|
By not knowing the real hashrate and hoping for the best, you will most probably accept their late deliver.
|
|
|
|
I think its a sierra. So that would be 3. But they are still tweaking. I'm not really used to read hashrate graphs, but i find it strange that the graph grows up and down by intervals of 200GH. There is nothing in the middle, but those intervals. |
|
|
|
|
My guess is that their next update will be monday night (GMT). 24 hours before the deadline (that standing to some has already passed).
Who will request a full BTC refund given that their BJ won't be delivered by the 31th of Dec (even santa claus can't help at this time).
|
|
|
|
|
Vi stanno inculando talmente bene che neppure ve ne accorgete :-)
|
|
|
|
|
0.04 BTC / GH è un esagerazione assurda.
Quando arriva quello che vi riporta alla razionalità non lamentatevi.
Non si può shortare vero? LOL.
|
|
|
|
Hosting at Thor? Yes, i'm paying the full rate now, i was planning to ask for a better rate if/when the MPP arrived, but that was long before October. |
|
|
|
|
@paranoidx,
I don't, actually, it's what i'm trying to point out. The problem is that many in this thread will believe that.
|
|
|
|
Maybe you need chill a little...you startin' to write pretty big BS...
I had some great fpv flights today. Where is my BS? |
|
|
|
|
So a sierra does 1200GH and a BJ 7/800? We are only losing time with all of this speculation, but why should we accept the delivery if they don't even tell us real numbers? (i'm supposing that the EXWORK thing isn't something they can appeal at)
|
|
|
|
I must have missed something. Where did they state that the 1200GH/s was a single BJ?
They said that the pool address of their twitter feed is connected to a single BJ. If they connected a sierra instead, they should have told us, they didn't. |
|
|
|
|
Because they told us so.
-Instigate your customers to suppose what you want to tell but can't
-Don't deny it
-Win
It looks like that everyone in this thread is sure that a single board does 800GH+. They told us that the 1200GH is a single BJ, so why we shouldn't believe them? I'm so tired of this...
|
|
|
|
What night are they talking about since that they are in the pacific side of the USA? (this bothers me since the beginning of their chip updates) |
|
|
|
Thanks, now we know their yield per wafer is around 110Th/s I'm terribly sorry that i made you lose the time needed to write all of that, but that is Cointerra chip, not Hashfast's one. I wanted to post it here to remember everyone that the competition isn't waiting for HF to tell us whatever that stats are for a BJ or a Sierra or whatever. |
|
|
|
 Spoiler Alert: this picture has nothing to do with this hashfast. |
|
|
|
|
In sostanza avere il mining come settore in perdita non bastava, e hanno deciso che la gente poteva perdere anche speculandoci sopra. Mi sembra giusto.
|
|
|
|
Right. After all they said that it's only one BJ, so it can't be a sierra, right?  What if they ship those amazing 1PH/s BJ after the 31 of Dec and you accept the delivery anyway, refusing the refund, and you discover that they only go at 600GH top?
I think i could should expect such a move from them.
|
|
|
|
I have to admit that 800GH/chip, if stable, would be impressive to say at least. I wonder how the sierra is supposed to dissipiate 3kW of heat in its 4U. Not even recent and ultra high density datacenters can handle 30kW/rack.
The Sierra is sold as 1.2 TH/s unit not a 3 chip unit. IF (and I haven't seen any convincing evidence) they are doing 600 GH/s+ they could drop the Sierra to two modules and just keep the extra hashing power for themselves. Does anyone think that is unlikely given all the other ways they have screwed over customers so far? From my proforma invoice: "Numer of Sierras" "Sierra contains 3 HashFast Golden Nonce (GN) ASICs, Performance: 1,200 Ghash/s at nominal clock speed" |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
