problems shouldn't have guns and there should be regular evaluation. There have already been retaliatory attacks across the world citing this as justification. Turkey's president Erdogon is even calling this a Christian lead war against Islam, which you can be sure will lead to even more violence. Of course as we all know hundreds of Christians slaughtered every month by radical Islamists is not worthy of reporting, but this New Zealand attack will be reported on for years to come on full blast. Unfortunately people seem unable to tell the difference between how often some thing happens in reality and how often the media reports on it. Heard from a family member that someone burned a bus in Italy. There were kids inside. Of course the guy was black and likely M. Direct calls for violence are a crime in most parts of the world already, but law enforcement and social media are quite selective over which of these they choose to act on. Who gets to set the standards for evaluation? What is stopping them from making those standards so impossible to meet that no one meets them? In the USA gun ownership is a right, not a privilege pending evaluation and government permission. Regarding the bus fire, I have also read about this story. Fortunately no one was killed, but setting a bus full of children on fire clearly shows the intent to. Tell me, how much media coverage have you seen about this? |
|
|
|
Watch the latest news here https://edition. cnn.com/2019/03/18/asia/new-zealand-mosque-shooting-monday-intl/index.html https://edition. cnn.com/2019/03/16/asia/new-zealand-mosque-shooting-victims/index.html HA HA No thanks.. More like "Watch the latest globalist, anti-America, anti-freedom, one world power shill propaganda here." What this guy did was terrible, make no mistake, but all of these calls for censorship and gun control are terrible also. This is NOT good for the cause of the right. This hurts the right, but may accelerate the left to attack the right, take rights and impose more control, to push closer to the tipping point of civil war exactly as the shooter claims he wants.. This entire situation is bad and not only has he murdered people but had done a great disservice to the right. This guy idolizes communist china so he is probably an authoritarian lefty anyway but will be labeled right wing to propagandize just as he wants to happen.. Think for a moment that if this is some sort of false flag, "winning his money in the crypto market" is a pretty darn good way to hide where your money actually came from, you think? This is not good and I do not want to see civil war, left vs right war, accelerated.. That would be very very not good.. There have already been retaliatory attacks across the world citing this as justification. Turkey's president Erdogon is even calling this a Christian lead war against Islam, which you can be sure will lead to even more violence. Of course as we all know hundreds of Christians slaughtered every month by radical Islamists is not worthy of reporting, but this New Zealand attack will be reported on for years to come on full blast. Unfortunately people seem unable to tell the difference between how often some thing happens in reality and how often the media reports on it. |
|
|
|
<snip>
Eh, okay. Then don't expect anyone to reply to any of your accusations, as nobody has any obligation to do so. Debate over. [waves magic wand] aaand debate open again I never asked for any of your commentary. I did however pose a direct question to Nutilduuh. None of your childish demands that I answer to this weird interrogation designed to distract from the fact that Nutilduuh tried to sell their account change anything. The fact is Nutilduuh was ready to sell out this user base and expose them to scams for money, and this behavior would be grounds for total loss of reputation if Nutilduuuh wasn't protected by people like you who refuse to act on it and would be ready to act in retaliation if anyone bothered to hold them to the same standards they hold others to. |
|
|
|
more shameless toadying Well gee, I guess it is a good thing I have no obligation to respond to your contrived interrogation over other people's ratings. I don't know what I would do if I didn't have your approval to move on marlboroza.  Can you tell me Nutilduuh, why is it account sellers are not to be trusted? Why is this bad for him but ok for you? |
|
|
|
I'll bid .005 for the sole.
I'm assuming this sole is without major sins?
I mean, considering it is an inanimate object I doubt it has any sins, but who knows. I might have stepped in something unholy... Left foot, size 12. Taking offers.
are you going to chop off your foot for this one? Or is this just a troll thread If no troll i bid .0055 btc for the sole of your left foot size 12 It is the left sole of a sandal of which I have lost the other matching sole. I can post pics later if you are interested. |
|
|
|
|
Is everyone seeing the pattern of how this person purposely mentioned a bunch of dissident type groups in order to cause them to be associated with his violent actions in order to make it a simple task to demonize them? Add a little censorship and boom, you have a machine for manufacturing guilt and the targets are prohibited by law (or TOS) from defending themselves.
|
|
|
|
How about stop changing subject Interesting concept. Tell me, why is it I should justify Nutilduuhs own ratings? That was kind of the whole point for bringing them up, to ask Nutilduuh to justify them and tell me why they were not the same as iCEBREAKER's rating. I love the turning everything on its head polar opposite game though where some how I am expected to justify the ratings of other people. All of your answers are in the last few pages of the thread, but of course you don't really have any questions you are just looking for an excuse to keep the topic sliding away from the fact that your buttbuddy sold their account, and the trust police mob consider this grounds for destroying the reputation of the account if it was anyone else. Of course there are standards for the regular plebeians of Bitcoin Talk, and then standards for those with the golden ass kissing lips. You all here dog piling have no problem digging into the lives of others, but when the roles are reversed suddenly you all become victims. |
|
|
|
Regardless the point is you engaged in high levels of scrutiny upon me for simply pointing out the abusive dynamic here,
Wrong... its for other reasons, but let's save that for your own reputation thread shall we? but I am "obsessed" for questioning your own behavior and double standards?
Yes. This is a pretty clear case of obsession if I've ever seen one, as far as this forum is concerned. And the dynamic is abusive, to be sure. I hope you're happy that I took you off ignore to respond to you. But its late and I'm knackered. As always, you can have the last word. Any chance you will answer my question and explain why account selling should be negative rated for others but not for you? Is not the fact that you tried to sell your account evidence that you have no regard for the user base here and were willing to allow them to be scammed because you wanted money? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
