My questions is this. If I give a negative rating to another user for a reason I think is justified and in return that same user gives me a negative rating as a retaliation what do the forum moderators do in this case, or better how do we deal with such issues? Nothing, it's exactly what the staff will do. As mentioned in the forum rules, feedbacks aren't moderated
surely a few reasons are because:
- they will need to spend the time to investigate issues which can be hard to do, time-consuming.
- if they start to do it from today, moderators will be overloaded with requests like they have never been before
I am sure many highly trusted members would not mind helping out in a situation like that with their insights and also suggesting what the proper action would be. If there is no doubt based on the proof provided by User A that user B tried to scam him all members would see that. Moderators wouldn't have to do much more related to feedback if they had the help from the community and the members they know can be trusted to make a fair decision. I am sure many users are worried whether or not to give a bad rating because they will get surely get one in return and that wont do them any good. Feedback, positive or negative, without any link for reference doesn't have much importance. Myself I consider such as useless (aside from a dozen of members) to get an opinion. Like the majority of users here, I think. You can post 100 negative feedback on a profile, I won't trust any without to be able to check a reference link and get my own opinion to decide if your feedback is valid to me |
|
|
|
tu trouves? Moi je trouve y'a de la classe  |
|
|
|
Merci LeGaulois pour ces informations. J'en conclue donc qu'il marque comme "good" mes reports, mais ne les traite pas et Theymos, de son point de vue, ne voit pas de reports unhandled. C'est du foutage de gueule. Et wow, je n'aurais jamais pensé qu'un "simple" forum puisse générer autant d'argent. Puisque tu as fais un fichier avec tous les liens tu pourra mettre en meta tous tes reports jugés mauvais. (un thread par report).
Haha, un thread par report non  . Alors autant je ne suis pas contre foutre un peu le bordel en meta et chier dans le ventilo, autant je ne suis pas volontaire pour me faire ban mon compte. Mais s'il y a un nouveau thread en meta ou si l'ancien est rouvert, je viendrais volontiers avec mes gros sabots D'ailleurs LeGaulois, il y aurait possibilité pour que tu rouvres le topic en meta ? Il fallait s'y attendre, en un mois Theymos n'allait pas prendre de décision. Mais là, on un peu de recul sur la façon dont sont gérés les reports. Tu rouvres le topic. On demande à ce que Theymos relance sa requete sur les unhandled reports. Il dit que tout va bien. Et blam, je lui balance mes reports non traités avec mes gros sabots. c'est fait https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2961670.msg32711991#msg32711991 |
|
|
|
|
My questions is this. If I give a negative rating to another user for a reason I think is justified and in return that same user gives me a negative rating as a retaliation what do the forum moderators do in this case, or better how do we deal with such issues?[/quote]
Nothing, it's exactly what the staff will do. As mentioned in the forum rules, feedbacks aren't moderated
surely a few reasons are because:
- they will need to spend the time to investigate issues which can be hard to do, time-consuming.
- if they start to do it from today, moderators will be overloaded with requests like they have never been before
|
|
|
|
There are tons of charts that you can use to find ideas, see here The blockchain is such a powerful technology that we can not imagine all the possibilities to use it. I advise you to read the blog from IBM which is very great to follow Good luck with your graphic. Also if you're new to this, create an account withcanva.com and use it with icons from flaticon and image from pixabay. |
|
|
|
|
You can install a virtual machine, using your own computer or buy a cheap VPS (you can find some very cheap deal now, like 15$ a year)
Install a parental control on the browser and set it to allow only bitcointalk.org to be visited
No public wifi
No weak password
No password stored on a cloud
Don't click on weird links
Use plugin like NoJS
Change the password from time to time
well, the basics...
|
|
|
|
|
I am interested. PM me if we can make a deal and if you're still looking for, please
Thank you
|
|
|
|
His trade history does not exactly make him the experienced businessman that I would expect to be in DT. You don't need to have a trade history nor to be a "businessman" It's how you behave in the community that matter, how you help it, how you contribute in. You should tell that to those I mentioned in the OP. Many of them have gone back multiple years in Red Tagging users. It's a valid point, however, it's maybe a big message to say that it's not welcome anymore, to be sure everyone understands it (I'm not saying it's the right way) He Red Tags people involved in certain businesses, but has failed to give a Red Tag to anyone in Blazed's trust list circle. The exclusion from theymos should also speak for itself.
Perhaps because he knows it won't have any effect (don't know what people see, if a DT tag another DT) His point is to tag people to clean the forum since we all know a user tagged won't come anymore since he can't cheat the forum and his/her account is useless. You can red tag members like Blazed, Ognasty, etc they will still come here... And this kind of people are real users with interest in the community, in cryptos. The one disappearing once they get a red trust are here only for hunting the ICO, Airdrops, bounties, whatever you call it. The exclusion from theymos should also speak for itself. No the decision by Theymos doesn't prove anything. Maybe actmyname have rushed too fast by tagging people but it may be because he was motivated to contribute in the community, it may be because he was frustrated to see the mess here (like a lot of members btw) A message from Theymos to Actmyname could have been enough to correct this behavior (maybe directives were not clear to him). Shit happens we are all humans, we learn from mistakes not really from success. But communication resolves the majority of problems There are 167 users in DT, and Blazed has 20 users on his trust list. Blazed has just under 12% of DT on his trust list, while many people have 63%-100% of their trust ratings from this group of 12% of DT You can be DT1 or DT2 you are not forced to insert in your list each DT1 or DT2, because you are not forced to trust the user list |
|
|
|
Hi Sir
You certainly aren't new to the forum but oh well...
There isn't a lot of DT1 members so it seems quite logical.
You can not blame trusted users for making deals with others trusted users. Or do you expect to make a deal with people you don't trust, or with 10 posts of great project Sir?
What I mean is: with time there is like a circle built. Old members know other old members, know where to spend time, and members that worth to make deals with.
It is called networking, infinity, friendship etc
(I am not including all people you listed there, as there is at least 1 listed I agree with your post)
If Blazed was the only users in DT 1 then what would be your point?
He probably didn't want to get his normal account red tagged because as we all know, it usually happens when you try to attack DT1 or highly trusted members. That being said, some of the yahoo's old posts seem quite worrying to me. It is definitely hypocritical to tag sold accounts when he was selling and also trying to build up reputation. Then again, I doubt anything bad will happen to him with the info you provided. Ah, the bravery on Bitcointalk.... |
|
|
|
|
Hi Sir
You certainly aren't new to the forum but oh well...
There isn't a lot of DT1 members so it seems quite logical.
You can not blame trusted users for making deals with others trusted users. Or do you expect to make a deal with people you don't trust, or with 10 posts of great project Sir?
What I mean is: with time there is like a circle built. Old members know other old members, know where to spend time, and members that worth to make deals with.
It is called networking, infinity, friendship etc
(I am not including all people you listed there, as there is at least 1 listed I agree with your post)
If Blazed was the only user in DT 1 then what would be your point?
Some of your points don't make sense either.
For example
- the one about ThePharmacist
"PayPal deals, each worth $25" What the amount has to do? If it's $25.10 are you ok bruh?
I did 2 or maybe 3 deals with him, not any of $25. And it's one of the members you can deal with, without wasting your time tto search for an escrow, sending your money first with no worry. Even if he tells me 'I will send your money tomorrow because I need to go to bed" I wouldn't be worried much about
- the one about Mexxer
Back in 2014 Selling accounts was not something giving troubles as it is in 2018. It was "acceptable" maybe because people were not raping the system to death
- the one about actinmyname
"actmyname doesn't run any signature campaigns but does Red Tag many users who "abuse bounty campaigns" and who trade forum accounts. He has only completed a handful of trades, and his trust score is 18: -0 / +2, with all of his ratings being attributed to other users on Blazed's trust list."
Is it a must to run a signature campaign? Is it important the number of trades completed? Because I see a problem with. There isn't a lot of members who worth to make a deal with.
Running a campaign is surely a nightmare too!
|
|
|
|
|
@Becassine Mais nous sommes des animaux ! On est juste moins intelligents parfois.
Ceci dit quand j'emploi le terme femelle, ce n'est pas du tout d'une facon pejorative.
|
|
|
|
le pourcentage de "accuracy" n'est pas tellement "acurrate" ou plutot pas tres représentant. Je t'explique, un report peut être classé en 3 categories (nous on les voit pas ces categories, but  ) good bad unhandled Si ton report est classé dans unhandled (non traité) ton accuracy baisse (puisque qu'on peut pas dire si il est bon ou pas donc inclassable quoi). Autrement dit si la personne ne traite pas tes reports ton pourcentage descend. Tu vois ce que je veux dire? Et dans certains cas les reports classés dans "unhandled" quand le moderateur ne sais pas quoi faire avec et qu il attend qu'un autre decide (un global mod je pense) mais ici y a qu 1 seul moderateur fantome J'ai envoyé un message à Theymos Jeudi. Devinez qui s'est connecté comme par hasard le meme jour, après une semaine sans etre venu sur le forum   Franchement, le forum à générer + 1 millions de dollars l'année derniere et à depenser 300 000... Il pourrait mettre une ptite piece pour changer de moderateurs ici et la. |
|
|
|
|
For "security" reasons NO
It has been asked and explained multiple times already but I can't give you a link right now, but if you search you will find it quickly.
|
|
|
|
|
This is something you should be worried about if you buy from anyone else than Ledger. In Your case you're safe and no need to worry. If we can't trust the original manufacturer then we shouldn't buy it :/
|
|
|
|
Non faut pas croire, Il y a au tant de femelles que de males dans la cryptos. C'est juste qu'elles ont malheureusement besoin de cacher leur féminité ou de restreintes leur cerlce sur le web pour ne pas être emmerder par des connards irrespectueux ... Mais si tu fais du Networking ou si tu participes, ou regarde des conferences, tu verras que c'est quasi 50/50... D'ailleurs les femelles dans la crypto par exemple ont souvent plus de connaissances que la moyenne générale. Si tu es sur Twitter tu peux regarder les hashtags. #WomenInTech #WomenInCode et autre tu vas mooner rapido Et dans la blockchain plus précisement c'est plus flagrant, c'est reeeeempli de femelles 😍😍😍 D'ailleurs je me dis souvent qu'ils y a plus de femelles que de males (en tout cas elles sont plus actives) la piscine est bien rempli que tu staff de chez coinbase   |
|
|
|
|
I see. In my case, Cryptopia isn't the first exchange I got this. There are about 5 exchanges where the same thing happened multiple times. And the very first was Bittrex. Coincidence or not, during this period I remember to read here a lot of users with a similar problem about their account; and a short period after, It's when Bittrex forced people with verification ID and limits such as x BTC per day to transfer out, etc...
|
|
|
|
|
Blockchain and blockchain is not the same
Now referring to the Blockchain (from Bitcoin) it's not a company and GDPR is targetting precisely companies. When to consider another blockchain, from a company or not, I am not sure if it really matters because we're just a number, inside...
And if I am wrong then Verge won't be considered as a privacy coin anymore so...
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
