It would be nearly trivial to tease out the truth of the effects of the vaccine using some basic statistics if one had reliable data. This is why attacks on data are so pernicious and widespread among the power structures who hold the reigns of control at this time (e.g., the CDC and by extension, those who influence that entity.)
The best that any earnest independent analysts can get is VAERS data with a reporting rate which runs at under 1% and has no reporting standards whatsoever. There is no way that this is an accident.
The best that any earnest independent analysts can get is VAERS data with a reporting rate which runs at under 1% and has no reporting standards whatsoever. There is no way that this is an accident.
attacks on data are widespread among the power structures..
hmmm
no the attacks are widespread amung the conspiracy theorists...against the power structures
note the difference
when you stop relying on conspiracy sites fighting talk... and realise that real doctors treating real patients making real medical reports.. has more reliable rate at much higher than your foolish mis-informed 1%
you start to realise those having severe adverse affects that require hospital treatment are pretty much 99.9% accurate.
yea only 1% of crybabies cry about the insignificant 'boo boos'. but that does not mean the severe adverse reports are too only 1% accurate