Our focus is now on caring and sharing, right? Yes, I understand. They make just the winners look good. But seriously, losses? They hide them in a dark, little chamber. I've witnessed with my own eyes. You know what?  Why let someone else's "winning streak" encourage us gamble more? Don't gamble because Joe down the block showed off a lot of cash. Bet for fun. Spend wisely. Like you, I don't like risking everything for fame. Also, greed—annoying? Gets you off guard. Suddenly, poof. Half your assets? Gone. Be smart about your bets, limit your losses, and always watch out for sly greed

Technically, We are playing in gambling because we think about having extra money by risking our own money on games. Unless you are just playing demo games or free spin then you really are not thinking about money when you go in the casino.

Thinking about profit when playing to the casino is not bad because that’s the goal on gambling to get the entertainment. It is bad when you are already relying on a casino to give consistent profit to and view it like a source of income.

That’s the actual ban description on the casino since their service offered is gambling while being there without allowing you to play is a distinct description of being ban. This is same with being ban on online casino. You can still visit the casino anonymously but you can’t play any of the games.

The real problem is Dana himself. He is so good on gambling. It’s not about his bet amount but rather his winning chance rate is too high which casino obviously doesn’t want to gamble anymore against him.  

Improved the lives? In what aspect? Keep in mind that Bitcoin yet is still not widely accepted across countries therefore it is not being used as a tool with inflation, at the present. Indeed many of us benefit from this technology as an investment but other than that is a bit off. Think of how many people are actually using Bitcoin as a mode of payment outside this industry such as to purchase goods; most of us are guilty of not doing so. It is a normal response ‘coz we know how big its potential as an asset. But I doubt it made such impact as changing our lives given that not all people are making use of it.

Yes, I believe that the legal age for gambling in many nations is 18 years of age or older, and I believe that this is the case. Young individuals under the age of 18 frequently receive gambling instruction from their elders once in one of two ways: either they choose to educate them or they are constantly present when competent gamblers are. Due to the fact that many nations do not place a high priority on gambling, many young individuals violate the age restrictions for gambling. They did not regard the laws as being so serious.


We all understand that gambling is bad because it has more negative effects than positive ones, so educating people about it is pointless. Despite this, more young people will engage in gambling-related activities if it is included in the curriculum at their schools. And once more, I doubt that many countries will even accept that due to the religions they follow. Countries are strongly opposed to gambling because of religion, and today the two most popular religions are Islam and Christianity, both of which forbid it.

Dunno...  I feel like Oliveira could give Makhachev a tougher time this time around.  I think it comes down to if Oliveira goes to Dubai like a month before the event and allow himself to adjust to the time zone and to the climate.  I was hearing the last time he was jet lagged as he went just 5 days before the event and he didn't bring his whole camp with him.

And another thing is Volk gave him such a tough match up, I don't think the line they have him on might justify it at the day of the match.  But we'll see...  If Khabib is in his corner it could help a lot.

You are getting almost all wrong, brokerage is a business and service, a middleman between traders and the market, do you expect them to offer their service for free? Of course, it has to be with tokens, and I don't see how these little tokens they charge translate to playing their clients.

Mind you, there are two types of retail brokers, one is an internal market maker, they earn when their clients lose and they lose when their clients win (paid winning from their pocket. This arrangement is fair, I see no one playing their clients here once they do not deny their withdrawal.

The other one is connected directly to the raw pool of the market, in which their clients win directly from the market and lose to the market. The former however could gain from the trader's loss, spread, commission and swap (which you didn't mention), while the latter will only gain from spread, commission and swap. This is a fiar arrangement since they are deploying their resources and technology to ensure you have access to the market which ordinarily can't be possible without them.

Also, the former can gain from liquidation of position, but the latter can't. Above all, all are dispensing their services with fair marked terms and conditions, it is the choice of anyone to deal with them.

I don't exactly know what's gonna happen next if Oliveira wins or loses at 294.  But what I think is it wouldn't make sense for Gamrot to fight Oliveira if Oliveira loses at 294.  Dunno...  Maybe the UFC might think it's a good idea from a match and rankings pov.

As for Chandler, coming off of a loss in a banger vs Poirier, I think he'll be matched up against Dariush.  McGregor is done and shouldn't be fighting anymore.  

UFC Free Fight:  Makachev vs Olivera 1
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-xAKq2yWM3s

^  Lol fluke or will Makachev have a harder time the next time around?

First I got attracted d d to dice reason being that the result of the games is instant and doesn't require any efforts from me and in as much as I have become aware of the relyiment on lick to win the game that made it easy for me to settle down for the game.

More so I have recently played sport bets although it not in house game any ways but then since I diverted my attention from dice,  I tried settling for slot but it still give me the same feeling as dice so I just moved on to full time sportbets.

The WBC always manages to insert themselves into these high profile events by creating special belts. I'm not sure if they're trying to milk these fighters for some sanctioning fees or if it's some sort of publicity stunt.

I've seen some footage of Ngannou training and he is in great shape and he seems really motivated. Even though money was his primary reason for challenging Fury I don't think it's the only reason. He wants to prove that he is taking this seriously and I expect him to have a much better performance than MMA fighters like Ben Askren and Nate Diaz who barely even bothered to train.

I think it's simply that the parties find a voice in using the service with each other. One time while accidentally using it during lunch, I accidentally turned on a channel with content introducing online gambling.
At that time, people claimed that in convenient times they could advertise anything, but children didn't care much, so sometimes we were afraid of the problem of accessing information in the next generation, but It seems that it is just an objective view. Wishing good things for everyone, I believe that as long as the product is suitable for the age content, it will be interesting for them to appear a lot.

thanks for summarizing it.

this is pretty much Identical to a scam I have seen before, I personally know several people who have been scammed like this and each of them lost thousands in our currency. I am guessing that he was encouraged to invest more money every time the withdrawal went through(just like how the poeple I know told me how they were encouraged to invest more after every successful withdrawal).

if the OP really plan on making money through these platforms, he needs to create good content, asking people to share his video isn't really gonna help him if he doesn't have content that people want to watch.

Casino or gambling ads are mostly seen on social media. I think we can't stop these ads at will. We should control our children and stop them from these gambling ads. If they get into gambling at such a young age.  Their future will be very bad. If we can keep our children careful then they can stay away from gambling. If we do not discipline our children properly then they will get involved in various crimes including gambling.

I do not think that Canelo is going to lose this fight. He is definitely a hell of a fighter. And it is actually a very big risk for anyone to predict otherwise. But the odds are really really big. So maybe if someone is going to put big money on Jarmell which is going to be a mistake. The big money are going to be put on Canelo. The smaller amount of money is definitely going to be put on Jarmel. Because I don't think anyone is actually going to take such a big risk with a big amount of money. That is just going to be a stupid decision for anyone to make. Let's see what happens. I am not expecting any surprises though.

Definitely, I'm still holding cryptocurrency and avoiding market predictions despite the fact that I've faced the death cross of my asset. Patience was really my stand for several years hoping that there's an amazing outcome of my principles and mindset towards the unexpected. It's more like gambling with unexpected chances in life, no matter what would it be; most importantly you're consistent with the target you have in life. Because, giving up has no room for the big dream that's possible to happen.