As Jutarul said:

https://twitter.com/shucky68/status/450680257646182400
Posted from Bitcointa.lk - #5jURXLJ28ekIKlzX

Yes, just read the court documents.
It was a group buy and they used John K. as escrow, John signed the rights to the group buy managers, and HF is claiming that they never bought from HF.

http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/21u55z/tro_response_from_hashfast/
Posted from Bitcointa.lk - #aoNphDuGedUjgwWp

How do you know? Seems to contradict a lot of things out there.
Posted from Bitcointa.lk - #oM06rfKN3UmNQttO

So maybe he can finally explain why we need 250GB of storage (was 500GB before if i recall it correctly)
Posted from Bitcointa.lk - #wDqzUbLiYxa3zutm

0.3 seconds? No, it's more like 0.3 milliseconds.
Posted from Bitcointa.lk - #q34iigucsfpHJ5oE

Lol at opensource, lol at you finding a backdoor in the rng.
Posted from Bitcointa.lk - #HZ4O7EoyLJwrLPpE

We are all looking forward for them to reply to you, Pete
Posted from Bitcointa.lk - #Vrx1ARpz5cQcd2T8

http://newsbtc.com/2014/03/27/heres-list-organizations-exhibiting-inside-bitcoins-new-york/

7-8th of April. I guess that on their way back to the Pacific they will stop by in Texas the 9th for that hearing.
Posted from Bitcointa.lk - #utcCVcU0tIFW0Xm3

Is the formula that calculates trust public? I don't understand why hashfast has a less negative trust than josh, with the feedbacks being more relevant in the first case (amount risked, trust of the people leaving feedback):

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=151974
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=8198
Posted from Bitcointa.lk - #5AOWrTe2PbvsUIQU

The fact that they will be trying it doesn't really mean that you have to let them do it.
Posted from Bitcointa.lk - #cw5RAUPbWrShHfnn

Read the difference between the first article against HF (not from coindesk) and the article that coindesk copied from the first source a few days after:
http://www.extremetech.com/uncategorized/173772-bitcoin-asic-manufacturer-hashfast-facing-lawsuits-over-alleged-false-advertising-fluctuating-bitcoin-prices
http://www.coindesk.com/asic-manufacturer-hashfast-faces-legal-action/

And yes, it can be fined. Find the bitcoin transaction id.
Posted from Bitcointa.lk - #HMCDFh1YM7Dr0I2O

And add to favs tweets from other scammers:
https://twitter.com/vessenes/status/449911717288759296
Posted from Bitcointa.lk - #jAIcuXH4vUBAN7Fq

For the same reason why their articles are link campaigns sometimes.
Posted from Bitcointa.lk - #kJ3DA4DMXizwTFah

1) pre: the guy posted raw html content and later converted it to bbcode, however the edits weren't imported on bitcointa.lk because of the robot access speed limitations theymos is imposing. I will get around it.
2) the thread was initially posted on Bitcoin Discussion and later moved to Alt. Cc. The crawler uses the original forum. (another thing to fix).
Posted from Bitcointa.lk - #waDddtlF35ojJRCQ

It is possible. But i don't want to put a link every page.
We can do something like:
https://bitcointa.lk/threads/bitcointa-lk-the-bitcointalk-community-with-a-2014-forum-software.281718/page-3#post-5710434
=>
https://bitcointa.lk/org/threads/bitcointa-lk-the-bitcointalk-community-with-a-2014-forum-software.281718/page-3#post-5710434
Redirecting to .org
Posted from Bitcointa.lk - #fnnucySVyM46T3Je

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=151974
-8502: -13 / +1(1) with depth = 3
Posted from Bitcointa.lk - #bJPL2bHAnK941tNh

No idiot in defaultTrust will ever do anything for an imaginary Imperial Monarch.


They are ridiculous.
Posted from Bitcointa.lk - #QTfYvTgAP0WmxMbm

No, but the their lawyers can't talk about "800% windfalls" anymore
Posted from Bitcointa.lk - #UxKLWGTtmgrHwkmf